Let's forget the MVP award and who is most valuable for their team. Forget about which team actually needs their superstar the most. Forget team record.
Strictly talking ability, who is the actual best player in the entire NBA in 2024?
Printable View
Let's forget the MVP award and who is most valuable for their team. Forget about which team actually needs their superstar the most. Forget team record.
Strictly talking ability, who is the actual best player in the entire NBA in 2024?
LeBron James.
Jokic. Not much argument
[QUOTE=SouBeachTalents;14892167]LeBron James.[/QUOTE]
as he leads a play-in team with another so called superstar
[QUOTE=SouBeachTalents;14892167]LeBron James.[/QUOTE]
First-reply slay :rockon:
Jokic. By far.
T.J. McConnell. They're just holding him back.
Yolk.
I've been watching Larry bird highlights and it's insane how Jokic looks faster and more coordinated.
Bird was slow slow. Jokic is just slow. He's a 7 foot Larry Bird.
LeBron
When healthy I think it's Embiid. Right now probably Giannis. Not mad at people who pick Jokic either.
Nikola Jokic
Jokic.
In a white mans sport AD for one qtr
but 3 qtrs giannis (average 36 min per game)
4 qtrs joker
steroid honorable mention old man bron
Jokic has been the undisputed best player for the past 3 seasons
If current trajectory stays this way he will enter the top 10 all time list
[QUOTE=Jasper;14892217]In a white mans sport AD for one qtr
but 3 qtrs giannis (average 36 min per game)
4 qtrs joker
steroid honorable mention old man bron[/QUOTE]
Good story VCDAPTW.
Kawhi no doubt
I guess the moral of the story is the best player in the league also is probably the MVP of the league?
Whoever it is, is on borrowed time. Cause its gonna be wemby soon
Embiid.
Jokic by every measure. Highest dpm, opm, vorp, per.
It's weird too, because guys with high opm usually have their dpm suffer because they're usually playing in a faster pace lineup, and vice versa for guys with high dpm(the second highest dpm guy has a -3 opm) since they're typically in slower pace lineups; but Jokic just dominates in every way possible. Tied for 2nd in defensive winshares behind Gobert, who is always a monster in the regular season. Because he's a 'slow white guy' people still think he's a bad defender.
[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14893131]Jokic by every measure. Highest dpm, opm, vorp, per.
It's weird too, because guys with high opm usually have their dpm suffer because they're usually playing in a faster pace lineup, and vice versa for guys with high dpm(the second highest dpm guy has a -3 opm) since they're typically in slower pace lineups; but Jokic just dominates in every way possible. Tied for 2nd in defensive winshares behind Gobert, who is always a monster in the regular season. Because he's a 'slow white guy' people still think he's a bad defender.[/QUOTE]
some think Gobert is a cumbersome white guy too though :facepalm
[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14893131]Jokic by every measure. Highest dpm, opm, vorp, per.
It's weird too, because guys with high opm usually have their dpm suffer because they're usually playing in a faster pace lineup, and vice versa for guys with high dpm(the second highest dpm guy has a -3 opm) since they're typically in slower pace lineups; but Jokic just dominates in every way possible. Tied for 2nd in defensive winshares behind Gobert, who is always a monster in the regular season. [B]Because he's a 'slow white guy' people still think he's a bad defender.[/B][/QUOTE]
To be fair, it's also because unlike most centers he RARELY even bothers to contest guys who are coming to the basket with a head of steam and a good angle that they're likely to score from. He basically just gives those baskets up to avoid foul trouble. So you can often directly see him looking like a traffic cone. Whereas most centers will try to contest, and they might get a block here or there, and maybe alter another couple of shots, but they'll also give up more And-1's as well as get into foul trouble. It's an interesting tactical tradeoff, but what Joker and the Nuggets have become very good at is taking defensive angles that rarely GIVE defenders those "straight to the basket" drives. Guys often end up taking awkward angles to the basket vs the Nuggets which makes beating Jokic, a true seven footer, at the rim a much harder task than if they get to their usual angles.
So he gives up the basket once guys already get a high probability shot, but he reduces the frequency they get those high probability chances relative to other teams. Which makes mathematical sense and explains why the numbers say he is a good defender, even if you only see the matador instances and never see him erasing guys with blocks from the weak side etc. His use of shrewd body positioning keeps defenders from getting as many good looks in the paint as theyre used to. When they do, he concedes it and goes and scores at the other end.
[QUOTE=FultzNationRISE;14893135]To be fair, it's also because unlike most centers he RARELY even bothers to contest guys who are coming to the basket with a head of steam and a good angle that they're likely to score from. He basically just gives those baskets up to avoid foul trouble. So you can often directly see him looking like a traffic cone. Whereas most centers will try to contest, and they might get a block here or there, and maybe alter another couple of shots, but they'll also give up more And-1's as well as get into foul trouble. It's an interesting tactical tradeoff, but what Joker and the Nuggets have become very good at is taking defensive angles that rarely GIVE defenders those "straight to the basket" drives. Guys often end up taking awkward angles to the basket vs the Nuggets which makes beating Jokic, a true seven footer, at the rim a much harder task than if they get to their usual angles.
So he gives up the basket once guys already get a high probability shot, but he reduces the frequency they get those high probability chances relative to other teams. Which makes mathematical sense and explains why the numbers say he is a good defender, even if you only see the matador instances and never see him erasing guys with blocks from the weak side etc. His use of shrewd body positioning keeps defenders from getting as many good looks in the paint as theyre used to. When they do, he concedes it and goes and scores at the other end.[/QUOTE]
This is very true. He does this also to save energy and be very quick with the inbounds pass. After a basket you described the ball is in play within half a second most of the time and the Nuggets run. However, Jokic defends differently as the game progresses. In the first half he usually runs and tries to assist teammates. In the second he slows down, defends more and tends to shoot more. In the 4th quarter it is rare people score easy baskets on him because he is not in foul trouble and will take the foul. There is a concept.
30ppg and 60% shooting (never been done in the NBA) :applause::bowdown::applause:
[video=youtube;5ZsBgSG7t4c]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZsBgSG7t4c[/video]
Probably Jokic. If Kawhi was ever actually 100% healthy it would probably be him, he's basically a poor man's, slower, more robotic version of Jordan.
But it just goes to show in this supposed "super athletic era", that the best player is probably a dude with terrible athletic ability.
It's Jokic. It's funny as hell because he doesn't exactly have sexy moves but he doesn't need them. His skill level is insane.
[QUOTE=Soundwave;14893181]Probably Jokic. If Kawhi was ever actually 100% healthy it would probably be him, he's basically a poor man's, slower, more robotic version of Jordan.
But it just goes to show in this supposed "super athletic era", that the best player is probably a dude with terrible athletic ability.[/QUOTE]
He's also less creative than Jordan. Worse playmaker than Jordan. Worse passer. Worse game manager. Worse at getting into the paint. Worse at drawing fouls.
But he does have a better shooting touch. His shooting touch is unbelievable.
But even 100% healthy I don't think he has the stamina to sustain what he does on both ends to be the best in the league. For short bursts he can go toe to toe with anyone in terms of game impact. Same as true of Jimmy but to a lesser extent.
for now its jokic, i think luka will have a few years after and then its wemby
I don't have any stake in the matter, but can someone explain to me why Jokic who scores 10 less points per game than Embiid on roughly the same efficiency, and 5 less points than Giannis on lower efficient and averages only 3 more assists than both is so head-and-shoulders better? Especially considering the mollywhopping comparison on defense?
I've heard it said SEVERAL times it's not close as well. How on earth can it not be close?
[QUOTE=beasted;14893303][B]I don't have any stake in the matter, but can someone explain to me why Jokic who scores 10 less points per game than Embiid on roughly the same efficiency, and 5 less points than Giannis on lower efficient and averages only 3 more assists than both is so head-and-shoulders better? [/B] Especially considering the mollywhopping comparison on defense?
I've heard it said SEVERAL times it's not close as well. How on earth can it not be close?[/QUOTE]
First of all it’s about more than numbers, but lets focus on just the numbers for the moment. Where are your numbers from? The regular season?
Thats cute.
[QUOTE=beasted;14893303]I don't have any stake in the matter, but can someone explain to me why Jokic who scores 10 less points per game than Embiid on roughly the same efficiency, and 5 less points than Giannis on lower efficient and averages only 3 more assists than both is so head-and-shoulders better? Especially considering the mollywhopping comparison on defense?
I've heard it said SEVERAL times it's not close as well. How on earth can it not be close?[/QUOTE]
Playoffs
[QUOTE=Manny98;14893312]Playoffs[/QUOTE]
Based on playoff history, last season was a heavy outlier for Jokic. Otherwise his playoff numbers are certainly not better than Giannis.
[QUOTE=beasted;14893303]I don't have any stake in the matter, but can someone explain to me why Jokic who scores 10 less points per game than Embiid on roughly the same efficiency, and 5 less points than Giannis on lower efficient and averages only 3 more assists than both is so head-and-shoulders better? Especially considering the mollywhopping comparison on defense?
I've heard it said SEVERAL times it's not close as well. How on earth can it not be close?[/QUOTE]
You can’t use stats to prop up Giannis and Embiid over Jokic and subsequently just ignore Jokic’s monster defensive stats and call him getting “mollywhopped” in that regard.
[QUOTE=beasted;14893317]Based on playoff history, last season was a heavy outlier for Jokic. Otherwise his playoff numbers are certainly not better than Giannis.[/QUOTE]
Jokic averaged 30/12/5 on 61%TS in the playoffs the 2 seasons before they won the championship. Granted, it was a small sample size, but that's what happens when you're missing your 2nd option for 2 years. But that's pretty damn close to what he averaged during his title run, and showed what he was capable of when he had a championship caliber team around him.
If anything, you could argue Giannis' title run is the real aberration, as outside of 2022 he never came close to averaging 30 ppg in the playoffs again, and even in 2022 his efficiency fell off a cliff.
While I don't think I need to even delve into Embiid's playoff track record, that shit speaks for itself :lol
The Nuggets as far as championship teams go or even compared to the rest of the league aren't especially talented. They're well-coached, play 5 man ball and led by an historically great offensive anchor. What Jokic does offensively is such a floor raiser than it does make up for his relative defensive deficiencies to guys like Giannis or Embiid. Even defensively, while no he's not winning any DPOY awards I think he's better on that side than given credit for.
In truth Jokic/Giannis/Embiid could all be the best on any given night. It's not like Jordan in the 90s, Shaq in 2000 or Lebron in the early 10s where everyone else is competing for 2nd.
[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14893328]You can’t use stats to prop up Giannis and Embiid over Jokic and subsequently just ignore Jokic’s monster defensive stats and call him getting “mollywhopped” in that regard.[/QUOTE]
I'm comparing individual stats. What individual stats tell you that Jokic is a good defender? Do any of those stats pass the eye test?
You should probably ask and answer these questions within your internal dialog when evaluating their defense.
From my view, Jokic is very thoroughly average defensively. He will not come close to a defensive team selection based on his current impact.
[QUOTE=SouBeachTalents;14893329]Jokic averaged 30/12/5 on 61%TS in the playoffs the 2 seasons before they won the championship. Granted, it was a small sample size, but that's what happens when you're missing your 2nd option for 2 years. But that's pretty damn close to what he averaged during his title run, and showed what he was capable of when he had a championship caliber team around him.
If anything, you could argue Giannis' title run is the real aberration, as outside of 2022 he never came close to averaging 30 ppg in the playoffs again, and even in 2022 his efficiency fell off a cliff.
While I don't think I need to even delve into Embiid's playoff track record, that shit speaks for itself :lol[/QUOTE]
He nearly averaged as many turnovers as assists. But I agree on the sample size being small.
[QUOTE=beasted;14893357]I'm comparing individual stats. [B]What individual stats tell you that Jokic is a good defender[/B]? Do any of those stats pass the eye test?
You should probably ask and answer these questions within your internal dialog when evaluating their defense.
From my view, Jokic is very thoroughly average defensively. He will not come close to a defensive team selection based on his current impact.[/QUOTE]
Advanced stats matter much more for defense than simple stats. They're a much better indicator than blocks per game or steals, zero chance Theo Ratliff was a better defender than Dennis Rodman, right?
top 5 in dws in order: gobert, joker/ant(tied), AD, Shai. All guys seen as elite defenders, except the show white guy.
top 5 in dpm in order: joker, Thybulle, Wemby, Hartenstein, and Shai.
Outlier year for Joker?
2023 dws- Joker is 8th with 3.8, Embiid is barely ahead at 3.9 and Giannis is at 3.7.
2023 top 5 dpm- Joker, Caruso, Giannis, Draymond, Anderson
2022?
top 5 dpm- joker, Giannis, Thybulle, Timelord, Horford
dws- Tatum, Joker, Gobert, Embiid, Timelord
I'm not saying Joker is all def. Neither he or Embiid are; Gobert is too good on that end in the regular season. But he's close enough that his superior offense, especially in the playoffs make him the best player:
Joker 28/12/7/1/1 on 53/41/82 over 68 games
Embiid 24/11/3/1/2 on 46/28/82 over 53 games
Giannis 27/12/5/1/1 on 53/26/62 over 79 games
I'm cool with Giannis being bitw, but Embiid is an outlier and doesn't belong in this conversation. Joker is a good defender in his own right, despite looking like he's never attempted a tricep extension in his life. A huge part of defense is to take away driving lanes and cuts before the offense even sees them, but most people don't notice this stuff.
[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14893367]Advanced stats matter much more for defense than simple stats. They're a much better indicator than blocks per game or steals, zero chance Theo Ratliff was a better defender than Dennis Rodman, right?
top 5 in dws in order: gobert, joker/ant(tied), AD, Shai. All guys seen as elite defenders, except the show white guy.
top 5 in dpm in order: joker, Thybulle, Wemby, Hartenstein, and Shai.
Outlier year for Joker?
2023 dws- Joker is 8th with 3.8, Embiid is barely ahead at 3.9 and Giannis is at 3.7.
2023 top 5 dpm- Joker, Caruso, Giannis, Draymond, Anderson
2022?
top 5 dpm- joker, Giannis, Thybulle, Timelord, Horford
dws- Tatum, Joker, Gobert, Embiid, Timelord
I'm not saying Joker is all def. Neither he or Embiid are; Gobert is too good on that end in the regular season. But he's close enough that his superior offense, especially in the playoffs make him the best player:
Joker 28/12/7/1/1 on 53/41/82 over 68 games
Embiid 24/11/3/1/2 on 46/28/82 over 53 games
Giannis 27/12/5/1/1 on 53/26/62 over 79 games
I'm cool with Giannis being bitw, but Embiid is an outlier and doesn't belong in this conversation. Joker is a good defender in his own right, despite looking like he's never attempted a tricep extension in his life. A huge part of defense is to take away driving lanes and cuts before the offense even sees them, but most people don't notice this stuff.[/QUOTE]
Hate to break it to you, but outside of tracking stats, all other advanced defensive metrics are estimates of impact. DBPM, DWS, DRtg all point to the team's effort, or the effectiveness of each 5-man unit.
There's no way you don't know how those metrics are calculated, so at this point you're just trying to support your point rather than present any analysis.
Also, stop race baiting. Joker IS slow. Fact, not opinion.
That's not taking anything away from the fact that he competes and defends within the system. But he has average instincts and cannot keep up with quicker players, clearly. What helps is that he puts in the effort which is half the battle. I don't see him taking possessions off defensively like so many other stars. I liken him to Curry. I think Curry is a very solid system defender despite being hidden at times.
But everyone with eyes can see his short comings defensively.