Who do you got?
Printable View
Who do you got?
Joker, easy. I love Steph Curry, but he has a lot of issues in the playoffs. Joker otoh, rises to the occasion when you need him most. The only players who have been able to consistently do that in the playoffs have been Jordan, Lebron, Kawhi and Big Honey; very short list.
I went with Joker as well. I am a big Steph fan but Jokic is more consistent and can adjust better to the defense.
Curry is a top 10 player all time ~ 4 rings all with superstar production, GOAT season, only UMVP in history, etc.
But... he's capable of having bad games. Yolk might be the GOAT because he simply doesn't have bad games.
There is no question Curry is the better player. Jokic's game relies on one thing- his being bigger and heavier than other players. Without that, he is merely an above-average player- a good shot and a passer. Jokic barrels into the defender, creating open looks and double teams he can pass out of. Were he DeMarcus Cousins doing the same thing, he would foul out of the game.
Curry brings an unparalleled skill to the game that is obvious by watching him. Amazing handles, can dribble past anyone, absolute wizardry in ball-handling and facillitating, dribble penetration and finding teammates whereever they are, one of the best finishers at the rim, the best passer in the game, best off the ball, the best shooter in the game. And not spot up 3. That's not skill. He creates 3's, and still shoots at a high %, much higher difficulty than spot-up 3 pt shooters which adds minimal value to the team offense.
Superior conditioning. Curry at 35 has more in his legs down the stretch of a game than Jokic has in his 20s. The difference in conditioning shows in the quality of their play in the 2nd half.
Klay Thompson would be a 3 and D nobody on any other team. We wouldn't even be talking about him were he not on the Warriors. His wide open looks owe to Curry's gravity. Curry's ability to make people around him great is second to none. Look at Andrew Wiggins' emergence since he played with Steph. Jokic has that ability too with Aaron Gordon as an example, but Curry is famous for it- and has produced more as a result.
Neither player excels on defense but Curry is 100% committed and his work in the gym and conditioning shows. Jokic is simply too slow, doesn't contest well on the perimeter, and is lagging at the end of the game.
It's not easy to win 4 rings. Of players that won their first championship fully in the 2000s (2000-2001), it is exceedingly rare. Tony Parker and LeBron were the only other ones of that same era. If you look at anyone who won their first rings after 2010's- it's just LeBron and Curry as leaders of their teams.
To compare jokic to Demarcus cousins is so absurd there aren't even words in the English or any world language for that matter to describe it. We would have to travel to another galaxy and learn a higher dimensional form of communication to describe how bad that comparison is.
Curry makes his team better
Jokic racks up more counting stats though so I expect that will influence most posters
[QUOTE=tpols;14910422]Curry is a top 10 player all time ~ 4 rings all with superstar production, GOAT season, only UMVP in history, etc.
But... he's capable of having bad games. Yolk might be the GOAT because he simply doesn't have bad games.[/QUOTE]
Stop lying. We are just a week removed from people questioning Jokic greatness because of two bad games where he shot 42 percent and had 11 turnovers and to the eye was playing uninspired and borderline overmatched by the Timberwolves defense.
Do better troll
[QUOTE=warriorfan;14910430]Curry makes his team better
Jokic racks up more counting stats though so I expect that will influence most posters[/QUOTE]
Jokic makes his teammates better too wtf.
[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14910432]Jokic makes his teammates better too wtf.[/QUOTE]
Yup. They both do. Jokic hasn't really had a 2016 Finals thing happen though. Unless you count the bubble vs Dwight.
[QUOTE=Carbine;14910431]Stop lying. We are just a week removed from people questioning Jokic greatness because of two bad games where he shot 42 percent and had 11 turnovers and to the eye was playing uninspired and borderline overmatched by the Timberwolves defense.
Do better troll[/QUOTE]
And now they're up 3-2 and spanking them dummy. :lol
Wisen up, you hear me?
[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14910432]Jokic makes his teammates better too wtf.[/QUOTE]
Where did I say Jokic doesn’t? lol
Ok i’ll put this in a more simplistic manner…
Who is a better off ball player? Steph Curry or Jokic
[QUOTE=warriorfan;14910437]Where did I say Jokic doesn’t? lol
Ok i’ll put this in a more simplistic manner…
Who is a better off ball player? Steph Curry or Jokic[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE] Curry makes his team better
Jokic racks up more counting stats though so I expect that will influence most posters [/QUOTE]You literally just passive aggressively implied a contrast in your post earlier.
Steph's reliance on 3s leads to more variance day to day. Joker has been much more consistent in the playoffs.
[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14910439]You literally just passive aggressively implied a contrast in your post earlier.[/QUOTE]
no….
They both obviously make their teammates better, that’s like an absolute given, I was saying Steph helps his teammates more, there was no implication that Jokic doesn’t make his team better and no one would ever try to argue that in a basketball discussion.
long story short you are being autistic af
Jokic is in that LeBron/Shaq/Hakeem tier of peak dominance, Curry’s a tier below that imo.
Similar impact but Jokic's defensive limitations are harder to cover than Curry's. Neglible really, with the caveat of Steph being more ideal regarding high-level team/roster construction.
Jokic is white, can't take anyone like that seriously. Therefore I chose curry
[QUOTE=Gohan;14910451]Jokic is white, can't take anyone like that seriously. Therefore I chose curry[/QUOTE]
Currys more white than black. His parents are both super lightskin. Unless you're adhering to the 1 drop rule lmao. Which was a white man distinction created specifically to discriminate.
The one who's international and didn't need six trips to the finals just to win his very first finals mvp.
The one that has 4x as many rings…wtf :oldlol:. The one that is in the top 10 all time….the one that’s going to win the gold medal this year….the one that has a winning record vs the other one….i can keep going you sacks of shit
Jokic and it's not even remotely close. Seriously. It's not even a debate.
A dominant big man just has a more efficient, consistent impact on the game than a jump shooter IMO, even if its the best shooter ever. And in this specific case when you compare intangibles and performance under pressure, it’s just an easy call.
Some guys are overrated or underrated by the public bc of very superficial things. People think Westbrook and Harden winning MVPs puts them in some kind of Top 50 ever category. They dont seem to notice or care that these guys cant be counted on when it matters. Which is more important, averaging a triple double in the regular season or excelling above the competition when it matters? Most fans have dumb priorities. It doesnt seem to matter to them that you woukdnt even WANT these guys in meaningful moments. And yet fans think theyre great. Its just parroting the common narrative. “I see their picture a lot, the league gave them an MVP. If I have to give an opinion I just rely on that. I cant really analyze their impact.” Theyre not being rational. Theyre not looking at evidence.
Curry of course IS clearly preferable to Harden and Westbrook. But his track record is that when it really matters… youre not sure youll get GREATNESS. In the regular season, absolutely. Record breaking, circus making, never been done kind of shooting brilliance. When its all on the line, and an agitator specialist like Delladova comes in to harass him? Curry gets thrown off a bit. He also gets too “dancey” when he makes a couple, and too pouty when he doesnt. He gets a bit too “casual behind the back passy” when hes trying to look cool in a critical finals moment. Compared to Jokic hes just a bit more poser and less killer.
It’s not a KNOCK on Curry to say hes less reliably great than Jokic. How many people arent?
It’s just a genuine fact. You can tell because the guys who hate jokic (bdonovan, maskembiid) or love curry (warriorfan) get emotional about it, while people who are neutral are just like “yeah, it’s jokic.”
Im sure there are some whod take Curry without an agenda. It’s fair to disagree. But MOST people who are just being matter of fact, take Jokic. And theres a reason for it.
[QUOTE=FultzNationRISE;14910482]A dominant big man just has a more efficient, consistent impact on the game than a jump shooter IMO, even if its the best shooter ever. And in this specific case when you compare intangibles and performance under pressure, it’s just an easy call.
Some guys are overrated or underrated by the public bc of very superficial things. People think Westbrook and Harden winning MVPs puts them in some kind of Top 50 ever category. They dont seem to notice or care that these guys cant be counted on when it matters. Which is more important, averaging a triple double in the regular season or excelling above the competition when it matters? Most fans have dumb priorities. It doesnt seem to matter to them that you woukdnt even WANT these guys in meaningful moments. And yet fans think theyre great. Its just parroting the common narrative. “I see their picture a lot, the league gave them an MVP. If I have to give an opinion I just rely on that. I cant really analyze their impact.” Theyre not being rational. Theyre not looking at evidence.
Curry of course IS clearly preferable to Harden and Westbrook. But his track record is that when it really matters… youre not sure youll get GREATNESS. In the regular season, absolutely. Record breaking, circus making, never been done kind of shooting brilliance. When its all on the line, and an agitator specialist like Delladova comes in to harass him? Curry gets thrown off a bit. He also gets too “dancey” when he makes a couple, and too pouty when he doesnt. He gets a bit too “casual behind the back passy” when hes trying to look cool in a critical finals moment. Compared to Jokic hes just a bit more poser and less killer.
It’s not a KNOCK on Curry to say hes less reliably great than Jokic. How many people arent?
It’s just a genuine fact. You can tell because the guys who hate jokic (bdonovan, maskembiid) or love curry (warriorfan) get emotional about it, while people who are neutral are just like “yeah, it’s jokic.”
Im sure there are some whod take Curry without an agenda. It’s fair to disagree. But MOST people who are just being matter of fact, take Jokic. And theres a reason for it.[/QUOTE]
tbh you are the one who gets emotional as well
you really hate curry dancing after 3 pointers, you hate it to the point where you dwell on it an unnecessary amount of the time and it’s obviously effected how you evaluate him as a player. Your takes on Curry have been so off base at times I think you are doing a troll, then I realize you aren’t, you just have let your biases cloud your judgement so much the stuff you say about him is just not true.
look i’m not going to sit here and debate all day, just letting you know from an outside perspective and you can take it or leave it, your steph curry takes are heavily biased and way off base.
Jokic. For three main reasons:
1) Each and every player who is NBA ready can play with him and will play their best basketball with him on the court. Everybody. You don't need to look for a certain type of player. It's plug and play.
2) If you double or triple him he will still beat you. If you double or triple Curry, the team will beat you. He draws attention and the others have numbers. With Jokic, it's still him.
3) Both players changed the game. It comes down to personal preference, but I like watching teamplay and passing more than lots of threes taken. I'm simply more entertained by a Jokic-led offense.
All that being said, I think both players are top 15. Curry won't go any higher. It's borderline top 10 at best. (Which is great.) We don't know what Jokic will do in the next 5 years, but he is not 30 yet. He can win some more rings, and one more MVP is not unlikely. (Honestly, not very likely either. He needs to play out of his mind to get another one. If it is debatable he won't win it again.)
[QUOTE=tpols;14910422]Curry is a top 10 player all time ~ 4 rings all with superstar production, GOAT season, only UMVP in history, etc.
But... he's capable of having bad games. Yolk might be the GOAT because he simply doesn't have bad games.[/QUOTE]
In no world is Curry ahead of any of these players.
MJ, Lebron, Kareem, Wilt, Bill R, Shaq, Duncan, Bird, Magic, or Kobe.
[QUOTE=StrongLurk;14910493]In no world is Curry ahead of any of these players.
MJ, Lebron, Kareem, Wilt, Bill R, Shaq, Duncan, Bird, Magic, or Kobe.[/QUOTE]
I'd have Kobe ranked higher, but acting like you couldn't even make the argument over him is ridiculous.
[QUOTE=bdonovan;14910426]There is no question Curry is the better player. Jokic's game relies on one thing- his being bigger and heavier than other players. Without that, he is merely an above-average player- a good shot and a passer. Jokic barrels into the defender, creating open looks and double teams he can pass out of. Were he DeMarcus Cousins doing the same thing, he would foul out of the game.
Curry brings an unparalleled skill to the game that is obvious by watching him. Amazing handles, can dribble past anyone, absolute wizardry in ball-handling and facillitating, dribble penetration and finding teammates whereever they are, one of the best finishers at the rim, the best passer in the game, best off the ball, the best shooter in the game. And not spot up 3. That's not skill. He creates 3's, and still shoots at a high %, much higher difficulty than spot-up 3 pt shooters which adds minimal value to the team offense.
Superior conditioning. Curry at 35 has more in his legs down the stretch of a game than Jokic has in his 20s. The difference in conditioning shows in the quality of their play in the 2nd half.
Klay Thompson would be a 3 and D nobody on any other team. We wouldn't even be talking about him were he not on the Warriors. His wide open looks owe to Curry's gravity. Curry's ability to make people around him great is second to none. Look at Andrew Wiggins' emergence since he played with Steph. Jokic has that ability too with Aaron Gordon as an example, but Curry is famous for it- and has produced more as a result.
Neither player excels on defense but Curry is 100% committed and his work in the gym and conditioning shows. Jokic is simply too slow, doesn't contest well on the perimeter, and is lagging at the end of the game.
It's not easy to win 4 rings. Of players that won their first championship fully in the 2000s (2000-2001), it is exceedingly rare. Tony Parker and LeBron were the only other ones of that same era. If you look at anyone who won their first rings after 2010's- it's just LeBron and Curry as leaders of their teams.[/QUOTE]
What is this nonsense?
Curry has one ring as the best player in the series, which is 2022.
Lebron and KD cucked Curry and were clearly superior to him in those playoffs/finals battle. Curry by himself in 2015 and 2016 was very underwhelming. I love Curry, but he is overrated at this time and is not a top 10 player of all time.
I'll take what Jokic did last year over anything Curry has done.
Jokic is a better playoff scorer (30 ppg average over the last four years on 63 ts)
He's a better passer.
A better conductor of offense.
Better rebounder.
Defensive impact is a wash.
Consistent dominance game to game is in Jokic favor during the playoffs as well.
Not sure what the argument is for Playoff Curry over Playoff Jokic
[QUOTE=warriorfan;14910490]tbh you are the one who gets emotional as well
you really hate curry dancing after 3 pointers, you hate it to the point where you dwell on it an unnecessary amount of the time and it’s obviously effected how you evaluate him as a player. Your takes on Curry have been so off base at times I think you are doing a troll, then I realize you aren’t, you just have let your biases cloud your judgement so much the stuff you say about him is just not true.
look i’m not going to sit here and debate all day, just letting you know from an outside perspective and you can take it or leave it, your steph curry takes are heavily biased and way off base.[/QUOTE]
It doesnt upset me, it's just my main knock on him so I bring it up when he's discussed. Someone thinking he's the GOAT isnt gonna affect my mood in real life for a single moment.
But if your team's down 10 in a big playoff game, and you havent been a factor, and then suddenly Barbosa hits a shot, and then Iguodala hits a shot, and then Bogut gets a block, and then Green steals a pass, and then Livingston hits a shot, all while you've contributed very little, and then suddenly your teammates have tied the game up, and then you finally make a shot and start skipping around celebrating and shimmying like you been bustin em up all game, and it's still only mid 3rd quarter and nothing has even been clinched yet :lol I mean it's just cringe.
And then feelin yourself so much youre tryin to throw slick, unnecessary passes that result in turnovers... the guy's just always out there trying more to look like Mr Cool for the nickelodeon kids choice award photographers than he is locked in trying to convert the win before celebrating. Compared to any other all time great he's way more focused on flash and silliness than he is on converting the win. It's a fact.
I dont think the average person appreciates this difference. But it's something that to me is easily a top factor when I'm identifying things that separate guys with similar achievements on paper. A lot of achievements are circumstantial. How a guy conducts himself is not circumstantial.
[QUOTE=StrongLurk;14910493]In no world is Curry ahead of any of these players.
MJ, Lebron, Kareem, Wilt, Bill R, Shaq, Duncan, Bird, Magic, or Kobe.[/QUOTE]
Curry is literally better than everybody on that list except MJ, Wilt, Kobe, and Bill Russell.
I actually undermined myself with my initial statement. Curry is top 5 all time. But Yolk is GOAT level.
We're splitting hairs here though and I'm sure we're mostly in agreement.
Jokic was swept out of the playoffs the first year he won MVP. Dude got so frustrated he straight up threw a cheap shot and ejected his own ass out of an elimination game. Lmao. Curry has never choked that hard.
This Jokic dude gets so much hype it’s ridiculous.
My greatest concern is with roster construction on a high-level team. I think some of you need to take a step back and reassess this question from a team-building perspective. Jokic's defensive limitations as a paint/rim protector are a much greater concern than any of Curry's weaknesses or comparative shortcomings.
Optimal personnel and scheme can mitigate Nikola's positional deficiency. But finding those right pieces to compensate is a little tougher than it is for Steph. Hence why I think it's easier to build an ATG-level team with Curry. And he's done it three times: 2015, 2016, and 2017.
Jokic proved he could win a championship. But leading a 8-10+ SRS team? He'll need better defensive players who can make up for his subpar paint protection. A better bench could get Denver to 60+ wins, 6-7 SRS. But beyond that? You'd need upgrades over the starters. And finding those guys who can improve the defense without compromising the offense? Tough.
For instance, Jaren Jackson Jr would most likely improve the defense. He's long, mobile, and loves to contest shots and provide weakside shot-blocking. But even though he can shoot better than Aaron Gordon, does Denver lose too much on offense? Jokic and AG have insane chemistry with the lob and cutting game. I don't know if JJR can do that.
You'd need to stack the deck a little harder to get to that 8-10 SRS tier with Jokic IMO. [I]Curry was able to build this in 2015 and 2016, with a box of scraps![/I]
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14910520]Jokic was swept out of the playoffs the first year he won MVP. Dude got so frustrated he straight up threw a cheap shot and ejected his own ass out of an elimination game. Lmao. Curry has never choked that hard.
This Jokic dude gets so much hype it’s ridiculous.[/QUOTE]
Curry threw his mouthguard onto a fan. That's just selective memory.
Overall Curry had more impact on the landscape of the NBA. Jokic is such a unicorn that his skillset can't be imitated. The whole NBA tries to play like the mid 10 Warriors played.
[QUOTE=FultzNationRISE;14910511]It doesnt upset me, it's just my main knock on him so I bring it up when he's discussed. Someone thinking he's the GOAT isnt gonna affect my mood in real life for a single moment.
But if your team's down 10 in a big playoff game, and you havent been a factor, and then suddenly Barbosa hits a shot, and then Iguodala hits a shot, and then Bogut gets a block, and then Green steals a pass, and then Livingston hits a shot, all while you've contributed very little, and then suddenly your teammates have tied the game up, and then you finally make a shot and start skipping around celebrating and shimmying like you been bustin em up all game, and it's still only mid 3rd quarter and nothing has even been clinched yet :lol I mean it's just cringe.
And then feelin yourself so much youre tryin to throw slick, unnecessary passes that result in turnovers... the guy's just always out there trying more to look like Mr Cool for the nickelodeon kids choice award photographers than he is locked in trying to convert the win before celebrating. Compared to any other all time great he's way more focused on flash and silliness than he is on converting the win. It's a fact.
I dont think the average person appreciates this difference. But it's something that to me is easily a top factor when I'm identifying things that separate guys with similar achievements on paper. A lot of achievements are circumstantial. How a guy conducts himself is not circumstantial.[/QUOTE]
what’s crazy is you went on a half decade crusade against kobe for hero balling and how hero ball is stupid and it’s only a fraction of the game that gets falsely extrapolated to meaning everything
then you flipped 180 when you want to disparage curry, now curry isn’t good because he isn’t hero balling
keep it consistent
and I would like to say you are allowed to have your basketball opinions evolve over time, just because you think one thing 10 years ago doesn’t necessarily mean you have to die with it
in this case in my opinion it feels extremely disingenuous
:confusedshrug:
[QUOTE=tpols;14910519]Curry is literally better than everybody on that list except MJ, Wilt, Kobe, and Bill Russell.
I actually undermined myself with my initial statement. Curry is top 5 all time. But Yolk is GOAT level.
We're splitting hairs here though and I'm sure we're mostly in agreement.[/QUOTE]
Cringe
[QUOTE=Overdrive;14910530]Curry threw his mouthguard onto a fan. That's just selective memory.[/QUOTE]
Not while getting swept during an elimination game in the second round as the MVP. Lmao.
Jokic the leagues MVP literally was swept out of the playoffs so bad that he flagrant fouled little ass Cameron Payne because he was so frustrated. Lol.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14910520]Jokic was swept out of the playoffs the first year he won MVP. Dude got so frustrated he straight up threw a cheap shot and ejected his own ass out of an elimination game. Lmao. Curry has never choked that hard.
This Jokic dude gets so much hype it’s ridiculous.[/QUOTE]
How is it choking when Denver lost to the top seed without Murray?
:facepalm
Who gives a **** about 8-10 SRS? Like you and a few people in the world. It's a nothing burger in the grand scheme of things.
Jokic has never had a team/talent level that warranted 65+ wins. Read what I'm going to say twice just to make sure it sinks in all the holes in your brain.
Jokic has NEVER played with an all NBA teammate, an all defense teammate or all star. I believe he is the ONLY MVP and champion that can say that in the history of the game.
Jokic plays in such a way that FOSTERS great team chemistry. His defensive shortcomings are totally overblown. The Nuggets had a very good playoff defense last year and they once again are playing very good defense.
The Mavericks had the #1 ranked defense the last quarter of the regular season with Doncic and Kyrie who are not known for defense whatsoever. This just shows that just because you have one liability (Jokic isn't even a liability, not even close) doesn't mean you can't play team defense at a high level.
[QUOTE=Im Still Ballin;14910446]Similar impact but Jokic's defensive limitations are harder to cover than Curry's. Neglible really, with the caveat of Steph being more ideal regarding high-level team/roster construction.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Im Still Ballin;14910528]My greatest concern is with roster construction on a high-level team. I think some of you need to take a step back and reassess this question from a team-building perspective. Jokic's defensive limitations as a paint/rim protector are a much greater concern than any of Curry's weaknesses or comparative shortcomings.
Optimal personnel and scheme can mitigate Nikola's positional deficiency. But finding those right pieces to compensate is a little tougher than it is for Steph. Hence why I think it's easier to build an ATG-level team with Curry. And he's done it three times: 2015, 2016, and 2017.
Jokic proved he could win a championship. But leading a 8-10+ SRS team? He'll need better defensive players who can make up for his subpar paint protection. A better bench could get Denver to 60+ wins, 6-7 SRS. But beyond that? You'd need upgrades over the starters. And finding those guys who can improve the defense without compromising the offense? Tough.
For instance, Jaren Jackson Jr would most likely improve the defense. He's long, mobile, and loves to contest shots and provide weakside shot-blocking. But even though he can shoot better than Aaron Gordon, does Denver lose too much on offense? Jokic and AG have insane chemistry with the lob and cutting game. I don't know if JJR can do that.
You'd need to stack the deck a little harder to get to that 8-10 SRS tier with Jokic IMO. [I]Curry was able to build this in 2015 and 2016, with a box of scraps![/I][/QUOTE]
These posts stress a great point.
Curry has a lack of defense (even though it gets overstated, he wasn’t a negative on defense in his prime). However at the point guard position it’s the position where it’s the easiest to hide a defender.
Out of all the positions point guard has the least defensive responsibility, and the most offensive.
So like ISB said from a team construction standpoint, Curry can be dropped in almost anywhere.
I think Jokic and Curry share the same boat while they are obviously offensive oriented players, them being so good at offense gets people to overly disrespect their defense. Both Curry and Jokic are not net negatives on the defense end.
That being said the front court has more defensive responsibility when compared to the point guard position. It hurts the team more to have an average defender at Center rather than point guard. It makes roster construction a little bit more tricky as well.
Sum it up, Jokic and Curry both have GOAT offensive impact, and hover around breaking even or a little positive on the defensive end. However due to positional roles, Curry is a better fit for this archetype when it’s at the point guard position rather than Center.