ESPN Insider Request:JOHN HOLLINGER'S Player Ratings

[QUOTE=OnceInADECADE]thanks bro i[COLOR="Green"] repp [/COLOR]u when i can[/QUOTE]
Covered, I repped him for you.

[QUOTE=Droid101]Covered, I repped him for you.[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately your rep is grey. But I appreciate the thought. I shall give your rep power within the next 24 hours!:cheers:

[QUOTE=Rose]Unfortunately your rep is grey. But I appreciate the thought. I shall give your rep power within the next 24 hours!:cheers:[/QUOTE]
Sonofabitch. I thought you only needed green to give green. I guess you need 10 points to give green (which, thanks to you, I now have!). :cheers:

[QUOTE=Droid101]Well, why not compare their 09-10 seasons?

Kobe, per 40 minutes: P 27.8 R 5.5 A 5.1
Danny G, per 40 minutes: P 26.3 R 6.0 A 3.0

Looks like his program projects Kobe will decrease (since he's so old) and Granger will increase (since he's about to enter his prime). Plus Granger plays a lot at the 3, Kobe plays at the 2 (hence the rebounding differential). doesn't look too far off, to me (of course his numbers always hit Kobe harder because he's old).

As for the other two:

Randolph, per 40 minutes: P 20.5 R 11.5 A 2.2
Amare, per 40 minutes: P 26.7 R 10.3 A 1.2

Same story looks to me. His program projected a slight increase per 40 minutes for Randolph (he's so young) and a slight decrease for Amare (he's older). I doubt Randolph will play anywhere near 40 minutes, but I don't think the per 40 minute projection is way off for him. I expect Amare to score a bit more than that, but that's about it.

They don't seem that far fetched to me.[/QUOTE]
Well if he's saying Kobe and Amere will decline, then i guess it's fine. Although he will probably be wrong about Kobe.:D

[QUOTE=Droid101]Sonofabitch. I thought you only needed green to give green. I guess you need 10 points to give green (which, thanks to you, I now have!). :cheers:[/QUOTE]
:cheers: I thought for awhile you did too. But then another guy I know on here couldn't give any rep, and then I figured out the problem.

[QUOTE=Droid101]Covered, I repped him for you.[/QUOTE]


thanks dude

Sam Young gets so many turnovers and is a poor dribbler because he is a tweener forward in the mould of Jamieson, but he is playing guard.

[QUOTE=G-train]Sam Young gets so many turnovers and is a poor dribbler because he is a tweener forward in the mould of Jamieson, but he is playing guard.[/QUOTE]
I agree with you.

It'd be great if u could post the Mavs' ratings, too! :rockon:

[QUOTE=creepingdeath]It'd be great if u could post the Mavs' ratings, too! :rockon:[/QUOTE]
Ask and you shall receive !

JASON KIDD, PG
Projection: 9.6 pts, 6.5 reb, 9.0 ast per 40 min; 13.16 PER | Player card

TYSON CHANDLER, C
Projection: 12.1 pts, 11.3 reb, 0.6 ast per 40 min; 13.35 PER | Player card

can anyone post it for atlanta or sactown?

40 odd rep points for the pistons please!

God dang, Kidd gets 10-10 basically, and only gets a 14 per? Hollinger's system really hates point guards.