Printable View
[QUOTE=fiddy]stopped reading there :facepalm[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure about Bulgaria, but australia has many jobs that are filled by immigrants who are willing to do it. Taxi drivers are filled by a lot of Indians here, no one else wants to do it low pay and can be dangerous.
[QUOTE=LJJ]Mosques? How about
-Increased social tension
-Increased crime
-Decreased wealth
-High pressure on social services
-Lowering emancipation and equality of women
-Deterioration of cultural norms and values
-Deterioration of culture in general
-Vast decrease in public safety
Etc. etc.[/QUOTE]
typical stereotypes
[QUOTE=poido123]Multiculturalism has its benefits. Like a poster said before, we have many unskilled jobs that the common white man are too lazy to do. A big reason why Mexicans are in America, they will take the jobs no o ne else wants to do.
We are crippled by our own laws and political correctness. While I don't really know if multiculturalism is the problem, I do know that australia will not cope with current immigration at the rate it is and the placement of these immigrants and clumping them.
I see outspoken people in australia from Islamic and Muslim background having their say about western society and their disgust for it, yet we do nothing to apprehend their slights while they happily enjoy the fruits of what a western society provides.
I'm sorry, but if these individuals are supporting the actions of extremist groups or the downfall of western society should be deported back to where they came from with no return. Why are we allowing these families and religious groups who support this to find haven in Australia while we have been at war with their people I am still shocked. If you support women oppression and you don't condemn the extremists you are no friend of ours.[/QUOTE]Accept the values of the country you emigrate to or piss off quite frankly. UK has groups running secret sharia courts and living under their own law, and a government and police force too scared of offending anybody to do anything about it. It is a real said situation when you have FGM taking place on your own shores, and the police referring to it as 'a sensitive cultural issue' - the French don't take this kind of BS: it's either assimilate, or **** off.
[QUOTE=brownmamba00]typical stereotypes[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, because all these places:
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_world#mediaviewer/File:Islam_by_country.png[/url]
Are veritable havens for women, and social utopias of peace, happiness, and prosperity (oh wait...)
[QUOTE=Dresta]Accept the values of the country you emigrate to or piss off quite frankly. UK has groups running secret sharia courts and living under their own law, and a government and police force too scared of offending anybody to do anything about it. It is a real said situation when you have FGM taking place on your own shores, and the police referring to it as 'a sensitive cultural issue' - the French don't take this kind of BS: it's either assimilate, or **** off.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]https://counterjihadnews.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/sharia4franceburqas.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/07/29/article-2020382-0D310E3000000578-763_468x289.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.unitedliberty.org/images/sharia2.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QfVWU-2pVL4/TAIyH2QWSMI/AAAAAAAAOTk/I4F813qiOSg/s640/Bangladeshi+Muslim+protesters+shout+slogans+as+they+burn+a+Swedish+flag+during+a+protest+against+social+networking+website+facebook+for+holding+a+competition+on+caricatures+of+Prophet+Mohammed,+in+Dhaka.jpg[/IMG]
They don't do this shit in Slavic countries. Part of the reason for that is because religion is actually important to a number of those countries (Poland is the most obvious example) so 1. that shit wouldn't fly 2. they know they can get away with it in pansy western europe+sweden, so they go there
BUT CAN'T YOU SEE HOW DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH?! ACCEPT THE CULTURAL ENRICHMENT, YOU EVIL EUROPEAN RACISTS!
[QUOTE=fiddy]Dont even reply to my posts you bangwagoner scum[/QUOTE]
I'm doing it now, bitch.
As I have been saying, EU either radically changes its approach or there will be muslim pogroms sooner than later. People are pissed around here and I am still living in a basically muslim-free country. Yet those few thousands here are managing to stir the pot quite successfully and they are daring to do more and more every day. I can't imagine how it looks in France or UK.
[QUOTE=Trollsmasher]As I have been saying, EU either radically changes its approach or there will be muslim pogroms sooner than later. People are pissed around here and I am still living in a basically muslim-free country. Yet those few thousands here are managing to stir the pot quite successfully and they are daring to do more and more every day. I can't imagine how it looks in France or UK.[/QUOTE]
look at us
look at Germany:coleman: :coleman: :coleman:
its terrible out here man:biggums:
[QUOTE=Marlo_Stanfield]look at us
look at Germany:coleman: :coleman: :coleman:
its terrible out here man:biggums:[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://polpix.sueddeutsche.com/polopoly_fs/1.164605.1358132249!/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/900x600/image.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=B-hoop]:facepalm
Of course they do that, the US is half a world away while Russia and China are knocking in their front door. They would do the same if the positions were reversed, its a way for the smaller countries to maintain their independence, pitting the big guys against one another.
And **** you with your "America has made it good with South America through aid". They have ****ed up almost all Central American countries for hundreds of years and you think some millions of dollars in aid will change anything, when the underlying factors for the impoverishment of the area will continue to exist.
I like the U.S and agree with the liberal principles they defend but U.S citizens in general love to talk about stuff they have no idea about. Their invasion of Iraq was complete bullshit, no other country other than the U.S, Britain, Australia (only 2k soldiers) and Poland (194 soldiers :oldlol: ) supported it. Saddam was massacring the Iraqis for the last 20 years, i don't remember the US hurrying to free them. WMDs were a bullshit excuse, in Britain they forged reports to make it seem more likely that they existed which was discovered by the parliament (research September Dossier).[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Of course they do that, the US is half a world away while Russia and China are knocking in their front door. They would do the same if the positions were reversed, its a way for the smaller countries to maintain their independence, pitting the big guys against one another.[/QUOTE]
You dont see countries around the US reach out towards china and russia for support.
The US actually does have disputed territories with Canada. there is this island on the east coast we both claim, We have never tried to intimidate Canada militarily, in order to annex the island unilaterally.
The US maintains far better relations with countries in our neighborhood than does china and russia in their neighborhood.
Name one country in north america or the caribbean or central america that seeks alliances with china and russia to counter american hegemony?
In south america only venezuela does so. but its government is increasing illegitimate with how it treats political dissidents.
America is a far more moral nation than either China or Russia and has not seeked to annex additional territory in over a century and a half.
[QUOTE]f course they do that, the US is half a world away while Russia and China are knocking in their front door.[/QUOTE]
The US navy is the dominant military force in easy asia.
[QUOTE]And **** you with your "America has made it good with South America through aid". They have ****ed up almost all Central American countries for hundreds of years and you think some millions of dollars in aid will change anything, when the underlying factors for the impoverishment of the area will continue to exist.[/QUOTE]
I have already admitted the banana republics we established in south america has been a black mark on US foreign policy. I dont blame anyone in south or central america for bearing a grudge against the US. Our support for people like pinochet was wrong, and helping to kill allende was also wrong.
With that said our extent of exploitation of the western hemisphere is mild compared to what russia has done to eastern europe.
The US maintains good relations with all countries in the western hemisphere other than venezuela. China has poor relations with almost all countries in asia and russia also has poor relations with countries in eastern europe. You cant dispute the fact that America's neighbors are less threatened by the US than Russia and China's neighbors are by them. This despite the fact that the US has a stronger more advanced military.
Edit: the US also gave panama the Panama Canal
2nd edit: Cuba is also anti american, but cuba is also an authoritarian dictatorship that crushes the political will of anyone that disagrees with the government
[QUOTE]I like the U.S and agree with the liberal principles they defend but U.S citizens in general love to talk about stuff they have no idea about. Their invasion of Iraq was complete bullshit, no other country other than the U.S, Britain, Australia (only 2k soldiers) and Poland (194 soldiers :oldlol: ) supported it. Saddam was massacring the Iraqis for the last 20 years, i don't remember the US hurrying to free them. WMDs were a bullshit excuse, in Britain they forged reports to make it seem more likely that they existed which was discovered by the parliament (research September Dossier)[/QUOTE]
Have you read any posts i have made here?
When have i said that invading iraq was justified? When have i said that the WMDs were real? I have constantly said the US was violating international law by invading iraq. Also that our conduct of the occupation triggered the current crisis. We did however push for a democracy in iraq and didnt steal their oil as some claim.
Although technically 48 countries supported the us invasion of iraq. 48 countries were in the coalition of the willing. The US is so influential/popular that 48 countries followed us into a bullshit war. Its a testament to the success of US foreign policy that even though we were wrong we were still supported by so many countries
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Number_of_foreign_troops_in_Irak_in_2006.png[/IMG]
Countries in the coalition of the willing
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/89/Coalition_of_the_willing.svg/400px-Coalition_of_the_willing.svg.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE]The Bush administration briefly used the term "Coalition of the Willing" to refer to the countries who supported, militarily or verbally, the 2003 invasion of Iraq and subsequent military presence in post-invasion Iraq. The original list released in March 2003 included 46 members.[3] In April 2003, the list was updated to include 49 countries, though it was reduced to 48 after Costa Rica objected to its inclusion. Of the 48 countries on the list, three contributed troops to the invasion force (the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland). An additional 37 countries provided some number of troops to support military operations after the invasion was complete.[/QUOTE]
I have never said the US foreign policy was perfect. I said the good outweighs the bad
[QUOTE=MavsSuperFan]You dont see countries around the US reach out towards china and russia for support.
The US actually does have disputed territories with Canada. there is this island on the east coast we both claim, We have never tried to intimidate Canada militarily, in order to annex the island unilaterally.
The US maintains far better relations with countries in our neighborhood than does china and russia in their neighborhood.
Name one country in north america or the caribbean or central america that seeks alliances with china and russia to counter american hegemony?
In south america only venezuela does so. but its government is increasing illegitimate with how it treats political dissidents.
America is a far more moral nation than either China or Russia and has not seeked to annex additional territory in over a century and a half.
The US navy is the dominant military force in easy asia.
I have already admitted the banana republics we established in south america has been a black mark on US foreign policy. I dont blame anyone in south or central america for bearing a grudge against the US. Our support for people like pinochet was wrong, and helping to kill allende was also wrong.
We that said our extent of exploitation of the western hemisphere is mild compared to what russia has done to eastern europe.
The US maintains good relations with all countries in the western hemisphere other than venezuela. China has poor relations with almost all countries in asia and russia also has poor relations with countries in eastern europe. You cant dispute the fact that America's neighbors are less threatened by the US than Russia and China's neighbors are by them. This despite the fact that the US has a stronger more advanced military.
Edit: the US also gave panama the Panama Canal
Have you read any posts i have made here?
When have i said that invading iraq was justified? When have i said that the WMDs were real? I have constantly said the US was violating international law by invading iraq. Also that our conduct of the occupation triggered the current crisis. We did however push for a democracy in iraq and didnt steal their oil as some claim.
Although technically 48 countries supported the us invasion of iraq. 48 countries were in the coalition of the willing. The US is so influential/popular that 48 countries followed us into a bullshit war. Its a testament to the success of US foreign policy that even though we were wrong we were still supported by so many countries
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Number_of_foreign_troops_in_Irak_in_2006.png[/IMG]
Countries in the coalition of the willing
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/89/Coalition_of_the_willing.svg/400px-Coalition_of_the_willing.svg.png[/IMG]
I have never said the US foreign policy was perfect. [B]I said the good outweighs the bad[/B][/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://cdn.niketalk.com/2/2f/350x700px-LL-2ff5111e_michael-jordan-laughing.gif[/IMG]
Well, it's undeniable really that the US has been the most benign dominant world power that has yet existed; no matter how many laughing gifs you want to post Marlo, it doesn't make your opinion any more valid.
The US would gain more international respect if it actually went after its own criminals (like Kissinger), instead of protecting them and treating them like honourable men who have done their country proud, when in actual fact they have run roughshod over the US Constitution, and done untold damage to its international image. Too much has been excused by the moniker of realpolitik.
[QUOTE=Marlo_Stanfield]Poido showing his true racist colors :roll: :roll: :biggums:[/QUOTE]
nobody here is racist.........anyone can see the new plague in europe.........
[QUOTE=brownmamba00]typical stereotypes[/QUOTE]
Stereotypes?
Those are facts.
[QUOTE=fiddy]Dont care. Fvck em.[/QUOTE]
Yeah. I don't give a shit about the EU. Probably should nuke the entire continent well, just to make sure that they don't start another world war. Total piece of shits the European countries are. Always getting into fights and causing problems for the rest of the world.
[QUOTE=BlazerRed]As I stated, they're in pain, starving and getting raped every day. They won't mind.[/QUOTE]
While we're at it, lets nuke all the places in the US with high crime, racist pieces of shit, and corruption. That probably would leave half the US alive and radioactive. Do you honestly think that every place in Africa is the same??
Kid, I suggest you travel.
Wow! I honestly can't believe that we actually have people who want to kill hundreds of millions of innocent kids and women. Just...WOW!!! Honestly, a basketball message board is the karst place I would expect them.
You guys, please leave this board and go to ********** of some or ****** place.