[QUOTE=-p.tiddy-]Film medium is meant to entertain, movies that is[/QUOTE]
:facepalm One of the most powerful art mediums regarded only for entertainment value. I'm ****ing speechless.
Printable View
[QUOTE=-p.tiddy-]Film medium is meant to entertain, movies that is[/QUOTE]
:facepalm One of the most powerful art mediums regarded only for entertainment value. I'm ****ing speechless.
[QUOTE=Jello]:facepalm One of the most powerful art mediums regarded only for entertainment value. I'm ****ing speechless.[/QUOTE]
Well tbh, he basically listed Pulp Fiction as one of his favorite movies. Based on that, do you really think he's going to like movies from 30s-60s?
[QUOTE=Dbrog]Are you really gonna go there? People are still entertained by Super Mario (see new super mario bros) and it's basically the same formula as it was back in the day (see Pokemon as well which is LITERALLY the same game). Old games are MUCH better than new ones in many cases (compare final fantasy's, compare Diablo/Baldurs Gate to new WRPGs,etc etc). The only genre that has really progressed is shooters and even then you could argue CSS and Deus-Ex are miles ahead of the CoDs and Battlefields of the world. I mean, are you really arguing that games haven't been dumbed down in the past 10 years?
Btw, you mention pong but fail to mention Pac-Man which sold very well and got great acclaim just recently (see: pacman championship ed). Millions upon millions of people are entertained by ANGRY FKING BIRDS. Do you really think they wouldn't be entertained by games like missile command and space invaders if they had a few bells and whistles added?[/QUOTE]
I've been a video game dev for over a decade dude... :facepalm no one is buying old games like pong and pacman anymore...there isn't a market for that stuff any longer.
okay....:facepalm
video games haven't progressed at all since pong
and movies haven't progressed since silent films
you guys win...I give up
[QUOTE=-p.tiddy-]okay....:facepalm
video games haven't progressed at all since pong
and movies haven't progressed since silent films
you guys win...I give up[/QUOTE]
You're too stupid to realize how stupid you are. I don't really blame you man. Continue with your shallow point of view.
[QUOTE=Jello]You're too stupid to realize how stupid you are. I don't really blame you man. Continue with your shallow point of view.[/QUOTE]
okay you stupid, stupid head
Guys, I get it now!
List of D. Piddy's previous work as a game dev:
[IMG]http://comicattack.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/superman6412495699951.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ns0cz6ycy_s/SsCILXV1HPI/AAAAAAAAC7g/mYp5uyNKdPw/s400/3.JPG[/IMG]
[IMG]http://mortarandpistol.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/big-rigs-over-the-road-racing-anyone-1652.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.vgchartz.com/games/pics/duke-nukem-forever-209536.jpg[/IMG]
"Look how the art has progressed over time!" :oldlol:
[QUOTE=ProfessorMurder]Way to compare a comedic legend to a primadonna dramatic actor.
[COLOR="Red"]Charlie Chaplin is a much better physical actor[/COLOR], hilarious, can direct, write, and is a f*cking legend.[/QUOTE]
he IS a legend, no doubt
but you seriously think his skill set is better than Bale's is today? Okay well I dissagree
[QUOTE=Dbrog]Guys, I get it now!
List of D. Piddy's previous work as a game dev:
[IMG]http://comicattack.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/superman6412495699951.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ns0cz6ycy_s/SsCILXV1HPI/AAAAAAAAC7g/mYp5uyNKdPw/s400/3.JPG[/IMG]
[IMG]http://mortarandpistol.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/big-rigs-over-the-road-racing-anyone-1652.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.vgchartz.com/games/pics/duke-nukem-forever-209536.jpg[/IMG]
"Look how the art has progressed over time!" :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
you're young I can tell...but here:
:oldlol: Yay games that are 100% shallow (except Borderlands)! Anyway, I think I'm done here but congrats if you really dev'ed on those games.
Oh and I think it's funny how you call me young when I compared old games to games of today (I grew up playing Atari 2600 btw). In case you haven't noticed, young gamers won't even touch games from the 90s let alone from the 80s...they think they are unplayable and suck (which makes me think you are lying about being a game dev).
[QUOTE=Dbrog]:oldlol: Yay games that are 100% shallow (except Borderlands)! Anyway, I think I'm done here but congrats if you really dev'ed on those games.
Oh and I think it's funny how you call me young when I compared old games to games of today (I grew up playing Atari 2600 btw).[/QUOTE]
I grew up on the 2600 as well
do you still play on that system today?
lol, how funny that you like Borerlands of all those...oh what a COINCIDENCE!!!...IT'S THE NEWEST ONE ON THE LIST!!!
[QUOTE=Dbrog]:oldlol: Yay games that are 100% shallow (except Borderlands)! Anyway, I think I'm done here but congrats if you really dev'ed on those games.
Oh and I think it's funny how you call me young when I compared old games to games of today (I grew up playing Atari 2600 btw).[COLOR="Red"] In case you haven't noticed, young gamers won't even touch games from the 90s let alone from the 80s...they think they are unplayable and suck [/COLOR](which makes me think you are lying about being a game dev).[/QUOTE]
exactly!!!
why do you think that is???
[QUOTE=-p.tiddy-]lol, how funny that you like Borerlands of all those...oh what a COINCIDENCE!!!...IT'S THE NEWEST ONE ON THE LIST!!![/QUOTE]
It's also the only one that actually has good writing (genuinely funny).
[QUOTE=-p.tiddy-]exactly!!!
why do you think that is???[/QUOTE]
I don't understand how sales = quality. You really think Call of Duty is better than Half-Life 2? It's the same with movies. The Oscar winners almost never have a large box-office gross. I guess you think graphics = most important in both movies and games (cause that's what most young people think...hence why they don't play old games).