ISH all-time draft thread

[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;14937060]He shot 32% from 3 the year they won the finals and was guarded half-ass by forwards. Giannis was literally forced to go 1vs4 against the Sun's defense and still averaged 35 on 66%TS. with a 50pt closeout game.

Pat being a post player means he actually demands attention from centers. You can't just stick forwards on him like you can with Brook.I already explained this but again this is where the IQ thing comes in to play. You have a 70 IQ but the arrogance of a PHD student lol.

Hey man, at least you were right about the Mavs beating the Celtics and the Trump shooting being staged. Just high level stuff spewing from that skinny dome of yours. :bowdown:[/QUOTE]


Listen, I'm trying to give you some constructive criticism and healthy advice and you come at me with an attitude? Watch your tone boy.

I'm re-evaluating the draft and given your draft position you could've legit had a team of:

PG - Gary Payton
SG - Reggie Miller
SF - Larry Bird
PF - Charles Barkley
C - Pat Ewing

And then Karl Malone, Dwight, and Webber off the bench...

Literally a 90s ****ing super team and probably would've been one of the best here. But you took guys like kyrie and klay instead super early, who I like... I'm probably one of the biggest kyrie fans on this site and have always rooted for Golden State in the Curry dynasty era... but to take them that early over MVP talent? Totally absurd.

Kyrie legit might not have even gotten drafted in this... there's only 8×8=64 picks. You could've got him in the last round so your picks were just [I]severely[/I] bad.

[QUOTE=tpols;14937065]Exactly. I can't believe he's even arguing that.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I'm arguing a guy who shot 32% from 3 for the run and given 10 feet of space by guards on every possession isn't actually respected as a lethal shooter and didn't provide elite spacing.

Watch that clip and see Giannis driving in the paint with 4 or 5 guys surrounding him. Now imagine him with Irving, Klay, and Bird on the perimeter instead and you may start to grasp what an intelligent team looks like instead of your insanely shitty team with 1 good 3pt shooter and subpar interior D. Literally one good 3 point shooter on the roster... that's your genius team. ****ing hell. :roll: and youre going off about spacing and fit. 65 IQ. Youre dropping by the post.


Anything else peanut head Timmy?

[QUOTE=tpols;14937066]
Literally a 90s ****ing super team and probably would've been one of the best here. But you took guys like kyrie and klay instead super early, who I like... I'm probably one of the biggest kyrie fans on this site and have always rooted for Golden State in the Curry dynasty era... but to take them that early over MVP talent? Totally absurd.
[/QUOTE]
I destroyed your horrendous Brook Lopez take so now you're back on the MVP talent thing.

:roll:

[QUOTE=tpols;14937066]Listen, I'm trying to give you some constructive criticism and healthy advice and you come at me with an attitude? Watch your tone boy.

I'm re-evaluating the draft and given your draft position you could've legit had a team of:

PG - Gary Payton
SG - Reggie Miller
SF - Larry Bird
PF - Charles Barkley
C - Pat Ewing

And then Karl Malone, Dwight, and Webber off the bench...

Literally a 90s ****ing super team and probably would've been one of the best here. But you took guys like kyrie and klay instead super early, who I like... I'm probably one of the biggest kyrie fans on this site and have always rooted for Golden State in the Curry dynasty era... but to take them that early over MVP talent? Totally absurd.

Kyrie legit might not have even gotten drafted in this... there's only 8×8=64 picks. You could've got him in the last round so your picks were just [I]severely[/I] bad.[/QUOTE]

We done with the 90!

I didn't realize it was my turn.

I'll take ANDREI KIRILENKO

[video=youtube_share;L82qRUzevp0]https://youtu.be/L82qRUzevp0?si=-pJumdtEYJgbjq1w[/video]

[QUOTE=DJMcDonald;14937127]I didn't realize it was my turn.

I'll take ANDREI KIRILENKO

[video=youtube_share;L82qRUzevp0]https://youtu.be/L82qRUzevp0?si=-pJumdtEYJgbjq1w[/video][/QUOTE]

:applause: Perfect defensive fit next to Dirk and an underrated playmaker.

About time you got someone who can defend the PnR lol

[QUOTE=tpols;14937066]Listen, I'm trying to give you some constructive criticism and healthy advice and you come at me with an attitude? Watch your tone boy.

I'm re-evaluating the draft and given your draft position you could've legit had a team of:

PG - Gary Payton
SG - Reggie Miller
SF - Larry Bird
PF - Charles Barkley
C - Pat Ewing

And then Karl Malone, Dwight, and Webber off the bench...

Literally a 90s ****ing super team and probably would've been one of the best here. But you took guys like kyrie and klay instead super early, who I like... I'm probably one of the biggest kyrie fans on this site and have always rooted for Golden State in the Curry dynasty era... but to take them that early over MVP talent? Totally absurd.

Kyrie legit might not have even gotten drafted in this... there's only 8×8=64 picks. You could've got him in the last round so your picks were just [I]severely[/I] bad.[/QUOTE]Join the next draft, Thurston Pollard.

Going to fix my two core issues which is spacing and rim protection with these picks

Picking Chauncey with my 6th pick a perfect point guard who can do everything well and was a all NBA defender

Then with my seventh pick I'm going with the Unicorn Porzingis to play next to Jokic he can help space the floor for Barkley and Jokic on offense and provides much needed rim protection and defense

[video=youtube_share;czFpMfUnhD4]https://youtu.be/czFpMfUnhD4?si=KYLZql8d-x2_MwrD[/video]

Going to move Barkley to the bench for fit reasons so I have someone who can give elite offense off the bench when Jokic sits

PG - Billups
SG - Allen
SF - Pippen
PF - Porzingis
C - Jokic

6th man - Barkley
7th man - Manu

[QUOTE=Manny98;14937136]Going to fix my two core issues which is spacing and rim protection with these picks

Picking Chauncey with my 6th pick a perfect point guard who can do everything well and was a all NBA defender

Then with my seventh pick I'm going with the Unicorn Porzingis to play next to Jokic he can help space the floor for Barkley and Jokic on offense and provides much needed rim protection and defense

[video=youtube_share;czFpMfUnhD4]https://youtu.be/czFpMfUnhD4?si=KYLZql8d-x2_MwrD[/video]

Going to move Barkley to the bench for fit reasons so I have someone who can give elite offense off the bench when Jokic sits

PG - Billups
SG - Allen
SF - Pippen
PF - Porzingis
C - Jokic

6th man - Barkley
7th man - Manu[/QUOTE]

I actually like the move of playing Barkley & Manu off the bench.

With my next pick I'll be taking THE MATRIX.

[video=youtube_share;ipb3nGEP1tA]https://youtu.be/ipb3nGEP1tA?si=GLShGvDcSnzVeSWj[/video]

Nash
Vince
Mac
Dirk
Shaq

AK
Matrix

A certain theme for my team. Got something cooked up for my last pick too.

I love Billups in 2006. Such an efficient monster and those Pistons teams played at a snail's pace. One of the most underrated PG seasons of all time.

[QUOTE=dankok8;14937161]I love Billups in 2006. Such an efficient monster and those Pistons teams played at a snail's pace. One of the most underrated PG seasons of all time.[/QUOTE]

I was saving him for my last pick, didn't expect him to get nabbed with all the great PGs left, but he's a great pickup that compliments any team

[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14937135]Join the next draft, Thurston Pollard.[/QUOTE]

the thing is, there's no objective way to tell whose is better. Do we have some advanced cpu we are plugging the line ups into? I doubt people are even gonna post advanced strategies for offense and defense, which would make a huge difference. They are just gonna be like well these names together = win. Wack.

Not shitting on this idea, cuz I enjoy looking at people's teams, but in the end, how do we know who is better? Who is gonna do a deep dive and who will get the final say? Some dudes who are constantly arguing Kobe v Bron with alts?

-Smak

[QUOTE=ILLsmak;14937170][B]the thing is, there's no objective way to tell whose is better.[/B] Do we have some advanced cpu we are plugging the line ups into? I doubt people are even gonna post advanced strategies for offense and defense, which would make a huge difference. They are just gonna be like well these names together = win. Wack.

Not shitting on this idea, cuz I enjoy looking at people's teams, but in the end, how do we know who is better? Who is gonna do a deep dive and who will get the final say? Some dudes who are constantly arguing Kobe v Bron with alts?

-Smak[/QUOTE]

Pretty much. Its just going to be people arguing for pages. I just like to draft a team for the fun of it. I don't care to spend time convincing people mine is the best.

[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;14937033]Seek help.[/QUOTE]

:oldlol: