Current LeBron is a much better player than Wizards Jordan

i believe the window licker brought up league averages earlier. let's do it the correct way.

[B]jordan's shooting percentages vs the lg avg.[/B]

mj - 42.6 [B]2pt%[/B], lg avg - 46.5%. difference of [B]-2.9%[/B].
mj - 18.9 [B]3pt%[/B], lg avg - 35.4%. difference of [B]-16.5%[/B]
mj - 41.6 [B]fg%[/B], lg avg - 44.5%. difference of [B]-2.9%[/B]
mj - 42.0 [B]efg%[/B], lg avg - 47.7%. difference of [B]-5.7%[/B]
mj - 46.8 [B]ts%[/B], lg avg - 52.0%. difference of [B]-3.2%[/B]

conclusion: below average inefficient chucker.

[B]lebron's shooting percentages vs the lg avg.[/B]

lbj - 62.0 [B]2pt%[/B], lg avg 53.2%. difference of [B]+8.8%[/B]
lbj - 35.9 [B]3pt%[/B], lg avg - 35.3%. difference of [B]+0.6%[/B]
lbj - 52.4 [B]fg%[/B], lg avg - 46.1%. difference of [B]+6.3%[/B]
lbj - 59.0 [B]efg%[/B], lg avg - 53.1%. difference of [B]+5.9%[/B]
lbj - 61.9 [B]ts%[/B], lg avg - 56.5%. difference of [B]+5.4%[/B].

conclusion. efficient scoring machine.

like i've said before and the stats back up...current lebron is better than any version of mj after 1993. deal with it.

[QUOTE=HoopsNY;14573516][I]"mrhrmrhmphrmrh mrhrmrhmphrmrh"[/I] - bumbling rabid Johnny the Bran Stan whose mother is his sister[/QUOTE]
Ether

[QUOTE=Johnny32;14573565]i believe the window licker brought up league averages earlier. let's do it the correct way.

[B]jordan's shooting percentages vs the lg avg.[/B]

mj - 42.6 [B]2pt%[/B], lg avg - 46.5%. difference of [B]-2.9%[/B].
mj - 18.9 [B]3pt%[/B], lg avg - 35.4%. difference of [B]-16.5%[/B]
mj - 41.6 [B]fg%[/B], lg avg - 44.5%. difference of [B]-2.9%[/B]
mj - 42.0 [B]efg%[/B], lg avg - 47.7%. difference of [B]-5.7%[/B]
mj - 46.8 [B]ts%[/B], lg avg - 52.0%. difference of [B]-3.2%[/B]

conclusion: below average inefficient chucker.

[B]lebron's shooting percentages vs the lg avg.[/B]

lbj - 62.0 [B]2pt%[/B], lg avg 53.2%. difference of [B]+8.8%[/B]
lbj - 35.9 [B]3pt%[/B], lg avg - 35.3%. difference of [B]+0.6%[/B]
lbj - 52.4 [B]fg%[/B], lg avg - 46.1%. difference of [B]+6.3%[/B]
lbj - 59.0 [B]efg%[/B], lg avg - 53.1%. difference of [B]+5.9%[/B]
lbj - 61.9 [B]ts%[/B], lg avg - 56.5%. difference of [B]+5.4%[/B].

conclusion. efficient scoring machine.[/QUOTE]

Damn... DE-stroyed! :oldlol:
Jordan extremist alts are going to do their best to ignore such factual evidence. Bu... bu... but "inflated stats era" :roll:

Wizards Jordan was flat out a poor basketball player, no matter how you slice it. Comparing him to this era, comparing him to averages of his own era or any previous era.

[QUOTE=TheGoatest;14573602]Damn... DE-stroyed! :oldlol:
Jordan extremist alts are going to do their best to ignore such factual evidence. Bu... bu... but "inflated stats era" :roll:

[B]Wizards Jordan was flat out a poor basketball player, no matter how you slice it. Comparing him to this era, comparing him to averages of his own era or any previous era.[/B][/QUOTE]

exactly. lol the window licker had no clue the destruction he was about to lay upon himself when he brought up league averages.

[QUOTE=Johnny32;14573518]What's funny is jordone vs rip is a closer comparison than mj vs legoat. Both negative defenders...rip is the more efficient scorer across the board. Mj rebounds and gets more assists. Pretty even overall i'd say.[/QUOTE]

as i mentioned earlier...this is a much better comparison.

jordone - [B]22.9 ppg[/B] on [B]22.1 fga[/B] (42.6 2pt%, 18.9 3pt%, 41.6 fg%, 42.0 efg%, 46.8 ts%), [B]5.7 rpg, 5.2 apg, 1.4 spg, 0.4 bpg[/B]
hamilton - 20.0 ppg on 17.2 fga ([B]43.8 2pt%, 38.1 3pt%, 43.5 fg%, 44.3 efg%, 51.1 ts%[/B]), 3.4 rpg, 2.7 apg, 0.6 spg, 0.2 bpg

Chucker Jordone - [B]22.9 ppg on 22.1 fga[/B] (42.6 2pt%, 18.9 3pt%, 41.6 fg%, 42.0 efg%, 46.8 ts%)
Cuttino Mobley - 21.7 ppg on 18.4 fga ([B]45.5 2pt%, 39.5 3pt%, 43.8 fg%, 49.3 efg%, 53.7 ts%)[/B]

lol this inefficient chucking fraud is getting his shit pushed in by everyone.

legoat - 30.3 ppg on 21.8 fga, 6.0 fta ([B]62.0 2pt%[/B], 35.9 3pt%, [B]52.4 fg%, 59.0 efg%, 61.9 ts%[/B])
embiid - 30.4 ppg on 19.7 fga, 11.8 fta (52.5 2pt%, [B]36.5 3pt%[/B], 49.5 fg%, 53.0 efg%, 61.2 ts%)

see the difference. legoat compares favorably to the leagues scoring leader and mvp candidate embiid. while jordone gets his shit pushed in by cuttino fkn mobley lol.

The early 2000s are arguably the greatest defensive era - statistically, its tops among DRTG. 39 & 40 year old Jordan saw this same defense night in and out. Does the retard above not realize that? :confusedshrug:

[QUOTE=HoopsNY;14573504]Your stats are decontextualized. But hey, if you're happy with empty stats then be my guest.[/QUOTE]

If we go by impact, and not raw numbers like that retard used, Jordan was top 5 in RPM (among SGs). Again, this is at 40 years old and during the GOAT defensive climate. Some chide MJ for his play because it messed with his career averages - but he faired well. If not for injury, I shudder to think what he'd put up.

[QUOTE=MadDog;14573652]If we go by impact, and not raw numbers like that retard used, Jordan was top 5 in RPM (among SGs). Again, this is at 40 years old and during the GOAT defensive climate. Some chide MJ for his play because it messed with his career averages - but he faired well. If not for injury, I shudder to think what he'd put up.[/QUOTE]

He was 38 you excuse making ******. He scored less efficiently than the league average so your pathetic whining is irrelevant. FloorDone has been exposed.

[QUOTE=Johnny32;14573688]He was 38 you excuse making ******. He scored less efficiently than the league average so your pathetic whining is irrelevant. FloorDone has been exposed.[/QUOTE]

Jordan was 40 in 2003, mouth breather. While you desperately cling to efficiency, MJ still impacted the game like a top 5 sg. Fact.

[QUOTE=Johnny32;14573565]i believe the window licker brought up league averages earlier. let's do it the correct way.

[B]jordan's shooting percentages vs the lg avg.[/B]

mj - 42.6 [B]2pt%[/B], lg avg - 46.5%. difference of [B]-2.9%[/B].
mj - 18.9 [B]3pt%[/B], lg avg - 35.4%. difference of [B]-16.5%[/B]
mj - 41.6 [B]fg%[/B], lg avg - 44.5%. difference of [B]-2.9%[/B]
mj - 42.0 [B]efg%[/B], lg avg - 47.7%. difference of [B]-5.7%[/B]
mj - 46.8 [B]ts%[/B], lg avg - 52.0%. difference of [B]-3.2%[/B]

conclusion: below average inefficient chucker.

[B]lebron's shooting percentages vs the lg avg.[/B]

lbj - 62.0 [B]2pt%[/B], lg avg 53.2%. difference of [B]+8.8%[/B]
lbj - 35.9 [B]3pt%[/B], lg avg - 35.3%. difference of [B]+0.6%[/B]
lbj - 52.4 [B]fg%[/B], lg avg - 46.1%. difference of [B]+6.3%[/B]
lbj - 59.0 [B]efg%[/B], lg avg - 53.1%. difference of [B]+5.9%[/B]
lbj - 61.9 [B]ts%[/B], lg avg - 56.5%. difference of [B]+5.4%[/B].

conclusion. efficient scoring machine.[/QUOTE]

No context provided for

1) The height of the defensive era vs. a defenseless era

2) The fact that MJ was 3 years removed from the league

3) A 2 year age difference

4) Stats that include both pre and post arthroscopic knee surgery

And most of all, impact. As Maddog mentioned, you're not considering impact, especially when we consider casts. I don't believe the gap between the two are wide, but I do believe MJ's overall impact at age 38 is more meaningful. You can take LeBron, I choose differently.

[QUOTE=MadDog;14573689]Jordan was 40 in 2003, mouth breather. While you desperately cling to efficiency, MJ still impacted the game like a top 5 sg. Fact.[/QUOTE]

The topic of discussion has clearly been 37 yr old legoat vs 38 year old poor mans cuttino mobley, window licker.

Did jordone trade rip for stack so he could shamelessly chuck inefficiently without anyone bringing up his teammate (rip) should prob be shooting 25 times per gm and mj 12 based on those horrific percentages.

That squad isn't winning 10 games in today's nba btw lol holy shit late 90s early 00s was really bad.