Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
Like Alt Account said -
[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;15035147]But again - you simply have to ask why. [/QUOTE]
In your theory nothing makes sense.
1. Framing Tyler Robinson as the shooter makes zero sense. Why?
2. Placing the real shooter at a completely different angle makes zero sense.
3. If the surgeon was in on it? He wouldn't say it was a miraculous miracle. He would say that is normal.
All of these weird hoops, for what? It's illogical
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
[QUOTE=highwhey;15035166]serious question DOOMS, are you having trouble accepting that the shooter is white?
because I have never seen you bring up conspiracy theories when the suspect is a minority, which of course is a rare occurrence I admit.[/QUOTE]
I'm having trouble with the people that are so desperate to believe the official story.... over and over and over and over and over again.
Same story... believe the Feds, believe the Government, You're crazy to ask questions or speculate.... rinse & repeat.
[video=youtube_share;2nmGS8rVuIM]https://youtu.be/2nmGS8rVuIM[/video]
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15035167]Like Alt Account said -
In your theory nothing makes sense.
1. Framing Tyler Robinson as the shooter makes zero sense. Why?
2. Placing the real shooter at a completely different angle makes zero sense.
3. If the surgeon was in on it? He wouldn't say it was a miraculous miracle. He would say that is normal.
All of these weird hoops, for what? It's illogical[/QUOTE]
Who gives a f*ck about my theory?
Do the Texts look like complete bull$hit? YES.
Does the shot appear to come from a different angle?.... Is the neck an exit wound?.... YES.
Is there a Motive for somebody in a strong position of power to kill Charlie? YES.
Is anybody believing the FBI right now (especially after Epstein)? NO.
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15035167]1. Framing Tyler Robinson as the shooter makes zero sense. Why?[/QUOTE]
You got to frame somebody.... right? If you don't, and the killer gets away, Feds look incompetent and conspiracy talk would be 10X worse... got to make a Left vs Right issue. And they've done just that.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15035167]2. Placing the real shooter at a completely different angle makes zero sense.[/QUOTE]
Why? Who's gonna disagree? You and many other's are going to believe the Feds over your own two eyes.
Majority of the witnesses in Dallas thought the shot that killed Kennedy came from the Grassy Knoll... why not just kill him from the 6th floor?
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15035167]3. If the surgeon was in on it? He wouldn't say it was a miraculous miracle. He would say that is normal.[/QUOTE]
You can't do that when every gun owner in America that goes hunting knows it's not normal.... and Candace has seen the footage of the camera in the back, so that video does exist.
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
Ah yes, they prepped a fake surgeon to answer the questions that will arise from their nonsensical decision to place a real shooter somewhere completely different instead of next to Robinson. :oldlol:
That acter surgeon had to say it's a miracle, because they knew, that everyone would be perplexed at no exist wound.
And then of course Israel wanted to keep Robinson alive. They'll kill everyone else, but not him, the one person who could do them in. :oldlol:
Completely air-tight theory here.
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
If Israel for some weird reason decided to focus on Charlie Kirk of all people, Robinson would be the one that actually pulls the trigger. And then he'd be dead from police fire or self inflicted wound right after.
No actors involved, no second shooters, no weird angles, no questions, no nothing. Clean and simple.
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15035176]Ah yes, they prepped a fake surgeon to answer the questions that will arise from their nonsensical decision to place a real shooter somewhere completely different instead of next to Robinson. :oldlol:
That acter surgeon had to say it's a miracle, because they knew, that everyone would be perplexed at no exist wound.
And then of course Israel wanted to keep Robinson alive. They'll kill everyone else, but not him, the one person who could do them in. :oldlol:
Completely air-tight theory here.[/QUOTE]
Surgeons are not supposed to give statements like that.
[I]A surgeon is required to make statements about a patient to the patient themselves, their family (with the patient's consent), and other medical professionals involved in the patient's treatment. However, they are legally and ethically prohibited from discussing a patient's protected health information (PHI) with unauthorized individuals due to confidentiality laws. [/I]
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15035177]
No actors involved, no second shooters, no weird angles, no questions, no nothing. Clean and simple.[/QUOTE]
There's a flip side to that coin... If there was no conspiracy then it wouldn't smell like Complete Bull$hit.
and make no mistake about it.... the entire thing smells like $hit.
lucky for us we have the most competent Federal Investigators who have never been guilty of ridiculous conspiracies in the past.
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
That's your problem. All you know is that "it smells like bullshit". You don't care if it actually makes any sense at all or not. You consistently cross the line where your story is far more ridiculous than their story is and you are incapable of seeing it.
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15035183]That's your problem. All you know is that "it smells like bullshit". You don't care if it actually makes any sense at all or not. You consistently cross the line where your story is far more ridiculous than their story is and you are incapable of seeing it.[/QUOTE]
No.... everybody and their mother believes the texts (that are not time stamped) are bull$hit and just a little bit too convenient.
The video of Kirk getting shot clearly shows that bullet entered the back side of his head and exited the neck.... but I'm suppose to believe there was no exit wound on a high powered rifle?
If you've ever gone to a magic show, just because you can't figure out how the magicians pulled it off... do you assume it really was magic? That's your logic.
It smells like bull$hit because it is bull$hit.... You just want to know how all the smoke & mirrors & secret doors are placed, and I'm sorry those answers can't be provided.
Just because you can't explain how it's pulled off doesn't mean you need to believe the ridiculous story the Feds are selling.
Then people try say that Kirk wasn't that important... like really?
If that's the case... were any of the political movements in the 50's and 60's worth the FBI's time to surveil, infiltrate, discredit, and disrupt?
[quote]COINTELPRO (a syllabic abbreviation derived from Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert and illegal[1][2][3] projects conducted between 1956 and 1971 by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting American political organizations that the FBI perceived as subversive.[4][5][6][7]
Groups and individuals targeted by the FBI included feminist organizations,[8][9] the Communist Party USA,[10] anti-Vietnam War organizers, activists in the civil rights and Black power movements (e.g., Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and the Black Panther Party), Student organizations such as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)[11] and Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), environmentalist and animal rights organizations, the American Indian Movement (AIM), Chicano and Mexican-American groups like the Brown Berets and the United Farm Workers, and independence movements (including Puerto Rican independence groups, such as the Young Lords and the Puerto Rican Socialist Party). Although the program primarily focused on organizations that were part of the broader New Left, they also targeted white supremacist groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan[12][13][14] and the National States' Rights Party.[15] [/quote]
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
The people defending the official story obviously haven't done any digging on this. They say there was no exit wound despite the fact that the gun the killer "used" can literally blow your head off. The old guy who everyone thought did it in the beginning happened to be at 9/11 and Boston Marathon bombing, now in jail for child porn so he won't be interviewed. Construction was also done where the shooter was right after the killing, an active crime scene. Yup, nothing to see here guys. :oldlol:
[url]https://uk.news.yahoo.com/installing-monument-construction-crew-seen-082645654.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAALDMdDIbqZ-uHNpFKLgNXRlPtTDGLlhvecX9zQE6rSZd0G6hRTmt34GS_X91F-JFt9gtEclu6l8dr0Lta0mGHPZVhOmeh75h3xxgJi4NDtqnA8_tVf437Hb8Ih2WLHkJ0GqnxedtkX3P9eRRASb5OS9Bm53SggJ6KrLEYjepfWz9[/url]
[video=youtube;JPBGQp6pH5g]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPBGQp6pH5g[/video]
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
Candace Owens talked to an eye witness and they said they saw the shooter with a smaller gun compared to the gun the FBI says is the murder weapon.
The eye witness is the person who recorded the shooter running on the roof.
FBI lying off their asses.
25 min mark
[video=youtube;UBkFkg4UNY8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBkFkg4UNY8[/video]
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15035186]The people defending the official story obviously haven't done any digging on this. They say there was no exit wound despite the fact that the gun the killer "used" can literally blow your head off. The old guy who everyone thought did it in the beginning happened to be at 9/11 and Boston Marathon bombing, now in jail for child porn so he won't be interviewed. Construction was also done where the shooter was right after the killing, an active crime scene. Yup, nothing to see here guys. :oldlol:
[url]https://uk.news.yahoo.com/installing-monument-construction-crew-seen-082645654.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAALDMdDIbqZ-uHNpFKLgNXRlPtTDGLlhvecX9zQE6rSZd0G6hRTmt34GS_X91F-JFt9gtEclu6l8dr0Lta0mGHPZVhOmeh75h3xxgJi4NDtqnA8_tVf437Hb8Ih2WLHkJ0GqnxedtkX3P9eRRASb5OS9Bm53SggJ6KrLEYjepfWz9[/url]
[video=youtube;JPBGQp6pH5g]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPBGQp6pH5g[/video][/QUOTE]
He literally wasn't at 9/11 or the Boston Marathon. He made a bomb threat at the Utah marathon AFTER the Boston marathon.
The problem with getting your info from wacky youtube videos is you end up posting false shit with no evidence and then try to tie that into this story as proof of a grand conspiracy.
The youtube algorithm is lying to you bro. It's time to take a break.
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
Here's a video of Zinn talking about how he was in Denver during 9/11.
[url]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOg0g7AgdBv/?hl=en[/url]
This definitely proves he was "at 9/11" which means this Kirk assassination must be a conspiracy. :lol
And Candace Owen's, the queen of credibility, coming HARD with the facts! :banana:
Re: "They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens
[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;15035189]
The problem with getting your info from wacky youtube videos is you end up posting false shit with no evidence and then try to tie that into this story as proof of a grand conspiracy.
[/QUOTE]
Jesus Christ.... you act as if the FBI has a monopoly on the Truth.
The Truth is whatever the Federal Government says is the truth is basically your stance.
A conspiracy is already dismissed even if your eyes tell you otherwise.
Yes, in the realm of conspiracy there will be a $hit ton of information that isn't true...
but what we're being sold from the people in charge sure as $hit ain't true either.