[QUOTE=RogueBorg;14646758]It's been obvious they can't refute your claims, so they resort to personal attacks. Classic sign that Lebronnies lost.[/QUOTE]
All you do here is nut-lick those who have the same opinions as yours. Bozo.
Printable View
[QUOTE=RogueBorg;14646758]It's been obvious they can't refute your claims, so they resort to personal attacks. Classic sign that Lebronnies lost.[/QUOTE]
All you do here is nut-lick those who have the same opinions as yours. Bozo.
[QUOTE=Axe;14646753]Who do you think played more games in their respective seasons?[/QUOTE]
That's irrelevant when 60 games vs 56 games is a fair sample size. Especially when Jordan started in less games. The point here is winning %. MJ was .500 while Lebron was .446. Even though he was significantly worse.
Can someone explain to me how 09 and 10 LeBron won more games than 80s MJ despite having similar casts?
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14646756]We don't play what ifs. Fact is the Wizards didn't make the playoffs and MJ's Wizards years are largely looked as a stain on his legacy.
Deal with it.
You same guys also ignoring '09 & '10 LeBron won more games than '88 & '89 MJ despite having similar casts, why is that? Why couldn't MJ elevate his teammates back then like LeBron did?[/QUOTE]
ok im gonna ask this again
you think lebron is better than jordan, this is mainly because of his longevity
if jordan and lebron had similar records with lebron having a marginally better supporting cast + jordan literally coming out of retirement in a tougher defensive era, why are the records even remotely close or in the same ballpark as each other?
how does this make sense?
Why did the Bulls still win 55 games without MJ in 94?
[QUOTE=outofstomach;14646757]not even a conversation :lol[/QUOTE]
Oh yes it is, last years failure is a huge stain against Lebron. The history books will remember the 2021-'22 Lakers as a team that had 5 Hall of Famers and 5 players that will be on the NBA's 100th Anniversary Team and failed to make the play-in.
The 2001-2003 Washington Wizards had 1 HOFer and 1 player that will be on the 100th Anniversary Team.
[QUOTE=Axe;14646729]Yet his team still made the playoffs despite him missing more than 60 games that season. :confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]
The Bulls did not want him to play that year. They wanted to lose and get a high pick. MJ forced his way onto the floor and carried a crappy team to the playoffs to the chagrin of the front office
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14646768]Why did the Bulls still win 55 games without MJ in 94?[/QUOTE]
Simple. The team over achieved for a single season.
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14646768]Why did the Bulls still win 55 games without MJ in 94?[/QUOTE]
Only Lebronstans think not winning the championship is a successful season.
Did the '94 Bulls win it all?
[QUOTE=theman93;14646764]That's irrelevant when 60 games vs 56 games is a fair sample size. Especially when Jordan started in less games. The point here is winning %. MJ was .500 while Lebron was .446. Even though he was significantly worse.[/QUOTE]
Yet jordan has never led that team to the postseason at all. At least kong did in the recent seasons with the lakers somehow. :confusedshrug:
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14646766]Can someone explain to me how 09 and 10 LeBron won more games [/QUOTE]
Can you explain how 66-16 Lebron had home court advantage and lost in 6 to Dwight and the Magic?
Answer-He scared of Kobe
[QUOTE=Axe;14646774]Yet jordan has never led that team to the postseason at all. At least kong did in the recent seasons with the lakers somehow. :confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]
Lebron has now missed the playoffs 4x, twice as many as Jordan.
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14646756]We don't play what ifs. Fact is the Wizards didn't make the playoffs and MJ's Wizards years are largely looked as a stain on his legacy.
Deal with it.
You same guys also ignoring '09 & '10 LeBron won more games than '88 & '89 MJ despite having similar casts, why is that? Why couldn't MJ elevate his teammates back then like LeBron did?[/QUOTE]
If you're paying attention the logic extends both ways. They were similar individually, but Lebron was better at elevating his teams to more wins in the regular season. Not in the playoffs though as they both were eliminated in the ECSF and ECF.
The difference you're missing when we compare 09/10 vs 88/89 and 02 vs 22, is that Lebron is supposedly [B][I][U]significantly[/U][/I][/B] better individually at 37 than Jordan was at 38. And Lebron also had the better supporting cast. Yet couldn't lead his team to more wins than washed up Jordan. How is that?
[QUOTE=RogueBorg;14646777]Lebron has now missed the playoffs 4x, twice as many as Jordan.[/QUOTE]
While the bulls made the 94 playoffs without him lmao.
Axe and co on a mission to bring down Jordan :oldlol:
Yet couldnt counter theman's points without ad hominems.