Re: The charlie kirk shooter was not immigrant or trans or minority, just a WHITE
3tard is in shambles because he's probably harboring a tranny terrorist himself.
Proctor is in shambles because it will be socially permissible again for people to call him a f@ggot when he's out in public.
Yes or No in shambles because he was hoping Kirk's murderer would be tied to "the joos". In fact he's probably glued to Ian Carroll's twitter feed as we speak for any morsel or crumb he could spin.
:oldlol: :oldlol: :oldlol:
Re: The charlie kirk shooter was not immigrant or trans or minority, just a WHITE
[QUOTE=Baller234;15033631]3tard is in shambles because he's probably harboring a tranny terrorist himself.
Proctor is in shambles because it will be socially permissible again for people to call him a f@ggot when he's out in public.
Yes or No in shambles because he was hoping Kirk's murderer would be tied to "the joos". In fact he's probably glued to Ian Carroll's twitter feed as we speak for any morsel or crumb he could spin.
:oldlol: :oldlol: :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
You seems very seethed. :oldlol:
Re: The charlie kirk shooter was not immigrant or trans or minority, just a WHITE
[QUOTE=BurningHammer;15033634]You seems very seethed. :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
he never cared about charlie kirk in the least way, he just used a tragedy for his agenda.
Re: The charlie kirk shooter was not immigrant or trans or minority, just a WHITE
[QUOTE=Baller234;15033631][B][SIZE=4]3tard is in shambles because he's probably harboring a tranny terrorist himself.[/SIZE][/B]
Proctor is in shambles because it will be socially permissible again for people to call him a f@ggot when he's out in public.
Yes or No in shambles because he was hoping Kirk's murderer would be tied to "the joos". In fact he's probably glued to Ian Carroll's twitter feed as we speak for any morsel or crumb he could spin.
:oldlol: :oldlol: :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
:roll:
Re: The charlie kirk shooter was not immigrant or trans or minority, just a WHITE
So sorry that whole "trans roommate who turned the shooter into a liberal" didn't turn out the way you were hoping for.
No reputable outlets like BBC, CNN, and Reuters have not confirmed this. A New York Post (Murdoch) report cites a law enforcement source claiming the suspect lived with a transgender partner, but details remain unverified beyond that. Authorities mentioned a cooperating roommate without specifying gender identity or orientation.
This story can get any traction outside of Murdoch and the right-wing media.
Nice try though.
Re: The charlie kirk shooter was not immigrant or trans or minority, just a WHITE
[QUOTE=ZenMaster;15033464]It's very natural to cut people off in longer debates like this when the person you're debating says something you simply don't believe to be real. He was also debating a lot of leftists who didn't want him at the campuses and would nothing better than to just be allowed their rant on his camera without being challenged on it. In the same way, Charlie was also cut off himself all the time. He allowed it both ways, which is why you don't see all of the videos of him debating ending in bickering about being cut off.
It's also clear that a lot of the radicals he debated were used to overwhelm others through verbal aggressiveness, so in terms of creating a movement, it's very good to have someone like Kirk out in campuses to show that these kids aren't the brightest and to make fun of them when they try to end a debate by claiming the other person to be racists/fascist.[/QUOTE]
The reality is that these sociopolitical debates are futile in a truthbringing sense. One's reality isn't the other's. What's true in the world Charlie Kirk lived in doesn't have to be true for someone having a totally different upbringing, peergroup, etc. So nobody will convince the other that what they say is the truth when it comes to points that aren't evidence based, but as said before, sociopolitical.
So in the end these debates are just a showcase for people who want to show strength by winning arguments against people that can't keep up in a debate for a lack of debating experience. Doesn't matter what affiliation the pro debater has, it's just sn agitationtool aimed at people, who watch the debates. People who are already leaning into the debater's direction are fooled into believing that his points have to be universally true, because some gender studies student couldn't keep up and debunk points that might be true or not.
The moment someone who can keep up that person will be mostly personally attacked by the partizan audience. Doesn't matter which side. It will always be some us and them battle and people are willingly falling for that while in the end it only fills the pockets of just a select few.
