Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=branslowski]Dude, your a double-standard f*cking joke....GTFO saying Bruce doesn't use selective stats....Have you ever even seen his post??...He cherry picks every negative thing Kobe has done...Then you come and suck him off by saying..."So what if he only used the negative ones, they are still facts"
But once someone uses "Cherry picking aka SELECTIVE STATS" against Jordan, now you realize that even though they are facts, they are selective ones...
Lets get to the real deal...You don't give a sh!t if it's done to Kobe...If it's done to Kobe, "Well, its still facts"...But if it's done to MJ, then it's hating.
Your probably the same type of guy who gets pissed at Kobe for pushing Gasol's head on the bench, and call Kobe a terrible teamate for that...But once we show you how MJ punched his teamate in the eye and blacked it, you say, "Well, MJ is a competitor, and he's just pushing his teamate, ultimate winner"...
My god you poster are the most hypocritical dumb f*cks...[/QUOTE]
You are the guy who has called FATAL a good poster... Shutup...
As for Kobe I won't defend him as a person that is the truth.. But if I saw someone write something about his game that I didnt' agree with I would back him... I have done it in the past.. As far as Bruce goes I have also blasted him in the past for harping on kobe.. Even after Kobe won the title Bruce harped on him and I wrote a negative post about Bruce.... You can look it up if you want to ....
As for selective , I am sure no one gets close to FATAL and his
[B]IF you don't count games 2,3, and 5 than MJ shot 39 percent..... [/B]
The fact that you can back this faker just shows exactly what kind of poster you are......... [B]At least Bruce never denied being a huge MJ F[/B]AN...
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=Abraham Lincoln]As if the italics were meaningless. I've linked to that site before in the Charles Barkley thread. Alas, without the name "Jordan" or "Bryant" in the title, you probably didn't click on it. You guys try to hard. Best be to promote thou efforts elsewhere.[/QUOTE]
Don't get thy panties in a bunch Abe :violin:
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=NBASTATMAN]
The fact that you can back this faker just shows exactly what kind of poster you are......... [B]At least Bruce never denied being a huge MJ F[/B]AN...[/QUOTE]
Well for one...Me vs You Poster wise, there is no Debate...Me>>>>You.
I also call Loki a good poster (even though he has bias against Kobe, and is a Jordan nut hugger) and you back him all the time...
Look, f*ck it...I should have never jumped in this "Is Fatal a good poster or not" BS....Because you, Juju, and lbjclutch, are on some kind of Elementary Kid sh!t going around telling ppl not to be cool with Fatal..."Because he doesn't suck MJ's dick to our liking"...
Lame.
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=Fatal9]The difference in pace would have little to no effect on Kareem's scoring numbers (half the time he didn't even cross the half court line when Oscar or someone else would push the ball). In a slower pace, you usually have a more structured offense and the superstar as a result ends up getting just as many touches, if not more (current Cavs system is a good example). [B]PER is a flawed and BS statistic[/B]. [B][B]The only time I use it is when comparing Kobe with someone like say Hakeem. [/B][/B]Why? Because everyone knows Hakeem at his peak was more dominant but PER tells us otherwise, and it points out the hypocrisy of the same people who say MJ is unquestionably the best because of PER (who then try to dismiss it as being useless when it works in someone else's favor). PER tells me Wade had the greatest finals performance ever, which is a joke considering it probably wasn't even top 15 by my count. It's a useless statistic that is used by ignorant fans. Also, Kareem's 4-5 blocks in his peak season also don't go towards "PER". Using PER to supposedly end an argument is an excellent way to show you know d!ck all.[/QUOTE]
Fatal comment , I believe this was written after the Game one of the finals.. Kobe was great that night....
[B] Kobe's PER right now is higher than Jordan's in '92, '96, '97 and could pass '98. That's four out of the six championship years.[/B]
Fatal comment after Kobe's PER goes down a bit, still a great performance by kobe bryant in the finals and playoffs.. One of the best so far from a guard....
[B]PER is a flawed and BS statistic[/B]
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
Why didn't you bold this part of my post? Do you read only what you want to read?
[QUOTE=Fatal9][B]The only time I use it is when comparing Kobe with someone like say Hakeem. Why? Because everyone knows Hakeem at his peak was more dominant but PER tells us otherwise, and it points out the hypocrisy of the same people who say MJ is unquestionably the best because of PER (who then try to dismiss it as being useless when it works in someone else's favor).[/B][/QUOTE]
You're really reaching eh. Searching up old threads and everything. Nice to know a stranger named fatal9 is on your mind this fine afternoon :oldlol:
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
I hope that post wasn't toward me statman because I really don't give a sh!t anymore about how much of a meany Fatal9 is...
Anyway, using common sense (which most doesn't have) he's saying he doesn't like PER, but, some MJ fans seem to use it to Kill other player's, so he was basically using their own logic and base to own them...
EX. I hate that stupid win shares stat...Duncan21 uses it to say Gasol>>Kobe...So (even though I hate it) I still use it to show that Ray Allen's Win Share>>>KG's, so is Allen a Greater player than KG? NO.
See right there?, Even though I think it's crap, I still used his own simple-minded base logic against him...
Hey, look, I could be dead wrong on this, maybe he did contridict himself..
IMO, PER isn't crap, but as it's creater said.."It isn't the end all be all on who the better player is"...
Bottom lne to ths whole saga...You, Me, Fatal, Catch, juju, exc.. All know MJ>>>Kobe....The funny thing is, besides Bruce, Fatal is the only one Iv'e seen write out a long essay on why MJ is greater than Kobe..Go figure:ohwell:
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=Fatal9]Why didn't you bold this part of my post? Do you read only what you want to read?
You're really reaching eh. Searching up old threads and everything. Nice to know a stranger named fatal9 is on your mind this fine afternoon :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
OWNED ...... Goodday...................
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=branslowski]I hope that post wasn't toward me statman because I really don't give a sh!t anymore about how much of a meany Fatal9 is...
Anyway, using common sense (which most doesn't have) he's saying he doesn't like PER, but, some MJ fans seem to use it to Kill other player's, so he was basically using their own logic and base to own them...
EX. I hate that stupid win shares stat...Duncan21 uses it to say Gasol>>Kobe...So (even though I hate it) I still use it to show that Ray Allen's Win Share>>>KG's, so is Allen a Greater player than KG? NO.
See right there?, Even though I think it's crap, I still used his own simple-minded base logic against him...
Hey, look, I could be dead wrong on this, maybe he did contridict himself..
IMO, PER isn't crap, but as it's creater said.."It isn't the end all be all on who the better player is"...
Bottom lne to ths whole saga...You, Me, Fatal, Catch, juju, exc.. All know MJ>>>Kobe....The funny thing is, besides Bruce, Fatal is the only one Iv'e seen write out a long essay on why MJ is greater than Kobe..Go figure:ohwell:[/QUOTE]
Not for you.. But it just shows what a fake he is... Then he writes about some other bullcrap because he can't find a way out of the situation.. HE GOT OWNED...
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=NBASTATMAN]OWNED ...... Goodday...................[/QUOTE]
What's with typing "owned" out of the blue?
I showed in the very same post, in what situations I use PER (to point out the hypocrisy of the same fans who use it against a player like Kobe). Then you go on to quote me in an instance where I used it in that exact same type of situation that I mentioned (against MJ fans who use it against Kobe all the time).
I guess I owned myself by pointing out the hypocrisy of Jordan fans when they use PER? Seems like they like to use it when it hurts Kobe but not when it helps him. What's the deal? :confusedshrug:
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=Fatal9]What's with typing "owned" out of the blue?
I showed in the very same post, in what situations I use PER (to point out the hypocrisy of the same fans who use it against a player like Kobe). Then you go on to quote me in an instance where I used it in that exact same type of situation that I mentioned (against MJ fans who use it against Kobe all the time).
I guess I owned myself by pointing out the hypocrisy of Jordan fans when they use PER? :confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]
Wrong you used PER in the past to show how great Kobe was playing in this years' playoffs... Then after his PER fell you write that you only use it to show what a bad stat it is.... :violin:
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=NBASTATMAN]Not for you.. But it just shows what a fake he is... Then he writes about some other bullcrap because he can't find a way out of the situation.. [B]HE GOT OWNED[/B]...[/QUOTE]
Did he truley? Or is it that you don't understand or fully grasp the contex in which he is displaying his post?
Re-read my Post..Fully...Could he be only using the Stat he hates, to throw the logic back in the face of those who abuse it?...Or does the gullable young lad still screams "Contridiction" or "HaHa Owned"??
Let's just be unbias here and try to understand basic text concept.
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=branslowski]Did he truley? Or is it that you don't understand or fully grasp the contex in which he is displaying his post?
Re-read my Post..Fully...Could he be only using the Stat he hates, to throw the logic back in the face of those who abuse it?...Or does the gullable young lad still screams "Contridiction" or "HaHa Owned"??
Let's just be unbias here and try to understand basic text concept.[/QUOTE]
It's funny how you haven't even seen the posts(yes not just that one) in the thread Fatal9 wrote those PER statements yet you are trying to tell Statman he doesn't grasp context.
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=branslowski]Did he truley? Or is it that you don't understand or fully grasp the contex in which he is displaying his post?
Re-read my Post..Fully...Could he be only using the Stat he hates, to throw the logic back in the face of those who abuse it?...Or does the gullable young lad still screams "Contridiction" or "HaHa Owned"??
Let's just be unbias here and try to understand basic text concept.[/QUOTE]
It seems odd to me that he uses PER to back up his case when Kobe is putting up a great PER and then calls it a bs stat after Kobe's PER drops...
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=branslowski]Did he truley? Or is it that you don't understand or fully grasp the contex in which he is displaying his post?
Re-read my Post..Fully...Could he be only using the Stat he hates, to throw the logic back in the face of those who abuse it?...Or does the gullable young lad still screams "Contridiction" or "HaHa Owned"??
Let's just be unbias here and try to understand basic text concept.[/QUOTE]
He doesn't get it dude, lol. I think fatal9 needs to come out of the closet, but he's a decent poster displaying "facts" too - Just like I thought Bruce was prior to the agenda. Funny how these goons concede that Bruce spits "100% facts", of course their not "spinned" like fatal9's. :confusedshrug:
Re: Michael Jordan Anti-clutch Log
[QUOTE=Cyclone112]It's funny how you haven't even seen the posts(yes not just that one) in the thread Fatal9 wrote those PER statements yet you are trying to tell Statman he doesn't grasp context.[/QUOTE]
Your right..I haven't seen that whole thread...But Statman only showed me that one Paragraph..So gauging off of the post he has shown me, aswell as the post he is upset over, I had to shed light on the real deal concept..
If I show you a pic of a Women's Chest, and they were big..And then said, "Look at those chest, they are small"...You would only comment on what you were shown, and then continue to call me an idiot for saying they were small...But then, out of left field, someone say's to you..."How can you get pissed at Brans? The chick had a ugly face, and fat legs, you don't even know her body, so why are you getting pissed at him?".....Then, you would sit back and say..."Well, I was only shown this, and made my opinion off of it"
Now, I really hope you understood that....If you did, no need for you to get upset and try to attack me...But you should grasp it, and as a man say.."Oh ok, I see what your saying bro"...