Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
DeRozan and many other players that aren't even as good as DeRozan would be 1st option over Pippen, which confirms that Pippen isn't top 75 - Pippen's stats and performance confirm that he's an Iggy-level player that was inflated to top 30 by the winning spotlight, while also reaching his ceiling alongside the most fundamentally-sound scorer of all-time - a guy that could get scoring champ amounts within a championship brand (unprecedented) that didn't allow ball-dominance/live dribbles, with the lowest turnover rate of anyone that matters.
Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=3ba11;14539499]DeRozan and many other players that aren't even as good as DeRozan would be 1st option over Pippen, which confirms that Pippen isn't top 75 - Pippen's stats and performance confirm that he's an Iggy-level player that was inflated to top 30 by the winning spotlight, while also reaching his ceiling alongside the most fundamentally-sound scorer of all-time - a guy that could get scoring champ amounts within a championship brand (unprecedented) that didn't allow ball-dominance/live dribbles, with the lowest turnover rate of anyone that matters.[/QUOTE]
For you to be so enamored with stats. You surely should feel Lebron is the GOAT. You can't make a stats argument for Jordan over James.
Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=97 bulls;14539516]For you to be so enamored with stats. You surely should feel Lebron is the GOAT. You can't make a stats argument for Jordan over James.[/QUOTE]
Yes, you absolutely can.
Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=RogueBorg;14539518]Yes, you absolutely can.[/QUOTE]
Please do
Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=97 bulls;14539516]For you to be so enamored with stats. You surely should feel Lebron is the GOAT. You can't make a stats argument for Jordan over James.[/QUOTE]
Jordan has the goat production rate - PPG, PER, BPM, WS/48, VORP, usage
And the goat plus/minus and latest [url=https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-07-2021/IPef8B.gif]Raptor[/url]
Every new stat that gets invented shows MJ as goat
Jordan also averaged 6 more points per 100 possessions than anyone in playoff history with better efficiency on those possessions (ortg) than anyone that matters.
Everyone in history needed teammates to match or exceed their scoring for entire playoff runs, while MJ led every SERIES by at least 10 ppg (edit: there were 2 series where MJ averaged 4 and 8 more than sidekick).. [I]This matters[/I] because equal-scoring partners attract equal defensive attention, so everyone had periods without facing maximum defensive attention - any period without facing maximum defensive attention is inflated stats compared to Jordan, who always defeated maximum defensive attention (always carried scoring load)
Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=3ba11;14539521]Jordan has the goat production rate - PPG, PER, BPM, WS/48, VORP, usage
And the goat plus/minus and latest [url=https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-07-2021/IPef8B.gif]Raptor[/url]
Every new stat that gets invented shows MJ as goat
Jordan also averaged 6 more points per 100 possessions than anyone in playoff history with better efficiency on those possessions (ortg) than anyone that matters.
Everyone in history needed teammates to match or exceed their scoring for entire playoff runs, while MJ led every SERIES by at least 10 ppg (edit: there were 2 series where MJ averaged 4 and 8 more than sidekick).. Equal-scoring partners attract equal defensive attention, so everyone had periods without facing maximum defensive attention - any period without facing maximum defensive attention is inflated stats compared to Jordan, who always defeated maximum defensive attention (always carried scoring load)[/QUOTE]
All you did was cherrypick the stats Jordan leads in. Lol. Don't do that. Take everything in to consideration. Be it advanced, per game averages, and totals.
Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=97 bulls;14539524]All you did was cherrypick the stats Jordan leads in. Lol. Don't do that. Take everything in to consideration. Be it advanced, per game averages, and totals.[/QUOTE]
Jordan leads all the advanced stats, plus/minus or per game, as my previous post showed
Lebron only has longevity (playing at a lower level for longer)
And again - everyone in history needed teammates to match or exceed their scoring for entire playoff runs, while MJ led every SERIES by at least 10 ppg.. [U]This matters[/U] because equal-scoring partners attract equal defensive attention, so everyone had periods without facing maximum defensive attention - any period without facing maximum defensive attention is [i]inflated stats compared to Jordan[/i], who always defeated maximum defensive attention (always carried scoring load)
Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=3ba11;14539525]Jordan leads all the advanced stats, plus/minus or per game, as my previous post showed
Lebron only has longevity (playing at a lower level for longer)
And again - everyone in history needed teammates to match or exceed their scoring for entire playoff runs, while MJ led every SERIES by at least 10 ppg.. [U]This matters[/U] because equal-scoring partners attract equal defensive attention, so everyone had periods without facing maximum defensive attention - any period without facing maximum defensive attention is [U]inflated stats compared to Jordan[/U], who always defeated maximum defensive attention (always carried scoring load)[/QUOTE]
So all you did, was reiterate your cherrypicked stats bro.
Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=JohnMax;14538629][url]https://twitter.com/statmuse/status/1493424878837374976[/url]
DeMar DeRozan last 6 games:
40 PTS | 67 FG%
38 PTS | 50 FG%
35 PTS | 64 FG%
36 PTS | 68 FG%
38 PTS | 59 FG%
45 PTS | 60 FG%
That’s the longest streak of 35-point games on 50% shooting in Bulls history. MJ never did it.[/QUOTE]
:lol
DeMar DeJordan
Re: Put DeMar DeRozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=97 bulls;14539490]heeeeeeesssss bbbbaaaaaaaccckkk!!!!!!![/QUOTE]
:roll:
Re: Put DeMar DeRozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[url=https://ibb.co/bPkpRyh][img]https://i.ibb.co/f2smGKR/5-D2-F4740-3044-431-C-AA57-5-D3-B530-EE02-E.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=https://imgbb.com/][img]https://i.ibb.co/LkBM9WG/5-D8-D9665-AECD-4-EE6-9434-AC08-E64-CA177.gif[/img][/url]
Re: Put DeMar DeRozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
Putting a modern professional athlete into the stone ages that was the NBA in 1994 would have a gargantuan impact on the timeline. He'd be on the $20 bill, the city would be renamed to Demarville and a 2000 ft. replica of the Colossus of Rhodes with his face would tower over the Chicago harbor. Instead of Obama, Demar would have been the senator out of Chicago and indeed the first black president. Consequently, no drone strikes and his insightful policies would convince the aliens to make peaceful contact 7 centuries earlier than planned. Humanity would be ready to take the next step into the great beyond with Lord Demar at the helm.
Re: Put DeMar DeRozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=FKAri;14579426]Putting a modern professional athlete into the stone ages that was the NBA in 1994 would have a gargantuan impact on the timeline. He'd be on the $20 bill, the city would be renamed to Demarville and a 2000 ft. replica of the Colossus of Rhodes with his face would tower over the Chicago harbor. Instead of Obama, Demar would have been the senator out of Chicago and indeed the first black president. Consequently, no drone strikes and his insightful policies would convince the aliens to make peaceful contact 7 centuries earlier than planned. Humanity would be ready to take the next step into the great beyond with Lord Demar at the helm.[/QUOTE]
We have slow white Europeans now win league mvp and never won gold medal either for country.
Re: Put DeMar DeRozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=kawhileonard2;14579431]We have slow white Europeans now win league mvp and never won gold medal either for country.[/QUOTE]
You mean Jokic? Hey isn't that the guy that uppercutted Kawhy on the chin with his dicc and put him on the IL?
Re: Put Demar Derozan with the 1993-94 Chicago Bulls?
[QUOTE=97 bulls;14539528]So all you did, was reiterate your cherrypicked stats bro.[/QUOTE]
It would be nice if you actually provided proper rebuttals to his arguments.