Ja Morant on video flashing another gun

[QUOTE=Kblaze8855;14778187]The argument is being fabricated on the fly to have something to fight about. I never said only one race uses the language. I said the language is generally reserved for a certain kind of person more than others. And obviously it is.[/QUOTE]

"Rednecks" as you put it do not typically post body language aggressive looking photos trying to portray themselves as something that they are not. White kids that do are thugs. Or want to be thugs. Rednecks might post pictures with guns with a stupid looking grin on their face and the picture of a dead animal.

Here is the definition of thug.

[QUOTE]thug: a violent, aggressive person, especially one who is a criminal.
"he was attacked by a gang of thugs"[/QUOTE]

If you find that one skin color of people are more often referred to as thugs, it may just be because a there is a larger percentage of that particular group that are thugs than the percentage of others groups of people that are thugs. But that's not a subject anyone here is willing to have an honest conversation about because it always boils down to people screaming about racism and pretending that evolution isn't a real thing and that all people of all groups act the exact same and have the same talents and abilities.

The implication behind all of your posting is "racism!" rather than just acknowledging all of this for what it is, a young immature kid trying to act tough. Now continue pretending to be offended.

[QUOTE=KNOW1EDGE;14777061]I love how the typical halfwits are trying to turn Morant into a victim of racism. Lol -I find genuine amusement in many of these comments :cheers:

The whole “Jokic listening to slip knot with a gun” comment was meant to be serious!! LOL -that was meant to prove morant is the victim of racism. Lol[/QUOTE]

maybe he is

i don't find it unreasonable to think so

[QUOTE=Wardell Curry;14778246]"Rednecks" as you put it do not typically post body language aggressive looking photos trying to portray themselves as something that they are not. White kids that do are thugs. Or want to be thugs. Rednecks might post pictures with guns with a stupid looking grin on their face and the picture of a dead animal.

Here is the definition of thug.



If you find that one skin color of people are more often referred to as thugs, it may just be because a there is a larger percentage of that particular group that are thugs than the percentage of others groups of people that are thugs. But that's not a subject anyone here is willing to have an honest conversation about because it always boils down to people screaming about racism and pretending that evolution isn't a real thing and that all people of all groups act the exact same and have the same talents and abilities.

The implication behind all of your posting is "racism!" rather than just acknowledging all of this for what it is, a young immature kid trying to act tough. Now continue pretending to be offended.[/QUOTE]

Ether.


Inb4 "see u guys are doing exactly what I said" :lol


Never seen a guy miss the point and continue to argue as if he's always right like kblaze. Dude is wrong about mostly everything but he has a massive ego so he always tries to straw man his way out no matter what. :lol

[QUOTE=Wardell Curry;14778246]"Rednecks" as you put it do not typically post body language aggressive looking photos trying to portray themselves as something that they are not. White kids that do are thugs. Or want to be thugs. Rednecks might post pictures with guns with a stupid looking grin on their face and the picture of a dead animal.

Here is the definition of thug.



If you find that one skin color of people are more often referred to as thugs, it may just be because a there is a larger percentage of that particular group that are thugs than the percentage of others groups of people that are thugs. But that's not a subject anyone here is willing to have an honest conversation about because it always boils down to people screaming about racism and pretending that evolution isn't a real thing and that all people of all groups act the exact same and have the same talents and abilities.

The implication behind all of your posting is "racism!" rather than just acknowledging all of this for what it is, a young immature kid trying to act tough. Now continue pretending to be offended.[/QUOTE]
[I]
[B]If you find that one skin color of people are more often referred to as thugs, it may just be because a there is a larger percentage of that particular group that are thugs than the percentage of others groups of people that are thugs.[/I][/B]

Those who control media, statistical data, and the educational system control the narrative. Why are white people who stole land, raped women of color with impunity and killed with impunity considered THUGS? In the 1500s race referred to kinship family history, it had nothing to do with skin color. You want to have honest dialog we can do that but I really don't think you want to go there. This country was built on racism and exploitation and through mapping of the genome DNA it has been proven skin color is as important as eye color outside of the benefits of melonin. There is only a 1% difference between all racial groups. Everyone on earth right now can be traced backed genetically to black people in africa.

[QUOTE=insight;14778305]There is only a 1% difference between all racial groups. Everyone on earth right now can be traced backed genetically to black people in africa.[/QUOTE]


Everyone is the exact same. Race, country, genetics, they're all the same as everyone else. Genetic differences aren't a real thing. We're all the same. Alllll the same. Men from the Netherlands aren't taller than everywhere else on average, for example. That's just a weird coincidence.

[QUOTE=insight;14778305][I]
[B]There is only a 1% difference between all racial groups. Everyone on earth right now can be traced backed genetically to black people in africa.[/QUOTE]

There is only a 3% difference between chimps and humans. And when you say "black people" , humans evolved at the tip of North Africa where "middle eastern, Arab" people reside now. Not from Sub Saharan Africa, where black people reside now

[QUOTE=Kblaze8855;14778187]Who said only white people use the word thug? Someone who never heard of Tupac, young thug, bone thugs, and so on I assume. Nobody here.

I said it’s used to describe black people behaving like this and not generally white people. And people are currently….doing exactly that.

The shit people make up to have something to argue with….

I doubt there’s anyone on this earth who ever said black people don’t themselves use the word “thug”. Nobody has ever said it but I need to come explain to you why one said it…

People are doing exactly what I said they do. Calling Ja Morant a thug. And if he were a young white guy listening to young white guy music with a gun….they’d call him something else. Likely a redneck. People doing it…is not proving im wrong to say they do it. I would be wrong if I said nobody black did it as well. You show me where I…or any human…said black people don’t…another story.

The argument is being fabricated on the fly to have something to fight about. I never said only one race uses the language. I said the language is generally reserved for a certain kind of person more than others. And obviously it is.[/QUOTE]

Ive said for years Thug is now a code word for stuff that would get faces caved in, in less civil times. Can't say certain words freely without backlash in the 20's so they use safe ones. And that said, Ja is THE furthest thing from a thug the black community could offer. Honestly most people that use that label have no clue what that class of person is capable of.....


****but yeah, he's an idiot, no doubt.

[QUOTE=The Hick;14778312]There is only a 3% difference between chimps and humans. And when you say "black people" , humans evolved at the tip of North Africa where "middle eastern, Arab" people reside now. Not from Sub Saharan Africa, where black people reside now[/QUOTE]

The oldest human fossil record was found in Ethopia which is south of Egypt. There is also evidence that the oldest pryramids are in southern africa which was not as kemit. Over time they migrated from the south to north.
There is an unexplained evolutionary gap between apes and homo sapien. Some theorize modern humans were genectically manipulated because the fossil record is incomplete. Plus there is no explaination why modern man lost his hair and genetic attributes which would be useful today.

[QUOTE=Wardell Curry;14778308]Everyone is the exact same. Race, country, genetics, they're all the same as everyone else. Genetic differences aren't a real thing. We're all the same. Alllll the same. Men from the Netherlands aren't taller than everywhere else on average, for example. That's just a weird coincidence.[/QUOTE]

[url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604262/[/url]

Social scientists have long understood race to be a social category invented to justify slavery and evolutionary biologists know the socially constructed racial categories do not align with our biological understanding of genetic variation. The completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 confirmed humans are 99.9% identical at the DNA level and there is no genetic basis for race

This thread is unbelievable. :facepalm

[QUOTE=SATAN;14778403]This thread is unbelievable. :facepalm[/QUOTE]

that's pretty funny

it is kind of all over the place

[QUOTE=insight;14778377]The oldest human fossil record was found in Ethopia which is south of Egypt. .[/QUOTE]

No. The oldest homo sapien fossils are found in Morocco at the tip of Africa. They predate homo sapien fossils in Ethiopia by 75,000-100000 years. The homo sapien fossils in Mt. Carmel Israel are almost as old as the Ethiopian fossils.

[QUOTE=The Hick;14778599]No. The oldest homo sapien fossils are found in Morocco at the tip of Africa. They predate homo sapien fossils in Ethiopia by 75,000-100000 years. The homo sapien fossils in Mt. Carmel Israel are almost as old as the Ethiopian fossils.[/QUOTE]

The fossils in Morocco have not been genetically traced back to every living person on the planet like Lucy in Africa. As the Piltdown Man Hoax proved making grand conclusion with complete testing is not good science. More testing is required to see how these fossils fit into the historical recorded we still have not found the so called bridge species between ape and man if it exist at all.

[QUOTE=insight;14778622]The fossils in Morocco have not been genetically traced back to every living person on the planet like Lucy in Africa. As the Piltdown Man Hoax proved making grand conclusion with complete testing is not good science. More testing is required to see how these fossils fit into the historical recorded we still have not found the so called bridge species between ape and man if it exist at all.[/QUOTE]

What does Lucy have to do with this? She wasn't human or even in the homo genus. You might as well say we all come from Asia since that's where all primates evolved from. And who mentioned anything about the Piltdown Man?

Mordant is just expressing his second amendment right.

Gun control is racist.


Real NRA peeps need to have JA’s back.