Printable View
[QUOTE=Hey Yo;14928498]Seething so hard he can't make up his mind if it was fake or not.[/QUOTE]
Fake or not. Your boy got touched on national TV. lol.
And according to yall it wasn’t even trained snipers, ISIS, the deep state, or Russian spy’s.
It was a kid radicalized by CNN.
Lmao!!!!!!
[QUOTE=ILLsmak;14928488]also re: registered republican. He could have done that so he could troll vote in the primaries. He did vote in 22, it says.
-Smak[/QUOTE]
Yeah and he donated to the democratic party.
Most shooters like this are just mentally ill and don't have any coherent ideologies.
Being a registered republican doesn't mean much especially as a 20 year old mentally ill kid.
He hated Trump - that's about all we can infer so far. So it's perfectly reasonable to question the irresponsible fear mongering and constant comparisons to Hitler as possibly shaping his actions.
[QUOTE=tpols;14928493]I'm a Trump guy but I wouldn't be surprised if this was all planned. No way secret service could be that incompetent. It's likely an inside stunt to gain notoriety and ultimately votes.[/QUOTE]
You'd rather believe they staged an assisination and got someone's head shot off in the crowd, then believe there was a lapse in security? As if lapses in security aren't prevalent through human history?
I know you have a really low IQ so occams razor probably doesn't even make sense to you.
[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;14928503]You'd rather believe they staged an assisination and got someone's head shot off in the crowd, then believe there was a lapse in security? As if lapses in security aren't prevalent through human history?
I know you have a really low IQ so occams razor probably doesn't even make sense to you.[/QUOTE]
Major lapses in security like this are tell tale signs that a person isn’t competent enough to lead this great nation.
I mean we literally have a candidate who’s running on the idea he can “secure” the border and protect us from foreign invaders, but he can’t even secure his own rally and protect himself.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14928505]Major lapses in security like this are tell tale signs that a person isn’t competent enough to lead this great nation.
I mean we literally have a candidate who’s running on the idea he can “secure” the border and protect us from foreign invaders, but he can’t even secure his own rally and protect himself.[/QUOTE]
Trump is not in charge of his security detail. It’s assigned to him. They asked for more agents and those requests were denied. They wouldn’t give RKJ a security detail. It’s a conspiracy alright. A conspiracy by Democrats to kill Trump.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14928505]Major lapses in security like this are tell tale signs that a person isn’t competent enough to lead this great nation.
I mean we literally have a candidate who’s running on the idea he can “secure” the border and protect us from foreign invaders, but he can’t even secure his own rally and protect himself.[/QUOTE]
May as well blame trump for why your amazon package wasn't delivered while you're at it. It's not remotely his job to secure the rally. You are mentally ill and deranged.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14928505]Major lapses in security like this are tell tale signs that a person isn’t competent enough to lead this great nation.
I mean we literally have a candidate who’s running on the idea he can “secure” the border and protect us from foreign invaders, but he can’t even secure his own rally and protect himself.[/QUOTE]
Since when do presidential candidates get to decide how much protection is provided by Secret Service at speaking events?
So all of you are gonna act like big bad shot caller Trump has no say over his security?
Lmao.
Being a private and public security expert should be a prerequisite for even wanting to run for President.
Leading by example is the right wing libertarian way. And Trump wants to act like some example of security. But what was he yesterday? An example of security lapses and getting touched.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14928509]So all of you are gonna act like big bad shot caller Trump has no say over his security?
Lmao.
Being a private and public security expert should be a prerequisite for even wanting to run for President.
Leading by example is the right wing libertarian way. And Trump wants to act like some example of security. But what was he yesterday? An example of security lapses and getting touched.[/QUOTE]
You're just making a braindead false equivalency because you lack basic intelligence. "Trump got shot at a rally therefore can't handle the border or foreign affairs" is a logical leap only the most primitive mind could actually make. You have literally smoked yourself retarded. :lol
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14928505]Major lapses in security like this are tell tale signs that a person isn’t competent enough to lead this great nation.
I mean we literally have a candidate who’s running on the idea he can “secure” the border and protect us from foreign invaders, but he can’t even secure his own rally and protect himself.[/QUOTE]
Do you think trump tells and directs his secret service to secure the place?
[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;14928513]You're just making a braindead false equivalency because you lack basic intelligence. "Trump got shot at a rally therefore can't handle the border or foreign affairs" is a logical leap only the most primitive mind could actually make. You have literally smoked yourself retarded. :lol[/QUOTE]
When hiring a security firm I’m going with the one who didn’t leave the most obvious rooftop snipers vantage point open for access.
Lmao.
Call me an old school free market dude but I’m voting with my dollars, and my dollars aren’t going towards a security company who can’t secure. Sorry.
This is a moronic argument, Lincoln got shot watching a fvcking play, that had literally no bearing on how he performed as president or how he did leading the country through a civil war.
I’m sorry for wanting a president competent enough to stay alive.
I mean this could obviously happen again.
If dude can’t even display basic individual survival skills by securing his own rally then what’s he going to do as president?
Shooting suspect was rejected from high school rifle club
The man suspected of shooting Donald Trump previously sought to join his high school’s rifle club, but was rejected and asked not to return, two students who were members of the team at the time told ABC News.
The suspect, Thomas Crooks, attended what was described as "preseason" for the rifle club, which is held before tryouts, but he did not make it to the tryouts, the two team members said. Both students said Crooks was a "bad shot," with one adding that he wasn't the right "fit."
"He didn't just not make the team -- he was asked not to come back because how bad of a shot he was. It was considered like, dangerous," classmate Jameson Myers told ABC News.
"On the first day of preseason, he basically couldn't even hit the target," Myers said.
The team’s coach declined to comment and referred questions to the school district. A spokesman for the school district did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
-ABC News' Olivia Rubin
^^ Hmm
-Smak
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14928509]So all of you are gonna act like big bad shot caller Trump has no say over his security?
Lmao.
Being a private and public security expert should be a prerequisite for even wanting to run for President.
Leading by example is the right wing libertarian way. And Trump wants to act like some example of security. But what was he yesterday? An example of security lapses and getting touched.[/QUOTE]
Stop talking.