[QUOTE=hawksdogsbraves]I think Brooks is and will be the best of the three.[/QUOTE]
This.
Printable View
[QUOTE=hawksdogsbraves]I think Brooks is and will be the best of the three.[/QUOTE]
This.
[QUOTE=bagelred]Another question is:
Would you rather have Brooks, Cole, and Shumpert?
Or Irving, Knight, and Walker?
Scouts. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
Just shut up.
Even those first 3 names have better moment now, you seriously think those guy better than Kemba? :roll:
And Irving has perform better anyway.
Shumpert
[QUOTE=bagelred]Another question is:
Would you rather have Brooks, Cole, and Shumpert?
Or Irving, Knight, and Walker?
Scouts. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
I agree with Knight & Walker but Irving will be good.
Irving
Brooks
Shumpert
Walker
Cole
Knight
[QUOTE=DRose1899]
Even those first 3 names have better moment now, you seriously think those guy better than Kemba? :roll:
[/QUOTE]
:roll:
maybe :confusedshrug:
they're all looking pretty good. honestly, i think brooks and cole have significantly better feel for the game than shumpert, but shumpert has real nice size and athleticism for his position and can bring it with the defense which almost makes up for that.
shumpert (16pts/6reb/4ast/3stls) outplayed kemba (10pnts/0reb/3ast/1stl) today
[IMG]http://pokerworks.com/w/articles/img/pwe1/4c89262eb.jpg[/IMG]
Marshon Brooks ^?
NO Marshon is cuter
Brooks may be the best scorer out of those 3 but Shumpert is without a doubt the most complete player.
He can play 2 positions,and I think he can even guard small forwards without much problems.
He's an amazing defender,very athletic,solid passer and can score the ball pretty well.
Maybe not as good as Brooks but he's way more complete player than him.
He's still young and he can become a great player if he continues to improve his offensive game and vision.
In order:
Shumpert
Brooks
Cole
[QUOTE=bagelred]Another question is:
Would you rather have Brooks, Cole, and Shumpert?
Or Irving, Knight, and Walker?
Scouts. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
I don't know would I rather have them than Irving but for sure I would rather have them than Knight and Walker. I'm not impressed by those two.
They're all very good, to be honest.
But I'm a Knicks fan and Iman Shumpert is the greatest player since Ewing so everyone else can fall and stub their toes.
I think Brooks is better than Cole.
And Kyrie has looked very good and will be great. Plus, I believe in Kemba so go Kemba. Knight will be good but nothing about him was ever particularly impressive.
[QUOTE=bagelred]Another question is:
Would you rather have Brooks, Cole, and Shumpert?
Or Irving, Knight, and Walker?
Scouts. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
Kyrie Irving - 15.0 ppg (44%), 5 apg, 4 rpg
Shumpert - 12.5 ppg (40%), 3 apg, 3 rpg
Brooks - 13.9 ppg (45%), 0.6 apg, 3 rpg
Cole - 10.9 ppg (45%), 4 apg, 2 rpg
You. :facepalm
[QUOTE=Clutch]Brooks may be the best scorer out of those 3 but Shumpert is without a doubt the most complete player.
He can play 2 positions,and I think he can even guard small forwards without much problems.
He's an amazing defender,very athletic,solid passer and can score the ball pretty well.
Maybe not as good as Brooks but he's way more complete player than him.
He's still young and he can become a great player if he continues to improve his offensive game and vision.
[/QUOTE]
Brooks is a very complete player too.. his defense is excellent. Quick feet, good anticipation, doesn't bite, huge wingspan. He goes down and boards with the bigs[had 10 today].. and on top of that he's got a great feel for both scoring and creating plays for others, extremely crafty at getting defenders to bite/jump out of position. On top of that he just has a knack for putting the ball in the hoop.
[QUOTE=RedBlackAttack]Kyrie Irving - 15.0 ppg (44%), 5 apg, 4 rpg
Shumpert - 12.5 ppg (40%), 3 apg, 3 rpg
Brooks - 13.9 ppg (45%), 0.6 apg, 3 rpg
Cole - 10.9 ppg (45%), 4 apg, 2 rpg
You. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
Minutes per game?
[QUOTE=tpols]Minutes per game?[/QUOTE]
Irving - 26
Shumpert - 29
Brooks - 23
Cole - 23