Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
[QUOTE=Rake2204]I can't find any solid information on White's standing reach. In a thread a few years ago, someone claimed it was 8'9'' (post #17): [url]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=71708&page=2[/url]
Here's another White clip. I find you can gain more from looking at the space between his feet and the ground rather than looking at his head in accordance to the rim. It's that dreaded low angle, the one I see a guy around here post pictures of LeBron James from, so nearly every jump looks rim level just because of the angle. Another more accurate way to gauge things is how horizontal his arm is at the time of his finish: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb7yehtLJHE&feature=player_embedded#[/url]![/QUOTE]
Wow... :bowdown:
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
Having the highest listed vertical jump in NBA History can give the chance to still dunk even at the age of 47.
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk-t2HnXfy4[/url]
:bowdown: :bowdown:
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
[QUOTE=Rake2204]I can't find any solid information on White's standing reach. In a thread a few years ago, someone claimed it was 8'9'' (post #17): [url]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=71708&page=2[/url]
[B]Here's another White clip. I find you can gain more from looking at the space between his feet and the ground rather than looking at his head in accordance to the rim. It's that dreaded low angle, the one I see a guy around here post pictures of LeBron James from, so nearly every jump looks rim level just because of the angle.[/B] Another more accurate way to gauge things is how horizontal his arm is at the time of his finish: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb7yehtLJHE&feature=player_embedded#[/url]![/QUOTE]
First this, second, you can't judge from the backboard either, it's smaller than the normal NBA ones.
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
Elliot Williams - Portland
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
[QUOTE=PTB Fan]Having the highest listed vertical jump in NBA History can give the chance to still dunk even at the age of 47.
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk-t2HnXfy4[/url]
:bowdown: :bowdown:[/QUOTE]
you know that's fake right?
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
I was reading an old SI article by Rick Telander from Webb's college days. Here's his take on Webb's vertical: [quote]Still, it comes down to that launching power. Forty dunks? Goaltending? Good gosh! To find out what Webb could really do, I took it upon myself to measure his vertical leap. I tested him after Midland finished a long scrimmage with Sul Ross State at Midland's Chaparral Center arena in late October. Spud was exhausted and the gym floor is very hard, but he jumped 41 inches straight up and 48 inches after taking a short run. There is every reason to believe that when the adrenaline is flowing and Webb is rested, he can go even higher.[/quote] [url]http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1126173/3/index.htm[/url]
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
Wilt Chamberlain - 50 inches. Straight from the horses mouth.
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
Darrell Griffith was supposed to be 48 or 50.
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
David Thompson deserves a mention
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
whenever a dude has a 40" vert, it always gets exaggerated like it's 45" or 46".
it's almost as bad as 6'9" dudes claiming to be 7-footers.
Re: Spud Webb - highest vertical in league history?
[QUOTE=DCL]whenever a dude has a 40" vert, it always gets exaggerated like it's 45" or 46".
it's almost as bad as 6'9" dudes claiming to be 7-footers.[/QUOTE]I've found this to often be true. I always feel like it has to do with the lack of clarity as to whether someone's referring to a true vertical, one step vertical, or maximum vert (via running start). That aside, I think some people like boosting numbers in a mythical fashion regardless.
For instance, I'm familiar with that famous Darrell Griffith photo (the one below):
[img]http://madeira.hccanet.org/project2_2012/westendorf_p2/griffith-2841624343_a40eb5e12c_display_image.jpg[/img]
Maybe we can talk angles or this or that but as high as he looks, can we really safely say that's four feet off the ground? A 50'' vertical on the 6'4'' Griffith would mean he would have been able to bite the rim, and I just haven't seen any clips to suggest he were ever close, even in his prime: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bAkaSw_sYY[/url]
That doesn't mean he couldn't jump. Griffith could fly. I just tend to agree that great leapers often reap the benefit of unrealistic boosts to their jumping numbers.