More strange coincidences from Sandy Hook

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Stop being so dense.

It is no secret the purpose of the CIA is to pull staged events in foreign countries to carry out an agenda.

What makes you think they can't do the same on our soil to push an agenda ..

That's their job; they destroy foreign countries through covert means. The government obviously has an agenda (aka motive), it is a fact the CIA does this kind of stuff overseas, so why is it so hard to believe they can't do it on american soil .. it is covert; nobody knows about it; they can get away with it; so why is it not plausible they will pull a stunt like this over here.

Stop being so dense.[/QUOTE]

Because when the CIA do it overseas they don't ring up the local film studios to put stupid references to their atrocities in their films.

[QUOTE=miller-time]Because when the CIA do it overseas they don't ring up the local film studios to put stupid references to their atrocities in their films.[/QUOTE]

You are f*ckin dense if you don't believe there are coded references in popular movies. The facts are there: there are numerous cryptic references to 9/11 in major movies way before it happened.

But you are dense and is prob incapable of digging a bit deeper in the critical aspect of your brain.

Leave this f*ckin thread alone. Can't us conspiracy nuts have our fun without you **** f*cks raining on the parade. A*shole.

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Leave this f*ckin thread alone. Can't us conspiracy nuts have our fun without you **** f*cks raining on the parade. A*shole.[/QUOTE]

No because there a people that will read your trash and believe it too. Either you defend your premise or you can f[COLOR="Black"]u[/COLOR]ck off.

[QUOTE=miller-time]Yes it is almost like they used names of real towns for names of fake ones. Could you imagine if there was a shooting in a town called Springfield!? The Simpsons predicted it![/QUOTE]

yah, but aurora and sandy hook both being used in the movie?

two pretty random cities and both have mass killings in them and one was during a showing of the movie?


it could be a coincidence, but that is one hell of a coincidence.


lets not compare this to seeing a movie where someone gets shot in new york and then people actually get shot in new york... not really close to the same level of coincidence

[QUOTE=miller-time]No because there a people that will read your trash and believe it too. Either you defend your premise or you can f[COLOR="Black"]u[/COLOR]ck off.[/QUOTE]

F*ck you Aussie boy.

We're just having fun here exercising a bit of critical thinking. Why do you have to be so serious Aussie boy .. stop raining on the parade. Did Obama elect you as "**** President Loser of the the anti-conspiracy club." What is wrong with a bit of denial and asking questions .. stop being such a close minded queeeer.

Creepy.

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]F*ck you Aussie boy.

We're just having fun here exercising a bit of critical thinking. Why do you have to be so serious Aussie boy .. stop raining on the parade. Did Obama elect you as "**** President Loser of the the anti-conspiracy club." What is wrong with a bit of denial and asking questions .. stop being such a close minded queeeer.[/QUOTE]

Critical thinking? More like no thinking at all.

[QUOTE=Lebowsky]Critical thinking? More like no thinking at all.[/QUOTE]

It's kinda funny that THIS is considered "critical thinking", but those of us who have [I]actually thought about it[/I] and (rightly) dismiss it outright are "mindless" "sheep" or whatever descriptor you want to use.

You either believe the conspiracy or are a sucker for it.

Where's my tinfoil?

[QUOTE=RaininThrees]It's kinda funny that THIS is considered "critical thinking", but those of us who have [I]actually thought about it[/I] and (rightly) dismiss it outright are "mindless" "sheep" or whatever descriptor you want to use.

You either believe the conspiracy or are a sucker for it.

Where's my tinfoil?[/QUOTE]

Whatever dumbsh*t. If you can't exercise a bit of denial and critical thinking skills, then you are just stupid wearing that tinfoil hat. Let's see the discrepancies coming out of the media:

Mother being a teacher and he shot her and students at the school.
Principle let him in the school because she knew him. Shooter shot his way in.
He shot children with a rifle but the rifle is found in car.
He shot children with hand guns but medical examiner says they were shot with rifle.
Brother was with the shooter. Brother was not with the shooter.
Brother was the shooter. Shooter had brothers ID
Mother is a gun toting lady.
Mother and son go and shoot gun a practice range often. ATF say no evidence of shooting range practice.
Mother was a teacher, mother was a substitute teacher, mother was a teacher

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]If you can't exercise a bit of denial and critical thinking skills, then you are just stupid wearing that tinfoil hat. Let's see the discrepancies coming out of the media[/QUOTE]

The discrepancies happen because the media are competing with each other to put the story out first. It is a lack of investigative journalism, and too much headline grabbing.

[QUOTE=miller-time]The discrepancies happen because the media are competing with each other to put the story out first. It is a lack of investigative journalism, and too much headline grabbing.[/QUOTE]

Again, your lack of knowledge is simply astounding. You don't know anything about reporting: reporters can only relay what is being told to them by the FBI, Police, and other agencies that decides to release the information.

There seems to be a deliberate attempt of misinformation. The idea is if you bombard the public with contradictory information after another, it will be harder to pin point what is factual since there are so many inconsistencies.

For example, one of the reports reported on a 2nd gunman, but since all reports are now being viewed as "rushed journalism," the initial report, whether factual or not, will now be discounted because of all the misreporting.

Usually incidents this major only has one report and most major news station would cite the official story from other news organization. So the style of reporting itself is another anamoly and something worth looking into a bit deeper.

But you are too dense, your brain might end up frying itself.

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Again, your lack of knowledge is simply astounding. You don't know anything about reporting: reporters can only relay what is being told to them by the FBI, Police, and other agencies that decides to release the information.

There seems to be a deliberate attempt of misinformation. The idea is if you bombard the public with contradictory information after another, it will be harder to pin point what is factual since there are so many inconsistencies.

For example, one of the reports reported on a 2nd gunman, but since all reports are now being viewed as "rushed journalism," the initial report, whether factual or not, will now be discounted because of all the misreporting.

Usually incidents this major only has one report and most major news station would cite the official story from other news organization. So the style of reporting itself is another anamoly and something worth looking into a bit deeper.

But you are too dense, your brain might end up frying itself.[/QUOTE]


Stopped reading in the first paragraph when it became obvious dude is a quack....lol, stfu sparky and calm down while you're at it.

[QUOTE=jaydacris]What Does It All Mean[/QUOTE]
Just the killer ****ing with people in an attempt to bring even more attention to the mass murder.

Either that or it's all just a coincidence; nothing to see here.

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0cV65-Hjnc"][IMG]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0cV65-Hjnc[/IMG][/URL]

So this teacher was reading to the kids during the shooting. This is so stupid. Why the f*ck would you read a book, y'know make any noise, when there was a gunmen that could possibly go into your classroom and kill everybody in there .. dude if I hear gun shots, I'm curling up in a corner being as quiet as possible. Why the hell would I want to make any noise (especially reading to 20 or more kids in a loud tone) and alert him towards my way.

Child actors:

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEUol3q1gb8"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEUol3q1gb8[/URL]

These kids are repeating what they have been told to repeat. You can notice the lack of emotion and how they would pause up to remember a line. If a situation is dramatic, usually the victims would tear up just talking about it, and if they deal with the situation in a different way, you can see the emotions in their eyes regardless.

The eyes tell the story.

Here is another fake stupid girl trying to act like she was there:

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqTWxYRUuPw"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqTWxYRUuPw[/URL]

So fake.

[QUOTE=DonD13]The illuminati created a hurricane??
But they probably had to make other as well to make sure they get the letter 'S'

Timing hurricanes with movie release dates and with massacres while anonymously writing weird movie revies requires not only an ingenious sense of humor but major project managing skills as well :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:

I'd join. pm me.[/QUOTE]

The government has a technology to control the weather: HARP.