Printable View
[QUOTE=riseagainst]"on pace" is pretty much another useless hypothetical term. He's just applying that same "on pace" logic to everything else.[/QUOTE]
Is he? Well then he's pretty damn wrong when it comes to Brendan Wright, don't you think?
No one would probably even change their opinion of him as a Player..
Neither with Kobe, but it's still chucking.
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater]Is he? Well then he's pretty damn wrong when it comes to Brendan Wright, don't you think?
No one would probably even change their opinion of him as a Player..
Neither with Kobe, but it's still chucking.[/QUOTE]
well if someone "makes history", good or bad, like missing the most shots per minute (36) or having the highest FG% in a season while scoring xxx amount, it should be talked about. But obviously no one cares about Brendan Wright. But if it was someone important having 75% FG in the first 10 games, they'll be all over ESPN: "on pace to set record FG% for a season."
If Brendan Wright was in Kobe's shoes, "on pace" for most missed shots per minute, it wouldn't all over the news. Hell, most people wouldnt even know about it.
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater][IMG]http://i.gyazo.com/4f19f496ba89f0c5a06882322c272720.png[/IMG]
On pace for most misses per minute all-time >>>>> not chucking[/QUOTE]
Chuck Noble? :oldlol:
[QUOTE=riseagainst]well if someone "makes history", good or bad, like missing the most shots per minute (36) or having the highest FG% in a season while scoring xxx amount, it should be talked about. But obviously no one cares about Brendan Wright. But if it was someone important having 75% FG in the first 10 games, they'll be all over ESPN: "on pace to set record FG% for a season."
If Brendan Wright was in Kobe's shoes, "on pace" for most missed shots per minute, it wouldn't all over the news. Hell, most people wouldnt even know about it.[/QUOTE]
Do you know anything about Brendan Wright's game and the shots he takes?
[QUOTE=pauk]Chuck Noble? :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
:oldlol: The original Chuck Norris
feels like 09 again. I love it
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater][IMG]http://i.gyazo.com/4f19f496ba89f0c5a06882322c272720.png[/IMG]
On pace for most misses per minute all-time >>>>> not chucking[/QUOTE]
This is a clear example of media bias trying to make Kobe look bad. Here is the mathematically correct infographic:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/zIXEIFG.jpg[/IMG]
Better, no?
Warmest regards,
Ayotunde Ndiaye
I noticed that too, ESPN going hard after Kobe. Today after he had his best game of the season so far:
[IMG]http://puu.sh/cXLpQ/f3b59f336d.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=6 for 24]This is a clear example of media bias trying to make Kobe look bad. Here is the mathematically correct infographic:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/zIXEIFG.jpg[/IMG]
Better, no?
Warmest regards,
Ayotunde Ndiaye[/QUOTE]
Damn, does put things into perspective :ohwell:
Tell us about how bad wilt was in the 62 season :rolleyes: :facepalm
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater]:roll:
When did ESPN shy away from sucking Kobe's dick 24/7? :biggums:[/QUOTE]
I can't tell if you're joking....
Summer of 2004 was the last time Kobe ever was getting insane publicity for all the wrong reasons.
[QUOTE=NBAplayoffs2001]I can't tell if you're joking....
Summer of 2004 was the last time Kobe ever was getting insane publicity for all the wrong reasons.[/QUOTE]
ESPN is the biggest Kobe hype machine there is, don't kid yourself.
This is the first year (I don't know why), where they are legit creating negative articles about him.
ESPN is what made Kobe overrated...
Lmao at how obv that loaded question is.
Bravo, BSPN.
Why is that an odd title? Dude is chucking away like very few ever have.
And last night the team played their best game of the year and he only took 18 shots.
:confusedshrug:
[QUOTE=DMAVS41]Why is that an odd title? Dude is chucking away like very few ever have.
And [B]last night the team played their best game of the year and he only took 18 shots.[/B]
:confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]
Yup. And that had Nothin to do with their second best scorer coming back and them playing their worst opponent of the season.. Absolutely nothing to do with that.