The Donald Confirmed to be Putin's Manchurian Candidate

The Donald claimed on Sunday that it wasn't the Russians hacking solely Democratic party officials, even intimated that there was no hacking at all.

[INDENT][B][U]Trump Told Russia To Blame for Hacks Long Before Debate
[/U][/B]
During Sunday's debate, Donald Trump once again said he doesn't know whether Russia is trying to hack the U.S. election, despite Friday's statement by the U.S. intelligence community pointing the finger at Putin -- and despite the fact that [B]Trump was personally briefed on Russia's role in the hacks by U.S. officials.

A senior U.S. intelligence official assured NBC News that cybersecurity and the Russian government's attempts to interfere in the 2016 election have been briefed to, and discussed extensively with, both parties' candidates, surrogates and leadership, since mid-August. "[COLOR="Red"]To profess not to know at this point is willful misrepresentation[/COLOR]," said the official. "The intelligence community has walked a very thin line in not taking sides, but both candidates have all the information they need to be crystal clear."[/B]

On Sunday, Trump disputed the idea there was any hack at all. "I notice, anytime anything wrong happens, they like to say the Russians are

very interesting. anonymous govt sources make big claims without any supporting evidence... seems legit.

you should highlight more of your posts with bold red text, it makes you so much more convincing!

[QUOTE=Nanners]very interesting. anonymous govt sources make huge claims without any supporting evidence... seems legit.

you should highlight more of your posts with bold red text, it makes you so much more convincing![/QUOTE]

Since you've posted in opposition to DonDadda, I can only assume you are 100% a Trump supporter. There is no other reasonable explanation to conclude.

[QUOTE=Hawker]Since you've posted in opposition to DonDadda, I can only assume you are 100% a Trump supporter. There is no other reasonable explanation to conclude.[/QUOTE]

i hate trump, i just hate clinton slightly more. if she had played fair with bernie i might be able to bring myself to vote for her, but she berned that bridge...

i support jill stein, but nobody gives a **** about her so ill talk about clinton and trump.

[QUOTE=Nanners]very interesting. anonymous govt sources make huge claims without any supporting evidence... seems legit.

you should highlight more of your posts with bold red text, it makes you so much more convincing![/QUOTE]

So you're with the Donald that there was no hacking done... As you post Wikileaks hacking releases incessantly?

[IMG]http://whatthevogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Kermit-The-Frog-Memes-Thats-None-Of-My-Business-Tho-What-The-Vogue-679x350.png[/IMG]

[QUOTE=DonDadda59]So you're with the Donald that there was no hacking done... As you post Wikileaks hacking releases incessantly?
[/QUOTE]

maybe there was a hack, maybe there was a mole (RIP seth rich?)

if it was a hack, maybe it was russians, maybe it was chinese, maybe it was a 12 year old autistic 4chan users from america.. i dont know and obviously you dont know either.

if you have any sort of real evidence/proof regarding what happened, feel free to share it at any time. when you do find something, please be sure to use plenty of bold red font so i know its legit.

You guys have obviously not read the story. This supposed email leak was doctored and included a paragraph that the author wrote for a Newsweek story months ago. Russian propaganda media reported it, and Trump reported on it immediately. He's presenting Russian propaganda as fact.

The author of the original article is calling out Russia for the plagiarism fail and falsifying the email, and Trump for reporting it as fact.

You idiots still don't think Putin is not trying to influence the election?

[QUOTE=DonDadda59]So you're with the Donald that there was no hacking done... As you post Wikileaks hacking releases incessantly?

[IMG]http://whatthevogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Kermit-The-Frog-Memes-Thats-None-Of-My-Business-Tho-What-The-Vogue-679x350.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
:roll:

[SIZE="7"][URL="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-13/saudi-arabia-has-funded-20-hillarys-presidential-campaign-saudi-crown-prince-claims"]One candidate has 20% of the campaign funded by Saudi Arabia.[/URL]

One candidate sold 20% of America's uranium stockpile to Russia in exchange for $145,000,000.[/SIZE]

[I]The other candidate is Donald Trump.[/I]

is OP being paid to post all this anti trump/pro hillary propaganda he wastes all day on here doing?

legit curious.

[QUOTE=Dr Seuss]is OP being paid to post all this anti trump/pro hillary propaganda he wastes all day on here doing?

legit curious.[/QUOTE]


He and Filljackson need extra $ for new gowns to wear to Hillary's inauguration.

[QUOTE=rezznor]You guys have obviously not read the story. This supposed email leak was doctored and included a paragraph that the author wrote for a Newsweek story months ago. Russian propaganda media reported it, and Trump reported on it immediately. He's presenting Russian propaganda as fact.

The author of the original article is calling out Russia for the plagiarism fail and falsifying the email, and Trump for reporting it as fact.

You idiots still don't think Putin is not trying to influence the election?[/QUOTE]
There is zero evidence to suggest the Russians are behind this.

It is far more likely the leaks are coming from disgruntled Clinton insiders.
[I]
Like Seth Rich for example.[/I]

[B]RIP[/B]

[QUOTE=DonDadda59]Kurt Eichenwald continues his one man destruction of [/QUOTE]
It's Unclear if only Sputnik had this email before Trump held it up. So Eichenwald might have this wrongl

Folks said this twitter site had it hours before Sputnik, but it's now deleted.

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CudXCzLUAAAkOr5.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE]What should cause alarm in this situation is another facet of what happened. It's not that Trump is a Putin marionette, it's that he seems to have pulled bad information off a questionable website and presented it on live television to an audience of thousands without skepticism. This is an indictment of his judgment, not of his loyalty.[/QUOTE]
Trump and Wikileaks appear to misunderstand the email. Blumenthal passed along an Eichenwald column. He didn't admit to anything.

Eichenwald is claiming that extra text was added to the Blumenthal email before Sputinik published it.

Trump could have gotten this from a different awful source.

[QUOTE=FillJackson]It's Unclear if only Sputnik had this email before Trump held it up. So Eichenwald might have this wrongl

Folks said this twitter site had it hours before Sputnik, but it's now deleted.

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CudXCzLUAAAkOr5.jpg[/IMG]


Trump and Wikileaks appear to misunderstand the email. Blumenthal passed along an Eichenwald column. He didn't admit to anything.

Eichenwald is claiming that extra text was added to the Blumenthal email before Sputinik published it.[/QUOTE]


Why did Hillary pull out of Ohio completely?

Why is she still spending money to run ads in perennial blue states like Minnesota and Washington?

[I][B]It's almost like she's completely given up on Ohio and Florida and now is afraid of losing blue fortresses Minnesota and Washington.[/B][/I]

This election bruh. News almost everyday. Omg. Sex scandals, a little bit of issues, insults, conspiracies, and potential civil war with the GOP. Now Trump is removing his shackles and is all like this isn't even his final form.

Grandma Nixon vs Orange Kefka everyone. Mockery awaits. There must be a documentary on this year.

[IMG]https://media.tenor.co/images/54451401d52c0dd2fe9ee5752857d53c/raw[/IMG]