Jalen Brunson is a better Knicks player than Prime John Starks

Starks is my fav player of all time so I'll chime in. Starks had the heart and khutzpah that he would prob make it interesting. Brunson has the whole bag on offense, he can do anything. But Starks' defense was great and he would make him earn everything. Team-wise, Starks was ahead of his time. He was a 3 and D guy in a league that didn't want the type.

Brunson is on his way, but no he is not a better Knicks player than Starks. He's getting there, let's see what happens in the playoffs.

[QUOTE=hold this L;14753636]You're either a bot to rack up views or just post dumb shit by looking at a box score.[/QUOTE]

I agreed with the 1st half of this statement but towards the end you said "JUST POST DUMB SHIT BY LOOKING AT A BOX SCORE". You said that as if John Starks was all NBA or something.

John Starks was a streaky shooter and played solid defense, he wasn't that great. Was an undersized SG, who couldn't handle the ball good enough to be a PG. Could go ICE COLD very easily.

[QUOTE=kawhileonard2;14754030]Shawn Kemp swept peak Hakeem. Hakeem beat Peak Magic without HCA. Dwight Howard beat Peak Lebron without HCA. Baron Davis beat peak Dirk without HCA. Dirk beat peak Lebron without HCA.[/QUOTE]
You just named multiple players that had nothing to do with this thread, you idiot.

2 years later Brunson is having another all star season