Tennis

Sinner wins US Open, 2nd slam of the year. Could well be the 3rd or 4th.




Its funny, Alcaraz - Sinner was another ultimate lithmus / IQ test on how strong your brain is and if you can think outside the box.


When Sinner was down 1-2 slams, it was clear to me he was better.

When Sinner was down 1-3 slams, it was clear to me he was better.

When Sinner was down 1-4 slams, it was clear to me more than ever, hes better.

For many people, its hard to think like that.


Its too ease for their feeble minds to take the simple option that requires no additional explanations.

Just "4 slams bro, he just won the last 2".

People are that simple. Dont have that critical think.

Still think Alcaraz is better but Sinner might be the real deal. He's proving me wrong.

[QUOTE=dankok8;14942024]Still think Alcaraz is better but Sinner might be the real deal. He's proving me wrong.[/QUOTE]

Youre so silly man.

[IMG]https://i.gyazo.com/c08b0445c6b8971108becb6c57833824.png[/IMG]



[IMG]https://i.gyazo.com/c3345e3f29079c7f8a790c2ade91ec02.png[/IMG]




These might genuinely be the 2 dumbest posts ever uttered on here regarding tennis.


dankok is seriously lucky this place has no tennis community lmao.

[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;14942053][IMG]https://i.gyazo.com/c08b0445c6b8971108becb6c57833824.png[/IMG]



[IMG]https://i.gyazo.com/c3345e3f29079c7f8a790c2ade91ec02.png[/IMG]




These might genuinely be the 2 dumbest posts ever uttered on here regarding tennis.


dankok is seriously lucky this place has no tennis community lmao.[/QUOTE]

It's not dumb at all. Alcaraz was much more proven with a 4-1 slam lead while being a year younger and with more big wins.

It is dumb.

look at you now. Everything you said was wrong.


You just couldnt recognize shit.


To say Alcaraz was a tier ahead of Sinner and that Sinner is far from an all time great (while suggesting Alc needs 30 slams cause theres no competition while Sinner is level in the H2H) with everything weve seen of him screams peak stupidity.


like unheard of stupidity. Type of stupidity youd put someone down for.

Alcaraz is more dynamic and exciting to watch, sorry to tell ya mate. Carlitos is younger and has more slams and is better on clay and grass. He will get better on HC as well, but he does have a USO under his belt. So calm down arby.

I'm not calling Carlitos an all time great yet either though. Time will tell, but stop overrating sinner. Sinner had a great year, especially on HC. And who beat him on HC this year??? Yeah, it was Carlos... and throw rubes in there as well. So no, they are not level in h2h. It's 5-4 Carlitos, he also beat him RG.

Thanks for saying a whole bunch of nothing.


And the 2 statements you made are just as dumb:


Alcaraz and Sinner are already ATGs.

Only question is if they will be GOATs.

I don't watch tennis often but Sinner and Djokovic are having a fantastic match right now :applause:

From what I believe Sinner & Alcaraz are the next Djokovic and Nadal....

[QUOTE=Manny98;14949429]From what I believe Sinner & Alcaraz are the next Djokovic and Nadal....[/QUOTE]

Sure are the next / current Big 2.

Fonseca is Sinner/Alcaraz level.

Djok-Alcaraz QF...


Going into the tournament I thought Alcaraz would wipe the court with Djokovic if theyd meet at this stage.


Things have changed.

Alcaraz is looking okay but not outrageous, and Djokovic is seriously good...

I have my doubts about HC Alcaraz, Im not sure he will hold up against Djokovics utter stability and wall-ness.

[QUOTE=insidehoops;14933029]The official tennis discussion thread!

The previous tennis thread was here:

[url]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?460872-Tennis[/url][/QUOTE]



Anddd you deleted it. Nice job Jeff... fu[B]c[/B]k you man.

Sinner - Rune now on... big one.