Candace Owens Hits #1 Podcast & THANKS Ben Shapiro For Firing Her

[QUOTE=diamenz;15042233]yeah well regardless of whatever you guys think of candace owens, tucker carlson, mtg and the entire turning point coalition these media figureheads are the future of conservative america. mtg is definately angling but i personally dgaf as long as she's saying the right things and pushing for the right policies. these are the people that young right wingers are flocking to in droves, especially so in the last couple of years. that's why bibi and the israeli government are pushing so hard to ensure their 'security' in the region now, because they know that time is ticking for them to get their agenda done, whatever that may be. it's also why they're pushing so hard moving so much money into our media and buying up major news companies now as well in an attempt to hold on to the zionists here and sway public opinion.

you can bet tucker will run in 28 and if he or a progressive democrat gets into office[B] israel's gonna be held to account and their reach in our government will be more limited[/B]. so for ben shapiro, mark levine, laura loomer and whoever else - the clock is ticking in terms of their relevance.[/QUOTE]

i like your optimism, as unlikely as it is bc israel is do deeply dug into america they would never allow this.

[QUOTE=diamenz;15042233]yeah well regardless of whatever you guys think of candace owens, tucker carlson, mtg and the entire turning point coalition these media figureheads are the future of conservative america. [B][SIZE=3]mtg is definately angling but i personally dgaf as long as she's saying the right things and pushing for the right policies.[/SIZE][/B] these are the people young right wingers are flocking to in droves, especially so in the last couple of years. that's why bibi and the israeli government are pushing so hard to ensure their 'security' in the region now, because they know that time is ticking for them to get their agenda done, whatever that may be. it's also why they're pushing so hard moving so much money into our media and buying up major news companies now as well in an attempt to hold on to the zionists here and sway public opinion.

you can bet tucker will run in 28 and if he or a progressive democrat gets into office israel's gonna be held to account and their reach in our government will be more limited. so for ben shapiro, mark levine, laura loomer and whoever else - the clock is ticking in terms of their relevance.[/QUOTE]

Uh, if you admit that MTG is angling then that means you shouldn't be trusting her. Lol what kind of retarded logic is that? All she's going to do from here on out is disagree with Trump. That's her character now, as if her giggling with the hags on The View wasn't a dead giveaway. Now Trump announces a plan to help home buyers build equity at a lower price point and she immediately starts fear mongering.

She shared this post so this pretty much lays out her game.

[url]https://x.com/SecretsBedard/status/1704215731770978466?s=20[/url]

She wants to put her name in that hat for VP in '28 and the only opening she has is to be the anti-Trump alternative. So she will not be saying a positive thing about Trump from here on out. Meanwhile Tucker is clearly sponsored by someone in Saudi Arabia.

If you're telling me that Tucker is the future of the conservative party when the guy is trying to soften people on the idea of accepting sharia law, that would be a huge problem not just for the conservative party but for the country as a whole. When both the right and the left are cozying up to radical islam, that is not good.

It's just hilarious that certain people on the woke right try to frame anyone who doesn't agree with them as brainwashed shills, all while propping up Tucker, MTG and Candace as people you could trust. Lol.

[QUOTE=Baller234;15042241]Uh, if you admit that MTG is angling then that means you shouldn't be trusting her. Lol what kind of retarded logic is that? All she's going to do from here on out is disagree with Trump. That's her character now, as if her giggling with the hags on The View wasn't a dead giveaway. Now Trump announces a plan to help home buyers build equity at a lower price point and she immediately starts fear mongering.
[/QUOTE]

i don't know what she's angling for but she's america first moreso than anyone. moreso than trump, like it or not. foreign and domestically. plus her voting record shows it.

on top of that she's disagreeing with trump in a substantive way. she goes out of her way to explain herself. it's not just trump derangement like you see from the Democrats.

people need to stop paying so much attention to what politicians on the hill [I]say[/I], getting caught up in media theatrics and the political rat race and start paying attention to what these people actually [I]do[/I].

[QUOTE=highwhey;15042238]i like your optimism, as unlikely as it is bc israel is do deeply dug into america they would never allow this.[/QUOTE]

i should have emphasized [I]more[/I] limited. obviously money talks and our congress is bought six ways from sunday but the difference between say a kamala harris and a ro khanna presidency in terms of israeli policy would be night and day. just follow the money.

[QUOTE=highwhey;15041951]Ben has been fuming bc he’s becoming irrelevant as he self exposed himself as a major zionist shill, not to mention Kirk took away his spotlight. Now he’s just a nagging little b1tch.[/QUOTE]

Correct.

I would like to see Levin & Shapiro in a real debate with real right wing people … they would simply walk out in protest, rather than actually have the debate.

[QUOTE=diamenz;15042247]i should have emphasized [I]more[/I] limited. obviously money talks and our congress is bought six ways from sunday but the difference between say a kamala harris and a ro khanna presidency in terms of israeli policy would be night and day. just follow the money.[/QUOTE]

And what makes you think the new person that takes office is above accepting new money when it's offered? :oldlol:

[QUOTE=BarberSchool;15042248]Correct.

I would like to see Levin & Shapiro in a real debate with real right wing people … they would simply walk out in protest, rather than actually have the debate.[/QUOTE]

it was just a day or two ago that tucker challenged levin to a public debate and levin bowed the *uck out going on some childish tangent like he usually does.

[QUOTE=Baller234;15042251]And what makes you think the new person that takes office is above accepting new money when it's offered? :oldlol:[/QUOTE]

depends on the person. does said person have a record of integrity? would a ron paul or bernie sanders switch up like that on a dime after spending their entire lives advocating for the things they believe in?

[QUOTE=diamenz;15042254]depends on the person. [B]does said person have a record of integrity? [/B]would a ron paul or bernie sanders switch up like that on a dime after spending their entire lives advocating for the things they believe in?[/QUOTE]

You think any of these people have integrity? Lol, Bernie has proven time and time again that he is a "team player" and will do what he can to advance his career and his influence.

THAT'S what you think the problem is? We just haven't had anyone with integrity run for president? Lol.

Do you think pro wrestling is real too?

[QUOTE=Baller234;15042264]You think any of these people have integrity? Lol, Bernie has proven time and time again that he is a "team player" and will do what he can to advance his career and his influence.

THAT'S what you think the problem is? We just haven't had anyone with integrity run for president? Lol.

Do you think pro wrestling is real too?[/QUOTE]

yes Baller234, bernie is weak and allows the Democrats to toss him up like the town slut. i understand that.

i'm talking in terms of consistent [B]policy [/B]throughout their careers. would bernie suddenly start taking $ from the health insurance companies if he were to take office? would ron paul suddenly change his mind in regard to policing the world?

as opposed to a kamala harris or a mike pence that are just birds of the same feather and are easily moved by money, power and the influence of their party.

then you have someone like trump. trump's not idealogical - he's transactional. he's a [I]businessman[/I]. it's a day to day thing with him depending on which way the winds are blowing.

surely you can agree with these things as they're not exactly subjective.

[QUOTE=diamenz;15042270]yes Baller234, bernie is weak and allows the Democrats to toss him up like the town slut. i understand that.

i'm talking in terms of consistent [B]policy [/B]throughout their careers. would bernie suddenly start taking $ from the health insurance companies if he were to take office? would ron paul suddenly change his mind in regard to policing the world?

as opposed to a kamala harris or a mike pence that are just birds of the same feather and are easily moved by money, power and the influence of their party.

then you have someone like trump. trump's not idealogical - [B]he's transactional.[/B] he's a [I]businessman[/I]. it's a day to day thing with him depending on which way the winds are blowing.

surely you can agree with these things as they're not exactly subjective.[/QUOTE]

I think that adequately describes every single person in Washington, and I don't think Bernie Sanders is any different.

I also think that if Trump is any indication, it's that even when you go into things with the best of intentions, no one at the highest levels of government is totally autonomous. They are all being pulled apart and led around in a million different directions. Everyone owes everyone a favor and everyone uses their leverage when they can. I'm sure someone has leverage on Bernie and if he were president, they wouldn't be afraid to use it.

[QUOTE=diamenz;15042245]i don't know what she's angling for but she's america first moreso than anyone. moreso than trump, like it or not. foreign and domestically. plus her voting record shows it.

on top of that she's disagreeing with trump in a substantive way. she goes out of her way to explain herself. it's not just trump derangement like you see from the Democrats.

people need to stop paying so much attention to what politicians on the hill [I]say[/I], getting caught up in media theatrics and the political rat race and start paying attention to what these people actually [I]do[/I].[/QUOTE]

She's a rambling lunatic.

And that America First isolationist theory that she's parroting is garbage. You don't ignore what's happening around the world and think it improves your status on the world stage.

[QUOTE=diamenz;15042245]i don't know what she's angling for but [b]she's america first moreso than anyone. moreso than trump, like it or not. foreign and domestically.[/b] plus her voting record shows it.

on top of that she's disagreeing with trump in a substantive way. she goes out of her way to explain herself. it's not just trump derangement like you see from the Democrats.

people need to stop paying so much attention to what politicians on the hill [I]say[/I], getting caught up in media theatrics and the political rat race and start paying attention to what these people actually [I]do[/I].[/QUOTE]
:lol

[QUOTE=Baller234;15042206]No they're real, I believe she showed them on her phone.

That is beside the point. If you're going to expose someone's private convos, you better have a good reason. Shitting on Ben Shapiro isn't a good enough reason. People talk shit about their associates all the time. It doesn't mean Kirk thought Shapiro was some evil guy or that they were strongly and ideologically opposed on the meat and potato issues.

We know those convos didn't mean anything because it didn't stop her from getting into bed with him. If anything she is just exposing herself as the snake he is. I would sure hate to be anyone whoever texted Candace something in confidence. She will expose private convos if the moment strikes her appropriate.[/QUOTE]

That doesn't mean they're real. She can create a fake conversation with any fake contact and then name it Charlie. Who the heck puts pictures on their contacts from something that you can find online?

Did she swipe to show the dates of these text messages?

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;15042286]She's a rambling lunatic.

And that America First isolationist theory that she's parroting is garbage. You don't ignore what's happening around the world and think it improves your status on the world stage.[/QUOTE]

Unless Trump tells you to.