You can't win the MVP when you have a teammate that scores 37 in a quater or 57 total

To me....Currys team isnt even that good from an individual player aspect. People so often cant seem to see the difference between chemistry and individual talent. Its a good team...with some good players. Talent wise? Its Curry....an all star teammate...and some high end role players who could be more on a bad team.

Klay is hardly exceptional as a #2. Hes not on any all time list of best second options. There have been teams he would be the 4th or 5th best player on. And I dont mean decades ago...I mean lately...I dont think we need to be acting like hes absurdly great for a #2.

Hes a very good second option.

I dont think hes the type of player we just disqualify teammates from major awards over.

Im not sure hes as good as Wade was in 2012. Better than Wade in 13 and 14...probably.

But hes not some epic number 2.

Can't give the MVP to losing teams... I don't care how well a player is playing. Thunder aren't even a playoff team at the moment.

And didn't LeBron win MVP's playing with a top 5 SG and top 5 PF? Who you are playing with doesn't have much to do with winning MVP.



That said, I still think Harden is MVP, as long as the Rockets can hold on to HCA.

[QUOTE=knicksman]let bran win them. So he would be among the embarrassing players of all time. 5 MVPs for just a 2/5[/QUOTE]
How many players have won that trophy again? oh yea both Harden and Westbrook did not win anything.

Irving has had two 50+ games this season, he has thrived playing within a better team and under a good coach.

[QUOTE=Eric Cartman]If you have an all star team around you, where they could replace you with a average player and still have similar success, then how are you more valuable than a guy carrying a bunch of scrubs to a top 4 seed in the West?

[/QUOTE]
If you think the Warriors or Cavs would be nearly as good without Steph or Lebron and replaced with average players than you are the dumbest ****ing person on this forum.

[QUOTE=Connor B]If you think the Warriors or Cavs would be nearly as good without Steph or Lebron and replaced with average players than you are the dumbest ****ing person on this forum.[/QUOTE]

If you replace Bran, with say, Luol Deng, they'd easily be a top 4 seed, considering Love's production would go through the roof.

With Steph Curry, they might not even make the playoffs, given how tough the West is, hence why is the MVP:

1a. Curry
1b. Harden







































































3. Bran

[QUOTE=Eric Cartman][B]If you replace Bran, with say, Luol Deng, they'd easily be a top 4 seed, considering Love's production would go through the roof.[/B]

With Steph Curry, they might not even make the playoffs, given how tough the West is, hence why is the MVP:

1a. Curry
1b. Harden







































































3. Bran [/QUOTE]

I agree, Miami sure are doing fine with that replacement.... no change at all.... still going on their 27 game winning streaks and champ favorites and all....

[QUOTE=pauk]I agree, Miami sure are doing fine with that replacement.... no change at all.... still going on their 27 game winning streaks and champ favorites and all....[/QUOTE]

:applause: :applause:

[QUOTE=plowking]You're literally applauding him dismantling your opinion. :oldlol:

You're one of the idiots that said Curry shouldn't win MVP because of Klay. Now you're applauding it because it suits the Bron agenda. :oldlol:[/QUOTE]


:roll: :roll: :roll: pauk u da real MVP :lol

[QUOTE=pauk]I agree, Miami sure are doing fine with that replacement.... no change at all.... still going on their 27 game winning streaks and champ favorites and all....[/QUOTE]
Stay mad that bran picks the most stacked teams (in the East of course) to join.

Your idol is a ***** bitch.

[QUOTE=pauk]I agree, Miami sure is doing fine with that replacement.... no change at all.... still going on their 27 game winning streaks and champ favorites and all....[/QUOTE]

Fixed.

Also:

Irving/Delly
J.R. Smith/Shumpert
Luol Deng/James Jones/Mike Miller
Kevin Love/ Thompson
Mozgov/ ????

That's a 4th seed in the East.

Deng has been good in Miami, probably their only consistent one during the season (playing and health wise).

Better than the Wizards and Bucks for sure.

[QUOTE=Eric Cartman]Kblaze conveniently leaves that part out :roll:[/QUOTE]
Actually I agree with Kblaze that one game by a teammate is meaningless in terms of the MVP and borderline trolling

[QUOTE=Eric Cartman]Nikka you think OKC isn't gonna be in the playoffs? :kobe:

It's a 100% they do, gonna get raped in the postseason most likely.[/QUOTE]



come and take your L

[QUOTE=pauk]I agree, Miami sure are doing fine with that replacement.... no change at all.... still going on their 27 game winning streaks and champ favorites and all....[/QUOTE]

Cartman, I think pauk left something for you..

[IMG]http://i1383.photobucket.com/albums/ah306/MaleRuler/GIFs/iWBJ4KrtSYtq2_zps8jzbwzj5.gif[/IMG]

Uh, Corey Brewer scored 51 just last year, no?

Houston is STACKED. :banana:

Why let team circumstances determine how valuable a player is?

Just because Klay scored 37 in a quarter or Kyrie had 2 50 point games doesn't mean Lebron and Curry aren't still very valuable players.

What you're basically saying is that an MVP shouldn't come from a good team. Which is stupid.