Impact Should Be Most Important Aspect When Handing out MVP

[QUOTE=ace23]Curry Wins Above Replacement: 26.5
Bron Wins Above Replacement: 20.5

:confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]


/thread

[QUOTE=SilkkTheShocker]None of those Miami team had more talent than GS. Or went through a postseason where they played an injured team in every round.[/QUOTE]
Lol but their best player had a superior impact right? Shouldn't that make up for it?

Also...in 2013 the Heat faced: The garbage Milwaukee Bucks (Losing record), the injured Bulls (ACL Derrick Rose/Spinal Tap Deng), and the Pacers (missing Danny Granger, unproven Paul George) and topped it off by almost losing to the Spurs with a hamstrung Tony Parker...

Your argument is almost as bad as your memory broski

[QUOTE=SilkkTheShocker]And LeBron still has more impact on team basketball and wins than anyone in the history of the NBA. Curry is a beast, great player. But take him off the Warriors and they're still in the WCF, with a chance for the Finals. Hell, he was their 3rd option in the Finals last year and they still won the series :eek: Take LeBron off this current Cavs team and they are maybe the 10th seed. Take LeBron off the Cavs last year and they're in the running to pick Towns. Unanimous MVP tho? Nah. He gets these votes because 1. People were tired of voting for LeBron. 2. The average sports fan can relate to him because of his girlish frame and ugly spouse. He inspires them they can be like him one day if they work on their trick shots, and join a team of multiple hall of fame level talents. I get it. But Curry just doesn't have that impact of The King.[/QUOTE]

didn't you laugh at people who made the same argument for rose in 2011?

Impact has always been the main criteria for MVP voting.

Why do you think Nash has two of them even though there were players who had more individual skills?

Like Nash, Curry has transcended the sport, and his contribution to the game will spread far beyond a momentary period of personal triumph.

[QUOTE=SilkkTheShocker]Physical conference. He doesn't have the opportunity to play a bunch of finesse-pseudo Euro-ball teams most nights. Not to mention Curry plays with wayyyyyy more talent.[/QUOTE]
Physical conference? :roll:

[QUOTE=Real14]Physical conference? :roll:[/QUOTE]

11,000 posts in two years. And 10,789 of them are emojis or two word replies. Nicely done :applause:

[QUOTE=SilkkTheShocker]You put someone like LeBron the 76ers, and they would most definitely have more of an impact than the 76ers with Curry on them. Curry is nice little gimmick player. He can get you over the hump. But Lebron is the hump. LeBron is the system. LeBron is the franchise. Warriors would win close to 60 game without Curry, and would be right in the mix to win the west. Cavs wouldn't even qualify for the playoffs in the East.[/QUOTE]

If Lecramp is so great why could he only has 2 Championships with 2 HOF players in the weak east and now can not even win a Championship with a clear path to the Finals every year?