-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=SouBeachTalents]
This dude always talks out his ass :oldlol:
Yeah, LeBron was never a big star in the league, regular Rudy Gay
[/QUOTE]
[B]Lebron had negative net rating[/B] in the 04' regular season, 06' playoffs, all his Finals losses, the [url=https://stats.nba.com/player/2544/advanced/?Season=2012-13&SeasonType=Playoffs&PORound=4]2013 Finals[/url], and the [url=https://stats.nba.com/player/2544/advanced/?Season=2018-19&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Period=4]4th quarters[/url] of this season
Yes, lebron was carried to the 2013 Finals victory despite being a net negative himself.. that's pathetic..
he's not top 5 all-time - that's already becoming consensus after this season's debacle, and after a few more years of LeDecline, he'll be out of the top 10
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=3ball]Max Kellerman said MJ had higher PER, offensive efficiency, peak, ppg and other things
So no one said stats don't matter with lebron vs MJ, because stats are an advantage for MJ over lebron [/quote]
No they aren't:
[B]PER[/B]
1. [B]Jordan 27.91[/B]
2. James 27.60
[B]Win Shares[/B]
[B]4. James 225.77 (and counting)[/B]
5. Jordan 214.02
[B]Box +/-[/B]
[B]1. James 9.13[/B]
2. Jordan 8.60
[B]VORP
1. James 128.89 (and counting)[/B]
2. Jordan 104.43
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=kuniva_dAMiGhTy]Because I don't have Lebron as GOAT, you highlighted that bit :oldlol:
Far as the "bold" goes?
I mean, if I have to explain why Jordan is more fundamentally sound to you...you probably haven't watched either enough. Period.[/QUOTE]
you can have whoever you choose your preference is pretty clear and i don't have an axe to grind either way. i pointed out the bolded because fundamental understanding of the game is a broad term and i dont agree. fundamental skills? sure have at it. fundamental understanding? cant quantify that bro.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=4pointshot]No they aren't:
[B]PER[/B]
1. [B]Jordan 27.91[/B]
2. James 27.60
[B]Win Shares[/B]
[B]4. James 225.77 (and counting)[/B]
5. Jordan 214.02
[B]Box +/-[/B]
[B]1. James 9.13[/B]
2. Jordan 8.60
[B]VORP
1. James 128.89 (and counting)[/B]
2. Jordan 104.43[/QUOTE]
[B]You posted total win shares, which is meaningless (longevity-based)
[I][COLOR="Navy"]MJ leads in average win shares (ws/48)
Only MJ is top 2 all-time in VORP, BPM, WS/48, and PER for regular season and playoffs..... And he set the record for plus-minus.. so MJ owns the advanced stats easily..[/COLOR][/I]. :confusedshrug:[/B]
-
Re: Goat debate
rings should have the highest weight and it should factor how you won it. Was it a ringchaser or role player or the man. Stats are deceiving coz players can statpad.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=3ball]You posted total win shares, which is meaningless (longevity-based) [/quote]
You may think counting stats are meaningless, but most people don't. Durability matters. Yes, Jordan retired twice, or he would have had a lot more, but James isn't done yet, either.
But let's accommodate your point. Through age 29 (when MJ retired the first time), James had more WS than Jordan, 168-147. Yes, he entered the NBA two years earlier, and if you start them at the same age, they are about even; but those extra years also mean more wear and tear down the road. Through age 34, when MJ retired the second time, he had 202 WS. Give him 30 WS for the nearly two seasons he missed playing baseball, and he's at a little over 230, slightly above where James is now at age 34. But keep in mind that in this exercise, Jordan gets those WS for free. He doesn't experience the wear and tear that would result if he had actually played those two years.
[quote]MJ leads in average win shares (ws/48) [/quote]
Again, a rate stat that doesn't take into account the length of the career. At their peaks, age 24-29, James's WS/48 was similar to MJ's. It has declined as he has continued to play, as Jordan's would have if he had continued to play. Jordan may have benefitted from the two years off, as his WS/48 had started to decline before baseball, and came back up after. In any case, Jordan retired the second time at age 34 when he had played about 930 games, and it was evident then that he was declining, as his WS/48 was his worst since his early years (not counting the few games he played when he returned from baseball). James reached that workload several years ago, and has been declining ever since.
So while you discount counting stats because James has played more games, you don't take into account that Jordan's rate stats are better in good part because he didn't play as many years while in decline, nor did he accelerate that decline by playing more games when he was younger.
[quote]Only MJ is top 2 all-time in VORP, BPM, WS/48, and PER for regular season and playoffs..... And he set the record for plus-minus.. so MJ owns the advanced stats easily..[/COLOR][/I]. :confusedshrug:[/B][/QUOTE]
But James is ahead of him in VORP and BPM, barely trails him in PER, and is high in WS48.
My point is not that James is the GOAT. It's that it's really close, and stats don't easily show that Jordan is better. You can have a good argument either way.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=sdot_thadon]you can have whoever you choose your preference is pretty clear and i don't have an axe to grind either way. i pointed out the bolded because fundamental understanding of the game is a broad term and i dont agree. fundamental skills? sure have at it. fundamental understanding? cant quantify that bro.[/QUOTE]
The two aren't mutually exclusive.
Lebron does things better, sure. Its mostly because of his build though.
Moving off the ball. Having the correct hand in passing lanes. Total control with angles (in the post, triplethreat, moving without the ball, or even just hitting freethrows). Mike was simply the more fundamental player, coupled with a higher in-game iq. Nothing he did was stagnant but everything was with a purpose. Quick and to the fukking point. And that's not a knock on Lebron. Jordan was faster than Kobe in that regard too. MJ's ability to adjust to a team offense, unlike Lebron who, for the most part is his team offense, I believe stemmed from playing college ball.
One of my favorite takeways about MJ is actually from Kenny Smith:
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4G3Eirm3uU[/url]
I can break this down at a macro and even micro level. Simply watching the 2 play should be enough though.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=pauk]What do you mean somehow? They have nowhere near the goods (accolades) to be in that discussion.... come on man, i know you aint stupid...
As far as the GOAT debate, you all know i like Lebron... but please, stop... MJ will never be surpassed, seemingly... through various criteria etc. Lebron is a bit more reasonable debate for being under MJ at the very best, if you are extremly kind to Russell/Wilt then he is #4, he shouldnt be anywhere lower than #5 tho... those other guys just dont have the accolades enough (Shaq, Bird, Kobe, Shaq is the closest)... Magic Johnson is the absolute closest accolades wise, but Lebron has the longevity thing (he was just more prominent for longer)...[/QUOTE]
Nah I don't believe that. I brought this up cause I have two new younger guys on my staff that I talk ball with and they use lebrons rebounds and assists as their reasoning for LeBron over Jordan. Which I don't really care who is goat I just like a good debate about it and lazy reasoning deserves the same in reply.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=nayte]Nah I don't believe that. I brought this up cause I have two new younger guys on my staff that I talk ball with and they use lebrons rebounds and assists as their reasoning for LeBron over Jordan. Which I don't really care who is goat I just like a good debate about it and lazy reasoning deserves the same in reply.[/QUOTE]
If they haven't watched MJ play then their opinion is irrelevant. I don't talk about guys I haven't watched play. I caught the tail end of Kareem so I don't talk about him either.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=Elosha]Lebron's RS stats and playoff stats aren't really better than Jordan's and they are almost certainly bound to get lower the longer he plays. He's nowhere close to Jordan in terms of accomplishments, playoff performances, etc. He's not nearly the defender Jordan was, particularly when comparing them in their 30's. What's his case for GOAT again, as opposed to top 5-10? :confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]
I'm not saying LeBron is goat but plenty do. This thread was me annoyed at some people's reasonings when talking about this topic.. Those people being some kids at my work
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=FKAri]If they haven't watched MJ play then their opinion is irrelevant. I don't talk about guys I haven't watched play. I caught the tail end of Kareem so I don't talk about him either.[/QUOTE]
Ha they even use the milkman reference that some of the people here use against jordan
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=nayte]Ha they even use the milkman reference that some of the people here use against jordan[/QUOTE]
To be honest I love pointing out things like how a grocery bagger dunked on MJ, MJ's trainer's name being linked with steroid rumors, MJ's admitted statpadding, etc. I enjoy seeing 3ball's HTML-heavy meltdowns. Though, he usually just ends up talking about Lebron :oldlol:
-
Re: Goat debate
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=FKAri]If they haven't watched MJ play then their opinion is irrelevant. I don't talk about guys I haven't watched play. I caught the tail end of Kareem so I don't talk about him either.[/QUOTE]
This
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=red1]1. mj
2. mj
3. kobe.[/QUOTE]
fixed.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=tpols]fixed.[/QUOTE]
1.mj
2.lbj
3.kaj
4.shaq
5.magic
6.bird
7.duncan
8.hakeem
12.kobe
Not sure who 9,10,11 are going to be just know kobe's going to fit [I]right in[/I] at 12. Perfect spot for him really.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=FKAri]To be honest I love pointing out things like how a grocery bagger dunked on MJ, MJ's trainer's name being linked with steroid rumors, MJ's admitted statpadding, etc. I enjoy seeing 3ball's HTML-heavy meltdowns. Though, he usually just ends up talking about Lebron :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
I suppose it depends if I'm having a debate or just talking sheit with mates. I will use those Jordan things and the delonte things for a laugh
3balls ability to turn any convo into a LeBron v Jordan is truly an amazing achievement. I don't care about any player enough to put in that much effort.. Lol.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=nayte]3balls ability to turn any convo into a LeBron v Jordan is truly an amazing achievement. I don't care about any player enough to put in that much effort.. Lol.[/QUOTE]
It would be even more amazing if it's some player nobody ever talks about like Bernard King.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=Marchesk]It would be even more amazing if it's some player nobody ever talks about like Bernard King.[/QUOTE]
There's certainly ppl on here who know more about Bernard King than myself, but the reason he's probably not brought up more is that he was a bit more one-dimensional than most of the atg most prolific scorers, though his boards were there sometimes, I think he tended to drive the paint a lot, and his defense was lacking.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=72-10]There's certainly ppl on here who know more about Bernard King than myself, but the reason he's probably not brought up more is that he was a bit more one-dimensional than most of the atg most prolific scorers, though his boards were there sometimes, I think he tended to drive the paint a lot, and his defense was lacking.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, it's not the best example. Elgin Baylor or Dr. J would be better to use. If we had a super Dr stan who always came up with arguments for how Erving was better than Lebron, that would be humorous.
Someone once did use Bernard King in an argument with me about how the GOAT is totally subjective, which I disagreed with. There's no argument for King over Jordan, Wilt, Kareem, etc. But they thought there was.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=Marchesk]Yeah, it's not the best example. Elgin Baylor or Dr. J would be better to use. If we had a super Dr stan who always came up with arguments for how Erving was better than Lebron, that would be humorous.
Someone once did use Bernard King in an argument with me about how the GOAT is totally subjective, which I disagreed with. There's no argument for King over Jordan, Wilt, Kareem, etc. But they thought there was.[/QUOTE]
As far as King's 84-85 season is concerned, he did lead the league in scoring average (though Jordan led in points scored and was a better all-around player, and of course Bird was the best player in the league at the time), but there's not much that is statistically outstanding about his season outside of the 60 point game at Madison Square Garden, where he scored an MSG record 40 points in the first half. The 60 and the first half points were both stadium record, but I think Kobe broke it in February 2009 IIRC.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=72-10]There's certainly ppl on here who know more about Bernard King than myself, but the reason he's probably not brought up more is that he was a bit more one-dimensional than most of the atg most prolific scorers, though his boards were there sometimes, I think he tended to drive the paint a lot, and his defense was lacking.[/QUOTE]
Bernard King didn't have a lot of moves but the ones he did have were deadly. Dude's gotten so underrated now.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=FKAri]Bernard King didn't have a lot of moves but the ones he did have were deadly. Dude's gotten so underrated now.[/QUOTE]
Every time he's discussed they always point out his lack of defense as a main reason why he didn't get in earlier. He toasted the Pistons in the 84 playoffs, though.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=Marchesk]It would be even more amazing if it's some player nobody ever talks about like Bernard King.[/QUOTE]
OK I'm setting you that challenge. Let's see what u can come up with
-
Re: Goat debate
.
[B]Accomplishments that only MJ has[/B]
- only player with 4+ fmvp (he has 6)
- only player at 30/5/5 for regular season... and playoffs... and Finals
- a record 10 scoring titles and all-time leader in PPG by wide margin [I][COLOR="DarkRed"](best raw stats)[/COLOR][/I]
- only player that is top 2 in career PER, VORP, BPM, WS/48 for regular season and playoffs [I][COLOR="DarkRed"](best advanced stats)[/COLOR][/I]
- most seasons with 1st team all-nba [U]and[/U] 1st team all-defense (9) and most consecutive (9) [I][COLOR="DarkRed"](most dominant)[/COLOR][/I]
- #1 all-time championship frequency since the 3-point line began - 6 in 15 yrs or 40% [I][COLOR="DarkRed"](best team stats)[/COLOR][/I]
- only MVP to win 70+ and the championship [I][COLOR="DarkRed"](top individual and team accomplishment)[/COLOR][/I]
- only all-time great that was never outscored by a teammate in a playoff series, and MJ led team by an average margin of 15.4 ppg over 2nd option [I][COLOR="DarkRed"](biggest burden/defensive attention)[/COLOR][/I]
- only MJ/Kobe won multiple rings with only 1 all-star teammate [I][COLOR="DarkRed"](won with the least)[/COLOR][/I], except Shaq (who had Kobe), and Hakeem (when MJ was out of league)
- only top 10 player to never lose as the 1 or 2 seed [I][COLOR="DarkRed"](most unbeatable player)[/COLOR][/I].. i.e. kareem lost 9 times, magic/lebron/bird 6 each; MJ was 6-0
- only player to win scoring title & dpoy in same season (88')
- only player to win MVP and dpoy in same season (88')
- only perimeter player to win scoring title and title in same season (6 times)
- only player to sweep all 3 MVP's, scoring title, 1st team all-D and ring in same season (96' and 98')
- [I]Best winning stats ever[/I] - 33.7 ppg and 6.6 apg in 91-93' PO (27.2 and 7.2 for lebron in 12/13/16' PO)
- [I]Best losing stats ever[/I] - 44 ppg against champion 86' celtics and their #1 defense, and 37/7/7 in 90' PO
.
-
Re: Goat debate
[quote=3ball].
[B]Accomplishments that only MJ has[/B]
- only player with 4+ fmvp (he has 6)
- only player at 30/5/5 for regular season... and playoffs... and Finals
- a record 10 scoring titles and all-time leader in PPG by wide margin [I][COLOR=DarkRed](best raw stats)[/COLOR][/I]
- only player that is top 2 in career PER, VORP, BPM, WS/48 for regular season and playoffs [I][COLOR=DarkRed](best advanced stats)[/COLOR][/I]
- most seasons with 1st team all-nba [U]and[/U] 1st team all-defense (9), and most consecutive (9) [I][COLOR=DarkRed](most dominant)[/COLOR][/I]
- #1 all-time championship frequency since the 3-point line began - 6 in 15 yrs or 40% [I][COLOR=DarkRed](best team stats)[/COLOR][/I]
- only MVP to win 70+ and the championship [I][COLOR=DarkRed](top individual and team accomplishment)[/COLOR][/I]
- only all-time great that was never outscored by a teammate in a playoff series, and MJ led team by an average margin of 15.4 ppg over 2nd option [I][COLOR=DarkRed](biggest burden/defensive attention)[/COLOR][/I]
- only MJ/Kobe won multiple rings with only 1 all-star teammate [I][COLOR=DarkRed](won with the least)[/COLOR][/I], except Shaq (who had Kobe), and Hakeem (when MJ was out of league)
- only top 10 player to never lose as the 1 or 2 seed [I][COLOR=DarkRed](most unbeatable player)[/COLOR][/I].. i.e. kareem lost 9 times, magic/lebron/bird 6 each; MJ was 6-0
- only player to win scoring title & dpoy in same season (88')
- only player to win MVP and dpoy in same season (88')
- only perimeter player to win scoring title and title in same season (6 times)
- only player to sweep all 3 MVP's, scoring title, 1st team all-D and ring in same season (96' and 98')
- [I]Best winning stats ever[/I] - 33.7 ppg and 6.6 apg in 91-93' PO (27.2 and 7.2 for lebron in 12/13/16' PO)
- [I]Best losing stats ever[/I] - 44 ppg against champion 86' celtics and their #1 defense, and 37/7/7 in 90' PO
.[/quote]
All of this is true, but this debate is meaningless.
GOAT = Team accomplishments + individual stats - bad losses / missed playoffs during prime.
That's how I look at it anyway.
That's why I have KAJ at #2 - 4 finals losses including the 83' sweep by Phila, missing the playoffs in the 70's during his peak twice. Plus "old man" rings as the 4th best player (87/88) - only 3 FMVPs.
Lebron = great stats, great player. Too many shrinking violet moments. 2007 awful finals numbers, 2010 quit, 2011 huge meltdown, 2014 air conditioner / geriatric Spurs team beating them, 2015 Game 4-6 chokejob, 2017-2018 only winning 1 finals game in 9 tries, and now the 2019 first year in the west = no playoff push.
It's over folks, and really ended after 2011.
-
Re: Goat debate
When there is a player better than Jordan, you will know it because it will be obvious. He will win 6 or more titles as the no.1 option.
You won't have to do all the stupid mental gymnastics you have to do to make LeBron it.
If your guy is the goat he doesn't need you to build a case for him, it's self evident to everyone by what he does on the court. Period.
Stop trying so damn hard.
-
Re: Goat debate
[QUOTE=Soundwave]When there is a player better than Jordan, you will know it because it will be obvious. He will win 6 or more titles as the no.1 option.
You won't have to do all the stupid mental gymnastics you have to do to make LeBron it.
If your guy is the goat he doesn't need you to build a case for him, it's self evident to everyone by what he does on the court. Period.
Stop trying so damn hard.[/QUOTE]
Nice take. I like it. Except the 6 rings part. I seem to remember Jordan being considered goat after 3 rings. So to me that doesn't play a big part
-
Re: Goat debate
Top 5 GOATs
--------------
1. [b]MJ[/b]: Transcended the game from SG forever. Much bigger than the sport itself. [b]Ali, Maradona[/b]. Cultural Icon.
2. [b]Kareem[/b]: Revolutionized the game from C position. invented "skyhook". the most unstoppable, undefendable shot in Bball history at that height.
3. [b]Wilt[/b]: Statistically, the Dominant player ever and greatest athlete ever. Revolutionized the sport.
4. [b]Magic[/b]: Revolutionized the game at PG position. controlled every aspect of the game without scoring a point.
5. [b]Bird[/b]: Revolutionized the game at SF position. Never needed the ball in his hand. But controlled the whole game. Maybe the best player to ever play the game.
These 5 are never changing in my book.