Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior

[QUOTE=TheMan]Butts? Black women maul Azn chicks, not contest. Facially? While there are beautiful black women, Azn women tend to have softer looking faces which is more pleasing to a man's eyes but where the problem lies is that Azns are as flat as an ironing board in general. What I mean be Azns are the Far East ones, just to be clear.[/QUOTE]

I'm not personally much into Asians, but I have read poll results where they rank #1 for fetishes among Americans.

Black women are easily the most unattractive females of any race. That's just my opinion, but it's not just by a little. White women, east Asians, middle eastern, latinas, even Indian women are all more attractive by far. Black women have too much testosterone, their legs are weird, nappy hair, noses too big. Nope.

[QUOTE=Prometheus]I'm not personally much into Asians, but I have read poll results where they rank #1 for fetishes among Americans.

Black women are easily the most unattractive females of any race. That's just my opinion, but it's not just by a little. White women, east Asians, middle eastern, latinas, even Indian women are all more attractive by far. Black women have too much testosterone, their legs are weird, nappy hair, noses too big. Nope.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, amongst white American dudes, they have Azn women as their top pick.

I've seen worldwide polls where Latinas are the most sought after in online dating sites though, followed by Eastern European women. Azn chicks come in third and you're right, black women usually come in last.

[QUOTE=TheMan]Yeah, amongst white American dudes, they have Azn women as their top pick.

I've seen worldwide polls where Latinas are the most sought after in online dating sites though, followed by Eastern European women. Azn chicks come in third and you're right, black women usually come in last.[/QUOTE]
Which is odd because latinas and black women are the two most overweight groups. Yet people overlook latinas psycho attitudes

[QUOTE=TheMan]Yeah, amongst white American dudes, they have Azn women as their top pick.

I've seen worldwide polls where Latinas are the most sought after in online dating sites though, followed by Eastern European women. Azn chicks come in third and you're right, black women usually come in last.[/QUOTE]

Latinas >>> IMHO. Just the most beautiful features.

[QUOTE=TheMan]Crazy how each race has its positives and negatives...a couple examples.

Asians are the smartest but are the least attractive to other races, the women have asses like teen boys and the Azn bros have tooth picks down there...otoh, black women have ass for days, black dudes have the biggest dongs but some of those brothas that live in the African bush are not much smarter than apes.[/QUOTE]
Asians are objectively the most attractive race for both males and females, it's been scientifically proven and they blow all the other races out the water with the poll results as well.

[QUOTE=Prometheus]Latinas >>> IMHO. Just the most beautiful features.[/QUOTE]
The thing with Latinas is that they by and large are a product of a mixture of three races, White, Native American and African...so they have a little of each race and when the right combo happens, ay mamacita!

Having said that and since all my life I've been surrounded by all kinds of Latinas, Mexican, Puerto Rican, Venezuelan, Colombian, Cuban etc, their exoticness is normal to me so I'm more fascinated by Eastern European chicks, Russians, Hungarians, Ukrainians, Czechs, Romanians etc...they get me hard but don't tell my wife :lol

[QUOTE=MrFonzworth]Asians are objectively the most attractive race for both males and females, it's been scientifically proven and they blow all the other races out the water with the poll results as well.[/QUOTE]:oldlol:

Says the Asian dude but whatever :cheers:

You might want to check how many international beauty pageants the Azn fam has vs the Latina fam for starters...

[QUOTE=TheMan]:oldlol:

Says the Asian dude but whatever :cheers:

You might want to check how many international beauty pageants the Azn fam has vs the Latina fam for starters...[/QUOTE]
Uhm since 2000 the Asians were responsible for 24 of the Big 4 beauty pageant winners.

2 of the last 3 Miss Internationals has been Asian. The current Miss Universe and Miss Earth winners are Asian:confusedshrug:

Latinas are a close 2nd however, and no one else is even close to them after that:cheers:

[QUOTE=MrFonzworth]Uhm since 2000 the Asians were responsible for 24 of the Big 4 beauty pageant winners.

2 of the last 3 Miss Internationals has been Asian. The current Miss Universe and Miss Earth winners are Asian:confusedshrug:

Latinas are a close 2nd however, and no one else is even close to them after that:cheers:[/QUOTE]
Link?

I honestly don't recall Azns dominating beauty pageants like you say...and by Azn I mean the Far East ones, are you including India for example? Far as I remember, Venezuela had the most winners and nobody else were close to matching them.

[QUOTE=TheMan]Link?

I honestly don't recall Azns dominating beauty pageants like you say...and by Azn I mean the Far East ones, are you including India for example? Far as I remember, Venezuela had the most winners and nobody else were close to matching them.[/QUOTE]
Yes Indians are included, they are Asian. Why would they be excluded?

[QUOTE=MrFonzworth][B]Yes Indians are included, they are Asian[/B]. Why would they be excluded?[/QUOTE]

Yikes...big time blunder in your Racial Draft

[QUOTE=MrFonzworth]Yes Indians are included, they are Asian. Why would they be excluded?[/QUOTE]

Well if you're actually including all of Asia, then they should have the most winners since Asia is like 67% of the global population.

Most people use "Asian" as shorthand for East Asian though. Indians look completely different.

Indian men are by far the ugliest men btw. They got some nice women though.

By FAR the ugliest men.

mix Blasian chicks are hot af

[QUOTE=scuzzy]mix Blasian chicks are hot af[/QUOTE]


This is true. Black and Asian almost always produces a good-looking combination. Better than Black and White.

[QUOTE=warriorfan]Yikes...big time blunder in your Racial Draft[/QUOTE]
I'm normally the first person to egg on the street shitters, but they do have some of the most pleasing to the eye women, as well as producing the most doctors of any country, they provide more to the globe than, say, any latino country.

[QUOTE=Prometheus]Well if you're actually including all of Asia, then they should have the most winners since Asia is like 67% of the global population.

Most people use "Asian" as shorthand for East Asian though. Indians look completely different.

Indian men are by far the ugliest men btw. They got some nice women though.

By FAR the ugliest men.[/QUOTE]
According to my extensive research into the subject, that's incorrect. Many African and South American countries produce uglier men than India.

Hrithik Roshan is cut from the same cloth as Brad Pitt. Then you have all of the Khans, Barun Sobti, Ranbir Kootr, etc.

Find me some men from Ghana, Cameroon, or Suriname that have better looks than these people and I will concede.

Ehh Asian women are more hype than reality imo. They’re fetishized for being submissive and small, which a lot of men and especially incels find attractive since it means they can “dominate” them

But I’ve lived and generally been around thousands of Asians and I just don’t find them that great. Especially Chinese women. I think if some of you visit China you’d change your mind really quick after seeing what the average Asian woman looks like. Not to mention they absolutely age the worst

Latinas are easily at the top. I agree with whoever said that as they mix the best of everything really. Bodies that can compete with black women, long hair like white women, they’re submissive assuming you can show them you’re not a pushover though even then they have a little sass and attitude that can be sexy, and they don’t age as bad as Asians. The accents and language just puts the cherry on top

I have black women over white women. Though by white women I mean typical Caucasian American women and African American women. The features of black women just beat white women imo, though I do like blue or green eyes (Not as much as Hazel though, GOAT eye color imo)

[QUOTE=LostCause]Ehh Asian women are more hype than reality imo. They

[QUOTE=MrFonzworth]I'm normally the first person to egg on the street shitters, but they do have some of the most pleasing to the eye women, as well as producing the most doctors of any country, they provide more to the globe than, say, any latino country. [/quote]

Meh, who cares, there's no shortage of doctors. And we produce some of the best talent in the arts and futbol, last 4 of 5 Oscars were won by Mexican directors, we produced Carlos Santana, one of the GOAT guitarists. Name any Indian American who is infuential in any art form in the US...maybe M Knight Shyamalan but whens the last time he did something decent, oh and Kumar lol

Messi, Maradona and Pele belong to the Latino Fam...Latinos dominate baseball...so India is decent in cricket, who GAF :lol

[Quote]According to my extensive research into the subject, that's incorrect. [b]Many African and South American countries produce uglier men than India. [/b]

Hrithik Roshan is cut from the same cloth as Brad Pitt. Then you have all of the Khans, Barun Sobti, Ranbir Kootr, etc.

Find me some men from Ghana, Cameroon, or Suriname that have better looks than these people and I will concede.[/QUOTE]
Lol, I have a Bollywood channel in my cable package and no bruh, the typical Indian dude is way the fukk uglier than the typical Latino dude, no contest :oldlol:

[QUOTE=MrFonzworth]Asians age the worst? :roll::roll::roll:

What a troll post. You can't just say "vist China you will know what i mean" China is massive. That's like saying "go to USA you will know what i mean" after going to some shit city in texas where the average broad is 220 lbs and lives in a trailer. If you go to Nanning Guangxi there's 40 year olds that look 25. If you go a little east to Yuling there's 40 year olds that's been eating dog since 25.[/QUOTE]

They absolutely age the worst. I don

[QUOTE=TheMan]Meh, who cares, there's no shortage of doctors. And we produce some of the best talent in the arts and futbol, last 4 of 5 Oscars were won by Mexican directors, we produced Carlos Santana, one of the GOAT guitarists.

Messi, Maradona and Pele belong to the Latino Fam...India can't produce a decent movie if its existence depended on it.


Lol, I have a Bollywood channel in my cable package and no bruh, the typical Indian dude is way the fukk uglier than the typical Latino dude, no contest :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
Fair enough, I'm not giving enough credit to South America. I completely overlooked the world's sport, but the point still stands with India vs. Africa though.

We are the best :banana:

kids :facepalm

[QUOTE=LostCause]They absolutely age the worst. I don

[QUOTE=MrFonzworth]White women age the worst easily. Asians dont age at all compared to them. Where did you go in China? I used to travel there a lot and I've never once covere d a mile in distance without seeing a woman I wouldn't mind shagging exclusively for the rest of my life.[/QUOTE]
You simply prefer Asian women because you're Asian and thats cool.

You gotta admit though, as Prometheus pointed out, Asia is home to almost 70% of the world's population OTOH Latin America is home to almost 9%. Huuuge difference, yet LA by size of their population is the GOAT in beauty pageant winners and internationally known models and hot Hollywood actresses...:rockon:

[QUOTE=LostCause]Ehh Asian women are more hype than reality imo. They

[QUOTE=Prometheus]So much about this post is excessively cringe.

I have a hard time believing any men DON'T find submissiveness attractive in a woman. If you don't like to lay it down and completely dominate her, then you're probably kind of a p*ssy yourself. Most (like 99% of) women want exactly that anyway. Unless you're talking about dominance in all areas of life, I guess I'm just talking about the bedroom.[/quote]

You

Indian Men and Indian Women are being severely underrated in this thread, but then again this is ISH.

Spiritually (if you've visited India you'd know how spiritual and blessed this country is---tombs of saints, birthplace of dharmic religions, lots of meditators and ascetics etc..), technologically, mathematically (Ramanujan), historically (centuries of civilization), culturally, food-wise (some of the most creative cuisine in the world), dancing-wise (there's a guy named Prabhu Deva who is as good as Michael Jackson), art-wise, poetry-wise, musical instruments, positions of power, warrior-wise (see Nepali Gurkhas or Mughal warriors, or the people who fought against Alexander, or the Ghazis of Pakistan or the Cholas), in building civilization, in doing a lot with a little (i.e. FoB immigrants making it in Silicon Valley), moral-wise (some of the nicest, humble, hardworking people on the face of the planet), virtue-wise, in keeping strong family ties---they are up there.

Black's creative ability being underrated. Songhai empire, Mali empire, Nubian Empire, many many musicians, many brilliant minds.

[QUOTE=MrFonzworth]White women age the worst easily. Asians dont age at all compared to them. Where did you go in China? I used to travel there a lot and I've never once covere d a mile in distance without seeing a woman I wouldn't mind shagging exclusively for the rest of my life.[/QUOTE]

White women theres so much variation because some of the best looking older women I know are white, , but generally speaking I can see your point

Most of my time there was in Beijing, but on another occasion I stayed in Shenzhen which I actually enjoyed better

[QUOTE=Prometheus]
[B]The craziest thing you said is black women over white women. I don't even think black dudes feel that way.[/B] It's been proven that black women have more testosterone than white women.

So you like your women less submissive and with more testosterone? You very well might be gay.[/QUOTE]
Actually most of us do.... Just like most white men prefer white women over Latinas and most Asian women prefer Asian men over white men



but all 3 of these groups have a stigma...

seriously some borderline uncomfortable points being thrown out here but yes mixed race women tend to be pretty attractive

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing]This is true. Black and Asian almost always produces a good-looking combination. Better than Black and White.[/QUOTE]
White/Asian and Black/Asian both tend to produce good results.

White/Black, not so much.

[QUOTE=tpols]Normally they don't, but that kid did. he laid him out.

and while little kids dont hit as hard, their brains are far more malleable and prone to damage.

it would be impossible to truly measure long term effect.

the younger you are, if you incur a major injury, the worse the butterfly effect will be.[/QUOTE]
If those kids were under 2 years old, what you said would be 100% true. Since they're not, it's not even close to being correct. As for the rest of your post... :oldlol:

[QUOTE=TheMan]Lol, I have a Bollywood channel in my cable package and no bruh, the typical Indian dude is way the fukk uglier than the typical Latino dude, no contest :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
South American and African are by FAR the ugliest in the entire world. It's not even remotely close.

Thanks AJ. We really needed that.

[QUOTE=warriorfan]Thanks AJ. We really needed that.[/QUOTE]
Following me around like my lap bitch, you crack addicted basement dwelling loser. :oldlol:

[QUOTE=warriorfan]Thanks AJ. We really needed that.[/QUOTE]
:roll: :roll: :roll:

[QUOTE=aj1987]Do you understand basic physics? 6 years olds, no matter what, are not capable of inflicting that sort of damage. They do not have the required momentum. I have nephews, who, as kids, took tumbles all the time. It's pretty much the same. Both are on pace to get into Ivy League schools. Didn't affect them, one bit. Not to mention the fact that they had injuries where they broke their noses, etc..

Again, I posted actual research which when into it. You're using an opinion as your argument.

From my article, which was ACTUAL RESEARCH:

When it comes to concussions, for 8-13 year old kids, there was a 0.067% chance of a kid getting a concussion.

When it comes to serious injuries, for 8-13 year old kids, there was a 0.14% chance of a serious injury.

Injuries in general, for 8-13 year old kids, was 0.26%.

The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%.

Again, this is not a small sample size. This is a sample size of 44,164 kids who played tackle football. Flag football pretty much doubles the injury rate though. Something which is still negligible.


As I said, kids at their ages (the ones posted in the twitter link) are not even remotely close to being able to hit hard enough to inflict actual damage. Basic physics and biology.

Please go through this article:

[url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/[/url][/QUOTE]

I'm sorry, I missed this... [URL="https://www.aafp.org/news/health-of-the-public/20180126subconcussivecte.html"]I'm not citing opinion[/URL]. I'm citing experts who both discovered CTE and specialize in studying CTE and other brain injuries.

[QUOTE]"Based on everything we know about CTE, Flag Football Under 14 makes overwhelming scientific sense," said Lee Goldstein, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor at Boston University School of Medicine and College of Engineering and principal investigator for the Brain study, in the release. "We will never prevent CTE by focusing on concussions. Any meaningful prevention campaign has to focus on preventing all hits to the head, including [B]subconcussive impacts[/B]."[/QUOTE]

I'm not sure if you read my post, but I specifically noted that[URL="https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/01/18/study-repeated-head-hits-concussions-cte"] subconcussive hits were the real concern, not simply concussions.[/URL]

[QUOTE]A Boston University study released Thursday provided scientific evidence that [B]repeated hits to the head, even those that do not produce concussion or concussion-like symptoms, can lead to the degenerative brain disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE)[/B].

[B]"We've had an inkling that subconcussive hits

[QUOTE=MaxFly]I'm sorry, I missed this... [URL="https://www.aafp.org/news/health-of-the-public/20180126subconcussivecte.html"]I'm not citing opinion[/URL]. I'm citing experts who both discovered CTE and specialize in studying CTE and other brain injuries.

I'm not sure if you read my post, but I specifically noted that[URL="https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/01/18/study-repeated-head-hits-concussions-cte"] subconcussive hits were the real concern, not simply concussions.[/URL]

So while the research you mentioned dwells on concussions and observable injuries, the research has moved beyond that. Also, I'm glad your nephews are doing well, but signs and symptoms of brain degeneration don't generally and necessarily present in young people in their late teens and early twenties. The concern isn't that kids are going to struggle early in life because they played football when they were kids. The concern is that while the subconcussive hits they receive when they are young don't produce any noticeable damage when they are young, those repeated hits will set them up for challenges when they are older.[/QUOTE]
From the article you cited:

"Researchers examined the postmortem brains of four male athletes [B]ages 17-18[/B]..."

Also, unless I'm completely misunderstanding your source, those brains were obtained from kids who passed away a day to four months. I wonder what their actual injuries were.

We're talking about youth football. Not JV or Varsity football.

"[B]The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%[/B]."

[QUOTE=aj1987]From the article you cited:

"Researchers examined the postmortem brains of four male athletes [B]ages 17-18[/B]..."

Also, unless I'm completely misunderstanding your source, those brains were obtained from kids who passed away a day to four months. I wonder what their actual injuries were.
[/QUOTE]

CTE develops over time. It requires repeated hits over time of both a concusive and subconcussive nature for brains to have and show the plaque buildup.

[QUOTE]"[B]The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%[/B]."[/QUOTE]

We don't reliably measure sub concussive hits as injuries because they don't present as injuries on the field. The damage from those sorts of hits isn't perceptible, and they add up over time.

[QUOTE=MaxFly]CTE develops over time. It requires repeated hits over time of both a concusive and subconcussive nature for brains to have and show the plaque buildup.[/quote]
Again, go back and read what I posted. We're talking about 6 year olds here. Also, try going through the research that I posted.


[QUOTE=MaxFly]We don't reliably measure sub concussive hits as injuries because they don't present as injuries on the field. The damage from those sorts of hits isn't perceptible, and they add up over time.[/QUOTE]
Except for that fact that we do.

Read:

"The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%."

So, there's a 0.27% chance of [B]ANY[/B] injury in youth football.

[url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/[/url]

[QUOTE=aj1987]Again, go back and read what I posted. We're talking about 6 year olds here. Also, try going through the research that I posted.



Except for that fact that we do.

Read:

"The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%."

So, there's a 0.27% chance of [B]ANY[/B] injury in youth football.

[url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/[/url][/QUOTE]

Ok, so how do we measure sub-concussive hits. What scale do they use as an assessment when there is no noticeable dizziness or disorientation from a hit.