Russell Brand accused of raping 4 women between 10-17 years ago

[QUOTE=diamenz;14831248]man i really hope we find out something about russell's size from these women. i mean it's obvious someone like him is big, but just HOW big is the question![/QUOTE]

Don't think I'm not keeping notes and keeping tabs on all these size and girth comments of yours as of late. I'm compiling my list. I got my eyes on you.

[QUOTE=jstern;14831336]He's been demonitized, suspended by YouTube, and Russel Brand content has been removed from the BBC.

[video=youtube_share;qr_Kjd0xXNA]https://youtu.be/qr_Kjd0xXNA[/video]

In before the Blade's, Off the Courts come in and say, "See... then the alligations must be true."[/QUOTE]

There is no free speech and presumption of innocence left in America and I blame every shithead Liberal that has walked the face of Earth since the dawn of time. This is a corporation just basically deciding that this man is guilty, and in a way, censoring him by deplatforming him.

"Errr it's a private company durr they can do what they want uh huh huh huh"

Should be interesting to see how this plays out. The 16 year old in 2006, I don't put that much stock in. They were in a relationship and she got dumped. Allegations 17 years later? Smh

The 2 most serious allegations are the presumably 2013 one where a woman said she was raped and went to a rape crisis center in LA. Medical personnel are required by law to report such incidents to police so she obviously didn't name names at the time.

And there's one that is now dated in 2003 where a woman said she was not raped but sexually assaulted. She has now just filed a criminal complaint with the police in the UK.

If you are rich and famous (or think you might be someday lol)you better watch every sexual encounter you are in. Some women want you to grab their throat or slap them a little, maybe talk dirty to them. What playful sex one day could be rape 10 years later.

[QUOTE=Long Duck Dong;14831352]Should be interesting to see how this plays out. The 16 year old in 2006, I don't put that much stock in. They were in a relationship and she got dumped. Allegations 17 years later? Smh

The 2 most serious allegations are the presumably 2013 one where a woman said she was raped and went to a rape crisis center in LA. Medical personnel are required by law to report such incidents to police so she obviously didn't name names at the time.

And there's one that is now dated in 2003 where a woman said she was not raped but sexually assaulted. She has now just filed a criminal complaint with the police in the UK.

If you are rich and famous (or think you might be someday lol)you better watch every sexual encounter you are in. Some women want you to grab their throat or slap them a little, maybe talk dirty to them. What playful sex one day could be rape 10 years later.[/QUOTE]

But what about this 45 year old virgin's opinion then??

[QUOTE=imdaman99;14831074]You act like you know how someone is supposed to act when they're raped so I'll give you the benefit of doubt that you've been violated. But everyone reacts differently to it. For 1 girl it might be traumatizing and leave her suicidal, for another it might be like any other Tuesday. Someone might need to hear that oh a girl is accusing Russell brand of violating her, which empowers her to speak up about it.

It's not always about women trying to get you[/QUOTE]

?

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;14831341]Don't think I'm not keeping notes and keeping tabs on all these size and girth comments of yours as of late. I'm compiling my list. I got my eyes on you.[/QUOTE]

hey now. hey hey now.

[QUOTE=Long Duck Dong;14831352]Should be interesting to see how this plays out. The 16 year old in 2006, I don't put that much stock in. They were in a relationship and she got dumped. Allegations 17 years later? Smh

The 2 most serious allegations are the presumably 2013 one where a woman said she was raped and went to a rape crisis center in LA. Medical personnel are required by law to report such incidents to police so she obviously didn't name names at the time.

And there's one that is now dated in 2003 where a woman said she was not raped but sexually assaulted. She has now just filed a criminal complaint with the police in the UK.

If you are rich and famous (or think you might be someday lol)you better watch every sexual encounter you are in. Some women want you to grab their throat or slap them a little, maybe talk dirty to them. What playful sex one day could be rape 10 years later.[/QUOTE]


The biggest red flag is they all came out 15+ years later at the same time. A clear coordinated effort that has to have had been orchestrated. It's purely impossible to not have been and makes me sad for the state of society where a woman's word is worth more than the "innocent until proven guilty" statute our justice system was built off. Which was a farce anyway given how black people were treated but if I keep going this paragraph will never end so I'll just leave it at this. This world is absolutely tremendously unfair and a hellscape compared to what we all await.

[QUOTE=tpols;14831371]The biggest red flag is they all came out 15+ years later at the same time. A clear coordinated effort that has to have had been orchestrated. It's purely impossible to not have been and makes me sad for the state of society where a woman's word is worth more than the "innocent until proven guilty" statute our justice system was built off. Which was a farce anyway given how black people were treated but if I keep going this paragraph will never end so I'll just leave it at this. This world is absolutely tremendously unfair and a hellscape compared to what we all await.[/QUOTE]

Well it's all coming out now because of an aggressive journalist from Times doing a story. They probably started out with the rumor of one victim, then after multiple interviews came across other women who years later felt victimized. It's what good journalists do. I don't blame the journalist. On the contrary, I'm itching to know the details of why a woman went to a rape crisis center but Brand wasn't immediately charged by the police.

Obviously now that it's public every single woman who felt the least bit slighted by Brand, wants the spotlight, now has an avenue of revenge, and/or sees dollar signs is going to come out now while the iron is still hot.

Besides Danny Masterson I can’t think of any celeb who has actually had their life ruined by these accusations so it’s weird to see people shrieking about how Brand is being targeted. Casey Affleck just starred in a huge blockbuster ffs.

[QUOTE=RRR3;14831385]Besides Danny Masterson I can’t think of any celeb who has actually had their life ruined by these accusations so it’s weird to see people shrieking about how Brand is being targeted. Casey Affleck just starred in a huge blockbuster ffs.[/QUOTE]

Casey Affleck was only accused of sexual harassment and there was no criminal investigation. Like Danny Masterson, Russell Brand has at least one of the women accusing him of outright rape. From what I understand only the NY police are investigating him at the moment for sexual harassment, but the LAPD probably aren't far behind on starting a rape investigation on this.

[QUOTE=Long Duck Dong;14831420]Casey Affleck was only accused of sexual harassment and nothing criminal. Like Danny Masterson, Russell Brand has at least one of the women accusing him of outright rape. From what I understand the only the NY police are investigating him at the moment for sexual harassment, but the LAPD probably aren't far behind on starting a rape investigation on this.[/QUOTE]
I still doubt he'll end up anything like Masterson, Affleck was just an example off the top of my head. Jared Leto has definitely been accused of rape and he's doing fine. Marilyn Manson is still touring isn't he

[QUOTE=RRR3;14831422]I still doubt he'll end up anything like Masterson, Affleck was just an example off the top of my head. Jared Leto has definitely been accused of rape and he's doing fine. Marilyn Manson is still touring isn't he[/QUOTE]

Don't you find it wierd so many celebs are accused of rape?

Maybe there's something going on in that industry?

Or whatever.....

[QUOTE=tpols;14831437]Don't you find it wierd so many celebs are accused of rape?

Maybe there's something going on in that industry?

Or whatever.....[/QUOTE]
Not really, it's a lethal combination of entitled people who are used to getting anything they want and people seeking out a wealthy target looking for a payday. The fact is people may have their suspicions one way or the other, but barring the results of the investigation, we'll never know for sure what happened, it's purely he said/she said. Having said that, he should be be considered innocent until proven guilty.

He is obviously the type to play fast and loose with women. But that doesn't mean he's guilty, although I wouldn't be surprised if he was. We're never going to know the truth. But they're definitely getting him out of the paint, that's for sure. Shouldn't **** with the machine - governments and corporations.

[video=youtube;ytqG5JajrUo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytqG5JajrUo[/video]

Here they come :oldlol:


Gonna die out like the basleess Tate accusations.

Is RR3 already believing them?


YouTube with the Orwell demonetization.

I feel like some of you don't remember what Russell Brand was like in the 2000s. He was a very reckless individual. That doesn't mean he's guilty but the guy hasn't got the cleanest of track records. Controversial is putting it mildly.

I don't care what comes out of this, I don't care if dude gets locked up or not, hopefully the courts are fair. But I will say that him in his mid 30s having "consensual" sex with a 16 year old is f@#ked up regardless of legality or if it was rape or not.

That basically says to me that he is a pedo and was willing to get as close as he could to a child within the realm of legality.

[QUOTE=tpols;14831371][B]The biggest red flag is they all came out 15+ years later at the same time. A clear coordinated effort that has to have had been orchestrated. It's purely impossible to not have been[/B] and makes me sad for the state of society where a woman's word is worth more than the "innocent until proven guilty" statute our justice system was built off. Which was a farce anyway given how black people were treated but if I keep going this paragraph will never end so I'll just leave it at this. This world is absolutely tremendously unfair and a hellscape compared to what we all await.[/QUOTE]
Yes by a lawyer. One woman comes forward and then the rest say "me too" hence the movement. All of them having at minimum having proof of at least relations with Brand which he doesn't deny. Now within those accusers, could some of them see this as an opportunity to cash in? Absolutely. But is it likely that 100% of them are? Doubt it. Odds are he raped a couple of them.

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14831625]I don't care what comes out of this, I don't care if dude gets locked up or not, hopefully the courts are fair. But I will say that him in his mid 30s having "consensual" sex with a 16 year old is f@#ked up regardless of legality or if it was rape or not.

That basically says to me that he is a pedo and was willing to get as close as he could to a child within the realm of legality.[/QUOTE]
Yeah even if he’s innocent he’s at the very least suspicious for this. And he would be guilty in America regardless.

The usual suspects believing women never lie about rape :lol

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14831628] Odds are he raped a couple of them.[/QUOTE]

yeah well i'm sure they led him on. you know how these groupie hoes are throwing around the pu$$y like hotcakes. especially when you're dealing with someone as well endowed as russell.

[QUOTE=TheMan;14831641]The usual suspects believing women never lie about rape :lol[/QUOTE]
Of course you’d defend a 35 year old pursuing 16 year old girls.

[QUOTE=RRR3;14831644]Of course you’d defend a 35 year old pursuing 16 year old girls.[/QUOTE]

Yes this is why I think it's impossible to side with Brand. He admits to having sex with a 16 year old, while he was 35, only he says it was consensual and she doesn't.

For him she was technically of legal age, but in the US about half the states would declare that sex with a minor.

To me, it's f@#ked up no matter what the law says were he is. I think that hints at him being a pedophile.

He was over twice her age. He was old enough to be her father. No one should be defending that.

[QUOTE=Long Duck Dong;14831352]

If you are rich and famous (or think you might be someday lol)you better watch every sexual encounter you are in. Some women want you to grab their throat or slap them a little, maybe talk dirty to them. What playful sex one day could be rape 10 years later.[/QUOTE]

This has been the rule for a long time already... rich, famous or regular person. It is no different than taking home a drunk woman from the bar. Both scenarios place you in a compromised position. Don't take huge risks on someone you just met.

After looking into him, during the time that these events happened, Brand was being treated for several addictions, including sex addiction and porn addiction. When he was 17 his father took him to a brothel and they shared prostitutes together. Brand also suffers from bipolar disorder and went through a period of self harming where he was cutting himself.

He has since recovered and is now in AA, and anti-porn. But during the time of these events he was a very f@#ked up lad.

[QUOTE=RRR3;14831644]Of course you’d defend a 35 year old pursuing 16 year old girls.[/QUOTE]

If he isn't breaking any laws banging 16 year olds, the law doesn't care about your feelings. I wouldn't do it, never been attracted to teens myself, I like full grown women with hairy muffins but to each his own as long as they ain't breaking laws, right?

[QUOTE=TheMan;14831663]If he isn't breaking any laws banging 16 year olds, the law doesn't care about your feelings. I wouldn't do it, never been attracted to teens myself, I like full grown women with hairy muffins but to each his own as long as they ain't breaking laws, right?[/QUOTE]

You're allowed to think for yourself and disagree with laws. The legal age of consent in Nigeria is 11, you cool with that?

[QUOTE=TheMan;14831663]II like full grown women with [B]hairy[/B] muffins [/QUOTE]

:biggums:

[QUOTE=diamenz;14831665]:biggums:[/QUOTE]

Yes I do, obviously trimmed, no full grown jungles but shaved beavers give off pedo vibes IMO, looks pubescent...yikes

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14831664]You're allowed to think for yourself and disagree with laws. The legal age of consent in Nigeria is 11, you cool with that?[/QUOTE]

I didn't know that but it goes without saying that that is extreme. For me, the cut off is 16, and even that it's a bit young, I'm cool with 18. I've never been attracted to teens, obviously only when I was a teen but once I hit my 20s, it's been 20s and over for me. But as I said, if that dude likes 16 year olds and it's legal where they at, the law doesn't care about our feelings, change the law instead of getting triggered.

[QUOTE=TheMan;14831666]Yes I do, obviously trimmed, no full grown jungles but shaved beavers give off pedo vibes IMO, looks pubescent...yikes[/QUOTE]

:applause:

A fully grown woman (lets say over the age of 25) with a completely bald pvssy is creepy IMO.

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14831661]After looking into him, during the time that these events happened, Brand was being treated for several addictions, including sex addiction and porn addiction. When he was 17 his father took him to a brothel and they shared prostitutes together. Brand also suffers from bipolar disorder and went through a period of self harming where he was cutting himself.

He has since recovered and is now in AA, and anti-porn. But during the time of these events he was a very f@#ked up lad.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, people in here are being very naïve; he was a loose cannon, to put it mildly. He wasn't the same that he is now.

He rocked up to work (at MTV) wearing an Osama Bin Laden costume. The day after 9/11. He got naked at a protest in like 2001. He was doing Hitler jokes and gestures while presenting an Awards show. That's just the tip of the iceberg really.

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14831655]He was [B]over twice her [/B]age. He was old enough to be her father. No one should be defending that.[/QUOTE]

He was less than twice her age.

Americans have a hang up about 18 being the age of consent but it's 16 in the majority of our states and slightly less than 16 if averaged around the world

[QUOTE=ShawkFactory;14831669]:applause:

A fully grown woman (lets say over the age of 25) with a completely bald pvssy is creepy IMO.[/QUOTE]

:applause:

It always creeped me out that Howard Stern would rag on and on about shaved beavers during his hey day in the 90s. I remember when I was about 10, my aunt was bathing my 2 year old cousin in front of me. Full grown women with shaved genitalia look WAY TOO MUCH like a child's genitalia. You're suspect af if you're into shaved beavers. It's no different from them pervs who want women to dress like little girls in school uniforms and pigtails, yeah, we know what you're really craving :facepalm

[QUOTE=RRR3;14831644]Of course you’d defend a 35 year old pursuing 16 year old girls.[/QUOTE]

You've never pursued a girl in your life so what would you know?


Existence is pain.

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;14831690]You've never pursued a girl in your life so what would you know?


Existence is pain.[/QUOTE]
You literally know nothing about my life besides what I’ve told you and you can’t even get that right. Meanwhile you’re defending pursuing high school sophomores. :facepalm

[B]Orwellian Letter from UK Parliament Regarding Russell Brand

[/B][video=youtube_share;YEa9pcOAZo8]https://youtu.be/YEa9pcOAZo8[/video]

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6fm3rGXcAAxsGt?format=jpg&name=large[/IMG]

[QUOTE=RRR3;14831694]You literally know nothing about my life besides what I’ve told you and you can’t even get that right. Meanwhile you’re defending pursuing high school sophomores. :facepalm[/QUOTE]

What does an anarchist care about the age of consent? I thought you'd be more of the "If they can bleed, they can breed" type

[QUOTE=Long Duck Dong;14831716]What does an anarchist care about the age of consent? I thought you'd be more of the "If they can bleed, they can breed" type[/QUOTE]
Anarchy doesn't mean you don't have a sense of right and wrong :wtf:

I can still think something is morally wrong even if I don't support imprisoning people for it, dawg. All I'm doing is judging Russell Brand for being creepy here, I didn't say lock him up. I think you can agree what he did there is creepy, even if he didn't force himself upon anyone.