[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999641]I would not want Nas working in the US Government.[/QUOTE]
Stupid fucc Rtard 3 would. That's why he voted for Meth Man and already confirmed he's voting for AOC.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999641]I would not want Nas working in the US Government.[/QUOTE]
Stupid fucc Rtard 3 would. That's why he voted for Meth Man and already confirmed he's voting for AOC.
[QUOTE=Baller234;14999659]Half the country being indoctrinated into a cooky religious cult that defies logic and common sense isn't a serious issue?
You're correct in that combating wokism was a major sticking point for republican voters. What you fail to understand is why.
And so long as you fail to understand why, you're never going to win an election again. Because nobody and I mean nobody on the right is ever going to vote for a woke candidate. They would sooner not vote.[/QUOTE]
I already stated why, although I did not elaborate. Wokeness was a major player because the US population is SPOILED TO THE CORE.
We have a lack of real issues, therefor we spend all our time arguing over trans people playing in Girl's volleyball games. Or who is on the label of Aunt Jamima's syrup. Or what the mascot of the Indians should be, or what race is found in most in Hollywood movies. Those are real issues in the US because we are a bunch of spoiled fckwads. Poor countries wish they had our woke issues.
We don't really know what a horrible economy is, we haven't seen one since the Great Depression. Even our poor most ghetto civilians have the lastest Iphone and several rooms with large flat screen TVs hanging up. We are one of the few countries where the poor people are the fat ones and the rich people are the skinny ones. Most of the world it is the exact opposite.
For 90% of us, we argue dumb circus politics all day out of sheer boredom, and not because it is something that directly effects us.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999667]I already stated why, although I did not elaborate. Wokeness was a major player because the US population is SPOILED TO THE CORE.
[B]We have a lack of real issues, therefor we spend all our time arguing over trans people playing in Girl's volleyball games. Or who is on the label of Aunt Jamima's syrup. Or what the mascot of the Indians should be, or what race is found in most in Hollywood movies. Those are real issues in the US because we are a bunch of spoiled fckwads. Poor countries wish they had our woke issues.[/B]
We don't really know what a horrible economy is, we haven't seen one since the Great Depression. Even our poor most ghetto civilians have the lastest Iphone and several rooms with large flat screen TVs hanging up. We are one of the few countries where the poor people are the fat ones and the rich people are the skinny ones. Most of the world it is the exact opposite.
For 90% of us, we argue dumb circus politics all day out of sheer boredom, and not because it is something that directly effects us.[/QUOTE]
Hey genius, these weren't issues until you guys turned them into one.
It was the left who complained about Aunt Jemima. It was the left who complained about the Indians. It was the left who complainined that there were too many white people in movies. It was the left who demanded that males compete with females.
We were doing perfectly fine before your side started making these ridiculous demands. If you believe wokeness to be an issue that hurts democrats, it is entirely your own doing. You started this wokeness, not us.
I agree with you that the woke lefties are entitled and spoiled to the core and thus don't know what real problems are. Thank you for finally seeing the light. :oldlol:
[QUOTE=Baller234;14999672]Hey genius, these weren't issues until you guys turned them into one.
It was the left who complained about Aunt Jemima. It was the left who complained about the Indians. It was the left who complainined that there were too many white people in movies. It was the left who demanded that males compete with females.
We were doing perfectly fine before your side started making these ridiculous demands. If you believe wokeness to be an issue that hurts democrats, it is entirely your own doing. You started this wokeness, not us.
I agree with you that the woke lefties are entitled and spoiled to the core and thus don't know what real problems are. Thank you for finally seeing the light. :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
I wasn't trying to point fingers like a tribal baffoon. All involved are guilty. I was trying to explain the guilt, and why it was a major factor in the election.
But another point I made is that the POTUS has no control over wokeness. Neither Dem or GOP. Kamala can't increase wokeness, and Trump can't decrease it. It is a facet of society, not a product of the government. It had no business influencing a vote to either candidate.
In fact I believe if anything, Trump will increase wokeness, and Kamala might have killed it off completely. It was already dying under Biden.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999678]I wasn't trying to point fingers like a tribal baffoon. [B][SIZE=4]All involved are guilty[/SIZE][/B]. I was trying to explain the guilt, and why it was a major factor in the election.
But another point I made is that the POTUS has no control over wokeness. Neither Dem or GOP. Kamala can't increase wokeness, and Trump can't decrease it. It is a facet of society, not a product of the government. It had no business influencing a vote to either candidate.
In fact I believe if anything, Trump will increase wokeness, and Kamala might have killed it off completely. It was already dying under Biden.[/QUOTE]
How?
Of all the problems you brought up, team blue is responsible for all of them and team red is responsible for none of them. So how are the sides equally responsible?
[IMG]https://media3.giphy.com/media/J2DYCDA15pTau86IGr/giphy.gif?cid=6c09b9528xg3dbkx235jl3t1hfywxr700qb1guqiy6rlu7ax&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Baller234;14999681]How?
Of all the problems you brought up, team blue is responsible for all of them and team red is responsible for none of them. So how are the sides equally responsible?
[IMG]https://media3.giphy.com/media/J2DYCDA15pTau86IGr/giphy.gif?cid=6c09b9528xg3dbkx235jl3t1hfywxr700qb1guqiy6rlu7ax&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g[/IMG][/QUOTE]
The people who voted Trump in because of wokeness are guilty.
If you voted in Trump because you believe the final score of girl's soccer game is important, YOU are guilty.
BOTH sides arguing day and night over an Aunt Jemima bottle are guilty.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999678]I wasn't trying to point fingers like a tribal baffoon. All involved are guilty. I was trying to explain the guilt, and why it was a major factor in the election.
But another point I made is that the POTUS has no control over wokeness. Neither Dem or GOP. Kamala can't increase wokeness, and Trump can't decrease it. It is a facet of society, not a product of the government. It had no business influencing a vote to either candidate.
In fact I believe if anything, Trump will increase wokeness, and Kamala might have killed it off completely. It was already dying under Biden.[/QUOTE]
You believe this because you don't understand communication and propaganda. It's a facet of society which can be affected like everything else.
[QUOTE]We are one of the few countries where the poor people are the fat ones and the rich people are the skinny ones. Most of the world it is the exact opposite.[/QUOTE]
Poor people are fat across the entire western world.
[QUOTE=ZenMaster;14999700]You believe this because you don't understand communication and propaganda. It's a facet of society which can be affected like everything else.
[/QUOTE]
I believe it because it is true. Obviously wokeness was used as propaganda, by both sides. But that is beside the point that these stupid meaningless issues exist because we are spoiled.
I think my overall point went over your head.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999695]The people who voted Trump in because of wokeness are guilty.
If you voted in Trump because you believe the final score of girl's soccer game is important, YOU are guilty.
BOTH sides arguing day and night over an Aunt Jemima bottle are guilty.[/QUOTE]
Huh? So if boys competing in a girls soccer game isn't important, why are democrats so concerned with it? Why invest so much of their political capital into it?
Let's play pretend for the moment and assume you're right. Let's say that more than half the country is just overblowing the issue for no reason at all.
If it's not an important issue, which is what you said, then why would the democrats double down all of it? Why not just accept that it's not popular and abandon ship? Why be willing to die on that hill?
[IMG]https://media3.giphy.com/media/J2DYCDA15pTau86IGr/giphy.gif?cid=6c09b9528xg3dbkx235jl3t1hfywxr700qb1guqiy6rlu7ax&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g[/IMG]
You keep insisting that it's not important, but obviously that's not what your leaders and representatives in government think. Your democratic officials think boys being able to compete in girls soccer is VERY important. So important that they were willing to hand the country over to Adolf Hitler.
[QUOTE=ZenMaster;14999700]
Poor people are fat across the entire western world.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]https://www.lovelljohns.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/obesity-world-map-global-580x319.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Baller234;14999708]Huh? So if boys competing in a girls soccer game isn't important, why are democrats so concerned with it? Why invest so much of their political capital into it?
Let's play pretend for the moment and assume you're right. Let's say that more than half the country is just overblowing the issue for no reason at all.
If it's not an important issue, which is what you said, then why would the democrats double down all of it? Why not just accept that it's not popular and abandon ship? Why be willing to die on that hill?
[IMG]https://media3.giphy.com/media/J2DYCDA15pTau86IGr/giphy.gif?cid=6c09b9528xg3dbkx235jl3t1hfywxr700qb1guqiy6rlu7ax&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g[/IMG]
You keep insisting that it's not important, but obviously that's not what your leaders and representatives in government think. Your democratic officials think boys being able to compete in girls soccer is VERY important. So important that they were willing to hand the country over to Adolf Hitler.[/QUOTE]
Both sides play to it for the reasons I have been saying, we are spoiled retards and the politicians play to that. Are you reading in here?
I mean are you saying that the final score of a girl's soccer game is actually an important issue? Has this affected your life in some way? It's a game. It means NOTHING.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999711]Both sides play to it for the reasons I have been saying, we are spoiled retards and the politicians play to that. Are you reading in here?
I mean are you saying that the final score of a girl's soccer game is actually an important issue? Has this affected your life in some way? It's a game. It means NOTHING.[/QUOTE]
Wait so if isn't important to you, why allow your party to sink to such depths over a non-important issue? If they don't represent your interests or you think they are alienating too many americans, why not demand they reverse course?
If it's not important to you but it's important to others, why can't you accept that? Why are you willing to follow the democrats off the cliff?
[QUOTE=Baller234;14999714]Wait so if isn't important to you, why allow your party to sink to such depths over a non-important issue? If they don't represent your interests or you think they are alienating too many americans, why not demand they reverse course?
If it's not important to you but it's important to others, why can't you accept that? Why are you willing to follow the democrats off the cliff?[/QUOTE]
I've said it was stupid from day 1.
You on the other hand, were convinced that girl's sports was a major crisis in the country because you're everything I said. A spoiled **** with nothing real to worry about.
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14999650]And Kamala was almost president[/QUOTE]
And Trump and GWB were presidents, dumb people can reach the highest levels.
Machiavellian :pimp:
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999716]I've said it was stupid from day 1.
You on the other hand, were convinced that girl's sports was a major crisis in the country because you're everything I said. A spoiled **** with nothing real to worry about.[/QUOTE]
So you agree that boys being able to compete in girls sports in stupid and nonsensical. Got it.
Well then it sounds like you really suffer from having misplaced priorities. Seems like you would rather direct your anger towards the critics instead of those responsible for the issue in the first place.
I mean let's follow your logic here. Democrats demand something you admit is totally stupid and nonsensical, but it's the [B]republicans[/B] fault for daring to take issue with it?
How do you not see you're in a cult?? :oldlol:
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999710][IMG]https://www.lovelljohns.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/obesity-world-map-global-580x319.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
So what you're saying is that around 50% of Americans are poor? Only not the real 3rd world skinny kind of poor, and they deserve to try this.
[QUOTE=Baller234;14999721]
Well then it sounds like you really suffer from having misplaced priorities. [/QUOTE]
My priorities are in things that actually matter, ie the economy.
Your priority is saving girl's soccer from boys scoring too many goals unfairly.
[QUOTE=ZenMaster;14999729]So what you're saying is that around 50% of Americans are poor? Only not the real 3rd world skinny kind of poor, and they deserve to try this.[/QUOTE]
I'm saying the average US citizen is spoiled.
Holy shit. Fat people are spoiled and women’s sports are trash. I think we need one more banger.
-Smak
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999733]My priorities are in things that actually matter, ie the economy.
Your priority is saving girl's soccer from boys scoring too many goals unfairly.[/QUOTE]
You keep trying to boil it down to a "soccer game" when in reality it's much bigger than that. The end result is the total eradication of female-only spaces. That's really what the progressive left wants.
In what universe is that not an important issue to most americans? Not only is more than half the population female, but the other half of the population that includes men likely have females in their lives that they care about. So this issue concerns pretty much anyone that is female or any person in America that has a wife, mother, sister, daughter or niece.
Instead of asking us why we care so much, let me turn the question around on you. Why is it so important for the democrats to eradicate female-only spaces?
[QUOTE=ZenMaster;14999729]So what you're saying is that around 50% of Americans are poor? Only not the real 3rd world skinny kind of poor, and they deserve to try this.[/QUOTE]
so, has no one told you you're extremely stupid? like you legit are retarded, maybe get checked out?
[QUOTE=ILLsmak;14999738]Holy shit. Fat people are spoiled and women’s sports are trash. I think we need one more banger.
-Smak[/QUOTE]
Generally speaking, yes.
Not "trash", just irrelevant.
I have daughters, and they grew up playing sports. The outcome of their games generally means absolutely nothing. And it is a joke that trans people playing in sports was actual issue in the election. Because the reality is, it means nothing.
99% of "woke" issues are complete Nothing Burgers. How is that for another banger?
They are mostly issues that bored people argue about on the internet, like I am doing now.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999734]I'm saying the average US citizen is spoiled.[/QUOTE]
Poor people being inclined to eat non organic carb filled addictive sugar diets and getting fat because of it, using that as an indicator to say the average American being spoiled is pretty nasty.
Why don't you apply the same logic of Americans being spoiled when the S&P500 drops 10%?
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999830]Generally speaking, yes.
Not "trash", just irrelevant.
I have daughters, and they grew up playing sports. [B]The outcome of their games generally means absolutely nothing[/B]. And it is a joke that trans people playing in sports was actual issue in the election. Because the reality is, it means nothing.
99% of "woke" issues are complete Nothing Burgers. How is that for another banger?
They are mostly issues that bored people argue about on the internet, like I am doing now.[/QUOTE]
Dude are you lying about having a daughter? Serious question because that doesn't sound like something a supportive father would say. The outcome of the game means nothing? Maybe when they're really little like 4-8, but eventually if your kid wants to take sports more seriously they have to learn how to compete. Winning and losing matters. Especially as they enter high school.
But you're telling us you don't care if your daughter wins or loses? Does SHE even care? Okay if no one cares about winning or losing, why is she even playing sports? Most girls that aren't competitive like that don't even get involved in sports to begin with. But you're telling me you went to your daughter's game and didn't care if she won? You didn't cheer her on?
Imagine practicing at something your whole life and winning some really important game like a regional playoff or something only to have your dad say, [B]"Hey I saw you won but the outcome of that game meant absolutely nothing you know[/B]."
Apparently you don't have to imagine that if your dad is Bill Gates.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15000397][B]Dude are you lying about having a daughter? [/B]Serious question because that doesn't sound like something a supportive father would say. The outcome of the game means nothing? Maybe when they're really little like 4-8, but eventually if your kid wants to take sports more seriously they have to learn how to compete. Winning and losing matters. Especially as they enter high school.
But you're telling us you don't care if your daughter wins or loses? Does SHE even care? Okay if no one cares about winning or losing, why is she even playing sports? Most girls that aren't competitive like that don't even get involved in sports to begin with. But you're telling me you went to your daughter's game and didn't care if she won? You didn't cheer her on?
Imagine practicing at something your whole life and winning some really important game like a regional playoff or something only to have your dad say, [B]"Hey I saw you won but the outcome of that game meant absolutely nothing you know[/B]."
Apparently you don't have to imagine that if your dad is Bill Gates.[/QUOTE]
He is. He does this a lot and then falls back to that “Lol I’m pretending to be actually Bill Gates, isn’t that original and funny?”
Guy definitely suffers from some sort of developmental disability.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999830]Generally speaking, yes.
Not "trash", just irrelevant.
I have daughters, and they grew up playing sports. The outcome of their games generally means absolutely nothing. And it is a joke that trans people playing in sports was actual issue in the election. Because the reality is, it means nothing.
99% of "woke" issues are complete Nothing Burgers. How is that for another banger?
They are mostly issues that bored people argue about on the internet, like I am doing now.[/QUOTE]
I'm just messing around. haha, no need to defend yourself against my twisting of your words!
-Smak
smartest prez of all time ... doesn't care about USA ,, [U][B]so goes golfing [/B][/U]and gave keys to Elon Musk... to make billions
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;14999639]Every POTUS had to navigate sectors and "rise the highest level". One of them has to be the dumbest.
I will say that with Trump, his emotional intelligence is much lower than his Intelligence Quotient.[/QUOTE]
I disagree. People who have met (watch the evolution of thought on this topic on All In Podcast) and gotten to know him think he's got high EQ. He's not IQ smart in the way lawyers are - knowing the constitution/history/laws of the US but common sense "people" smart. Yes, I know he's EGOTISTICAL but from what people say - quite charming in person.
I saw him up close in Miami when he first started running - back in a 2015/16? rally in a ballroom at Trump Doral - he is a very dynamic/magnetic speaker - got PRESENCE.
[QUOTE=Jasper;15001099]smartest prez of all time ... doesn't care about USA ,, so goes golfing and gave keys to [B][U]Elon Musk[/U][/B]... to make billions[/QUOTE]
Well, if there's ever a person who doesn't quite come across vs what's going on inside - it's Musk. The way he (pauses and) talks - he's sounds asperger-ish but underneath is a brilliant mind. The story of how in the beginning of Space X, he couldn't get good/great engineers to work on the rocket/launch and had to do a lot of it himself - is impressive for someone with a physics and economics degree.
[QUOTE=rmt;15001298]I disagree. People who have met (watch the evolution of thought on this topic on All In Podcast) and gotten to know him think he's got high EQ. He's not IQ smart in the way lawyers are - knowing the constitution/history/laws of the US but common sense "people" smart. Yes, I know he's EGOTISTICAL but from what people say - quite charming in person.
I saw him up close in Miami when he first started running - back in a 2015/16? rally in a ballroom at Trump Doral - he is a very dynamic/magnetic speaker - got PRESENCE.[/QUOTE]
These people aren't seriously concerned about Trump's supposed low IQ because these are the same people who pulled the level for The Cackler, a woman so dumb her handlers had to keep her hidden for more than a month after receiving the nomination. Literally the moment she started speaking her campaign took a nosedive. :oldlol:
Just wait until Ocrazyo is the dem nominee. She makes The Cackler look like Isaac Newton. :oldlol:
[QUOTE=Baller234;15001443]These people aren't seriously concerned about Trump's supposed low IQ because these are the same people who pulled the level for The Cackler, a woman so dumb her handlers had to keep her hidden for more than a month after receiving the nomination. Literally the moment she started speaking her campaign took a nosedive. :oldlol:
Just wait until Ocrazyo is the dem nominee. She makes The Cackler look like Isaac Newton. :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
Your moron leader will be so bad, Ocrazyo (or another way left candidate), will be seen as the obvious choice. Just like in 2008. Your idiot in chief will make that happen :lol
Midterms are going to be an absolute blowout.
[video=youtube;90U_LgTHLRQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90U_LgTHLRQ[/video]
He's got two years to do all the damage he can squeeze in, which is actually plenty of time unfortunately.
"Midterms are going to be an absolute blowout"
Brought to you by the same people who said:
- "The GOP has moved on from Trump..."
- "The GOP won't back Trump because he's a proven loser..."
- "The GOP is never gonna win an election again..."
- "Trump is going to jail..."
- "Biden is leading in the polls against Trump..."
- "Kamala is leading in the polls against Trump..."
:oldlol:
The only thing anyone said in that list you made is Kamala leading in the polls, and that was true. Biden was never leading the polls, which is why he got replaced.
Trump lost the House in his first term. It isn't an off the wall prediction at all and we are already seeing hints of now. Where Musk is in Wisconsin (a swing state) trying to rally the election and then gets blown out by Dems.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15001691]"Midterms are going to be an absolute blowout"
Brought to you by the same people who said:
- "The GOP has moved on from Trump..."
- "The GOP won't back Trump because he's a proven loser..."
- "The GOP is never gonna win an election again..."
- "Trump is going to jail..."
- "Biden is leading in the polls against Trump..."
- "Kamala is leading in the polls against Trump..."
:oldlol:[/QUOTE]
You make up shit that no one here said, and as Off the Court already posted, Harris was leading in the polls during the summer.
[QUOTE=Off the Court;15001665]Midterms are going to be an absolute blowout.
[video=youtube;90U_LgTHLRQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90U_LgTHLRQ[/video]
He's got two years to do all the damage he can squeeze in, which is actually plenty of time unfortunately.[/QUOTE]
It's comically early to be predicting an election that's 18 months out. There was supposed to be a huge red wave in 2022 and that never materialized.
[QUOTE=TheMan;15001704]You make up shit that no one here said, and as Off the Court already posted, Harris was leading in the polls during the summer.[/QUOTE]
I promise you there were idiots here saying the GOP was moving on from Trump.
Otherwise what else more can I add? Have fun fantasizing about the midterms two years out. :oldlol:
[QUOTE=SouBeachTalents;15001709]It's comically early to be predicting an election that's 18 months out. There was supposed to be a huge red wave in 2022 and that never materialized.[/QUOTE]
No it isn't, the economy is ALWAYS issue numero uno and the tariff situation hasn't even materialized yet. 2 years is no time when in reference to that. Recession is coming, we can all see it.
Aside from that it is the norm for the mid-terms to go to the opposite party, the Dems winning during Biden's term was an anomaly and only happened because of Jan 6 and the fact that the average American eye-rolled at Trump's election conspiracies.
[QUOTE=Off the Court;15001745]No it isn't, the economy is ALWAYS issue numero uno and the tariff situation hasn't even materialized yet. 2 years is no time when in reference to that. Recession is coming, we can all see it.
Aside from that it is the norm for the mid-terms to go to the opposite party, the Dems winning during Biden's term was an anomaly and only happened because of Jan 6 and the fact that the average American eye-rolled at Trump's election conspiracies.[/QUOTE]
Taking UK as an example: They suffered and still do from the Brexit, but Farage is still gaining traction. What alot of populists are great at is deflecting from not giving solutions to the problems they loudly point at and the damage they often deal to the very people they are supposedly campaigning for.
[QUOTE=Off the Court;15001665]Midterms are going to be an absolute blowout.
[video=youtube;90U_LgTHLRQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90U_LgTHLRQ[/video]
He's got two years to do all the damage he can squeeze in, which is actually plenty of time unfortunately.[/QUOTE]
Trump's numbers slightly decreasing should mean Dems numbers are increasing, right?