Printable View
[QUOTE=highwhey;15012224]what a sad response. "my idol is being accused of being a pdf file, but how come they didn't reveal it earlier"
you are a sick and disgusting human being.[/QUOTE]
I'm saying if it's true it reflects poorly on Elon *as well as* as Trump.
Basic comprehension skills my guy. Starting to think you were the kid in your class that ate the elmer's glue.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15012234]I'm saying if it's true it reflects poorly on Elon *as well as* as Trump.
Basic comprehension skills my guy. Starting to think you were the kid in your class that ate the elmer's glue.[/QUOTE]
Dude Elon is a piece of shit. Not saying this for sure true. But no one would be surprised that he hid this information as long as it was financially beneficial for him. That’s how these types of people (billionaires) operate..
[QUOTE=Baller234;15012234]I'm saying if it's true it reflects poorly on Elon *as well as* as Trump.
Basic comprehension skills my guy. Starting to think you were the kid in your class that ate the elmer's glue.[/QUOTE]
considering the severity of the accusation, he may not have had evidence or any palpable way of proving it true. real life is not insidehoops where people log into alternate accounts and make baseless accusations simply because they dislike another person.
and you never said it reflects poorly on trump, not initially until i called you out.
[QUOTE=highwhey;15012248]considering the severity of the accusation, he may not have had evidence or any palpable way of proving it true. real life is not insidehoops where people log into alternate accounts and make baseless accusations simply because they dislike another person.
and you never said it reflects poorly on trump, not initially until i called you out.[/QUOTE]
It was inferred you fukking moron.
[QUOTE]So what would have happened if the bill never passed? Elon would have just kept this a secret the whole time? [B]Doesn't really reflect well on him either if you ask me.[/B][/QUOTE]
Are you familiar with what the word "either" means?
Put down the elmer's glue and stop posting you fukking retard.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15012259]It was inferred you fukking moron.
Are you familiar with what the word "either" means?
Put down the elmer's glue and stop posting you fukking retard.[/QUOTE]
MELTDOWN :roll:
[QUOTE=Baller234;15012259]
Put down the elmer's glue and stop posting you fukking retard.[/QUOTE]
Hehehehehehehehehehehehe that was a good one.
Now Elon is calling for Trump to be impeached.
What a couple of bitches.
[url]https://x.com/RealCandaceO/status/1932808686545567977[/url]
Candace Owens of all people, getting down to it. :applause:
Trump ain't releasing the Epstein files, ever. He's a prominent figure in them, what did Epstein say...? We've been close friends for over 10 years or something to that effect. Also Trump admitting on video that his pal Epstein likes em on the younger side :lol
And Epstein "killed" himself while Trump was POTUS...how convenient.
[QUOTE=TheMan;15013784]Trump ain't releasing the Epstein files, ever. He's a prominent figure in them, what did Epstein say...? We've been close friends for over 10 years or something to that effect. Also Trump admitting on video that his pal Epstein likes em on the younger side :lol
And Epstein "killed" himself while Trump was POTUS...how convenient.[/QUOTE]
Where there's smoke, there's fire.
If the Epstein files did exonerate Trump from being a pedo, you know he would have released them by now and prove Elon is a liar.
The fact that Trump does not speaks volumes.
I don't care who's named in the Epstein files. I wanna know who his clients were and who was playing footsies with underage teens.
Here is Trump talking about Epstein and his "cesspool" island back in 2015, even implicating Prince Andrew.
[video=youtube;_0SuZQZGKqo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0SuZQZGKqo[/video]
This video doesn't prove Trump's innocence but judging from his response here it would be pretty damn bold of him to start dropping names like that if he were just as guilty. Judging from his body language and his mannerisms he doesn't look like he's trying to hide anything. Plus you're talking about a guy who made enemies out of all the intelligence agencies and all the most powerful people in the world. If there was irrefutable proof that Trump visited the island or that he was a client, we 100% would have heard it by now.
Now if you told me someone close to him was a client, or that he was beholden to someone who was a client, that would surprise me a lot less.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15013889]I don't care who's named in the Epstein files. I wanna know who his clients were and who was playing footsies with underage teens.
Here is Trump talking about Epstein and his "cesspool" island back in 2015, even implicating Prince Andrew.
[video=youtube;_0SuZQZGKqo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0SuZQZGKqo[/video]
This video doesn't prove Trump's innocence but judging from his response here it would be pretty damn bold of him to start dropping names like that if he were just as guilty. Judging from his body language and his mannerisms he doesn't look like he's trying to hide anything. Plus you're talking about a guy who made enemies out of all the intelligence agencies and all the most powerful people in the world. If there was irrefutable proof that Trump visited the island or that he was a client, we 100% would have heard it by now.
Now if you told me someone close to him was a client, or that he was beholden to someone who was a client, that would surprise me a lot less.[/QUOTE]
if he had nothing to hide, he would have forced patel's hand already.
[QUOTE=highwhey;15013891]if he had nothing to hide, he would have forced patel's hand already.[/QUOTE]
I'm gonna have to agree with you on this highwhey...
I don't think Elon was talking $hit just for the sake of it... Elon was betrayed, and in return betrayed Trump, and wasn't with a made-up lie.
[QUOTE=highwhey;15013891]if he had nothing to hide, he would have forced patel's hand already.[/QUOTE]
Not if he's beholden to someone who's on the list.
[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15013895]I'm gonna have to agree with you on this highwhey...
I don't think Elon was talking $hit just for the sake of it... Elon was betrayed, and in return betrayed Trump, and wasn't with a made-up lie.[/QUOTE]
He said Trump's name appeared in the files. He didn't say to what degree or whether or not he was a client.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15013899]Not if he's beholden to someone who's on the list.
He said Trump's name appeared in the files. He didn't say to what degree or whether or not he was a client.[/QUOTE]
How do you not realize how pathetic you sound? :oldlol:
Your hero is a pedo, deal with it.
[QUOTE=RRR3;15013901]How do you not realize how pathetic you sound? :oldlol:
Your hero is a pedo, deal with it.[/QUOTE]
Sorry but "deal with it" doesn't prove anything.
Also worth mentioning that a pedophile is someone who has interactions with a prepubescent child, not an underage teen. So far nobody has accused Epstein or Maxwell of trafficking prepubescent children. The youngest victim we know of so far was 14. Unacceptable of course but that wouldn't technically make someone a pedophile.
As someone who's probably been accused of being a pedophile before, I'm shocked you don't know the difference.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15013907]Sorry but "deal with it" doesn't prove anything.
Also worth mentioning that a pedophile is someone who has interactions with a prepubescent child, not an underage teen. So far nobody has accused Epstein or Maxwell of trafficking prepubescent children. The youngest victim we know of so far was 14. Unacceptable of course but that wouldn't technically make someone a pedophile.
As someone who's probably been accused of being a pedophile before, I'm shocked you don't know the difference.[/QUOTE]
So in your book Jeffrey Epstein, the guy famous for being a pedophile, isn't a pedophile just a guy who was "unacceptable"? Interesting. And then you turn around and accuse me because you're so sensitive about Trump. Relax, kid, I'm not accusing you, just the guy your boy Musk outed. Or is Musk bad now?
[QUOTE=RRR3;15013909]So in your book Jeffrey Epstein, the guy famous for being a pedophile, isn't a pedophile just a guy who was "unacceptable"? Interesting. And then you turn around and accuse me because you're so sensitive about Trump. Relax, kid, I'm not accusing you, just the guy your boy Musk outed. Or is Musk bad now?[/QUOTE]
You really do have a brain the size of a rice krispy. That's not what I was inferring at all.
You accused Trump of being a pedophile. I was simply correcting your incorrect word usage. Epstein did not traffic any prepubescent children that we know of, therefore his clients wouldn't be considered pedophiles. You probably couldn't bribe the world's richest and most powerful men with children that young to begin with. Even on "To Catch A Predator" they never used children that young as bait because the pool of predators is extremely small.
Musk is not my boy, he is simply an ally for the time being. I don't fully trust any of them. That applies to Trump too. You keep acting like my world would be shattered if it ever came out that Trump was a child molester but it really wouldn't. I would be extremely disappointed of course but it's not like I would start questioning my life or regret voting for him. He would still be a great president just like OJ Simpson was still a great football player.
Trump might be Satan to you but he is not God to me. That's why you're vaccinated and I'm not.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15013918]You really do have a brain the size of a rice krispy. That's not what I was inferring at all.
You accused Trump of being a pedophile. I was simply correcting your incorrect word usage. Epstein did not traffic any prepubescent children that we know of, therefore his clients wouldn't be considered pedophiles. You probably couldn't bribe the world's richest and most powerful men with children that young to begin with. Even on "To Catch A Predator" they never used children that young as bait because the pool of predators is extremely small.
Musk is not my boy, he is simply an ally for the time being. I don't fully trust any of them. That applies to Trump too. You keep acting like my world would be shattered if it ever came out that Trump was a child molester but it really wouldn't. I would be extremely disappointed of course but it's not like I would start questioning my life or regret voting for him. He would still be a great president just like OJ Simpson was still a great football player.
Trump might be Satan to you but he is not God to me. That's why you're vaccinated and I'm not.[/QUOTE]
You know full well everyone refers to Epstein as a pedophile, I'm not sure why you're pretending otherwise. From his wikipedia page:
[QUOTE]On August 23, 2019, the prosecutor's office in Paris, France, opened a preliminary investigation into Epstein, after Yael Mellul wrote to the Paris prosecutor to report the international dimensions of the pedophile network involving Jeffrey Epstein, criticizing the slow pace of justice.[147] [/QUOTE]
I'm acting as if your world would be shattered because you're engaging in denial when plenty of other conservatives (including Doomsday Dallas) have acknowledged Trump seems to be a child predator.
[QUOTE=RRR3;15013923]You know full well everyone refers to Epstein as a pedophile, I'm not sure why you're pretending otherwise. From his wikipedia page:
I'm acting as if your world would be shattered because you're engaging in denial when plenty of other conservatives (including Doomsday Dallas) have acknowledged Trump seems to be a child predator.[/QUOTE]
How am I engaging in denial? Nothing has been proven whatsoever. Even if Musk wasn't lying or trolling, which he very well could have been, all he said was that Trump's name appeared in the files. He never said he was on Epstein's client list or that he took trips to the island. Otherwise his name could appear in the files for any number of reasons.
I wasn't referring to Epstein being a pedo, I was talking about his clients. It's not feasible to me that if there really was some grand scheme to blackmail powerful men that they would use 8-9 year olds as bait. That's an awfully big gamble.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15013925]How am I engaging in denial? Nothing has been proven whatsoever. Even if Musk wasn't lying or trolling, which he very well could have been, all he said was that Trump's name appeared in the files. He never said he was on Epstein's client list or that he took trips to the island. Otherwise his name could appear in the files for any number of reasons.
I wasn't referring to Epstein being a pedo, I was talking about his clients. It's not feasible to me that if there really was some grand scheme to blackmail powerful men that they would use 8-9 year olds as bait. That's an awfully big gamble.[/QUOTE]
Maybe Musk was lying or trolling, but it's pretty obvious he meant the list wasn't being released because it would greatly hurt Trump. You can do the math. Musk isn't trustworthy so you would normally have a point there but I remember you being very willing to give him the benefit of the doubt before this so.
[QUOTE=RRR3;15013926]Maybe Musk was lying or trolling, but it's pretty obvious he meant the list wasn't being released because it would greatly hurt Trump. You can do the math. Musk isn't trustworthy so you would normally have a point there but I remember you being very willing to give him the benefit of the doubt before this so.[/QUOTE]
[I]Time to drop the really big bomb. @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT![/I]
That was the tweet. Looks like he was very careful choosing his words if you ask me. "Trump is in the Epstein files" could mean any number of things. If he really had that kind of knowledge he could have been far more descriptive.
Do you think Musk even has access to that kind of information? If Musk knows exactly who Epstein's clients were and could prove it, why hasn't he?
[QUOTE=Baller234;15013931][I]Time to drop the really big bomb. @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT![/I]
That was the tweet. Looks like he was very careful choosing his words if you ask me. "Trump is in the Epstein files" could mean any number of things. If he really had that kind of knowledge he could have been far more descriptive.
Do you think Musk even has access to that kind of information? If Musk knows exactly who Epstein's clients were and could prove it, why hasn't he?[/QUOTE]
How would I know what Musk had access to? But he was in Trump's inner circle and had security clearance for a lot of stuff so would it shocked you if he read the files? How is Musk going to prove it if he doesn't have the files himself? Maybe Musk is lying, but you'd think Trump would just release them to shut him up if that were the case.
[QUOTE=RRR3;15013933]How would I know what Musk had access to? But he was in Trump's inner circle and had security clearance for a lot of stuff so would it shocked you if he read the files? How is Musk going to prove it if he doesn't have the files himself? Maybe Musk is lying, but you'd think Trump would just release them to shut him up if that were the case.[/QUOTE]
Trump wouldn't release them if he was beholden to someone on the list.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15013936]Trump wouldn't release them if he was beholden to someone on the list.[/QUOTE]
Who is Trump beholden to?
[QUOTE=RRR3;15013937]Who is Trump beholden to?[/QUOTE]
I wish I knew, but if he's obstructing the release of the files it means either he's implicated or someone he's beholden to is implicated.
Look at Brandon. As far as I know not a single person ever accused him of being an Epstein client yet during his entire tenure as president he made zero effort to uncover that stone. You weren't even allowed to [I]say[/I] the word "Epstein" around democrats.
Who was Brandon covering for?
[QUOTE=Baller234;15013943]I wish I knew, but if he's obstructing the release of the files it means either he's implicated or someone he's beholden to is implicated.
Look at Brandon. As far as I know not a single person ever accused him of being an Epstein client yet during his entire tenure as president he made zero effort to uncover that stone. You weren't even allowed to [I]say[/I] the word "Epstein" around democrats.
[B]Who was Brandon covering for?[/B][/QUOTE]
Probably himself as well as Bill Clinton. You really thought I was gonna be afraid to admit that lol? I know those guys are predators (since you don't like the term pedophile)
[QUOTE=RRR3;15013944]Probably himself as well as Bill Clinton. You really thought I was gonna be afraid to admit that lol? I know those guys are predators (since you don't like the term pedophile)[/QUOTE]
Not at all. That wasn't a "gotcha", it was a rhetorical question.
I'm saying you don't have to be an Epstein client in order to cover for an Epstein client.
Left minded posters when Baller talks about Brandon:
[IMG]https://media.tenor.com/WBSt2gcsNVMAAAAM/we-dont-care.gif[/IMG]
[SIZE=7][B]anyone know?[/B][/SIZE]
[IMG]https://media.tenor.com/kVrGzZGZnUUAAAAM/pulp-fiction-wtf.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Baller234;15013943]I wish I knew, but if he's obstructing the release of the files it means either he's implicated or someone he's beholden to is implicated.
Look at Brandon. As far as I know not a single person ever accused him of being an Epstein client yet during his entire tenure as president he made zero effort to uncover that stone. You weren't even allowed to [I]say[/I] the word "Epstein" around democrats.
Who was Brandon covering for?[/QUOTE]
The third option is that there is a former President (Bill Clinton) on that list and other high-powered people on that list and Trump is either being instructed not to release it or realizes the level of damage it will do if it's released and chooses not to have it released. I'm thinking there are a lot more Democrats on that list than there are Republicans and a lot of leaders from other countries too. The fallout might be worse than just never releasing it and just realizing that Epstein took the coward's way out. For some reason, Maxwell is still in prison and hasn't had a deal offered yet. Maybe there is no list. Maybe she doesn't know shit.
[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;15014154]The third option is that there is a former President (Bill Clinton) on that list and other high-powered people on that list and Trump is either being instructed not to release it or realizes the level of damage it will do if it's released and chooses not to have it released. I'm thinking there are a lot more Democrats on that list than there are Republicans and a lot of leaders from other countries too. The fallout might be worse than just never releasing it and just realizing that Epstein took the coward's way out. For some reason, Maxwell is still in prison and hasn't had a deal offered yet. Maybe there is no list. Maybe she doesn't know shit.[/QUOTE]
Why would Trump care about hurting Democrats?
[QUOTE=RRR3;15014179]Why would Trump care about hurting Democrats?[/QUOTE]
Come on man, you don't buy the theory that Trump has decided to leave himself in question in order to save the country from the insane damage caused by knowing Bill Clinton, who was in office 25 years ago and kicked out for a blow job, was on the Epstein list?
Imagine the chaos that would cause.
All the backflips, somersaults, and 1080 McTwists that MAGA is doing is hilarious :roll:
Trump is in like 800 pictures with Epstein, every Trump family member can be found on flight logs and his phone number book. They are known buddies. Trump has a history of cheating on his wife. And now we have his good buddy Elon Musk flat out saying that he is on the list. And still they are like "he's trying to save Bill Clinton" :oldlol:
Here is the REAL situation. The question is no longer "is Trump on there?" The question is now: "Does MAGA care that Trump is on there?"
And I think for most of MAGA, the answer to that question is "NO".
[QUOTE=Off the Court;15014184]All the backflips, somersaults, and 1080 McTwists that MAGA is doing is hilarious :roll:
Trump is in like 800 pictures with Epstein, every Trump family member can be found on flight logs and his phone number book. They are known buddies. Trump has a history of cheating on his wife. And now we have his good buddy Elon Musk flat out saying that he is on the list. And still they are like "he's trying to save Bill Clinton" :oldlol:
Here is the REAL situation. The question is no longer "is Trump on there?" The question is now: "Does MAGA care that Trump is on there?"
And I think for most of MAGA, the answer to that question is "NO".[/QUOTE]
there's nothing about trump that would make MAGA lose love for him. he's a confirmed PDF, not even a rumor but actually confirmed, he's a liar, thieve, cheats on his wife with prostitutes, terrible businessman, horrible negotiator, walks back on his word, disrespects the military, disrespects even his own voter base...and not one inch of lost love.
that's a cult.
[QUOTE=RRR3;15014179]Why would Trump care about hurting Democrats?[/QUOTE]
Because the media would spin it as the Trump administration going after his political enemies. Let's face it, politicians in this country are a protected class. I'm not saying I wouldn't love seeing Democrats behind bars, but in this upside down and crazy world, it may actually backfire on Trump.
But **** it, let the Democrats burn. They are terrible people.
[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;15014200]Because the media would spin it as the Trump administration going after his political enemies. Let's face it, politicians in this country are a protected class. I'm not saying I wouldn't love seeing Democrats behind bars, but in this upside down and crazy world, it may actually backfire on Trump.
But **** it, let the Democrats burn. They are terrible people.[/QUOTE]
he already has begun doing that. he's allowing a florida sheriff to tell people its ok to run over protestors LMAO.
he's also threatening people that protest on his birthday. didn't he also say there would be grave consequences for elon if he funded liberals?
[url]https://www.axios.com/2025/07/07/jeffrey-epstein-suicide-client-list-trump-administration[/url]
The cover-up has completed. :ohwell:
[QUOTE=BurningHammer;15020602][url]https://www.axios.com/2025/07/07/jeffrey-epstein-suicide-client-list-trump-administration[/url]
The cover-up has completed. :ohwell:[/QUOTE]
Let's hear the MAGA excuse for this :yaohappy: