Printable View
[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15012395][url]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?521382-Predator-vs-Spider-Man-2025-who-you-got&p=14996708[/url]
so which is better?
Killer of Killers vs Spiderverse
[img]https://mlpnk72yciwc.i.optimole.com/cqhiHLc.IIZS~2ef73/w:350/h:530/q:75/https://bleedingcool.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/PREDSM2025001_Brown.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Spider-verse. The ending to the sequel was awesome. Great cliffhanger. Not even close to me.
[QUOTE=Phoenix;15012466]Or Star Wars for that matter. The difference is those movies didn't consciously write the men in those movies to be complete morons to offset them against the empowered female. Sarah Conner, Ripley and Princess Leia were all great characters with the appropriate sensibilities and vulnerabilities to make them relatable. The fact that they were also female was never the point. Modern Hollywood doesn't know how to write.[/QUOTE]
I don't think those movies would be called woke today by most people if they came out today. Their characters didn't feel unnatural or out of place or overpowering. Sarah Conner was never the lead in any of the Terminator films. Arnold overpowered everyone. In T2 Arnold and John were the main focus for majority of the movie and Sarah was the third most important character. In the original Kyle Reese was her protector. Same thing with Princess Leia. Vader, Luke and maybe even Han Solo were stronger characters.
Ripley is different though, but she wasn't thrown into the main lead role unnaturally. She didn't just become a badass in Aliens out of nowhere. She went through trials and tribulations in the first film, showed fear, showed weakness and overcoming it. And what she is in Aliens is her facing her fears.
Compare that to something like Rey in Star Wars, the first time she picks up a lightsaber she suddenly can defeat Kylo Ren who's trained with the Force and lightsaber for years and was a proper padawan, but she can defeat him? Several times in fact? That's crazy woke. Two totally different animals.
[QUOTE=Meticode;15012473]I don't think those movies would be called woke today by most people if they came out today. Their characters didn't feel unnatural or out of place or overpowering. Sarah Conner was never the lead in any of the Terminator films. Arnold overpowered everyone. In T2 Arnold and John were the main focus for majority of the movie and Sarah was the third most important character. In the original Kyle Reese was her protector. Same thing with Princess Leia. Vader, Luke and maybe even Han Solo were stronger characters.
Ripley is different though, but she wasn't thrown into the main lead role unnaturally. She didn't just become a badass in Aliens out of nowhere. She went through trials and tribulations in the first film, showed fear, showed weakness and overcoming it. And what she is in Aliens is her facing her fears.
Compare that to something like Rey in Star Wars, the first time she picks up a lightsaber she suddenly can defeat Kylo Ren who's trained with the Force and lightsaber for years and was a proper padawan, but she can defeat him? Several times in fact? That's crazy woke. Two totally different animals.[/QUOTE]
The only reason I say they would be is because of the current environment of 'empowered female character' movies and I think those films would get ( unjustifiably) lumped into that category. Those women wouldn't necessarily have to be the 'main' character per se, just prominently featured like Sarah Conner was even though Terminator was an Arnold vehicle. Sarah in T2 IMO would definitely be considered 'woke' in 2025, not because she really was, but just because of the environment we're in and I don't think many people can critically tell the difference nowadays. They'd equate Leia and Rey as 'woke' even though they're worlds apart in characterization. Granted, if those movies were actually made today they would probably depict those women differently. Remember that we first met Leia back in 1977 as the 'damsel in distress' that needed to be rescued by the two ( white cis) males. That wouldn't fly today. Actually if you recall, they had a lightsaber training scene in Rise of Skywalker and Leia got the better of Luke. I think that's a clear indication that Leia would have gotten the 'girl boss' treatment from the get-go today. They basically would have depicted her in the same way they did Rey, immediately capable of outshining the men. And Han/Luke would have been depicted as buffoons to make her look even better( which they basically did with Finn).
[QUOTE=Phoenix;15012483]The only reason I say they would be is because of the current environment of 'empowered female character' movies and I think those films would get ( unjustifiably) lumped into that category. Those women wouldn't necessarily have to be the 'main' character per se, just prominently featured like Sarah Conner was even though Terminator was an Arnold vehicle. Sarah in T2 IMO would definitely be considered 'woke' in 2025, not because she really was, but just because of the environment we're in and I don't think many people can critically tell the difference nowadays. They'd equate Leia and Rey as 'woke' even though they're worlds apart in characterization. Granted, if those movies were actually made today they would probably depict those women differently. Remember that we first met Leia back in 1977 as the 'damsel in distress' that needed to be rescued by the two ( white cis) males. That wouldn't fly today. Actually if you recall, they had a lightsaber training scene in Rise of Skywalker and Leia got the better of Luke. I think that's a clear indication that Leia would have gotten the 'girl boss' treatment from the get-go today. They basically would have depicted her in the same way they did Rey, immediately capable of outshining the men. And Han/Luke would have been depicted as buffoons to make her look even better( which they basically did with Finn).[/QUOTE]
A lot of it depends on the writing IMO. Even today. There are strong female leads today that aren't considered woke or forced. It just depends on the material. The material is usually woke. Especially from Disney lately.
[QUOTE=Meticode;15012485]A lot of it depends on the writing IMO. Even today. There are strong female leads today that aren't considered woke or forced. It just depends on the material. The material is usually woke. Especially from Disney lately.[/QUOTE]
That's just it, the Star Wars license is owned by Disney so Leia is a prime candidate. You'd need a completely different studio not intent on pushing identity politics.
[QUOTE=Meticode;15012473]I don't think those movies would be called woke today by most people if they came out today. Their characters didn't feel unnatural or out of place or overpowering. Sarah Conner was never the lead in any of the Terminator films. Arnold overpowered everyone. In T2 Arnold and John were the main focus for majority of the movie and Sarah was the third most important character. In the original Kyle Reese was her protector. Same thing with Princess Leia. Vader, Luke and maybe even Han Solo were stronger characters.
Ripley is different though, but she wasn't thrown into the main lead role unnaturally. She didn't just become a badass in Aliens out of nowhere. She went through trials and tribulations in the first film, showed fear, showed weakness and overcoming it. And what she is in Aliens is her facing her fears.
Compare that to something like Rey in Star Wars, the first time she picks up a lightsaber she suddenly can defeat Kylo Ren who's trained with the Force and lightsaber for years and was a proper padawan, but she can defeat him? Several times in fact? That's crazy woke. Two totally different animals.[/QUOTE]
Aliens absolutely would have been labeled woke. Only survivors a woman and a little girl lol.
Terminator and T2 would have also I think but perhaps to a lesser degree.
And then T3 features a female Terminator lol, that would have for sure warranted woke calls.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15012507]Aliens absolutely would have been labeled woke. Only survivors a woman and a little girl lol.
Terminator and T2 would have also I think but perhaps to a lesser degree.[/QUOTE]
I disagree.
[QUOTE=Meticode;15012514]I disagree.[/QUOTE]
[url]https://x.com/esjesjesj/status/1930861984200741155?t=fiqIz9zURYjHbRoZtfwskw&s=19[/url]
They new Alien series is being called "woke" now because there is a woman lead. But you think for some reason the originals would sneak past?
It's just because you saw those movies before being conditioned to view anything as woke.
A black dude in a commercial is woke now.
Aliens actually had a trans marine too. You think a trans military would get by the anti-wokesters today?
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15012531]A black dude in a commercial is woke now.[/QUOTE]
A black person appearing in a commercial isn't woke, but a black person appearing in 80% of commercials at the expense of all other groups is definitely woke.
Black people have been over-represented in film, television and commercials to a ridiculous and abnormal degree. It's not anyone else's fault that you can't recognize the pattern.
[QUOTE=Phoenix;15012488]That's just it, the Star Wars license is owned by Disney so Leia is a prime candidate. You'd need a completely different studio not intent on pushing identity politics.[/QUOTE]
It's obvious that current Star Wars hates everything about old Star Wars, and that includes Leia.
Leia was a brave no nonsense hero but she was also a woman who gave in to her feminine desires. Her entire arc in the second movie is coming to terms with the fact that she's in love with Han.
That would never fly in current Star Wars. Romance isn't allowed anymore. The male heroes are all beta cucks and the female heroes are all fierce warriors that don't need no man.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates]Aliens actually had a trans marine too. You think a trans military would get by the anti-wokesters today?[/quote]
Martinez wasn't trans. She was a dyke lesbian. I'm pretty sure most people perceived her that way as well. At least anyone that I've ever talked to about the movie. That's the whole reason why Hudson jokes with her after waking up saying, "Has anyone ever mistaken you for a man?" It wasn't because she was a trans man, it was because she's was a woman, identifying as a woman, but masculine and gay. If you search it online it tells you this.
If you're going to say that would be woke (which I disagree with) you might as well say that every single movie Michelle Rodriguez has been in as a masculine military female was woke too. Because that's the type of character she's played in most of her movies in her career. Those wouldn't be woke today.
But in Aliens when Ripley is looking through the original Alien crews' bio Lambert (the blonde short hair woman) is labeled as a transgender in her file, but you would've never knew this in the original Alien movie that she was trans. There's no mention of it, or clues or anything and it was only added during Aliens production.
Listen...I agree there's a ton of woke stuff and maybe some stuff from back then would be considered woke, but I disagree on a lot of the things mentioned because of the way the writing was. It's of my opinion those things don't feel forced. I'm sure some people will say they're woke though. Can't please everyone. We'll agree to disagree.
I just don't get how or why anybody would be a cheerleader for men and women to drift further away from their traditional roles.
If these changes are natural in society.... why is Hollywood and Corporate America doing everything in their power to force the message?
why would you want women to be more masculine, men to be more feminine, and people to be more gay? Why become a progressively pro-woke cheerleader in that regard?
Nobody is trying eradicate this trend from society.... we've just taken notice of how extreme it has become in Movies & TV Shows. It's Forced.
There's an argument to be made that ART imitates life.... But I'm gonna argue that the propaganda machine is aware that LIFE imitates Art, and there's a reason why this stuff is so forced.
If you really want to get to the short & sweet simple answer as to why Hollywood does this: It's because it's blasphemous.
Here's a woke fun fact to consider: Women are overall less happier now that we have less of a patriarchy.
you would think all this girl-power, feminist garbage would bring more joy to women.... but it's actually done the opposite.
That's because contrary to popular belief, humans don't chase happiness. We chase power. Do you think Trump and Musk just want to be "happy"? They would have retired to the beach decades ago if that was the case. Women are like that too, they want to own everything, just like men. They don't care as much about being "blissful" as everyone thinks.
You know who cares about being in bliss? Little kids. And as we grow older, we get bored of that.
[QUOTE=Meticode;15012573]Martinez wasn't trans. She was a dyke lesbian. I'm pretty sure most people perceived her that way as well. At least anyone that I've ever talked to about the movie. That's the whole reason why Hudson jokes with her after waking up saying, "Has anyone ever mistaken you for a man?" It wasn't because she was a trans man, it was because she's was a woman, identifying as a woman, but masculine and gay. If you search it online it tells you this.
If you're going to say that would be woke (which I disagree with) you might as well say that every single movie Michelle Rodriguez has been in as a masculine military female was woke too. Because that's the type of character she's played in most of her movies in her career. Those wouldn't be woke today.
But in Aliens when Ripley is looking through the original Alien crews' bio Lambert (the blonde short hair woman) is labeled as a transgender in her file, but you would've never knew this in the original Alien movie that she was trans. There's no mention of it, or clues or anything and it was only added during Aliens production.
Listen...I agree there's a ton of woke stuff and maybe some stuff from back then would be considered woke, but I disagree on a lot of the things mentioned because of the way the writing was. It's of my opinion those things don't feel forced. I'm sure some people will say they're woke though. Can't please everyone. We'll agree to disagree.[/QUOTE]
Her name is Vasquez
[IMG]https://thenerdybird.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/AliensVasquez.jpg[/IMG]
She'd 100% be called "great more forced woke Hollywood gay crap" by Doomsday Dallas today.
Then you have Ripley and Newt
[IMG]https://static1.srcdn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Aliens-poster-Ripley-and-Newt.jpg[/IMG]
A woman and a little girl the only survivors while all the strong white male marines DIED. Obviously a woke message that women are the strongest of the species.
This would have been labeled the wokest shit ever made if it came out today.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15012507]Aliens absolutely would have been labeled woke. Only survivors a woman and a little girl lol.
[/QUOTE]
nah. that woke shit wasn't prevelant in hollywood back then and definitely wasn't thrown in our faces or getting shoved down our throats at every turn like it is now. it just happened naturally and wasn't a big deal. plus the acting and quality of the movies didn't suffer as a result of it. at worst if it were even a thing, it was tolerable.
[QUOTE=diamenz;15012598]nah. that woke shit wasn't prevelant in hollywood back then and definitely wasn't thrown in our faces or getting shoved down our throats at every turn like it is now. it just happened naturally and wasn't a big deal. plus the acting and quality of the movies didn't suffer as a result of it. at worst if it were even a thing, it was tolerable.[/QUOTE]
I'm saying if that movie came out TODAY.
But also, there were lots of 'woke" movies before "woke" was a thing.
Imagine if Boys Don't Cry came out today? Or 'Do the Right Thing". Those moves are as woke as it gets. Or Dances with Wolves, 9 to 5.
How about Trading Places? poor black dude switching places with a rich white dude. :oldlol:
Or that one flick where Richard Pryor was a poor black guy handed millions of dollars.
And Terminator? Strong female Sarah Connor defeats the ultimate unstoppable White Male. Like, you're fooling yourself if you think that doesn't get a "woke" label today.
Yea there's a difference in that Aliens was like the first movie to ever do this.... kinda makes it original right?
But here we are almost 40 years later and we have Hollywood and Corporate America trying to make it the new normal.... it's not an original idea anymore is it?
You picked a movie that was the first of it's kind... almost 40 years later men & women have drifted so far away from their traditional roles that we can't even properly define what a woman is anymore and have to use pronouns.
And you want to become a cheerleader for this bombardment of wokeness as if it's still not progressive enough?
There's a difference between finding one random & rare 80's movie with a strong female lead and a dyke... compared to a never ending marketing campaign geared towards wokeness the past 10 years.
Go into youtube and search WOKE commercials... Welcome to the future. Can you honestly say you want more of this stuff?
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOPlGE_awKw[/url]
[b]WOKE Pride Month Commercials: Try To Guess 2024![/b]
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15012601][B]I'm saying if that movie came out TODAY.[/B]
But also, there were lots of 'woke" movies before "woke" was a thing.
Imagine if Boys Don't Cry came out today? Or 'Do the Right Thing". Those moves are as woke as it gets. Or Dances with Wolves, 9 to 5.
How about Trading Places? poor black dude switching places with a rich white dude. :oldlol:
Or that one flick where Richard Pryor was a poor black guy handed millions of dollars.[/QUOTE]
honestly i don't think that would be the case at all. like i said, any mild wokism back then would happen naturally and wasn't injected into the movie at it's outset, so it wouldn't suffer as a result of it. nowadays, movies are [B]based[/B] on being problack, profemale, multigender, what have you and the movie is built around that. it's just not the same at all.
[QUOTE=diamenz;15012606]honestly i don't think that would be the case at all. like i said, any mild wokism back then would happen naturally and wasn't injected into the movie at it's outset, so it wouldn't suffer as a result of it. nowadays, movies are [B]based[/B] on being problack, profemale, multigender, what have you and the movie is built around that. it's just not the same at all.[/QUOTE]
The entire movie is a woman and little girl overcoming everything scary while all the men die :oldlol:
Complete with butch dyke lesbian in the military.
The new Alien series is being called "woke" right now just because of a female android. But you think the original which had a female LEAD wouldn't?
okay
The entire reason this even came up is because Killer of Killers is being labeled woke and it isn't "[B]based[/B] on being problack, profemale, multigender, what have you"
[QUOTE=diamenz;15012606]honestly i don't think that would be the case at all. like i said, any mild wokism back then would happen naturally and wasn't injected into the movie at it's outset, so it wouldn't suffer as a result of it. nowadays, movies are [B]based[/B] on being problack, profemale, multigender, what have you and the movie is built around that. it's just not the same at all.[/QUOTE]
I agree with this.
Bill Gates has the lowest iq. It’s amazing :roll:
I’m usually pretty good at telling but I can’t tell if he’s a super lame troll or just really that stupid.
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15012594]That's because contrary to popular belief, humans don't chase happiness. We chase power. Do you think Trump and Musk just want to be "happy"? They would have retired to the beach decades ago if that was the case. Women are like that too, they want to own everything, just like men. They don't care as much about being "blissful" as everyone thinks.
You know who cares about being in bliss? Little kids. And as we grow older, we get bored of that.[/QUOTE]
While men & women are both human... they are built differently physically & mentally... you just erased gender entirely and lumped women into the same category as Musk & Trump.
Women want to be happy (at all ages) contrary to your own made up belief.... more than men because they run off emotion more than logic.... which is why 70% of divorces are initiated by women.
It's men that focus more on the duty of being a provider, sacrificing their own happiness to do so... (or that's how it use to be.)
It is because women seek power & independence as opposed to being submissive they find themselves increasingly less happy.... and completely out of their role as a mother.
Either way... we've gone from this:
[img]http://www.endedtvseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/olivia-dabo-the-wonder-years-e1400485518479.jpg[/img]
to this American abomination:
[img]https://imusic.b-cdn.net/images/item/original/989/5039036080989.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15012594]You know who cares about being in bliss? Little kids. And as we grow older, we get bored of that.[/QUOTE]
My point exactly... your whole platform panders to kids.
[img]https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/04/PP_2024.4.9_partisan-coalitions_4-01.png[/img]
as we get older... we get tired of it.
what has it all led to? Women wanting the patriarchy back
[video=youtube;KMCX20K7pDY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMCX20K7pDY[/video]
Sucks that this turned into this discussion versus about the mini movie. Can't even get away from these conversations when talking about f*cking aliens killing for sport. :oldlol:
[QUOTE=Meticode;15012632]Sucks that this turned into this discussion versus about the mini movie. Can't even get away from these conversations when talking about f*cking aliens killing for sport. :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
I shouldn't have posted the Tyrone Magnus review lol.
This is all my fault lol.
Makes sense that he'd be as anti-woke as he is though.... Like, I said, been forever since I had stopped by his channel.
[img]https://c.tenor.com/vS8Ui1_qIQUAAAAd/tenor.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15012637]I shouldn't have posted the Tyrone Magnus review lol.
This is all my fault lol.
Makes sense that he'd be as anti-woke as he is though.... Like, I said, been forever since I had stopped by his channel.
[img]https://c.tenor.com/vS8Ui1_qIQUAAAAd/tenor.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
He click baits too now. I think his most recent one was on Thunderbolts and he titled it "Marvel's back!" with a thumbs up from him. Then when you watch his review he's just like "Marvel's not back, it was just mediocre with some good parts of the movie."
lol
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15012601]I'm saying if that movie came out TODAY.
But also, there were lots of 'woke" movies before "woke" was a thing.
Imagine if Boys Don't Cry came out today? Or 'Do the Right Thing". Those moves are as woke as it gets. Or Dances with Wolves, 9 to 5.
How about Trading Places? poor black dude switching places with a rich white dude. :oldlol:
Or that one flick where Richard Pryor was a poor black guy handed millions of dollars.[/QUOTE]
Some of those movies actually ARE woke but it hadn't become a dominant trend yet. The seeds were definitely being planted though. An entire generation of people grew up thinking Spike Lee was some genius who had something important to say.
Meanwhile like most woke trash, DTRT is a fukking retarded movie with a retarded message. Radio Raheem was not a martyr or a victim. He was a violent troublemaker and he was entirely responsible for his own death.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15012745]Meanwhile like most woke trash, DTRT is a fukking retarded movie with a retarded message.[/QUOTE]
Not a completely retarded message. Not in this scene.
[video=youtube;ZUbvT6YKPzk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUbvT6YKPzk[/video]
[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15012749]Not a completely retarded message. Not in this scene.
[video=youtube;ZUbvT6YKPzk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUbvT6YKPzk[/video][/QUOTE]
True.
The movie flirts with both sides but in the end you can tell where Spike was hoping the audience would land. In the end Mookie doesn't really get any type of comeuppance for starting the riot and Sal is way too understanding and forgiving.
In reality Mookie is a gigantic piece of shit and Sal should have wrang his neck.
[QUOTE=Baller234;15012751]True.
The movie flirts with both sides but in the end you can tell where Spike was hoping the audience would land. In the end Mookie doesn't really get any type of comeuppance for starting the riot and Sal is way too understanding and forgiving.
In reality Mookie is a gigantic piece of shit and Sal should have wrang his neck.[/QUOTE]
You make a good point though... what is Doing the Right Thing? Burning down your own neighborhood and businesses whenever there is some kind of injustice against one black person?
That's doing the right thing?
There's an easy way to solve this problem btw if the BLM crowd is so terrified of white cops.... Black Cops patrol Black Neighborhoods. We can go back to segregation in that regard if it helps the BLM crowd feel safer at night.
[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15012755]You make a good point though... what is Doing the Right Thing? Burning down your own neighborhood and businesses whenever there is some kind of injustice against one black person?
That's doing the right thing?
There's an easy way to solve this problem btw if the BLM crowd is so terrified of white cops.... Black Cops patrol Black Neighborhoods. We can go back to segregation in that regard if it helps the BLM crowd feel safer at night.[/QUOTE]
Nah black people don't riot when black cops kill black people. Look no further than Tyre Nichols. Easily the worst case of police brutality caught on camera in our lifetime and it was nothing but crickets.
And it happened AFTER Floyd. AFTER they swore up and down that raising awareness was the most important thing.
As for the ending of DTRT, Sal was basically a father figure to Mook. Before the Radio Rahiem incident in the pizzaria Sal is telling Mookie how much he means to him and how he's always been like a son to him. He tells him that he'll always have a place in his business no matter what.
And how does Mookie repay him? By burning down his business and his life's work. All because some violent asshole needlessly tried to KILL Sal and then wouldn't surrender to the police when apprehended.
Sal and his sons are the real victims in that movie, but in Spike Lee's twisted mind his attitude towards them seems to be "Oh well".
I maintain the only/main reason George Floyd/BLM caught fire like it did was because it happened 3 months into the Pandemic, and we were all crazy from being locked down. The world was a powder keg, and that was the igniter. If 2020 was a normal year that would have been treated like any other similar situation.
It's funny to see the discussion of the movie Predator: Killer of Killers has migrated to topics George Floyd and COVID now. :roll:
@Dooms I am not going to piece apart that long post with various pics from TV shows. My point is that "happiness" is not what drives most adults, male or female. We all want to be IN CHARGE. We all want to make a difference in the world, we all want to feel important. The older we get, the less we give a shit about being "happy" and the more we care about being "IMPORTANT".
Ask yourself this, would you want to be a "house wife" and sit around all day watching soap operas for the rest of your life, spending your spouses money when he wants to give you some if that meant you were a bit happier? Or would you rather be the one calling all the shots and changing the world?
[QUOTE=Meticode;15012797]It's funny to see the discussion of the movie Predator: Killer of Killers has migrated to topics George Floyd and COVID now. :roll:[/QUOTE]
lol....
yea let's get back on topic...
For the Sequel I think we need a Knight, a Western Cowboy, and maybe a Roman gladiator of some kind.... no Females.
and maybe we can throw in a Gorilla vs Predator (without weaponry) .... since the topic of 100 men vs a Gorilla has been popular lately.
Predator had a pretty solid fight with a Bear, So I'd like to see Predator vs Gorilla.
[video=youtube;B8fwWLv_x5A]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8fwWLv_x5A[/video]
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15012802]@Dooms I am not going to piece apart that long post with various pics from TV shows. My point is that "happiness" is not what drives most adults, male or female. We all want to be IN CHARGE. We all want to make a difference in the world, we all want to feel important. The older we get, the less we give a shit about being "happy" and the more we care about being "IMPORTANT".
Ask yourself this, would you want to be a "house wife" and sit around all day watching soap operas for the rest of your life, spending your spouses money when he wants to give you some if that meant you were a bit happier? Or would you rather be the one calling all the shots and changing the world?[/QUOTE]
oh God.... here we go again
[QUOTE=Bill Gates;15012802]@Dooms I am not going to piece apart that long post with various pics from TV shows. My point is that "happiness" is not what drives most adults, male or female. We all want to be IN CHARGE. We all want to make a difference in the world, we all want to feel important. The older we get, the less we give a shit about being "happy" and the more we care about being "IMPORTANT".
Ask yourself this, would you want to be a "house wife" and sit around all day watching soap operas for the rest of your life, spending your spouses money when he wants to give you some if that meant you were a bit happier? Or would you rather be the one calling all the shots and changing the world?[/QUOTE]
This is kind a sad way to see life if you think that's what majority of people want in life. Neither of those things are what's important.
[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15012803]lol....
yea let's get back on topic...
For the Sequel I think we need a Knight, a Western Cowboy, and maybe a Roman gladiator of some kind.... no Females.
and maybe we can throw in a Gorilla vs Predator (without weaponry) .... since the topic of 100 men vs a Gorilla has been popular lately.
Predator had a pretty solid fight with a Bear, So I'd like to see Predator vs Gorilla.
[video=youtube;B8fwWLv_x5A]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8fwWLv_x5A[/video][/QUOTE]
A really good one would be a Instagram model that slides into the Yuatja's DMs. Those are the deadliest predators of all. Especially the one that goes for high profile sports athletes. Whatever Yuatja gets involved with her is paying out a settlement.