Printable View
[QUOTE=Mr. Woke;14593752]Only if you thought they were a championship contender :roll:
If you objectively looked at the roster, you would have known that they were never a championship contender.[/QUOTE]
They failed to live up to expectations even if you just expected them to be a .500 team. They finished 33-49. :facepalm
[QUOTE=Baller789;14593578]Doesn't matter if the oddsmakers got it wrong.
The fact that the Lakers even failed to qualify for one of the 10 available playoff slots is a Lebron Legendary fail moment.
Remember your hero posted that we keep the same energy. And a storm is coming.
And we all know how that turned out :roll:
And the fact you had to post 3 times in a row shows how insecure you are.[/QUOTE]
The fact that you keep responding to me shows how insecure you are :roll:
You are also too much of a retard to do any serious basketball analysis. The oddsmakers failed to do their homework on the Lakers, and as a result of that, they got their prediction wrong. Plain and simple.
Hopefully the Lakers front office will give LeBron a better supporting cast for next season.
[QUOTE=tontoz;14593754]They failed to live up to expectations even if you just expected them to be a .500 team. They finished 33-49. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
I personally didn't expect them to be a .500 team. Their depth was one of the worst in the league.
[QUOTE=Mr. Woke;14593756]I personally didn't expect them to be a .500 team. Their depth was one of the worst in the league.[/QUOTE]
So where is your previous post proving that?
[QUOTE=Mr. Woke;14593755]The fact that you keep responding to me shows how insecure you are :roll:
You are also too much of a retard to do any serious basketball analysis. The oddsmakers failed to do their homework on the Lakers, and as a result of that, they got their prediction wrong. Plain and simple.
Hopefully the Lakers front office will give LeBron a better supporting cast for next season.[/QUOTE]
Oddsmakers failed to do their homework?
:roll:
The whole gambling business is built on the oddsmakers getting the odds right.
You on the other have only have your mental gymnastics and Lebron weiner down your throat. :lol
[QUOTE=Baller789;14593799]Oddsmakers failed to do their homework?
:roll:
The whole gambling business is built on the oddsmakers getting the odds right.
You on the other have only have your mental gymnastics and Lebron weiner down your throat. :lol[/QUOTE]
They got it wrong buddy boy.
Nice projection. LeBron haters are expert mental gymnasts who twist themselves into pretzels trying to justify their deranged LeBron hate.
[QUOTE=Baller789;14593798]So where is your previous post proving that?[/QUOTE]
Like I already said in another thread:
Before the season started I believed that the Lakers were gonna finish somewhere between the 8th and 11th seed. However, I wasn't surprised that a lot of people stupidly thought that they were "a serious contender" because many people often tend to overrate LeBron's supporting casts to downplay his achievements, and the overall roster objectively was subpar.
Sure, they had LeBron and AD, but two players can only do so much. Regarding Westbrook, even before the season, I was doubtful that he was a top 50 player in the NBA. And let's take a look at the rest of the roster: Trevor Ariza (very below average role player), Dwight Howard (very below average role player), Carmelo (slightly above average role player), Kent Bazemore (very below average role player), Avery Bradley (average role player), Wayne Ellington (below average role player), Stanley Johnson (average role player), Talen Horton-Tucker (below average role player), Wenyen Gabriel (average role player), Malik Monk (somewhat above average role player), Austin Reaves (average role player), and Kendrick Nunn (he didn't play this season, but he is a somewhat above average role player at best, only slightly better than Monk).
Also, I wasn't a fan of the Westbrook trade (this was the fault of the front office), but I thought that he would play decently at least (not All-Star level but like a top 100 NBA player at least; this season he wasn't a top 100 NBA player). Even if LeBron and AD had played in more games (and even if Russ had played better), their overall record would not have been much better than their 33-49 record because the depth was subpar. The roster clearly needs a major overhaul for the Lakers to even be a top 6 team in the Western Conference next season.
[QUOTE=Mr. Woke;14593849]They got it wrong buddy boy.
Nice projection. LeBron haters are expert mental gymnasts who twist themselves into pretzels trying to justify their deranged LeBron hate.[/QUOTE]
Lol. There's no need to justify anything. The dude led a superteam to the lottery.
Ponder that deeply.
He. Led. A. SUPERTEAM. To. The. LOTTERY.
The team that was the favorite to win the conference. I know this is difficult for you to deal with.
"Bu-bu-bu-but I knew it was gonna happen before the season started." Uh huh. Sure you did, champ.
"It's not his fault. He needs more help." You got that right. He obviously needs WAAAYYYY more help. :lol
:lebroncry:
[QUOTE=Full Court;14593999]Lol. There's no need to justify anything. The dude led a superteam to the lottery.
Ponder that deeply.
He. Led. A. SUPERTEAM. To. The. LOTTERY.
The team that was the favorite to win the conference. I know this is difficult for you to deal with.
"Bu-bu-bu-but I knew it was gonna happen before the season started." Uh huh. Sure you did, champ.
"It's not his fault. He needs more help." You got that right. He obviously needs WAAAYYYY more help. :lol
:lebroncry:[/QUOTE]
Are we really talking about a Season 19 player?
Can you PLEASE post MJ's season 19 stats? :lol
[QUOTE=Shooter;14594316]Are we really talking about a Season 19 player?
Can you PLEASE post MJ's season 19 stats? :lol[/QUOTE]
MJ accomplished an insane amount more than Bronie in half the time. Longevity stats are literally the only thing you and your fellow Bronies have left to cling to.
D E S P E R A T I O N
And 40-year-old Jordan, as much as he sucked, was STILL a more impactful player than Bronie is at 37.
Ponder THAT deeply.
[url=https://ibb.co/VJk78Tq][img]https://i.ibb.co/PFV78g6/94-D04-E16-93-D8-4288-BEF3-E8-B9-EBAF72-A3.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=https://ibb.co/stQsbdz][img]https://i.ibb.co/hCH2LJw/BFD200-FE-3-F01-444-D-97-A1-1019-E7054-F87.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=https://imgbb.com/][img]https://i.ibb.co/G0spGSd/CD514-DC6-3-E01-4-CC5-BF56-689056-C38-F5-E.gif[/img][/url]
[QUOTE=Mr. Woke;14593849]They got it wrong buddy boy.
Nice projection. LeBron haters are expert mental gymnasts who twist themselves into pretzels trying to justify their deranged LeBron hate.[/QUOTE]
You have completely deflected the fact that it is in the oddsmakers best interest to get it right. It is Lebron who failed to live up to expectations.
And it is in you best interest to ride Lebron's d!ck.
:roll:
Talk about captain obvious.
[QUOTE=Mr. Woke;14593850]Like I already said in another thread:
Before the season started I believed that the Lakers were gonna finish somewhere between the 8th and 11th seed. However, I wasn't surprised that a lot of people stupidly thought that they were "a serious contender" because many people often tend to overrate LeBron's supporting casts to downplay his achievements, and the overall roster objectively was subpar.
Sure, they had LeBron and AD, but two players can only do so much. Regarding Westbrook, even before the season, I was doubtful that he was a top 50 player in the NBA. And let's take a look at the rest of the roster: Trevor Ariza (very below average role player), Dwight Howard (very below average role player), Carmelo (slightly above average role player), Kent Bazemore (very below average role player), Avery Bradley (average role player), Wayne Ellington (below average role player), Stanley Johnson (average role player), Talen Horton-Tucker (below average role player), Wenyen Gabriel (average role player), Malik Monk (somewhat above average role player), Austin Reaves (average role player), and Kendrick Nunn (he didn't play this season, but he is a somewhat above average role player at best, only slightly better than Monk).
Also, I wasn't a fan of the Westbrook trade (this was the fault of the front office), but I thought that he would play decently at least (not All-Star level but like a top 100 NBA player at least; this season he wasn't a top 100 NBA player). Even if LeBron and AD had played in more games (and even if Russ had played better), their overall record would not have been much better than their 33-49 record because the depth was subpar. The roster clearly needs a major overhaul for the Lakers to even be a top 6 team in the Western Conference next season.[/QUOTE]
Bla blah blah.
Where is your post proving that? Youre just BSing your way outta dis. :roll:
And oh, didn't read. :oldlol:
[QUOTE=Mr. Woke;14593850]Like I already said in another thread:
Before the season started I believed that the Lakers were gonna finish somewhere between the 8th and 11th seed. However, I wasn't surprised that a lot of people stupidly thought that they were "a serious contender" because many people often tend to overrate LeBron's supporting casts to downplay his achievements, and the overall roster objectively was subpar.
Sure, they had LeBron and AD, but two players can only do so much. Regarding Westbrook, even before the season, I was doubtful that he was a top 50 player in the NBA. And let's take a look at the rest of the roster: Trevor Ariza (very below average role player), Dwight Howard (very below average role player), Carmelo (slightly above average role player), Kent Bazemore (very below average role player), Avery Bradley (average role player), Wayne Ellington (below average role player), Stanley Johnson (average role player), Talen Horton-Tucker (below average role player), Wenyen Gabriel (average role player), Malik Monk (somewhat above average role player), Austin Reaves (average role player), and Kendrick Nunn (he didn't play this season, but he is a somewhat above average role player at best, only slightly better than Monk).
Also, I wasn't a fan of the Westbrook trade (this was the fault of the front office), but I thought that he would play decently at least (not All-Star level but like a top 100 NBA player at least; this season he wasn't a top 100 NBA player). Even if LeBron and AD had played in more games (and even if Russ had played better), their overall record would not have been much better than their 33-49 record because the depth was subpar. The roster clearly needs a major overhaul for the Lakers to even be a top 6 team in the Western Conference next season.[/QUOTE]
Meltdown
*2022-2023