Wizards jordon was worse than nearly any all-time great who played until his late 30s

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14647023]What separated the early-mid 80's Celtics teams from their late 80s version was their bench. By '88 KC Jones strictly played their starters it seemed.

Not to mention DJ was on the decline by '88, Parish regressed a bit and McHale was never really the same after he broke his foot in '87, especially oh the defensive end.

Again, history looks at the Celtics as the better team. Shit, the Rockets repeated in the mid 90's, would you dare say they were better than the mid 80's Celtics just because they repeated as champs? Lol[/QUOTE]

The only Celtic team I would put over the '89 Pistons are the '86 Celtics. Every other year is a toss up.

LeBron is better.

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14646781]Nice cop out[/QUOTE]

Hey thats the reality. Doesnt mean you have to like it. :confusedshrug:

[QUOTE=Axe;14646791]But those aren't dynasties coach. Since someone said 'dynasties' have to 'three-peat' first. :roll:[/QUOTE]

If thats your argument.

Do you concede that I'm correct about dynasties?

Otherwise you just shot yourself.

[QUOTE=SATAN;14647120]LeBron is better.[/QUOTE]

...at getting empty stats. FACTS

[QUOTE=Bawkish;14647140]...at getting empty stats. FACTS[/QUOTE]

Maybe the not great offensive players or has beens should have done all the scoring. LeBron shouldn't have even shot the ball at all. Shouldn't have even tried.

[QUOTE=Baller789;14647137]If thats your argument.

Do you concede that I'm correct about dynasties?

Otherwise you just shot yourself.[/QUOTE]
Sure, if it makes you feel better mentally. Us non-casuals personally think that your self-indulgent opinion is dumb tho. :oldlol:

[QUOTE=Xiao Yao You;14646981]Who cares that he had Oakley? They traded Oakley because they liked Horace better. Oakley nor Horace were all stars like a couple of those guys mentioned[/QUOTE]

Well, Oakley was a good role player and the enforcer on CHI those years. I'm saying he had Oakley, but LeBron's cast was still better.

[QUOTE=Axe;14647170]Sure, if it makes you feel better mentally. Us non-casuals personally think that your self-indulgent opinion is dumb tho. :oldlol:[/QUOTE]

Actually its really strange that you would try to use someone else's argument and try to imply it to someone else.

Bronies are really struggling with this one. Only way they could respond is through moving goalposts and deceit.

[QUOTE=Baller789;14647214]Actually its really strange that you would try to use someone else's argument and try to imply it to someone else.[/QUOTE]
Because you would clearly have issues if they use the term 'dynasty' in describing teams you think they shouldn't be describing with the said term.

[QUOTE=Axe;14647217]Because you would clearly have issues if they use the term 'dynasty' in describing teams you think they shouldn't be describing with the said term.[/QUOTE]

Well no one was able to disprove my point. Despite all your frustrations and efforts.

Feel free to try again and make a thread about it. I dont want to derail this one.

Still that doesnt justify using my talking points when they are contrary to yours. Its odd.

Contrary? Lmao i bet even coach himself had to scratch his own head when he saw what you thought about it.

Axe i suggest you argue your point rather than arguing your ego.

I said enough in this thread. As I've said if you have anything to argue about that, make a thread about it, I would be happy to participate in it.

Yeah you don't like to get exposed. Ok bub.

[QUOTE=theman93;14646250]Wizards jordon was so much worse than 37 year old Lebron that he led the 2002 Wizards to a better record than the 2022 Lakers in less games started and with a much worse supporting cast.

Also, MJ was atleast an all-star at age 39. Duncan and Malone were not.[/QUOTE]

Jordan didnt make any allnba teams those years.


Man I missed this beautiful thread.