Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
Nope. The main reasons Shaq was so much better than Dwight are his superior footwork, post moves and passing ability, plus the fact that he's 3-4 inches taller.
Shaq weighed 340 when he had easily his best season(1999-2000). This was what he looked like on media day that season.
[IMG]http://i244.photobucket.com/albums/gg34/NBA7902/Shaqmediaday2.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i244.photobucket.com/albums/gg34/NBA7902/Shaq19992000.jpg[/IMG]
So no, fatter is not better. If you looked at Shaq's other best seasons 2000-2001, 1994-1995, 1993-1994, 1997-1998, 2004-2005 ect. He was always in the 300-350 range. The only exceptions were 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 where he was upwards of 380, but as a result his defense declined and he wasn't at the level he was during the first 2 years of the 3peat.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
dwight needs fatter footwork, passing and lowpost moves
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
[QUOTE=BirdOverrated]Shaq is both strong, fat, and agile. He has been the most dominant big man ever.
Dwight is strong and lean, would he more dominant with some fat?[/QUOTE]
LOL DW needs more skillz not fat.Pah showing his low IQ again.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
Shaq got fat for a while but that was only a few years. Other than that, he's been a beast. Oh, and his quick post up moves after getting deep post position was insane! Kids w' short memories. Dwight's got a long ways to go to catch up to Shaq in the skills department. Oh, and Shaq has superior intellect, basketball iq, and passing ability.
