Yes because, Pete Myers>>>>>DeRozan, right? :facepalm
Printable View
Yes because, Pete Myers>>>>>DeRozan, right? :facepalm
DeMar would fit really well in the 90s because of his mid-range game. If he was on the Bulls in 93-94, in place of Pete Myers at SG, they'd definitely be a better team. I think they probably would've even gone to the finals, considering how close they got to beating the Knicks, the team that eventually made it out of the East that year.
[QUOTE=Roundball_Rock;13996604]Yes because, Pete Myers>>>>>DeRozan, right? :facepalm[/QUOTE]
This is the hard-nosed Knicks defense we're talking about, Derozan would be a net negative.
The Bulls get worse in the playoffs against good teams with Derozan than without him, I have no doubt about it.
LOL, so many insecure LeBron jock riders in this thread.
[QUOTE=imdaman99;13997266]This is the hard-nosed Knicks defense we're talking about, Derozan would be a net negative.
The Bulls get worse in the playoffs against good teams with Derozan than without him, I have no doubt about it.[/QUOTE]
The Bulls would get worse with DeRozan in place of Pete Myers? That is crazy.
[QUOTE=Roundball_Rock;13972878]Easily. You are replacing the worst starting SG in the NBA with an all-star.[/QUOTE]
They don't win shit, Derozen is trash in the playoffs.
the Milicic curse continues, i.e. when the coaching staff does more work than the head coach because they don't get the blame from public.
Phil Jackson always said team wins with Jeff Horacek at two guard
Pip gets MVP and FMVP
[QUOTE=aceman;13997383]Phil Jackson always said team wins with Jeff Horacek at two guard[/QUOTE]
They almost traded for prime Hornacek at the deadline but Krause screwed it up.
The people saying DeRozan wouldn't help are ridiculous. The Bulls would go from the worst starting SG in the league to an all-star. Somehow that wouldn't help. :biggums:
[QUOTE=juju151111;13997351]They don't win shit, Derozen is trash in the playoffs.[/QUOTE]
this
[QUOTE=Roundball_Rock;13997574]They almost traded for prime Hornacek at the deadline but Krause screwed it up.
The people saying DeRozan wouldn't help are ridiculous. The Bulls would go from the worst starting SG in the league to an all-star. Somehow that wouldn't help. :biggums:[/QUOTE]
No Derozen is very bad and has had some very low moments. He was literally benched against the Cavs and he was being guarded by the legendary JR Smith :oldlol:
You MJ kids never watched Pete Myers play. :lol
[QUOTE=Roundball_Rock;13997574]They almost traded for prime Hornacek at the deadline but Krause screwed it up.
The people saying DeRozan wouldn't help are ridiculous. The Bulls would go from the worst starting SG in the league to an all-star. Somehow that wouldn't help. :biggums:[/QUOTE]
Derek Harper was an even cheaper alternative to Hornacek. Hornacek required a 20 ppg starter ( Jeff Malone & a 1st).
Harper was traded to Bulls biggest rivals Knicks for a rotational player & a 1st rounder( 25th pick) . Bulls could have had Harper , plus kept him from the Knicks who upraded from an injured Doc Rivers . Harper was available/ relatively cheap & still solid player. Knicks most efficient player & best guard in the Finals.
Harper would have been an upgrade over sticking with damn Pete Myers.
[QUOTE=32jazz;13998171]Derek Harper was an even cheaper alternative to Hornacek. Hornacek required a 20 ppg starter ( Jeff Malone & a 1st).
Harper was traded to Bulls biggest rivals Knicks for a rotational player & a 1st rounder( 25th pick) . Bulls could have had Harper , plus kept him from the Knicks who upraded from an injured Doc Rivers . Harper was available/ relatively cheap & still solid player. Knicks most efficient player & best guard in the Finals.
Harper would have been an upgrade over sticking with damn Pete Myers.[/QUOTE]
Agreed. Krause did a great job but having Myers instead of Harper or Hornacek may have cost them a ring. To make matters worse their top rival got Harper.