Often controversial fat **** Jason Whitlock in trouble for comments you agree with.

[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;14129229]Maybe you should read what rawimpact just posted.

Whitlock actually has a brain and can articulate himself.

You white knight trash.[/QUOTE]

Who the **** is he ‘white knighting’ for? There are literally no women reading this message board. Since when is spitting facts ‘white knighting’? Jesus you ****ing angry misogynist dipshits deserve a swift baseball bat to the skull.

[QUOTE=bison;14129254]Who the **** is he ‘white knighting’ for? There are literally no women reading this message board. Since when is spitting facts ‘white knighting’? Jesus you ****ing angry misogynist dipshits deserve a swift baseball bat to the skull.[/QUOTE]

Meltdown:roll:

[QUOTE=Hakkim90cc;14129234]"Basketball analyst"

"Sportswriter"[/QUOTE]

It was an opinion piece, relax. They're only words. Kobe never gave him the attention he wanted which fueled his hate.

Fatlock needs to stay in his lane and continue playing a game that's safe, which is being the obsequious "black friend" to white America.

Bootlicks like Fatlock ALWAYS get too comfortable and mistake patronizing for actual love or respect, they end up castigating a group that's not sanctioned by their paymasters and get their heads lopped off.

[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;14129229]Maybe you should read what rawimpact just posted.

Whitlock actually has a brain and can articulate himself.

You white knight trash.[/QUOTE]
Someone as stupid as you should never talk about intelligence. I have no interest in reading Whitlock's letter to Bryant, if it in some way shows the credentials I requested demonstrating why he is more qualified to talk about basketball than anyone else feel free to post that otherwise you might as well stop posting as you are again failing to make a point.

Okay after reading that Kobe piece, this Whitlock dude is definitely a woman hating incel. :lol What a weird guy.

[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14129265]Someone as stupid as you should never talk about intelligence. I have no interest in reading Whitlock's letter to Bryant, if it in some way shows the credentials I requested demonstrating why he is more qualified to talk about basketball than anyone else feel free to post that otherwise you might as well stop posting as you are again failing to make a point.[/QUOTE]

:applause::cheers:

[QUOTE=rawimpact;14129259]It was an opinion piece, relax. They're only words. Kobe never gave him the attention he wanted which fueled his hate.[/QUOTE]

Opinion /=/ spreading false rumours about another mans wife

You can get shot for that

[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;14129191]Lmaoooo



What?


Lol so?

I'm saying intelligence or perseverance makes your opinion meaningful, beauty doesn't.[/QUOTE]

Ok but I was just saying it's all privilege. Because it is. Life isn't fair.

And these guys and gals largely aren't on TV because of their intelligence levels. They're there to entertain us, and we watch and consume this shit because we want to be entertained.

I don't take any of their opinions seriously because they're all retards. Therefore, at the end of the day, her beauty being the primary factor as to why she gets a say doesn't matter to me because I don't care about any of their opinions anyways.

I don't even give a **** about the opinions of most NBA coaches and GMs, you think I'm going to get hung up on the opinions of Sports "reporters"?

Hahahaha!

[QUOTE=rawimpact;14129181]Yeah the average ISH poster prob has know bball knowledge than her.

I enjoy Jason's take... although I may not always agree with it, I find it refreshing when columnist dont all have the same opinions and pad their egos.

I remember reading Jason's pieces on the lakers in the early 2000s, he's earned his stripes.[/QUOTE]


The average ISH poster couldn’t draw up a play and not be laughed at by professionals. She played 4 years of SEC ball. She would probably make most of us look stupid talking the ins and outs. Most of ISH can’t identify an offensive concept being run. Bunch of “Lebron ball....Curry ball” know nothings trolling.

She would likely stand out as unusually informed if she tried. Shed recognize a flex offense immediately and most of ISH would have to Google it. Hard to replace actually playing and getting high level coaching even if it is women’s ball. They are less athletic but you still have to know what’s going on around you.

She would talk circles around these ring counting clowns even if she doesn’t do it on tv where it would be boring.

[QUOTE=Kblaze8855;14129306]The average ISH poster couldn’t draw up a play and not be laughed at by professionals. She played 4 years of SEC ball. She would probably make most of us look stupid talking the ins and outs. Most of ISH can’t identify an offensive concept being run. Bunch of “Lebron ball....Curry ball” know nothings trolling.

She would likely stand out as unusually informed if she tried.[/QUOTE]

That's great, but that doesn't mean she actually follows the NBA.

You don't just "forget" Anthony Davis who was arguably the best defensive player in the league this year.

What that reeks of is not watching the season, voting anyways and basing said votes off of getting your stats from some stats website, and then accidentally overlooking one of the names.

Of course she follows the nba. She’s at games. She’s watching games with nba players. If the only nba games she saw were the ones she hosted studio shows for she would know Anthony Davis.

You don’t think I’ve ever written a list of people and forgot one?

What she did was forgot to proof read and get someone to look it over. I’d have someone read all my shit just to not embarrass myself like that.

Alright whatever I don't really feel like getting into it. Like I said, none of their opinions matter anyways.

It’s a bad look I’m just saying....there’s no way she doesn’t know Anthony Davis. She was on an SEC basketball show when Davis was SEC player of the year. She had a really public ****up and makes women look bad...but you know she knows him. She probably personally knows him.

[QUOTE=Shogon;14129307]That's great, but that doesn't mean she actually follows the NBA.

You don't just "forget" Anthony Davis who was arguably the best defensive player in the league this year.

What that reeks of is not watching the season, voting anyways and basing said votes off of getting your stats from some stats website, and then accidentally overlooking one of the names.[/QUOTE]

I mean, if she looked up the stats and STILL left Davis off, I feel like that would almost be more damning. The reality is, she probably just doesn't take her vote very seriously. Which would be fine, except for the fact that plenty of people DO take these votes seriously, so it shouldn't be hard to find voters who do as well.