[QUOTE=highwhey;15015274]thats netanyahu on the phone with trump trying to convince him to drop the bunker penetrator[/QUOTE]
lmao... that was pretty good.
Printable View
[QUOTE=highwhey;15015274]thats netanyahu on the phone with trump trying to convince him to drop the bunker penetrator[/QUOTE]
lmao... that was pretty good.
F1
[IMG]https://media.drive.com.au/obj/tx_q:50,rs:auto:1920:1080:1/driveau/upload/cms/uploads/0e54c184-6c72-57c6-86f7-d94243150000[/IMG]
was pretty dope, fun to watch. brad pitt is still a cool actor. i'd say a 7.9/10
[QUOTE=highwhey;15018137]F1
was pretty dope, fun to watch. brad pitt is still a cool actor. i'd say a 7.9/10 [/QUOTE]
Don't forget Hans Zimmer
[video=youtube_share;0CYG5qkO12w]https://youtu.be/0CYG5qkO12w[/video]
[img]https://c.tenor.com/vS8Ui1_qIQUAAAAd/tenor.gif[/img]
I had Ironheart playing in the background as I was scrolling though my phone....
Even while not paying attention to it.... I still had to turn it off.
I'm with Tyrone... this is so bad it can't be watched.
[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15018188]Don't forget Hans Zimmer[/QUOTE]
oh sh1t that was his score? no wonder those racing scenes felt so immersive, aside from the great pov camera work, the sounds just made it so immersive.
28 Years Later. 5/10, both prequels were better, would not recommend.
[QUOTE=highwhey;15018205]oh sh1t that was his score? no wonder those racing scenes felt so immersive, aside from the great pov camera work, the sounds just made it so immersive.[/QUOTE]
[img]https://c.tenor.com/rBb7_nAypOMAAAAd/tenor.gif[/img]
[video=youtube;n3z7nJ9U0gk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3z7nJ9U0gk[/video]
[QUOTE=highwhey;15018205]oh sh1t that was his score? no wonder those racing scenes felt so immersive, [B]aside from the great pov camera work,[/B] the sounds just made it so immersive.[/QUOTE]
Haven't seen it yet, but from the looks of it I think they literally used the onboard cameras that F1 cars have.
I only have 3 movies in 2025 that I will definitely be paying money to see regardless of the reviews.
1. One Battle After Another
2. Running Man (no trailer yet)
3. Avatar 3 (no trailer yet)
[video=youtube;feOQFKv2Lw4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feOQFKv2Lw4[/video]
Might end up paying for Jurassic World, Fantastic 4, Predator, and Tron .... but it's looking like I'm gonna pass on Superman.
Other than that.... what's good in 2025? What's going to be worth a trip to the theater or paying to stream?
Not a fan of Horror movies (Weapons, The Long Walk, Him) < check out the trailers for those movies
[img]https://media2.firstshowing.net/firstshowing/img16/HimPosterMainimagebigtall5991.jpg[/img]
oh and the new Matthew McConaughey movie looks good.... I'll be checking that one out.
[video=youtube;_G5-cUDrlB0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_G5-cUDrlB0[/video]
[video=youtube;a4LWhnvydQU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4LWhnvydQU[/video]
What is this a comedy?
[img]https://c.tenor.com/axOnbyO1YOAAAAAd/tenor.gif[/img]
[center][img]https://i0.wp.com/justnlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Sinners-to-From-Dusk-Till-Dawn.-3.jpg[/img]
[video=youtube;7joulECTx_U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7joulECTx_U[/video]
[img]https://i0.wp.com/justnlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Sinners-to-From-Dusk-Till-Dawn.-2.jpg[/img]
[b]SINNERS has taken the DUSK til DAWN concept and improved it.
9/10[/b] [/center]
The Score
[IMG]https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/w300_and_h450_bestv2/fsb4m9XW59mei8GKznvI3lLzcfp.jpg[/IMG]
Are you ****ing kidding me man?
Great ****ing movie.
I was gonna say: Not the most highly rated movie but it had me on the edge of my seat the whole time.
And it did.
But that final took it up another notch. Amazing twist.
It had me on the edge of my seat because there was so much at stake, and you genuinely didnt know how it woud turn out.
You definitely rooted for the thieves here, at least I did. Interesting to note because the director did not want Brando to play his character as charmingly as he did. Brando kind of went rogue on that. If he had played it more seriously/"bad guy", it would have given the whole thing a different feel/dynamic I suppose.
Even though in the beginning I didnt find DeNiro as more convincing than Norton, in terms of knowledge about the crime game, you rooted for him. Especially in the end.
The score(rating) would have this as just a nice heist flick, but I thought it was one of the better ones.
7.8/10 minimum, maybe 8/10. I guess re-watchability is one reason you could give it the lower score but I dont agree with the imdb rating of 6.9 at all. "cliche script" "standard plotting", man this shit was done right.
Layer Cake
[IMG]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e8/Layer_Cake_Poster.JPG[/IMG]
Great British gangster movie, mid early 2000s. Guy Ritchie style kinda but not by him.
Craig is great and his physique in this is perfect male body imo.
I watched this a couple days ago actually before The Score. My first 2 watched movies (besides the cinema ones) in a long time.
I love the tidbits and insights these crime movies have, when they show actual practical knowledge of how something is executed, how an operation is run, just an insight into said crime field.
The directors definitely do their research or work with people that give them info into however something is done typically.
7.6/10
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;15020372]The Score
[IMG]https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/w300_and_h450_bestv2/fsb4m9XW59mei8GKznvI3lLzcfp.jpg[/IMG]
Are you ****ing kidding me man?
Great ****ing movie.
I was gonna say: Not the most highly rated movie but it had me on the edge of my seat the whole time.
And it did.
But that final took it up another notch. Amazing twist.
It had me on the edge of my seat because there was so much at stake, and you genuinely didnt know how it woud turn out.
You definitely rooted for the thieves here, at least I did. Interesting to note because the director did not want Brando to play his character as charmingly as he did. Brando kind of went rogue on that. If he had played it more seriously/"bad guy", it would have given the whole thing a different feel/dynamic I suppose.
Even though in the beginning I didnt find DeNiro as more convincing than Norton, in terms of knowledge about the crime game, you rooted for him. Especially in the end.
The score(rating) would have this as just a nice heist flick, but I thought it was one of the better ones.
7.8/10 minimum, maybe 8/10. I guess re-watchability is one reason you could give it the lower score but I dont agree with the imdb rating of 6.9 at all. "cliche script" "standard plotting", man this shit was done right.[/QUOTE]
I liked this movie. Great cast. I did laugh about how a huge plotline of the movie is Edward Norton pretending he has down syndrome. :lol
But they did it somewhat tastefully and it worked and it was an interesting plotline because they showed how psycho and committed Norton’s character was. Today I’m pretty sure that plotline doesn’t fly though.