Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
Sorry but you've turned into a cornball with this one bro.
But its not as bad as saying you'd take dray over peak 2004 MVP KG on your all time team at forward.
:lol
That one took the cake.
Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
[QUOTE=tpols;15016808]Oh it was 1.6 instead of 1.5
:roll:
Monster production. That 12/9/1.6 on poor shooting is definitely untouchable.[/QUOTE]
Why did you round it down to 1 bpg when it should have been 2? You have an agenda. We done with the 90's!
[video=youtube;nBIdhE7IrsQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBIdhE7IrsQ[/video]
Buck Wiliams would never!
Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
I mean almost any all star forward could do a double single. They used to get double doubles at least.
Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
[QUOTE=tpols;15016812]I mean almost any all star forward could do a double single. They used to get double doubles at least.[/QUOTE]
Chet Holmgren in game 7 of the Finals: 5 blocks
Buck Williams season high in blocks in 1991-92 INCLUDING the postseason: 4 blocks
We done with the 90's :lol
Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15016815]Chet Holmgren in game 7 of the Finals: 5 blocks
Buck Williams season high in blocks in 1991-92 INCLUDING the postseason: 4 blocks
We done with the 90's :lol[/QUOTE]
This is such a childish take. Bucks Williams wasn't a shotblocker just like Rodnman wasn't a shotblocker.
Do you know what Rodman's career high in playoff blocks is? 4. Do you know who's the better defender between Chet and Rodman? See how stupid you sound?
Not saying I agree with any of this Buck vs Chet stuff because I honestly don't care, but this is just an idiotic reasoning.
Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
[QUOTE=beasted;15016868]This is such a childish take. Bucks Williams wasn't a shotblocker just like Rodnman wasn't a shotblocker.
Do you know what Rodman's career high in playoff blocks is? 4. Do you know who's the better defender between Chet and Rodman? See how stupid you sound?
Not saying I agree with any of this Buck vs Chet stuff because I honestly don't care, but this is just an idiotic reasoning.[/QUOTE]
He waited for Chet to finally do something after Halis injury to start talking shit.
Dude had 11 blocks in the whole series. 5 of them came in the game Hali gets hurt. SGA had just as many blocks in the series as 7 foot Chet.
Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
[QUOTE=beasted;15016868]This is such a childish take. Bucks Williams wasn't a shotblocker just like Rodnman wasn't a shotblocker.
Do you know what Rodman's career high in playoff blocks is? 4. Do you know who's the better defender between Chet and Rodman? See how stupid you sound?
Not saying I agree with any of this Buck vs Chet stuff because I honestly don't care, but this is just an idiotic reasoning.[/QUOTE]
Chet > Rodman
We done with the 90!!
Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
[QUOTE=tpols;15016812]I mean almost any all star forward could do a double single. They used to get double doubles at least.[/QUOTE]
Double single!!!!... :oldlol:
Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
Chet is nothing ... finals showed that ... he is a weak as$ 7' that scores only on weak side.
Re: Battle of 3rd options - Buck Williams destroys Chet Holmgren.. at any age
Still waiting for someone to post a vid of Buck Williams dominating on the defensive end during the '92 Finals like Chet did in that game 7.
[video=youtube;nBIdhE7IrsQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBIdhE7IrsQ[/video]