Morant disappointed in the coaching staff's lack of belief in Ja-ball

[QUOTE=Xiao Yao You;15040736]Michael Scotto: Ja Morant has been suspended one game for conduct detrimental to the team, Grizzlies say.

x.com[/QUOTE]

[url]https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/46806262/grizzlies-suspend-ja-morant-1-game-conduct-detrimental[/url]

He's dog shit. lol.

I just saw a report stating that he's been suspended for one game for "conduct detrimental to the team."

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15040751]He didn't average 30 PPG you dummie.

No way you are this dumb. :lol[/QUOTE]

It was 27.4. :lol Cry about it.

[QUOTE=Full Court;15040755]It was 27.4. :lol Cry about it.[/QUOTE]

At least you admitted to being wrong this time instead of doubling down on your nonsense which makes you look even more dumb.

You are getting ragdolled in here. :lol

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15040756]At least you admitted to being wrong this time instead of doubling down on your nonsense which makes you look even more dumb.

You are getting ragdolled in here. :lol[/QUOTE]

Going off memory and I was within a couple points. And that's all you have to dispute. :lol Yep, expected you to ignore everything else. You've got nothing.

[B][SIZE=6]1987_Ragdolled[/SIZE][/B]

[QUOTE=Full Court;15040757]Going off memory[/QUOTE]

You have shit memory.

[QUOTE=Yes or No;15040730]He's not good. You're retarded.[/QUOTE]
[Url=https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRPZqPRPHIF2xVI5uiUFQ7DcZyo3SNqMMQAlw&usqp=CAU][img]https://c.tenor.com/5vKnZA8IzwIAAAAC/tenor.gif[/img][/url]

[QUOTE=Full Court;15040750]Morant in '22 averaged 30 ppg, was shooting almost 35% from 3, won the MIP award, had a PER of 24.4, and was 7th in MVP voting. MVP voting should mean a lot to you, since that was the ONLY THING you could come up with to justify your retarded take that Chris Paul was better than Stockton. :lol

So go ahead, tell us again how Morant wasn't good.[/QUOTE]

Didnt you just ask for the strength of schedule?

What happened to that point?

They went 20-5 beating good teams. Better rate than with him.

25 games is a serious sample.

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15040758]You have shit memory.[/QUOTE]

Here's another fun fact for you: Did you know that in '22 Morant was ahead of Curry, Lebron, and Durant in MVP voting? I bet you didn't know that, did you? :lol I mention it because according to you MVP voting is the primary metric for determining who is a better player.


[B][SIZE=6]1987_Ragdolled[/SIZE][/B]

[QUOTE=Full Court;15040761]Here's another fun fact for you: Did you know that in '22 Morant was ahead of Curry, Lebron, and Durant in MVP voting? I bet you didn't know that, did you?[B] :lol I mention it because according to you[/B][B] MVP voting is the primary metric for determining who is a better player. [/B]


[B][SIZE=6]1987_Ragdolled[/SIZE][/B][/QUOTE]

Not really. SGA won MVP last season, but I still believe Jokic was better overall.

I just checked and Morant finished 7th. And you had him #1.

A player whose team went 25-5 without him.

[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;15040760]Didnt you just ask for the strength of schedule?

What happened to that point?

They went 20-5 beating good teams. Better rate than with him.

25 games is a serious sample.[/QUOTE]

He quickly ran away from that topic. He thought he had me cornered.:lol

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15040762][B]Not really.[/B] SGA won MVP last season, but I still believe Jokic was better overall.

I just checked and Morant finished 7th. And you had him #1.

A player whose team went 25-5 without him.[/QUOTE]

That's funny. MVP voting was the ONLY thing you could come up with for why CP was better than Stockton. But now it doesn't matter I see. :roll:

And SGA was the rightful MVP last year. You overrate Jokic. When the game's on the line, the ball goes to Murray. That's not how an MVP should work.

[QUOTE=Full Court;15040764]That's funny. MVP voting was the ONLY thing you could come up with for why CP was better than Stockton. But now it doesn't matter I see. :roll:

And SGA was the rightful MVP last year. You overrate Jokic. When the game's on the line, the ball goes to Murray. That's not how an MVP should work.[/QUOTE]

If you have one player consistently finishing higher in MVP voting over another player then yes. The player finishing higher year in and year out is more likely better. Like in the CP3 and Stockton case.

But to use it as a one year sample is retarded. Peja finished ahead of Shaq & Kobe in the MVP voting one year. Nobody will say he was better than both.

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15040765]If you have one player consistently finishing higher in MVP voting over another player then yes. The player finishing higher year in and year out is more likely better. Like in the CP3 and Stockton case.

But to use it as a one year sample is retarded. Peja finished ahead of Shaq & Kobe in the MVP voting one year. Nobody will say he was better than both.[/QUOTE]

I don't disagree with your second paragraph, but the first paragraph just shows your simplistic mind. Your complete inability to look at the totality of context. How many MVP votes do you think CP3 would have gotten if prime Karl Malone was his teammate?

[QUOTE=Full Court;15040768]I don't disagree with your second paragraph, but the first paragraph just shows your simplistic mind. Your complete inability to look at the totality of context. How many MVP votes do you think CP3 would have gotten if prime Karl Malone was his teammate?[/QUOTE]
More than Stockton