Printable View
[QUOTE=jaydacris]sir, you're logical reasoning and rationality are not welcome in this thread where we are on a mission to unlock the real truths of this country![/QUOTE]
Find the truth here, I follow all the strands of this and unravel the conspiracy.
After unravelling, it all fits together like a watch.
[url]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=285027[/url]
It was government funded nudists.
[QUOTE=miller-time]I don't believe you are being sincere, but actually look at what you are saying. Look past this stupid persona you've created and actually read what you're writing. You are a disgusting person.[/QUOTE]
About 30-40 years ago, they would call this investigative journalism. Nowadays anyone who calls bullsh*t on anything is now a conspiracy theorist. The media has been bought and paid for by the highest bidder. They no longer seek the truth but merely report on what is being told.
I see very little concrete proof, fake actors, and a lot of misinformation from the media.
[B]My position is simply "I know nothing, therefore I am asking questions." Your position is you already know everything based on the media, thus those who are seeking answers probably know nothing and are delusional for not believing what they are being told.[/B]
It is as simple as that. If you don't like this kind of crap, then why are you constantly trolling this thread. You would be better off ignoring it and continue to live in your own little bubble reality that allows the media to dictate your perspective.
I like asking questions when I see a few anamolies; what is wrong with that .. why is being curious such a sin nowadays?
[QUOTE=KevinNYC]Find the truth here, I follow all the strands of this and unravel the conspiracy.
After unravelling, it all fits together like a watch.
[url]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=285027[/url]
It was government funded nudists.[/QUOTE]
That thread is stupid as f*ck.
[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]That thread is stupid as f*ck.[/QUOTE]
Who got to you?
Were they nude?
[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]About 30-40 years ago, they would call this investigative journalism. Nowadays anyone who calls bullsh*t on anything is now a conspiracy theorist. The media has been bought and paid for by the highest bidder. They no longer seek the truth but merely report on what is being told.
I see very little concrete proof, fake actors, and a lot of misinformation from the media.
[B]My position is simply "I know nothing, therefore I am asking questions." Your position is you already know everything based on the media, thus those who are seeking answers probably know nothing and are delusional for not believing what they are being told.[/B]
It is as simple as that. If you don't like this kind of crap, then why are you constantly trolling this thread. You would be better off ignoring it and continue to live in your own little bubble reality that allows the media to dictate your perspective.
I like asking questions when I see a few anamolies; what is wrong with that .. why is being curious such a sin nowadays?[/QUOTE]
Ignoring/dismissing everything that goes against your precious conspiracy theory is not a good stance to take especially when you're trying to act like you're open-minded while everyone is close-minded.
[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]You are f*ckin dense if you don't believe there are coded references in popular movies. The facts are there: there are numerous cryptic references to 9/11 in major movies way before it happened.
But you are dense and is prob incapable of digging a bit deeper in the critical aspect of your brain.
Leave this f*ckin thread alone. Can't us conspiracy nuts have our fun without you **** f*cks raining on the parade. A*shole.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]F*ck you Aussie boy.
We're just having fun here exercising a bit of critical thinking. Why do you have to be so serious Aussie boy .. stop raining on the parade. Did Obama elect you as "**** President Loser of the the anti-conspiracy club." What is wrong with a bit of denial and asking questions .. stop being such a close minded queeeer.[/QUOTE]
Damn you are one open minded sob.
[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]The government has a technology to control the weather: HARP.[/QUOTE]
:facepalm
In all seriousness, the original post you created is rather interesting.
[QUOTE=timlush]Haven't followed this story very closely, was there anyone who was shot but didn't die?[/QUOTE]
That's a really good question. I was wondering how a 20 year old could be precise enough to drop 26 bodies like he was some highly ranked special forces secret weapon. I do find it rather puzzling that the very few rushed to the hospital were later dead... not a single "survivor" unless I'm missing something?
[QUOTE=TheSilentKiller]Yes, even several children.[/QUOTE]
I haven't heard a single instance in this entire story / development of those who were shot but survived. I must be missing something ...
[QUOTE=Legend of Josh]I haven't heard a single instance in this entire story / development of those who were shot but survived. I must be missing something ...[/QUOTE]
There seems to be a lot of loops holes & unanswered questions. Very similar to the Aurora shooting. The media goes crazy, makes up lies & facts.. they never tell the entire story. Hype dies down, and everyone just leaves it alone.
LOL so the CIA one of the world's most sophisticated agencies is going to pass code messages through movies.....because well I guess conspiracy theorists actually don't need a reason to spout some insane bullshit. According to conspiracy theorists there was supposed to be a major catastrophy at the olympics and the world was supposed to end yesterday...but of course they'll conveniently forget that. The only thing this shows is conspiracy theorists are insensitive jerkoffs
How many threads are you guys going to steal from above top secret?
You straight copy and pasted this thread title content of the thread from another website.
[QUOTE=longtime lurker]LOL so the CIA one of the world's most sophisticated agencies is going to pass code messages through movies.....because well I guess conspiracy theorists actually don't need a reason to spout some insane bullshit. According to conspiracy theorists there was supposed to be a major catastrophy at the olympics and the world was supposed to end yesterday...but of course they'll conveniently forget that. The only thing this shows is conspiracy theorists are insensitive jerkoffs[/QUOTE]
Pride is their ultimate motivation. That would explain the "in your face" facet (movies, music, media, etc). They take pleasure in doing it right in front of us, and when all is said and done looking back, we'll come to the grim realization all the signs were blatantly in sight, and we were either too naive, ignorant or drowning in denial to stop it.
[QUOTE=Legend of Josh]That's a really good question. I was wondering how a 20 year old could be precise enough to drop 26 bodies like he was some highly ranked special forces secret weapon. I do find it rather puzzling that the very few rushed to the hospital were later dead... not a single "survivor" unless I'm missing something?[/QUOTE]
small kids.....they die easy.........:(
besides, the AR-15 bushmaster is used by military in many countries......very powerful and deadly
.
[QUOTE=n00bie]There seems to be a lot of loops holes & unanswered questions. Very similar to the Aurora shooting. The media goes crazy, makes up lies & facts.. they never tell the entire story. Hype dies down, and everyone just leaves it alone.[/QUOTE]
I think you need to learn how the media works these days. Here's how it goes:
1) Major news story happens
2) Everyone rushes to get the story broken "first", not really caring if the info is 100% verified or not. Poor information is originally disseminated.
3) Over the next few days the actual details come out, corrections get made (and conspiracy theorists are born), actual new reporting and analysis gets done
4) New news story breaks, news agencies forget about original incident and move on to the next one, because that's what drives rating/web hits
5) Repeat step 1
There isn't anything sinister here. Just a bunch of inept new organizations looking for ratings.
[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]That thread is stupid as f*ck.[/QUOTE]
It's just as plausible as this one.
[QUOTE=Legend of Josh]That's a really good question. I was wondering how a 20 year old could be precise enough to drop 26 bodies like he was some highly ranked special forces secret weapon. I do find it rather puzzling that the very few rushed to the hospital were later dead... not a single "survivor" unless I'm missing something?[/QUOTE]Nothing precise about it. he used over 100 rounds to kill 26 in an enclosed space.
[QUOTE=RaininThrees]It's just as plausible as this one.[/QUOTE]
This RAMBO genius is such a great critical thinker that he can't even recognize a parody of his own style of "reasoning."
[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Show me videos of witnesses who actually went through the whole ordeal. So far I have only seen a bunch of actors and no real emotions.[/QUOTE]
I guess you missed all the pictures I just posted.
I'll help you out again, because you seem to be rather dense:
[IMG]http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/Breitbart/Big-Government/2012/CT%20Shooting/sandy_hook_parents_crying_reuters.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/12/15/article-2248584-1684DC9A000005DC-339_638x412.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/tAONbWiI_YtqbiicBIPOcQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTMxMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/blogs/partner/470_2558444.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.redletterchristians.org/wp-content/uploads/Children-Sandy-Hook.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/12/21/article-2251701-169CE7BB000005DC-404_634x457.jpg[/IMG]
Want more?
[QUOTE=KevinNYC]This RAMBO genius is such a great critical thinker that he can't even recognize a parody of his own style of "reasoning."[/QUOTE]
Exactly.
[QUOTE=daily]Nothing precise about it. he used over 100 rounds to kill 26 in an enclosed space.[/QUOTE]
Exactly.
Dude was just firing into a crowd and kept firing until everyone was down.
For those who haven't heard about survivors, there's this:
[url]http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/sandy-hook-classroom-survivor-played-dead-165139277--abc-news-topstories.html[/url]
[QUOTE]The lone survivor of one of the two Sandy Hook Elementary School first-grade classrooms where Adam Lanza allegedly shot and killed 20 children tricked the gunman by playing dead, the girl's pastor said.
"She ran out of the school building covered from head to toe with blood and the first thing she said to her mom was, 'Mommy, I'm OK but all my friends are dead,'" Pastor Jim Solomon told ABC News' Lara Spencer this weekend.
The girl, a 6-year-old whose name is not being released for privacy reasons, was the first student to emerge from the lockdown at Sandy Hook, Solomon said. He said the young girl described the shooter to her mom in a way that only a young child can.
"Well, she saw someone who she felt was angry and someone she felt was very mad," Solomon said. "I think it's impossible outside of divine intervention. She has wisdom beyond her years, for sure."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=daily]Nothing precise about it. he used over 100 rounds to kill 26 in an enclosed space.[/QUOTE]
yes, it was not out in the courtyard......it was inside classrooms i think..?...:(
[QUOTE=daily]Nothing precise about it. he used over 100 rounds to kill 26 in an enclosed space.[/QUOTE]
He also shot them multiple times. Including one child who was shot 11 times.
I don't think any specific shooting skill was needed at all.
[QUOTE=tomtucker]yes, it was not out in the courtyard......it was inside classrooms i think..?...:([/QUOTE]
Other than the school officials he encountered after shooting his way in, all the killing occurred in just two classrooms. The first group was thought to be clutching each other out of fear.
[QUOTE=RaininThrees]Exactly.
Dude was just firing into a crowd and kept firing until everyone was down.
For those who haven't heard about survivors, there's this:
[url]http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/sandy-hook-classroom-survivor-played-dead-165139277--abc-news-topstories.html[/url][/QUOTE]
I believe there were other survivors in the second classroom who were hidden in the closet, but they may mean the only survivor who he saw.
Rambo asking for pictures of tears and funerals is sickening. You are a horrible person. But I guess you get a pass because you are just 'asking questions'. :facepalm
You know, more and more I'm beginning to think that the Internet is a bad idea. Used to be that in order for your voice/opinion to be heard, you needed to be exceptional in some way or have some sort of perceivable talent. Now, any idiot with a modem connection can spew whatever stupidity is brewing in his brain and he won't have a shortage of like-minded dunces to agree with him.
[QUOTE=DonDadda59]You know, more and more I'm beginning to think that the Internet is a bad idea. Used to be that in order for your voice/opinion to be heard, you needed to be exceptional in some way or have some sort of perceivable talent. Now, any idiot with a modem connection can spew whatever stupidity is brewing in his brain and he won't have a shortage of like-minded dunces to agree with him.[/QUOTE]
everybody's gonna get their 15 mins of fame
and I do think conspiracy types have been emboldened by internet cause they probably perceive more ppl out there than in reality actually agree with them
While I agree most conspiracy theories are ill-founded and plausibly false, all of them can't be complete and total bullshit. Whether or not we believe them to be true/false is irrelevant, what's important and actually matters is are they in-fact true or false.
[QUOTE=DonDadda59]You know, more and more I'm beginning to think that the Internet is a bad idea. Used to be that in order for your voice/opinion to be heard, you needed to be exceptional in some way or have some sort of perceivable talent. Now, any idiot with a modem connection can spew whatever stupidity is brewing in his brain and he won't have a shortage of like-minded dunces to agree with him.[/QUOTE]
Look closely at pop culture over the last say 5-8 years and so and tell me that there isn't a cultural debate going on about this exact issue. One of my professors argued that there is now a debate raging about whether or not some totalitarian philosophies are actually beneficial to the existence of a state. Not the idea of true total media control centralized by the government, but more the idea that media control should be in the hands of people who are qualified. Interesting stuff.
[QUOTE=Timmy D for MVP]Look closely at pop culture over the last say 5-8 years and so and tell me that there isn't a cultural debate going on about this exact issue. One of my professors argued that there is now a debate raging about whether or not some [B]totalitarian philosophies are actually beneficial to the existence of a state[/B]. Not the idea of true total media control centralized by the government, but more the idea that media control should be in the hands of people who are qualified. Interesting stuff.[/QUOTE]
I think it's almost tautological that totalitarian philosophies would benefit preservation of the state but that is interesting. Can you hook a brother up with some good articles or papers to read?
[QUOTE=Legend of Josh]Pride is their ultimate motivation. That would explain the "in your face" facet (movies, music, media, etc). They take pleasure in doing it right in front of us, and when all is said and done looking back, we'll come to the grim realization all the signs were blatantly in sight, and we were either too naive, ignorant or drowning in denial to stop it.[/QUOTE]
Obviously. Had I just gone to see The Dark Knight Rises and noticed the words "Aurora" and then "Sandy Hook", I clearly then would have had the knowledge to go and prevent those shootings.
Awesome, they're planting these hints to either:
Drop us clues to see if we can prevent the tragedies in time because they like playing sick and twisted games like this with society.
or
They're subliminal messages hidden in films to trigger a shooter to carry out the shootings (Project MKUltra).
[QUOTE=Jackass18]Obviously. Had I just gone to see The Dark Knight Rises and noticed the words "Aurora" and then "Sandy Hook", I clearly then would have had the knowledge to go and prevent those shootings.
Awesome, they're planting these hints to either:
Drop us clues to see if we can prevent the tragedies in time because they like playing sick and twisted games like this with society.
or
They're subliminal messages hidden in films to trigger a shooter to carry out the shootings (Project MKUltra).[/QUOTE]
No, you're just not seeing the bigger picture and making yourself look like a [I]jackass[/I] in the process.
I'm not referring to the Sandy Hook incident specifically, I'm just saying in general.
[QUOTE=Legend of Josh]While I agree most conspiracy theories are ill-founded and plausibly false, all of them can't be complete and total bullshit. Whether or not we believe them to be true/false is irrelevant, what's important and actually matters is are they in-fact true or false.[/QUOTE]
There are some that are actually true. The problem is these Internet wackos try and turn every single story into a conspiracy theory by ignoring/dismissing everything that goes against it and also twist and stretch many others to fit into their conspiracies.
[QUOTE=Legend of Josh]No, you're just not seeing the bigger picture and making yourself look like a [I]jackass[/I] in the process.[/quote]
I was simply making a joke... I was reading about people who were saying such things and also other reasons (TDKR triggered those people to do those shootings for example). For pride? Yeah, they hold pride so highly and would risk so much for it. Rub it all in our faces and then what? We finally find out and there's chaos or maybe we're all brainwashed by then or have little to no power to do anything about it? All these plots with so many people involved and everything running so smoothly with no leaks or screw ups? It's awfully hard to keep a secret so big especially with so many people involved, and then you throw in that they're also handing out clues all along? The gov't has so many problems and bungled so many things, and they have many people who scrutinize every little thing they do, but they can orchestrate this grand plot having us all fooled all the while dropping hints? Bravo, gubment, bravo.
People criticize the government to no end, but then think they could pull off some gigantic, nefarious plot all the while dropping hints here and there while laughing behind our backs with maniacal laughter...
[QUOTE=DonDadda59]You know, more and more I'm beginning to think that the Internet is a bad idea. Used to be that in order for your voice/opinion to be heard, you needed to be exceptional in some way or have some sort of perceivable talent. Now, any idiot with a modem connection can spew whatever stupidity is brewing in his brain and he won't have a shortage of like-minded dunces to agree with him.[/QUOTE]
Whatever.
If it's anything, the internet allows information that usually go unreported by the media to be heard and allows the people to voice their opinion on a subject that will be heard by many other people. Before, this right was something only the media, celebrities, politicians, etc. (aka rich people) had access to. Now the majority of the population finally has a voice.
Conspiracy theory is a form of investigative journalism; I don't see anything wrong with questioning anamolies that usually are released through the media.
I think the act of questioning has been so distorted and the dependence on the media has been so ingrained that many people will no longer question what is being told.
In fact, if you do question, then you are considered "delusional" and like you said it, "dunce."
But I like the fact they are raising questions even though some of them are wrong; usually the ones that are full of sh*t are the ones nobody will take seriously, it is the ones that hit a bit too close to home that the government is scared of.
A true Democracy requires discourse (even if the person raising the question is wrong), not just one take on a subject from a widely controlled media.
[QUOTE=TheSilentKiller]Rambo asking for pictures of tears and funerals is sickening. You are a horrible person. But I guess you get a pass because you are just 'asking questions'. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
I didn't ask for pictures; I asked for videos. [B]My premise remains: these are robotic child actors spitting out script lines.[/B]
I am asking for proof; surely if 27 people died someone on the scene must be a bit traumatized and can't simply fake this sh*t right ..
Where's the video?
[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Conspiracy theory is a form of investigative journalism; I don't see anything wrong with questioning anamolies that usually are released through the media.
[/QUOTE]
No, conspiracy theory is a form of douchebaggery. If you were an investigative journalist, you would be in Sandy Hook right now conducting interviews with law enforcement, school officials, families, etc. Instead, you're on a message board coming off a completely clueless and insensitive dunce. What is your particular conspiracy theory exactly? From what I gather here it looks like you're trying to convince people that the massacre didn't happen and some government agency or body hired child actors to read scripts.
According to your journalistic investigation, what are the particular agencies that were involved in this hoax? I mean something like this would require a whole town, state, and the federal government's participation as well as the media, law enforcement, etc. Who benefits from this?
I mean, you have thought this through haven't you? This thread and its content aren't just the copy & pasted mental diarrhea of some internet loser, right? This is the result of a thorough and well-documented investigation, amirite?
[QUOTE=DonDadda59]No, conspiracy theory is a form of douchebaggery. If you were an investigative journalist, you would be in Sandy Hook right now conducting interviews with law enforcement, school officials, families, etc. Instead, you're on a message board coming off a completely clueless and insensitive dunce. What is your particular conspiracy theory exactly? From what I gather here it looks like you're trying to convince people that the massacre didn't happen and some government agency or body hired child actors to read scripts.
According to your journalistic investigation, what are the particular agencies that were involved in this hoax? I mean something like this would require a whole town, state, and the federal government's participation as well as the media, law enforcement, etc. Who benefits from this?
I mean, you have thought this through haven't you? This thread and its content aren't just the copy & pasted mental diarrhea of some internet loser, right? This is the result of a thorough and well-documented investigation, amirite?[/QUOTE]
If I was in Sandy Hook as a reporter, I would do what every reporter does: stick a thumb up my a*s and report what was being told like a parrot.
Investigative reporting digs deeper than what is being reported. The "professional" journalism you speak of is just pure bullsh*t. This is why I compare the investigative (REAL) reporting to conspiracy theorists: they are asking questions, finding anamolies, doing further research, and creatively coming up with different hypothesis when they come across an anamoly. There is no technique in the reporting going on in the media: [B]these so called professionals are basically riding on some gossip worthy of TMZ and reporting it. That's it. That's their technique.[/B]
Sadly anyone who attempts this kind of reporting will either get fired or be label as a conspiracy theorist. It is a lost art.
If your journalist professor supports this kind of reporting, you need to find a better education homie.
[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]If I was in Sandy Hook as a reporter, I would do what every reporter does: stick a thumb up my a*s and report what was being told like a parrot.
Investigative reporting digs deeper than what is being reported. The "professional" journalism you speak of is just pure bullsh*t. This is why I compare the investigative (REAL) reporting to conspiracy theorists: they are asking questions, finding anamolies, doing further research, and creatively coming up with different hypothesis when they come across an anamoly. There is no technique in the reporting going on in the media: [B]these so called professionals are basically riding on some gossip worthy of TMZ and reporting it. That's it. That's their technique.[/B]
If your journalist professor supports this kind of reporting, you need to find a better education homie.[/QUOTE]
So basically you took the long way of admitting you're talking out of your ass, or more likely, copy & pasting someone else's bullshit. I asked you point blank- what is your theory on what occurred (or didn't), who specifically was involved, who benefited, and what do you have to back up these assertions.
It's really pretty simple stuff. I'm going to sleep and I fully expect you to dodge the questions, but hey maybe I'll be surprised. Have a great night, make sure the government or illuminati doesn't send some brainwashed assassin to your home to silence you (hopefully your hometown doesn't appear in any recent film releases). :cheers:
[QUOTE=DonDadda59]No, conspiracy theory is a form of douchebaggery. If you were an investigative journalist, you would be in Sandy Hook right now conducting interviews with law enforcement, school officials, families, etc. Instead, you're on a message board coming off a completely clueless and insensitive dunce. What is your particular conspiracy theory exactly? From what I gather here it looks like you're trying to convince people that the massacre didn't happen and some government agency or body hired child actors to read scripts.
According to your journalistic investigation, what are the particular agencies that were involved in this hoax? I mean something like this would require a whole town, state, and the federal government's participation as well as the media, law enforcement, etc. Who benefits from this?
I mean, you have thought this through haven't you? This thread and its content aren't just the copy & pasted mental diarrhea of some internet loser, right? This is the result of a thorough and well-documented investigation, amirite?[/QUOTE]
The proof is still on your side.
[B]
Where are the videos of the traumatic witnesses in the shooting.[/B] Sadly, there is only one crying scene and the guy literally had to work up a sad face before they turned on the camera.
[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urrRcgB581w"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urrRcgB581w[/URL]
:lol
This whole thing stinks of fakeness.