-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=ukballer]First year I've really not cared for getting CoD, and still don't know a lot about the game, not bothered checking reviews or watching many trailers etc.
I'm going with what Undisputed said, taking a year off from playing it.
I did intend to get a PS4, but I'm putting that idea to one side for now and will wait 7-8 months instead.[/QUOTE]
Best way to go, skipping one or two.
I am going with the PS4 as soon as they're available again. I am done with Microsoft, and I really am excited for the Killzone franchise, and that sweet ass dualshock 4 controller...that thing is absolutely perfect. Xbox has a strong list of launch games compared to the PS4, but Sony has always been slow starters when it comes to games. And I expect Xbox to keep steering their games in the camera(kinect) direction. Why else would they make you buy it? No interest in those stupid cameras.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
a lot of you may already know but
call of duty ghosts graphics engine = upgraded quake 3 arena engine
[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine[/URL]
cod development team sure has it easy :D
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
Do you not get a point towards your killstreak for flag captures in Domination? Weak...
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=code green]Do you not get a point towards your killstreak for flag captures in Domination? Weak...[/QUOTE]
Have to be the first one there. I don't like this game yet.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=UConnCeltics]Have to be the first one there. I don't like this game yet.[/QUOTE]
Me either man.
What does your class setup look like gun/perks?
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=GOBB]Me either man.
What does your class setup look like gun/perks?[/QUOTE]
What I use most right now is:
SA-805
Red Dot
Grip
Frag
Sleight of Hand
Off the Grid
Fully Loaded
Quickdraw
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=magic chiongson]a lot of you may already know but
call of duty ghosts graphics engine = upgraded quake 3 arena engine
[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine[/URL]
cod development team sure has it easy :D[/QUOTE]
If it aint broke don't fix
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
so far i am liking it. this feels more of a successor to blops 1. hated blops 2 because of the shitty map design. maps in ghosts are pretty good. i like how you can unlock whatever u want from early; but squad points are fukkin hard to come by - at least for me.
playing on pc is way different than console. i play with my ps3 controller and i can never win a shootout if the person who is good with a mouse keyboard :(
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=magic chiongson]a lot of you may already know but
call of duty ghosts graphics engine = upgraded quake 3 arena engine
[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine[/URL]
cod development team sure has it easy :D[/QUOTE]
It's upgraded from the Modern Warfare 3 engine, it's says so right there in the page you linked.
Saying it's an upgraded Quake 3 Arena engine is like saying the latest Macbook Air is an upgraded Apple 3. Get that fanboy BS outta here.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[quote=LJJ]It's upgraded from the Modern Warfare 3 engine, it's says so right there in the page you linked.
Saying it's an upgraded Quake 3 Arena engine is like saying the latest Macbook Air is an upgraded Apple 3. Get that fanboy BS outta here.[/quote]
wrong analogy, macbook air has an intel core processor while apple 3 has an old apple processor. iw3 engine is directly extended from quake 3 engine code :confusedshrug: cod fanboy: "the latest cod graphics looks way better than the previous one" :D
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=magic chiongson]wrong analogy, macbook air has an intel core processor while apple 3 has an old apple processor. iw3 engine is directly extended from quake 3 engine code :confusedshrug: cod fanboy: "the latest cod graphics looks way better than the previous one" :D[/QUOTE]
The point you are missing is, people don't play COD for the OMG amazing Graphicz. The game doesn't change controls, stick to the smoothness of the franchise and the customization that was introduced in COD4 that everybody loves
I'd say the Engine has changed so much that I don't even think anyone would recognize it as the quake 3 engine
[IMG]http://legacy.macnn.com/thereview/reviews/quake3/screen1.jpg[/IMG]
Don't even dare to say that THAT looks like COD
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[quote=CelticBaller]The point you are missing is, people don't play COD for the OMG amazing Graphicz. The game doesn't change controls, stick to the smoothness of the franchise and the customization that was introduced in COD4 that everybody loves
I'd say the Engine has changed so much that I don't even think anyone would recognize it as the quake 3 engine
[IMG]http://legacy.macnn.com/thereview/reviews/quake3/screen1.jpg[/IMG]
Don't even dare to say that THAT looks like COD[/quote]
did i say any of those? check my first post, i said iw team had it easy. compared to other game devs they barely did anything, and rake in tons of money. and fanboys justify it by saying things like omg it has the best graphics etc
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=magic chiongson]wrong analogy, macbook air has an intel core processor while apple 3 has an old apple processor. iw3 engine is directly extended from quake 3 engine code :confusedshrug: cod fanboy: "the latest cod graphics looks way better than the previous one" :D[/QUOTE]
The processor is one of the things they upgraded somewhere along the line, hence the word upgrade.
Saying it's an upgrade (over many, many generations) of the Quake 3 engine is fanboy nonsense. Might as well say it's an upgrade of the Quake 1 engine. We are talking many, many iterations ago, there is nothing direct about it.
What is your point any way? DICE didn't build a new engine for Battlefield 4 either by your logic. But I didn't see you trolling the Battlefield thread by saying they simply used an old engine saying the devs had it easy and it's all based around Bad Company tech. Oooh right, that's that fanboyism coming into play.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
Gotta say I was way more interested in BO2 as a prestige master as opposed to less than 10 hours with Ghosts.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=LJJ]
What is your point any way? DICE didn't build a new engine for Battlefield 4 either by your logic. But I didn't see you trolling the Battlefield thread by saying they simply used an old engine saying the devs had it easy and it's all based around Bad Company tech. Oooh right, that's that fanboyism coming into play.[/QUOTE]
You have a good point here, but the Dice engine is a young pup compared to the COD engine. Frostbite 1.0 was originally released in 2008 (the year after COD:4 MW1 was released), that Quake engine was originally released in 1999.
Anyway, the COD developers dont use the quake engine because they are lazy, they use it because its a great engine for a fast and twitchy first person shooter.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=KeylessEntry]You have a good point here, but the Dice engine is a young pup compared to the COD engine. Frostbite 1.0 was originally developed in 2008 (the year after COD:4 MW1 was released), that Quake engine was originally developed in 1999.[/QUOTE]
The Quake engine is older than that, it's from the mid 90s. But that doesn't mean shit, because they aren't using that engine. They are using a continuously redeveloped proprietary engine that at one point in time used the Quake engine as a starting poitn. Just like DICE isn't using the shitty Frostbite 1 engine.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=GOBB]This game blows.[/QUOTE]
what is wrong with it?
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
i actually like it even tho im gettin murked. kill streaks seem to kinda suck. still haven't tried extinction
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
I bit, and I'm downloading the PC version, even though I've heard it's a horrible console port.
I've also heard it's now almost an advantage to use a controller on the PC version over keyboard/mouse. PC master race gamers must be pissed. :D
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=ukballer]I bit, and I'm downloading the PC version, even though I've heard it's a horrible console port.
I've also heard it's now almost an advantage to use a controller on the PC version over keyboard/mouse. PC master race gamers must be pissed. :D[/QUOTE]
was ur steam, breh? les come together like butt cheeks :cheers:
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
I have only put enough time in to be a level 14, but so far the new perk system is greatness.
Killstreaks are not worth it in this game. Been running Specialist, and its a good fit.
Any 360 players here wanna get some games in, add [B]cloud shadows[/B]. I am a major noob in this game still, but once I can afford(COD points) the setups I want and get a feel for the pace and maps....it will be on.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=Bucket_Nakedz]was ur steam, breh? les come together like butt cheeks :cheers:[/QUOTE]
ukballer is my account name, but WarroF1 is my current steam name, hopefully catch you in a game soon! I've not even played yet, but will sometime soon.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=ukballer]ukballer is my account name, but WarroF1 is my current steam name, hopefully catch you in a game soon! I've not even played yet, but will sometime soon.[/QUOTE]
i sent u a friend request. im ruckx86. hurry yo ass up and get online u tea drinking mofo
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=Bucket_Nakedz]i sent u a friend request. im ruckx86. hurry yo ass up and get online u tea drinking mofo[/QUOTE]
Accepted. :lol
I'm with GOBB though, the game isn't great. For me anyway, just feels exactly like MW3 with slightly better hit detection. The few maps I played on had no flow, didn't like them. I'll give it more time, but not that impressed really.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
Let me do you all a favor. This is the setup you want to run
MSBS-silencer and red dot site
no secondary
no tactical's/explosives
Stalker
Quickdraw
Speed
Focus
Amplify or Dead Silence, former if you have a headset
The class is virtually unstoppable, although the bullet damage in the game combined with the spawn points make it very frustrating. I can hold around a 3.0 K-D ratio, but I never lose a face to face battle. It's always getting shot from behind by someone that spawned 20 yards back while I was running away.
Also the killstreaks suck dick.
Trinity Rockets can be useful at times, but more often than not I can't get a kill with the first 2 that break off.
Gryphon is cool, but it gets shot down in no time if your opponents have a brain
The dog is worthless until you die and it gives away your position
Sentry Gun doesn't even fire the majority of the time since it can be seen on the minimap and people avoid the area. Plus there is a delay in its reaction time.
Maniac is decent I guess, but if you're in a group of 2-3 you're dying.
Regular Juggernaut is total trash. Not being able to heal combined with slow reaction times=4-5 kills max before you're gunned down
Heli Pilot would be excellent but the controls suck dick for piloting the chopper and you end up spinning around trying to get an angle to shoot the enemies half of the time
If someone weaves and maximizes cover, they can virtually avoid the small rods from the Loki which is 90% of its ability.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
3.0 KD? I call BS. Prove it. I have no problem being wrong.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=GOBB]3.0 KD? I call BS. Prove it. I have no problem being wrong.[/QUOTE]
your my little bitch, fukkin f@ggot!
GOBB dumb ass n!gga
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
Including Ghosts, how would you rank the COD series?
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=Shade8780]Including Ghosts, how would you rank the COD series?[/QUOTE]
Dont have ghosts but Im bored.
COD4>MW2>WAW>MW3>BO2>BO
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=TylerOO]Dont have ghosts but Im bored.
COD4>MW2>WAW>MW3>BO2>BO[/QUOTE]
Black Ops last?! Worse than BO2, MW3 and WAW?! :roll:
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=Shade8780]Black Ops last?! Worse than BO2, MW3 and WAW?! :roll:[/QUOTE]
Black Ops 1 was so boring and the hit detection was the worst. MW3 drove me nuts but atleast it was fun when you beasted it
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
Black ops was shit. I agree with you Tyler, people love to praise for the "balance" but fail to point how boring the game was. If there's one thing I disagree is the ranking of WaW, thats shit is right up there next to Black Ops 1
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=TylerOO]Dont have ghosts but Im bored.
COD4>MW2>WAW>MW3>BO2>BO[/QUOTE]
You dont have Ghosts? Say what?! By your rankings you might like it. You can have my game. I hate it.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=GOBB]You dont have Ghosts? Say what?! By your rankings you might like it. You can have my game. I hate it.[/QUOTE]
Is it that bad?
What system you got it on? I'm thinking about getting for the 360
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=TheReal Kendall]Is it that bad?
What system you got it on? I'm thinking about getting for the 360[/QUOTE]
I have it for 360. The game simply isnt fun for me.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
Home for break, can't get XBox to connect to internet. No ghosts for me, what a loss. Not.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
[QUOTE=GOBB]You dont have Ghosts? Say what?! By your rankings you might like it. You can have my game. I hate it.[/QUOTE]
Yea I haven't got it. I might get it eventually
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
1. MW1
2. BO2
3.MW2
4. BO
5.Ghosts
6.WAW
7. MW3
This is how I rank them.
MW1 was the GOAT when it came out.
I am still playing BO2. I love the graphics, weapons, maps, pointstreaks are really awesome ( Dragonfire FTW) and the perks.
-
Re: Call of Duty: Ghost
black ops is still my favorite. it had the best maps imo. i didn't play mw1 online but i still feel like it had the best campaign. i fukking hate mw2 with a passion. the only thing i enjoyed was spec ops. i really like ghosts, tho. the killstreaks sucks and most of the guns suck as well. but i like most of the maps except for storm front. blops 2 felt more like an iw game where as ghosts feels like a treyarch.
question for yallz: which cod in your opinion had the best maps?