Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
[QUOTE=MaxFly]Ok, so how do we measure sub-concussive hits. What scale do they use as an assessment when there is no noticeable dizziness or disorientation from a hit.[/QUOTE]
[url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/[/url]
[B][SIZE="4"]READ[/SIZE][/B]. It really isn't that long.
[I]"Contact injuries were defined as any injury sustained due to impact with another player, regardless of whether the injury occurred while playing flag or tackle football. An injury was considered noncontact if it occurred without an external force exhibited by another player, such as those experienced during a running drill. An injury was considered severe if it resulted in a concussion, fracture, or ligament tear. All other injuries were considered nonsevere. The leagues encouraged their teams to use the International Consensus Statement Guidelines for Sport-Related Concussion."[/I]
In short, even sprains, tears, and other possible non-contact relates injuries are considered overall.
Including all those, the probability of a kid injuring himself was .27%.
Among those injuries, 27%-35% of the injuries were fractures.
Another quote:
"[I]...sprains, strains, and contusions, have suffered from more variability in reporting, with 9% to 69% of reported injuries being sprains, strains, and contusions.[/I]"
[B]Supporting my initial statement:[/B]
"[I]Players in grades 7 and 8 have almost twice the injury risk when compared with players in grades 4, 5, and 6.[/I]"
"[I] In studies in which athlete-exposures were measured, the injury risk in older and more experienced athletes could be attributed to the more experienced players
Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
[QUOTE=aj1987]
As I said in my initial post, it's basic science.[/QUOTE]
You're a moron. There's nothing scientific about cherrypicking to support your predetermined conclusion.
Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
[QUOTE=nightlight]You're a moron. There's nothing scientific about cherrypicking to support your predetermined conclusion.[/QUOTE]
Cherrypicking? What was I cherrypicking, you braindead subhuman [COLOR="Black"]c[/COLOR]unt? :confusedshrug:
Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
[QUOTE=aj1987][url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/[/url]
[B][SIZE="4"]READ[/SIZE][/B]. It really isn't that long.
[I]"Contact injuries were defined as any injury sustained due to impact with another player, regardless of whether the injury occurred while playing flag or tackle football. An injury was considered noncontact if it occurred without an external force exhibited by another player, such as those experienced during a running drill. An injury was considered severe if it resulted in a concussion, fracture, or ligament tear. All other injuries were considered nonsevere. The leagues encouraged their teams to use the International Consensus Statement Guidelines for Sport-Related Concussion."[/I]
In short, even sprains, tears, and other possible non-contact relates injuries are considered overall.
Including all those, the probability of a kid injuring himself was .27%.
Among those injuries, 27%-35% of the injuries were fractures.
[/QUOTE]
So I'm going to ask you again more directly. I'm just looking for a yes or no.
[B]When a player gets hit during the course of a game, and gets up [COLOR="DarkRed"]without[/COLOR] showing signs of dizziness, disorientation, or any other injury, including a sprain, tear or fracture, is any injury recorded?[/B]
Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
This thread is about Asian women. Why are you talking about brain damage?
Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
[QUOTE=MaxFly]So I'm going to ask you again more directly. I'm just looking for a yes or no.
[B]When a player gets hit during the course of a game, and gets up [COLOR="DarkRed"]without[/COLOR] showing signs of dizziness, disorientation, or any other injury, including a sprain, tear or fracture, is any injury recorded?[/B][/QUOTE]
:facepalm :facepalm :facepalm :facepalm :facepalm
Since you obviously can't or won't read, yes.
Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
[QUOTE=aj1987]:facepalm :facepalm :facepalm :facepalm :facepalm
Since you obviously can't or won't read, yes.[/QUOTE]
No, I read. Maybe I missed something.
What injury is reported when a player suffers [COLOR="DarkRed"][B]no[/B][/COLOR] noticeable injury and [B][COLOR="DarkRed"]does not[/COLOR][/B] suffer from any dizziness or disorientation after a hit. So a player takes a good hit on 2nd down, but pops right back up and is ready for 3rd down right away. What injury do people on the sidelines record?
Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
[QUOTE=dude77]wtf would you have your 6 yr old doing this shit ? god damn people are ****ing stupid[/QUOTE]
I know what the **** how are there this many parents that don't give a **** about their children?
Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
[QUOTE=MaxFly]No, I read. Maybe I missed something.
What injury is reported when a player suffers [COLOR="DarkRed"][B]no[/B][/COLOR] noticeable injury and [B][COLOR="DarkRed"]does not[/COLOR][/B] suffer from any dizziness or disorientation after a hit. So a player takes a good hit on 2nd down, but pops right back up and is ready for 3rd down right away. What injury do people on the sidelines record?[/QUOTE]
Why don't you email them and ask them?
Here's the link to the article:
[url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/[/url]
I PROVED my statement to be a fact. Now, you can either hold the L and move on continue with shifting the goalposts.
Re: Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior
[QUOTE=Shogon]If you accept that there are athletic genetic differences, you must accept that there are intellectual genetic differences.
And yes, asians are smarter than whites.
However, I'm pretty sure that whites are more spatially aware, they're more athletic, and they have much higher levels of empathy.
People in China literally run people over repeatedly after accidentally hitting them with their cars... because it's cheaper.
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9h0mNzjSIk[/url][/QUOTE]
Asians are not smarter, they just score better on math tests because they're forced to study like 7 hours per day outside of regular school
Asians are a close seconds behind whites though