-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=ItsMillerTime;14165945]Why hasn't Trump released his taxes? What is he hiding? If the New York Times had to do this much digging, imagine what else is out there.
Or just continue sticking your head in the sand and blaming the LEFT for everything. I don't really give a shit.[/QUOTE]
trump's tax is more serious than biden family's corruption?
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[url]https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/03/exclusive-donald-trump-penthouse-buyer-has-ties-group-chinese-military-intelligence/?fbclid=IwAR2WJ0ijPdLVdL7pma1c1M28bQNH6KVwSxf8RcXUo3R641YkAHD2D8kTHtY[/url]
Kind of thing happens all the time. It's not even interesting news anymore.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166024][url]https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/03/exclusive-donald-trump-penthouse-buyer-has-ties-group-chinese-military-intelligence/?fbclid=IwAR2WJ0ijPdLVdL7pma1c1M28bQNH6KVwSxf8RcXUo3R641YkAHD2D8kTHtY[/url]
Kind of thing happens all the time. It's not even interesting news anymore.[/QUOTE]
seems everyone forget trump was a business man, while biden was politician for 47 years.
u aint allow to deal any shady business once u become a public servant.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=bobopenguin;14166030]seems everyone forget trump was a business man, while biden was politician for 47 years.
u aint allow to deal any shady business once u become a public servant.[/QUOTE]
Trump was temporarily not President on February 21st?
Nevermind, I don't think of Trump as serving the public.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166032]Trump was temporarily not President on February 21st?
Nevermind, I don't think of Trump as serving the public.[/QUOTE]
We don't mind because I don't think anyone of us care you don't think of him as a public servant.
You must be one of those 'Not my president' green hair colored chicks
But what we don't get is why you think a guy who cant raise a kid can make america great again
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=rawimpact;14166034]We don't mind because I don't think anyone of us care you don't think of him as a public servant.
You must be one of those 'Not my president' green hair colored chicks
But what we don't get is why you think a guy who cant raise a kid can make america great again[/QUOTE]
If you don't care what I think why are you replying to me with an insult to avoid the point(s) I've been making? Not only do you care but you're also clearly upset.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166049]If you don't care what I think why are you replying to me with an insult to avoid the point(s) I've been making? Not only do you care but you're also clearly upset.[/QUOTE]
If you read my post you'd see we dont care that you don't think of him as a public servant because that is not a matter of opinion, it's a fact.
I went on to say what we don't understand... meaning want to gain perspective.
Upset? Please, i'm too old to have anything that comes across on this board trigger any anger or emotion outside of a laugh.
A guy who wants to stop our dependence on china has a coke-head kid collecting money from foreign countries being on boards he has no qualifications being on.
Tell me, what qualifications does that coke head have being on a foreign energy board?
Tell me, do you think anyone else besides hunter can get off not dishonorably discharged for drug use while in the armed forces? How is that not his father using his influence to sway justice? And now you want to put him as top dog?
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=rawimpact;14166051]If you read my post you'd see we dont care that you don't think of him as a public servant because that is not a matter of opinion, it's a fact.
I went on to say what we don't understand... meaning want to gain perspective.
Upset? Please, i'm too old to have anything that comes across on this board trigger any anger or emotion outside of a laugh.[/QUOTE]
I tend to think posters that avoid discussing what I have to sayand instead go with personal attacks are just being emotional. So while you don't seem to have anything to contribute it would be wrong to assume you're just crying. My apologies.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
Fox News literally has guys charged with conspiracy against the US talking about this
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166059]I tend to think posters that avoid discussing what I have to sayand instead go with personal attacks are just being emotional. So while you don't seem to have anything to contribute it would be wrong to assume you're just crying. My apologies.[/QUOTE]
Are you talking about that mother jones article? That sounds like quite the reach, not even CNN has posted it.
If you're selling a home or whatever and you have a perspective buyer, are you vetting who buys the property? I mean c'mon lol.... banks do the underwriting
Just because a chinese businesswomen buys a house it means the seller has an affiliation beyond that transaction?
Reminder, tears are a common attribute of the LEFT. Someone cue that gif of girl screaming because hilary lost.
But i'm curious now, if Trump isn't a public servant, who is your president?
-
Re: Odds of being true?
Wait were somehow tying Biden into his sons business dealings with no proof but the guy who actually has a foreign account and foreign investments isn’t worse?
Keep drinking that kool aid
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=rawimpact;14166051]A guy who wants to stop our dependence on china has a coke-head kid collecting money from foreign countries being on boards he has no qualifications being on.
Tell me, what qualifications does that coke head have being on a foreign energy board?
Tell me, do you think anyone else besides hunter can get off not dishonorably discharged for drug use while in the armed forces? How is that not his father using his influence to sway justice? And now you want to put him as top dog?[/QUOTE]
Why does Ben Carson run HUD? Why is Jared Kushner negotiating peace in the Middle East? You want to talk about what guys are qualified for when your guy is Trump? I'm not going to defend Hunter Biden in any way but we can at least say that he was kept out of the government. If there is something to prosecute regarding the money he made and this isn't a Russia planted con job (which is what the intel agencies are actually telling us) then let Trump have his DoJ prosecute it. But if his pet AG Barr can't see anything worth pursuing I don't see why you think bringing it up is a good argument.
And we're still ignoring:
[QUOTE]When a Chinese American businesswoman who sells access to powerful people [URL="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/02/donald-trump-sells-park-avenue-penthouse-angela-chen"]recently purchased[/URL] a $15.8 million penthouse in a building owned by President Donald Trump, the deal raised a key question. Was this a straightforward real estate transaction, or was this an effort to win favor with the new administration? The woman, Angela Chen, refused to discuss the purchase with the media. The White House and the Trump Organization would not comment on it. Further investigation by [I]Mother Jones[/I] has unearthed a new element to the story: Chen has ties to important members of the Chinese ruling elite and to an organization considered a front group for Chinese military intelligence.[/QUOTE]
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=rawimpact;14166065]Are you talking about that mother jones article? That sounds like quite the reach, not even CNN has posted it.
If you're selling a home or whatever and you have a perspective buyer, are you vetting who buys the property? I mean c'mon lol.... banks do the underwriting[/quote]I'm not the President of the United States. They are supposed to divest themselves of all business interests for a reason.
[QUOTE]Just because a chinese businesswomen buys a house it means the seller has an affiliation beyond that transaction?[/QUOTE]Well if she's part of Chinese intelligence...
[QUOTE]Reminder, tears are a common attribute of the LEFT. Someone cue that gif of girl screaming because hilary lost.[/QUOTE]Yeah you're crying. I retract my apology.
[quote]But i'm curious now, if Trump isn't a public servant, who is your president?[/QUOTE]"[I]I don't think of Trump as serving the public."[/I]
I thought that was a clever line but it may have gone over your head.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166105]Why does Ben Carson run HUD? Why is Jared Kushner negotiating peace in the Middle East? You want to talk about what guys are qualified for when your guy is Trump? I'm not going to defend Hunter Biden in any way but we can at least say that he was kept out of the government. If there is something to prosecute regarding the money he made and this isn't a Russia planted con job ([B]which is what the intel agencies are actually telling us[/B]) then let Trump have his DoJ prosecute it. But if his pet AG Barr can't see anything worth pursuing I don't see why you think bringing it up is a good argument.
And we're still ignoring:[/QUOTE]
I think that was Adam Schiff and not an intelligence agency.
[QUOTE]Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on Monday said that Hunter Biden’s laptop “is not part of some Russian disinformation campaign,” amid claims from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff suggesting otherwise.[/QUOTE]
[URL="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-hunter-biden-laptop-emails-not-russian-disinformation-campaign"]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-hunter-biden-laptop-emails-not-russian-disinformation-campaign[/URL]
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=CelticBaller;14166069]Wait were somehow tying Biden into his sons business dealings with no proof but the guy who actually has a foreign account and foreign investments isn’t worse?
Keep drinking that kool aid[/QUOTE]
No, were discussing what appears to be undisputed fact that Joe Biden was involved with his crackhead sons shady business dealings. Joe is referenced in several of the emails that have been released, the secret service logs for Joes protection detail show that he was present in the area that all of the meetings referenced in the emails were said to take place.
If Joe is clean and the emails are all bullshit, why hasnt he come out and said so? Its been almost a week since the initial story came out in ny post and the Biden campaign refuses to make any comment...
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Nanners;14166138]No, were discussing what appears to be undisputed fact that Joe Biden was involved with his crackhead sons shady business dealings. Joe is referenced in several of the emails that have been released, the secret service logs for Joes protection detail show that he was present in the area that all of the meetings referenced in the emails were said to take place.
If Joe is clean and the emails are all bullshit, why hasnt he come out and said so? Its been almost a week since the initial story came out in ny post and the Biden campaign refuses to make any comment...[/QUOTE]
He wasn’t referred at all in those emails, and this all ironic coming from Trump fans
You can’t throw stones inside a glasshouse
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=ZenMaster;14166137]I think that was Adam Schiff and not an intelligence agency.
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-hunter-biden-laptop-emails-not-russian-disinformation-campaign[/URL][/QUOTE]
[url]https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/10/21/rudy-giuliani-gives-alleged-hunter-biden-laptop-authorities/6005040002/[/url]
Also a report by Senate Republicans.
[QUOTE]U.S. Senate Republicans published a report last month based on an investigation into the claims. Though they found Hunter Biden's business made State Department officials' work awkward, they found no evidence that Joe Biden acted inappropriately.[/QUOTE]My bad.
And still waiting to see what Barr does about this.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166150][url]https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/10/21/rudy-giuliani-gives-alleged-hunter-biden-laptop-authorities/6005040002/[/url]
Also a report by Senate Republicans.
My bad.
And still waiting to see what Barr does about this.[/QUOTE]
I believe this is the head of that committee, who's angry that they didn't get the information from the laptop so they would have had all the evidence. On the flip side, he's also asking for the FBI to come out and say if they believe the emails are fake, but I don't believe they have.
Very likely that some people on that committee could be compromised as well and be in on a cover up. Like with Burisma, Joe's family is not the only one that gets paid.
This is what they do, they silo up the information and investigations so no one ever has to connect the full picture in order to claim someone are doing things right. On committee approves or disapprove of work done by the people in one of two parties, and all refer to each other for confirmation that they're not corrupt.
"Oh Hunter and his buddies made a deal, well we can look at that. Oh the taxes are paid in the US from money made on this deal? Then all good and even though the connections might cause a worry, it all looks good from our end where we only look at his business from a tax paying perspective". Where they really should be saying, "well we need to have a look at the communication and transactions between Hunter, his business partners, Joe, as well as the rest of the family".
Anyways, here's the quote.
[URL="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8853097/Ron-Johnson-demands-FBI-Director-Wray-confirm-details-surrounding-Hunter-Biden-laptop-scandal.html"]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8853097/Ron-Johnson-demands-FBI-Director-Wray-confirm-details-surrounding-Hunter-Biden-laptop-scandal.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]In the letter to Wray, Johnson details that a whistleblower contacted his committee on September 24 regarding Hunter Biden's hard drive, which was left water damaged at a computer repair shop. The owner told the committee that he handed the MacBook laptop over to the FBI.
Johnson noted in his letter that his staff immediately asked the FBI to confirm or deny certain details to better validate the claim made by the whistleblower, but the bureau said they would not comment on any of the information.
'[T]he committee must know whether the FBI has assessed the validity of materials the whistleblower has provided, and what, if any, actions the FBI has taken since obtaining this information,' Johnson continued in his note to Wray.
The Wisconsin Republican senator said his questions about what the FBI knew about what was found on Hunter Biden's hard drive and when they knew it speaks to a 'larger issue.'
'Why did they sit on it? Are they covering up just because Hunter Biden might be engaged in things that also maybe should have been investigated and possibly prosecuted? Do we have two systems of justice: one for Democrats and one for Republicans? One for the well-connected versus one for the rest of the Americans?' he asked the Fox News host.[/QUOTE]
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166105]Why does Ben Carson run HUD? Why is Jared Kushner negotiating peace in the Middle East? You want to talk about what guys are qualified for when your guy is Trump? I'm not going to defend Hunter Biden in any way but we can at least say that he was kept out of the government. If there is something to prosecute regarding the money he made and this isn't a Russia planted con job (which is what the intel agencies are actually telling us) then let Trump have his DoJ prosecute it. But if his pet AG Barr can't see anything worth pursuing I don't see why you think bringing it up is a good argument.
And we're still ignoring:[/QUOTE]
Elected presidents can pick and choose who they want as advisors. Whether you agree with that or not is a matter of opinion. Jared Kushner is a Harvard Grad with a degree in government. When we talk about Hunter walking away without dishonorable discharge -- we're talking about possible corruption when everyone else who tests positive for drugs in their system during their service are discharged dishonorably.
You previously posted about me not answering your question and followed up. But you didn't answer my question in regards to what Hunter is doing on a foreign country's board with no experience. Oh wait, you wont defend him and are doing what you accused me of doing... side stepping the question.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=ZenMaster;14166160]I believe this is the head of that committee, who's angry that they didn't get the information from the laptop so they would have had all the evidence. On the flip side, he's also asking for the FBI to come out and say if they believe the emails are fake, but I don't believe they have.
Very likely that some people on that committee could be compromised as well and be in on a cover up. Like with Burisma, Joe's family is not the only one that gets paid.
This is what they do, they silo up the information and investigations so no one ever has to connect the full picture in order to claim someone are doing things right. On committee approves or disapprove of work done by the people in one of two parties, and all refer to each other for confirmation that they're not corrupt.
[URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8853097/Ron-Johnson-demands-FBI-Director-Wray-confirm-details-surrounding-Hunter-Biden-laptop-scandal.html[/URL][/QUOTE]
So now the FBI is in on it?
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=CelticBaller;14166144]He wasn’t referred at all in those emails, and this all ironic coming from Trump fans
You can’t throw stones inside a glasshouse[/QUOTE]
are you clueless? or are you intentionally lying?
[IMG]https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/10/Biden-Pozharskyi-email.jpg?quality=90&strip=all[/IMG]
[url]https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/[/url]
[quote]Don't mention Joe being involved, it's only when u are face to face, I know u know that but they are paranoid[/quote]
[url]https://twitter.com/MikeEmanuelFox/status/1319280974044131328[/url]
[IMG]https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/10/Archer-Biden-email-graphic.jpg?quality=90&strip=all[/IMG]
[url]https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/hunter-biden-emails-show-leveraging-connections-with-dad-to-boost-burisma-pay/[/url]
[url]https://nypost.com/2020/10/15/biden-advisers-cannot-rule-out-meeting-with-ukrainian-energy-executive/[/url]
[IMG]https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/10/Biden-Expectations-email-graphic.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=662[/IMG]
[url]https://nypost.com/2020/10/15/emails-reveal-how-hunter-biden-tried-to-cash-in-big-with-chinese-firm/[/url]
-
Re: Odds of being true?
That's what 47 years of swamp looks like
Biden wants to make the US great again and independent of china or foreign countries... but his son has never been great and is dependent on foreign countries to make a living. Daddy to the rescue
Could the Dems of put a more crooked guy to go against Trump? IF so it would have been a sweep for them instead of what i suspect will be a narrow margin win.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166167]So now the FBI is in on it?[/QUOTE]
Maybe someone within the FBI, yes that's a possibility. Same way that you insinuate that the Director of National Intelligence is in on it for Trump.
Look it can't all be true or false.
Either the FBI had or didn't have this laptop for almost a year, and if head of that committee is asking them about the information on it, it certainly sound like they had it. Kind of the same with the subpoena we were discussing.
So if they did have the laptop since December, either the FBI did nothing with the information because it's not criminal, or they did an investigation and found the emails to be fake, or there's an active investigation for almost a year.
I think the last option is the information is real and someone there did nothing on purpose, either in corporation with Biden/DNC, maybe to get them back into power. Or the alternative is someone there did it on their own, with it being something that could then be used to blackmail the next President if he won.
If the FBI believes these emails are faked by Russians, then it's national security threat and Ratcliff should be aware.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=CelticBaller;14166144]He wasn’t referred at all in those emails, and this all ironic coming from Trump fans
You can’t throw stones inside a glasshouse[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Hunter Biden’s ex-business partner Tony Bobulinski was warned “don’t mention Joe” in a 2017 text exchange which emerged following Bobulinski’s bombshell statement to The Post that former vice president Joe Biden was involved in his family’s plot to make millions in Communist China.
The messages, obtained by Fox News on Thursday, purportedly shows Bobulinski being instructed by James Gilliar, another key player in the alleged scheme, not to make any mention of the former veep’s involvement.
“Don’t mention Joe being involved, it’s only when u [sic] are face to face, I know u [sic] know that but they are paranoid,”[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]“Hunter Biden called his dad “the Big Guy” or “my Chairman,” and frequently referenced asking him for his sign-off or advice on various potential deals that we were discussing,” he said in the devastating statement.
“I’ve seen Vice President Biden saying he never talked to Hunter about his business. I’ve seen firsthand that that’s not true, because it wasn’t just Hunter’s business, they said they were putting the Biden family name and its legacy on the line,” he went on.[/QUOTE]
[URL="https://nypost.com/2020/10/22/hunter-biden-ex-business-partner-told-dont-mention-joe-in-text/"]https://nypost.com/2020/10/22/hunter-biden-ex-business-partner-told-dont-mention-joe-in-text/[/URL]
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=rawimpact;14166163]Elected presidents can pick and choose who they want as advisors. Whether you agree with that or not is a matter of opinion. Jared Kushner is a Harvard Grad with a degree in government. When we talk about Hunter walking away without dishonorable discharge -- we're talking about possible corruption when everyone else who tests positive for drugs in their system during their service are discharged dishonorably.[/quote]This is a worthless defense. We are talking about whether or not the individuals in question should have their posts. Just because Trump could make me the head of NASA doesn't mean I should be running it. The important question is about qualifications. So congrats to Kushner for graduating from Harvard, and I'm sure he's a bright guy, but how does just graduating from Harvard make him qualified for one of the most important foreign policy discussions we engage in? Kushner is a businessman. He is out there in the Middle East trying to work out a fair deal (well, supposedly) so that the rest of that area accepts Israel and hopefully the Palestinians accept the situation. It has almost nothing to do with his background. And I could have named several other examples. Like the brain surgeon in charge of housing and urban development. What has Nancy Devos ever had to do with education, and has she ever had any interest in improving public schools? And I could go on.
Hunter Biden, not being part of our government, is a different case. If there is legit corruption there involving his father then they can persecute that but he was not part of Obama's team.
[quote]You previously posted about me not answering your question and followed up. But you didn't answer my question in regards to what Hunter is doing on a foreign country's board with no experience. Oh wait, you wont defend him and are doing what you accused me of doing... side stepping the question.[/QUOTE]So? Again: I am not defending Hunter Biden. I don't understand why that's hard to understand. He had a relationship with his dead brother's wife, did drugs, has been up to...whatever he's been up to. I have no need or desire to defend him. And?
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166183]This is a worthless defense. We are talking about whether or not the individuals in question should have their posts. Just because Trump could make me the head of NASA doesn't mean I should be running it. The important question is about qualifications. So congrats to Kushner for graduating from Harvard, and I'm sure he's a bright guy, but how does just graduating from Harvard make him qualified for one of the most important foreign policy discussions we engage in? Kushner is a businessman. He is out there in the Middle East trying to work out a fair deal (well, supposedly) so that the rest of that area accepts Israel and hopefully the Palestinians accept the situation. It has almost nothing to do with his background. And I could have named several other examples. Like the brain surgeon in charge of housing and urban development. What has Nancy Devos ever had to do with education, and has she ever had any interest in improving public schools? And I could go on.
Hunter Biden, not being part of our government, is a different case. If there is legit corruption there involving his father then they can persecute that but he was not part of Obama's team.
So? Again: I am not defending Hunter Biden. I don't understand why that's hard to understand. He had a relationship with his dead brother's wife, did drugs, has been up to...whatever he's been up to. I have no need or desire to defend him. And?[/QUOTE]
No, we're talking about legality. But lets put that aside for now.
Okay so Kushner, who has little experience in the middle east has been in that position for three years... during the three years he served that role - what has he done wrong to show he didn't deserve that role? Last I recall it was Obama that ran under the lines Bring our soldiers home -- I paraphrase -- but I don't think that was done until his second term and I believe ISIS grew under his watch. The way I see it, ISIS is better controlled, we have less solders and wars now then under the Obama era. I wont even get into the other good things that have happened in the ME during the Trump era.
Ben Carson might be known as a surgeon but please do yourself a favor and read his bio.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=rawimpact;14166195]No, we're talking about legality. But lets put that aside for now.
Okay so Kushner, who has little experience in the middle east has been in that position for three years... during the three years he served that role - what has he done wrong to show he didn't deserve that role? Last I recall it was Obama that ran under the lines Bring our soldiers home -- I paraphrase -- but I don't think that was done until his second term and I believe ISIS grew under his watch. The way I see it, ISIS is better controlled, we have less solders and wars now then under the Obama era. I wont even get into the other good things that have happened in the ME during the Trump era.
Ben Carson might be known as a surgeon but please do yourself a favor and read his bio.[/QUOTE]
And you know that ISIS is better-controlled how? And you know that has anything to do with Kushner because? Really I'm not sure what Kushner's real impact is myself, I'm just pointing out the fact that he was given a post for which he is completely unqualified. He would not have that office (whatever it actually is) if he was not the President's son-in-law. [URL="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/28/us/politics/jared-kushner-security-clearance.html"]He wouldn't even have a security clearance.[/URL]
Not interested in reading the Carson autobiography.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=bobopenguin;14165874][URL="https://nypost.com/2020/10/22/hunter-biz-partner-confirms-e-mail-details-joe-bidens-push-to-make-millions-from-china/"]https://nypost.com/2020/10/22/hunter-biz-partner-confirms-e-mail-details-joe-bidens-push-to-make-millions-from-china/[/URL]
[I]My name is Tony Bobulinski. The facts set forth below are true and accurate; they are not any form of domestic or foreign disinformation. Any suggestion to the contrary is false and offensive. I am the recipient of the email published seven days ago by the New York Post which showed a copy to Hunter Biden and Rob Walker. That email is genuine.
This afternoon I received a request from the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs and the Senate Committee on Finance requesting all documents relating to my business affairs with the Biden family as well as various foreign entities and individuals. I have extensive relevant records and communications and I intend to produce those items to both Committees in the immediate future. [/I]
[I]What I am outlining is fact. I know it is fact because I lived it. [B]I am the CEO of Sinohawk Holdings which was a partnership between the Chinese operating through CEFC/Chairman Ye and the Biden family. I was brought into the company to be the CEO by James Gilliar and Hunter Biden. The reference to “the Big Guy” in the much publicized May 13, 2017 email is in fact a reference to Joe Biden. The other “JB” referenced in that email is Jim Biden, Joe’s brother.[/B]
[B]Hunter Biden called his dad ‘the Big Guy’ or ‘my Chairman,’ and frequently referenced asking him for his sign-off or advice on various potential deals that we were discussing. I’ve seen Vice President Biden saying he never talked to Hunter about his business. I’ve seen firsthand that that’s not true, because it wasn’t just Hunter’s business, they said they were putting the Biden family name and its legacy on the line.[/B][/I]
[I]I realized [B]the Chinese were not really focused on a healthy financial ROI. They were looking at this as a political or influence investment. Once I realized that Hunter wanted to use the company as his personal piggy bank by just taking money out of it as soon as it came from the Chinese[/B], I took steps to prevent that from happening.
The Johnson Report connected some dots in a way that shocked me — it made me realize the Bidens had gone behind my back and gotten paid millions of dollars by the Chinese, even though they told me they hadn’t and wouldn’t do that to their partners.[/I]
ouch. dagger in the heart.[/QUOTE]
Part left out from the subsequent conversation:
[QUOTE]What is not clear yet is whether Joe Biden had secret stakes in any of Hunter’s other deals. As for this one, while the date on the May 2017 email would be nearly four months after Biden left the White House, it’s not known when discussions among the partners and with the Chinese first began. Certainly they started before the email. [/QUOTE]
That was lodged into the middle of the NY post article. Until those 2 things are cleared up, we don't have a open-and-close case.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=rawimpact;14166163]Elected presidents can pick and choose who they want as advisors. Whether you agree with that or not is a matter of opinion. Jared Kushner is a Harvard Grad with a degree in government. When we talk about Hunter walking away without dishonorable discharge -- we're talking about possible corruption when everyone else who tests positive for drugs in their system during their service are discharged dishonorably.
You previously posted about me not answering your question and followed up. But you didn't answer my question in regards to [B]what Hunter is doing on a foreign country's board with no experience[/B]. Oh wait, you wont defend him and are doing what you accused me of doing... side stepping the question.[/QUOTE]
Hunter is a lawyer who got his degree from Yale (after transferring from Columbia University). Very difficult colleges to get into. He was also on Amtrak board appointed by President George Bush (few years as vice-chairman of Amtrak board). He also started his own investment firm and lobbying firm. There, I answered your question.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=bladefd;14166317]Hunter is a lawyer who got his degree from Yale (after transferring from Columbia University). Very difficult colleges to get into. He was also on Amtrak board appointed by President George Bush (few years as vice-chairman of Amtrak board). He also started his own investment firm and lobbying firm. There, I answered your question.[/QUOTE]
cos his dad was VP.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=bobopenguin;14166482]cos his dad was VP.[/QUOTE]
In 1996?
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;14166495]In 1996?[/QUOTE]
i was saying he got a job cos his dad was a vp. not because he went to yale.
-
Re: Odds of being true?
[QUOTE=bobopenguin;14166709]i was saying he got a job cos his dad was a vp. not because he went to yale.[/QUOTE]
His dad was a Senator when President George Bush appointed him to the Amtrak board as vice-chairman.