The US blew up Russia's pipeline.

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14730479]I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.[/QUOTE]

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline, but instead it now has to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price lessening the living conditions for everyone here.
The US carried out a covert attack on a pipeline here, how would you describe it if Russia blew up a US pipeline between say Texas and New York? Act of war or not?

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14730479]I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.[/QUOTE]

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline, but instead it now has to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price lessening the living conditions for everyone here.
The US carried out a covert attack on a pipeline here, how would you describe it if Russia blew up a US pipeline between say Texas and New York? Act of war or not?

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14730479]I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.[/QUOTE]

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14730479]I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.[/QUOTE]

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14730479]I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.[/QUOTE]

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14730479]I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.[/QUOTE]

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14730479]I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.[/QUOTE]

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[QUOTE=Off the Court;14730479]I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.[/QUOTE]

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

This supercut sums it up the situation so phenomenally that it can break the brains of the most indoctrinated of NPCs

[video=youtube_share;NSZyKYitC3M]https://youtu.be/NSZyKYitC3M[/video]

You have to be literally retarded to believe that Russia blew up their own pipeline

BTW, the Biden admin basically declared war on Russia with this act of terrorism, so when we all die in the upcoming nuclear holocaust be sure to thank the nearest democrat for your fate