Has Anyone Had As Many Injuries As D-Rose Wearing Nikes???

[QUOTE=2swift4u]I don't think it's that far-fetched to be honest. I've played in a ton of differents shoes & brands and trust me it can make a big difference. Don't get me wrong I don't believe you're going to tear your acl by playing in Adidas or any other brand because that has some other reasons as you correctly mentioned but what happened to Rose the other night clearly looks like a shoe-issue to me. Furthermore if I remember correctly he sprained his ankle as soon as he put on those cut-down Adidas Crazylights 2-3 years ago. I think he never wore them again afterwards.[/QUOTE]
Cool, you do know that high tops don't prevent you from rolling your ankle right? Wow, so a guy puts on new shoes and gets injured and decides that those shoes must have caused the injury and so he never wears them again. Ok great. So I got gas from a gas station that I never go to and then my car broke down so clearly it must have been that gas that made my car break down. You're logic and reasoning are incredible. Look for a future in academics.

Adidas = German = evil nazis
Nike = American = heavenly gift
Premise of this thread.

[QUOTE=2swift4u]I don't think it's that far-fetched to be honest. I've played in a ton of differents shoes & brands and trust me it can make a big difference. Don't get me wrong I don't believe you're going to tear your acl by playing in Adidas or any other brand because that has some other reasons as you correctly mentioned but what happened to Rose the other night clearly looks like a shoe-issue to me. Furthermore if I remember correctly he sprained his ankle as soon as he put on those cut-down Adidas Crazylights 2-3 years ago. I think he never wore them again afterwards.[/QUOTE]


exactly this...you can't overlook the possibility is all I'm saying, the shoe gave away at some point. whether it be due to a wet floor allowing no grip or simply malfunction on the shoes part, and we aren't even talking of his ankle, it's a factor.

chocolate even indicated it being a very small probability to this, though probable :rolleyes:...now he wants to throw in his OSU brain surgeon specialist about assessing a foot injury. where's your orthopedic and podiatry friends to lend their knowledge? :facepalm

[QUOTE=r15mohd]exactly this...you can't overlook the possibility is all I'm saying, the shoe gave away at some point. whether it be due to a wet floor allowing no grip or simply malfunction on the shoes part, and we aren't even talking of his ankle, it's a factor.

chocolate even indicated it being a very small probability to this, though probable :rolleyes:...now he wants to throw in his OSU brain surgeon specialist about assessing a foot injury. where's your orthopedic and podiatry friends to lend their knowledge? :facepalm[/QUOTE]
Ok smart guy, let's talk about podiatry. Podiatrists aren't even MDs in most cases you moron. You really made yourself look smart there. My friend who is the brain surgeon works all the time with orthos with athletes at OSU but I'm sure you knew that. More than half his surgeries involve the back and the spine not the brain but I'm sure that you knew that as well. You also knew that in dealing with back problems that all factors are taken in to account such as hamstring and lower leg problems/imbalances etc, right? Sure you did because you're smart.

Ok, please tell me what about Nikes caused Pennys injury or Odens or Tmac or whoever else had awful injuries in them. So lets see, these shoes are so bad that they gave way to cause not only an ACL tear but also a meniscus tear and then two ankle sprains and now a hamstring injury. Makes sense to me.

I said the possibility being small as in almost impossible just because I would never rule anything out but it's almost zero. If you think that his shoes caused his injuries, then you're an absolute moron. What more can I say. Never mind that hightop shoes have been shown to not prevent ankle injuries but yes, somehow his shoes are ruining his career. Please tell me how Nash's Nikes have ruined the end of his career. Seems odd that all his injuries have happened in those shoes.

[QUOTE=chocolatethunder]It's Adidas you moron not Addidas. It's named after the company's founder Adi Dassler. "aid das" Get it? I knew you would because you're smart.[/QUOTE]

Lol. Lol.

You wanna shoe battle you googling stupid son of heroin ho?

[QUOTE=chocolatethunder]Ok smart guy, let's talk about podiatry. Podiatrists aren't even MDs in most cases you moron. You really made yourself look smart there. My friend who is the brain surgeon works all the time with orthos with athletes at OSU but I'm sure you knew that. More than half his surgeries involve the back and the spine not the brain but I'm sure that you knew that as well. You also knew that in dealing with back problems that all factors are taken in to account such as hamstring and lower leg problems/imbalances etc, right? Sure you did because you're smart.

Ok, please tell me what about Nikes caused Pennys injury or Odens or Tmac or whoever else had awful injuries in them. So lets see, these shoes are so bad that they gave way to cause not only an ACL tear but also a meniscus tear and then two ankle sprains and now a hamstring injury. Makes sense to me.

I said the possibility being small as in almost impossible just because I would never rule anything out but it's almost zero. If you think that his shoes caused his injuries, then you're an absolute moron. What more can I say. Never mind that hightop shoes have been shown to not prevent ankle injuries but yes, somehow his shoes are ruining his career. Please tell me how Nash's Nikes have ruined the end of his career. Seems odd that all his injuries have happened in those shoes.[/QUOTE]

Nash hurt his back carrying groceries doe.

This latest injury looked like his shoe gave out.

A long line of ADDDDDDDDidas sponsored players have been injured.

There's something to it. adddddddddddidas suck. Bottom line.

[QUOTE=Bless Mathews]Lol. Lol.

You wanna shoe battle you googling stupid son of heroin ho?[/QUOTE]
I don't even know what shoe battling is but I know how to spell Adidas. I'm 42 and I'm the son of a bookkeeper not a heroin ho. And I didn't have to google that. I know that because I'm smart, just like you apparently. I know who started Nike, Puma and Adidas. I have no idea who started other shoe companies. I know this because I'm a distance runner and if you were one too you would know that and understand why I do but since you're a moron, you don't.

[QUOTE=Bless Mathews]Lol. Lol.

You wanna shoe battle you googling stupid son of heroin ho?[/QUOTE]
Why does he have to be a son of heroin ho? Why aim so low? You coulda gone with "son of a semon demon" or "son of a DMV worker".

[QUOTE=Bless Mathews]Nash hurt his back carrying groceries doe.

This latest injury looked like his shoe gave out.

A long line of ADDDDDDDDidas sponsored players have been injured.

There's something to it. adddddddddddidas suck. Bottom line.[/QUOTE]
Ok, list me the players wearing shoes other than Adidas who have been hurt.
Penny, Hill, Oden, Roy, Yao, Bynum, Kobe (not when he was w Adidas), Nash, Durant, Noel (KY), Webber, Amare.

Ok, I got it started for you. Now you continue it and then list me all the Adidas players who have been hurt.

Thanks.

Oh, I don't like Adidas or Rose just to be clear but I hate stupidity even more.

[QUOTE=chocolatethunder]Ok smart guy, let's talk about podiatry. Podiatrists aren't even MDs in most cases you moron. You really made yourself look smart there. My friend who is the brain surgeon works all the time with orthos with athletes at OSU but I'm sure you knew that. More than half his surgeries involve the back and the spine not the brain but I'm sure that you knew that as well. You also knew that in dealing with back problems that all factors are taken in to account such as hamstring and lower leg problems/imbalances etc, right? Sure you did because you're smart.

Ok, please tell me what about Nikes caused Pennys injury or Odens or Tmac or whoever else had awful injuries in them. So lets see, these shoes are so bad that they gave way to cause not only an ACL tear but also a meniscus tear and then two ankle sprains and now a hamstring injury. Makes sense to me.

I said the possibility being small as in almost impossible just because I would never rule anything out but it's almost zero. If you think that his shoes caused his injuries, then you're an absolute moron. What more can I say. Never mind that hightop shoes have been shown to not prevent ankle injuries but yes, somehow his shoes are ruining his career. Please tell me how Nash's Nikes have ruined the end of his career. Seems odd that all his injuries have happened in those shoes.[/QUOTE]

we can go on and on about this...fact of the matter is it's probable, therefore to dismiss it initially is falsified, as you want to indicate. if you refuse to see that assessing things from every angle is unwarranted that's on you...it's probably why your friend is the surgeon and not you,he's obviously detailed in his work. *see, i can throw out rhetoric in my posts too:rolleyes:

and since you want to get technical, it's neurosurgeon not brain surgeon in ALL cases. as for podiatry, I like how you throw in most cases here...still leaving the probability aspect :rolleyes:

just agree to disagree and move along :cheers:

[QUOTE=chocolatethunder]Ok, list me the players wearing shoes other than Adidas who have been hurt.
Penny, Hill, Oden, Roy, Yao, Bynum, Kobe (not when he was w Adidas), Nash, Durant, Noel (KY), Webber, Amare.

Ok, I got it started for you. Now you continue it and then list me all the Adidas players who have been hurt.

Thanks.

Oh, I don't like Adidas or Rose just to be clear but I hate stupidity even more.[/QUOTE]

Danilo gallinari tore his acl right after he switched to addddddidas.

Shumpert.

Rubio.

Wall.

Barbosa.

Dwight Howard.

Brook Lopez.

Eric Gordon.


As a smart guy you claim to be, the proportion of adddddddddidddas wearing players have high rate for injury.

WAY more players wear nike than addddiddaas.

Nothing, coincidence and pattern.

Heard of that one ?

[QUOTE=chocolatethunder]It's Adidas you moron not Addidas. It's named after the company's founder Adi Dassler. [b]"aid das" [/b]Get it? I knew you would because you're smart.[/QUOTE]
This post is golden

[QUOTE=chocolatethunder]I don't even know what shoe battling is but I know how to spell Adidas. I'm 42 and I'm the son of a bookkeeper not a heroin ho. And I didn't have to google that. I know that because I'm smart, just like you apparently. I know who started Nike, Puma and Adidas. I have no idea who started other shoe companies. I know this because I'm a distance runner and if you were one too you would know that and understand why I do but since you're a moron, you don't.[/QUOTE]


You're 42, really smart and yet you have nothing better to do than insulting people on this forum. I'm impressed! :applause:

[QUOTE=r15mohd]we can go on and on about this...fact of the matter is it's probable, therefore to dismiss it initially is falsified, as you want to indicate. if you refuse to see that assessing things from every angle is unwarranted that's on you...it's probably why your friend is the surgeon and not you,he's obviously detailed in his work. *see, i can throw out rhetoric in my posts too:rolleyes:

and since you want to get technical, it's neurosurgeon not brain surgeon in ALL cases. as for podiatry, I like how you throw in most cases here...still leaving the probability aspect :rolleyes:

just agree to disagree and move along :cheers:[/QUOTE]
Most of the idiots on here wouldn't know what neurosurgery is but they know what a brain surgeon is. Unlike orthopedics, a neurosurgeon is often referred to as a "brain surgeon". Yes an overwhelming majority of podiatrists are not MDs, there is nothing misleading about my statement. And no, something being a remote possibility doesn't make it "probable". Yes there is a possibility that you could die in a plane crash but that doesn't make it "probable" as you said. It's a possibility not a probability. "To dismiss it is falsified", nothing is "falsified". You might want to check your Funk and Wagnalls on that one. If you've ever diagnosed a problem or problem solved you consider all things and the things that are least likely to be of concern are given the least amount of attention for obvious reasons. You don't rule anything out just because it's the least possible but you don't give it the weight you would give things that are much more likely or of sounder reasoning. In the universe, almost anything is possible so nothing is ever completely ruled out without exhaustive research. But to take the least possible thing possible and to focus all of your energy on that one thing is foolish.

I was wondering the same thing when I saw Rose go down last night. But those Kobe nike low tops are treacherous for your ankles.