Put Wade on the Bulls from 1984-1996, How does his Career turn out?

[QUOTE=Roundball_Rock]

They went 7 games versus the Knicks with D-League Myers but would lose with a top 3-4 all-time SG? In 91', when Chicago beat Detroit, they swept them. They would lose with Wade?[/QUOTE]

Why would I be talking about 1991 Detroit? They were done. They aren't beating prime Detroit with Wade at all.

The Knicks lost in 7, lost in 6, won in 7. Most games were within 10 points. Wade is worse than Jordan and not as mentally tough. Wade wouldn't get the same calls that Jordan got or the same benefit of the doubt. Knicks win. End of story.

Wade's longevity kinda screws him.. He'd be 2011 version by rhe time pippen was mature and bad boy plus showtime fell off.. So he'd only have 2 or 3 years of being prime.. But with the way pippen was playing in the mid 90s I can see them competing with even a washed up wade.so probably 2 or 3 titles.

It just shows how far the Jordan mythology has gone. The team was contender with a SG who was not even a top 50 SG--in that given year--in 94' but they could not win with a top 3-4 all-time SG. :lol They had no competitive series in 91' or 96' with MJ. In most years the ECF was a cake walk. Without MJ in 94' they played the very teams they faced the previous two years.

Vs. Cleveland: 4-2, 4-0, 3-0.
Vs. New York: 4-3, 4-2, 3-4.

57 wins in 93' with MJ, 55 without him in 94' with a D-League replacement at SG.

Yet people are acting like the team would fall off the cliff with Wade? :wtf:

[QUOTE]7. Most games were within 10 points. Wade is worse than Jordan and not as mentally tough.[/QUOTE]

The Knicks' margin of victory with Myers, not MJ in 94' were 1* (Hue Hollins), 4, 5 and 10. Wade is not better than Myers enough to put the Bulls over the top??? Forgot Wade. Without the Hollins call the Bulls would have won.

The 91' Pistons were in the ECF and the #2 seed. If they couldn't beat the Bulls who would in the East? Do you think the Lakers, who lost in a backdoor sweep, would stop the Bulls in the Finals with Wade?

None, those Pistons teams would whip him good.

If he fell 7 times,he's not gettin up 8 like the commercial.

Hell, are they even making the Finals. Could they get past Detroit in 91, Chicago in 92 and 93? Orlando in 95 and 96?

[QUOTE=L.Kizzle]None, those Pistons teams would whip him good.

If he fell 7 times,he's not gettin up 8 like the commercial.

Hell, are they even making the Finals. Could they get past Detroit in 91, Chicago in 92 and 93? Orlando in 95 and 96?[/QUOTE]
Yes.

Wade isn't smart enough to full comprehend and instill the triangle offense, look at how Melo is doing. MJ and Kobe are leagues above Wade in the smarts department.

[QUOTE=Roundball_Rock]It just shows how far the Jordan mythology has gone. The team was contender with a SG who was not even a top 50 SG--in that given year--in 94' but they could not win with a top 3-4 all-time SG. :lol They had no competitive series in 91' or 96' with MJ. In most years the ECF was a cake walk. Without MJ in 94' they played the very teams they faced the previous two years.

Vs. Cleveland: 4-2, 4-0, 3-0.
Vs. New York: 4-3, 4-2, 3-4.

57 wins in 93' with MJ, 55 without him in 94' with a D-League replacement at SG.

Yet people are acting like the team would fall off the cliff with Wade? :wtf:



The Knicks' margin of victory with Myers, not MJ in 94' were 1* (Hue Hollins), 4, 5 and 10. Wade is not better than Myers enough to put the Bulls over the top??? Forgot Wade. Without the Hollins call the Bulls would have won.

The 91' Pistons were in the ECF and the #2 seed. If they couldn't beat the Bulls who would in the East? Do you think the Lakers, who lost in a backdoor sweep, would stop the Bulls in the Finals with Wade?[/QUOTE]

Why are you talking about 1991? I don't care. I never said anything about 1991. And yeah they might still beat the Bulls.

You think the Bulls didn't get a bunch of bs calls in 93 and 94 because they were the Bulls who had won multiple titles? Nah, couldn't be.

[QUOTE=ProfessorMurder]Why are you talking about 1991? I don't care.

You think the Bulls didn't get a bunch of bs calls in 93 and 94 because they were the Bulls who had won multiple titles? Nah, couldn't be.[/QUOTE]

Yea but Wade been getting bullshit calls since before he ever won anything. People act like mj wasn't getting extreme preferential treatment.. He was the Golden boy. If he didn't exist and Wade was there in his place he'd be the new golden boy for his extremely aesthetic game and takeover ability (even though it's less than Jordans it would still be better than any other wings at the time) .. And would get similar great ref treatment.

Plus Wade had some of the best series of his career against Ben Wallace Pistons and Thibs Celtics.. People acting like he can't take contact or perform against physical defenses...

[QUOTE=tpols][B]Yea but Wade been getting bullshit calls since before he ever won anything.[/B]People act like mj wasn't getting extreme preferential treatment.. He was the Golden boy. If he didn't exist and Wade was there in his place he'd be the new golden boy for his extremely aesthetic game and takeover ability (even though it's less than Jordans it would still be better than any other wings at the time) .. And would get similar great ref treatment.

Plus Wade had some of the best series of his career against Ben Wallace Pistons and Thibs Celtics.. People acting like he can't take contact or perform against physical defenses...[/QUOTE]

Wade got all the Calls during the 2004 & 2005 Playoffs?

Bump. Hopefully others can give their opinion

I'm a big fan of Wade but there is now way he wins 3+ rings like some are suggesting. I would give him 1991 with 2010 Wade but after that? Idk, they'd have an outside shot in 92 with the 2011 version of Wade but after that he started declining so there would be no reasonable way to think he'd win any more at that point.

So yeah, i'm confident in saying he'd get one ring, with a ceiling of 2.

[QUOTE=nathanjizzle]2 championships. we already know what it would be like if he played with pippen and a contending supporting cast.[/QUOTE]


:applause: :bowdown: my nizzle fa shizzle.

4th and 5th year Wade was injured

by 93 Wade isn't healthy enough to lead a team, he'd make a good second option to Pippen but not as good as Scottie Pippen was at being the second option to Jordan

Wade would shred the lack of lane penetration

If prime Wade could drop 30/5/7 being the primary option on his team in a zone friendly league, You sure as hell bet he'd do 33/5/7 in the 90's...

Win maybe 5 chips with a healthy Wade