Candace Owens Hits #1 Podcast & THANKS Ben Shapiro For Firing Her

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15042554]Personality goes a long way.[/QUOTE]

She's cute, but too masculine personality wise for my liking. I like feminine/submissive women, Owens isn't really that.

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15042556]She's cute, but too masculine personality wise for my liking. I like feminine/submissive women, Owens isn't really that.[/QUOTE]


The name of her book is "Make Him a Sandwich"


Yea she's a little too talkative, but I'm sure she would STFU and make me a sandwich if I wanted her too.


right now she's saying all the right things, so she can keep talking

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15042554]Personality goes a long way.[/QUOTE]

True personality is shown when the camera's and microphones are off. In this case it's kind of like a Pro Wrestler getting the signal to stop the gimmick while being interviewed, cause the camera's been turned off.

[center][img]https://assets.newsweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/2398018-candace-owens-condemns-pornography.jpg[/img]

[video=youtube;MvZ9CI6wAgk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvZ9CI6wAgk[/video][/center]

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15042560]The name of her book is "Make Him a Sandwich"


Yea she's a little too talkative, but [B]I'm sure she would STFU and make me a sandwich if I wanted her too.[/B]


right now she's saying all the right things, so she can keep talking[/QUOTE]

:oldlol:

I don't think so.

I have no idea what her book is about, but the irony of the title is that capitalism is to blame for women no longer being subservient house slaves. Not feminism, or wokeness, or democrats, or liberals. CAPITALISM.

Households now require 2 working parents just to survive. It isn't even women's fault that they no longer do all the house chores. It's the fault of the system. They have to work 40 hour weeks just like men do and if you expect them to do all the house work? That relationship is dead in the water.

[QUOTE=Hey Yo;15042562]True personality is shown when the camera's and microphones are off. In this case it's kind of like a Pro Wrestler getting the signal to stop the gimmick while being interviewed, cause the camera's been turned off.[/QUOTE]

Right.

In private Candace was texting Kirk and saying mean things about Shapiro. Then she joins his team and pretends he's awesome. Then they start disagreeing over Israel and all of a sudden he's back to being evil again.

Candace is transactional just like the rest of them. I used to really like her and was a fan, but even back then in some of the debate clips I remember plenty of examples of her acting like an overly emotional woman. I took that into account anyway and remained a fan.

Then the Kanye thing happened and I'm sorry but she totally jumped off the deep end. All of a sudden she acted like her and Kanye were best friends and that everyone was just bullying him for his opinions. Lol no. He was purposefully and provocatively going at jewish people, and not in a subtle or nuanced way. He got the exact response he was looking for. Turns out when you say "Hitler was awesome", certain people and certain companies are going to want to disassociate from you. But no, Candace continued to play dumb. And through all of it her jewish employer, Ben Shapiro, was totally supportive of her.

[B]Ben Shapiro Says Candace Owens Would Be Fired From Daily Wire if She Said What Kanye Said — And That Her Defense of Him Was Morally ‘Wrong’[/B]

[url]https://www.mediaite.com/media/podcasts/ben-shapiro-says-candace-owens-would-be-fired-from-daily-wire-if-she-said-what-kanye-said-and-that-her-defense-of-him-was-morally-wrong/[/url]

He didn't fire her even though he very well could have. They didn't really come to blows until the Israel fiasco after Oct 7th and she went full blown crazy. So sorry, I'm not buying this narrative that Owens is some sweet innocent angel and that Shapiro was this evil zealot who wanted to silence her. While Kanye was dressing like a klansman and saying he loved Hitler, Candace was right there with him and defending him. And Shapiro tolerated it.

And I'm not saying Shapiro is a saint either, but he's not the one who switched up. You know where he stands. The Ben Shapiro we are witnessing in 2025 is the same Ben Shapiro as last year and the year before that. Meanwhile you have no idea what version of Candace you're going to get on any given day. It's very possible that in a year's time we'll be seeing a totally different Candace.

[video=youtube;TaWjk-nAMhg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaWjk-nAMhg[/video]

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15042599][video=youtube;TaWjk-nAMhg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaWjk-nAMhg[/video][/QUOTE]

This clip is a self own and makes Tucker look worse, and all I watched were the first 2.5 minutes.

Tucker is all but admitting that he agrees with the policies Maduro has in place and his applauding him for being "socially conservative". Shapiro is saying who gives a shit if he has conservative values when the people don't have a choice in the matter and he's a ruthless dictator.

Meanwhile Tucker is saying, "But they banned pornography!" Like this is some salient point.

Not sure how this is a W for Tucker or your side. Shapiro is the one who makes more sense here.

Seems like Tucker's whole gimmick now is contrarianism and false relativism.

[I]"Sharia just means submitting to God. What's so horrible about that!?!? :: AHAHAHA!!! ::

"Okay so the country is run by a communist dictator, but tell me... are the people of Venazauela sinking in credit card debt!?!?" :: AHAHAAA! ::

"Are WE really so different here in America!?!?"[/I]

[IMG]https://media.tenor.com/vSbkMNLAJ5gAAAAM/tucker-laughing-liberty-jamison.gif[/IMG]

I used to defend Tucker all the time. Shame on me honestly for thinking any of these people were principled actors.

Shapiro caught red handed. lmao

[url]https://youtube.com/shorts/_1ukEOKg7ms?si=KsP_UBNBoDlDA_qz[/url]

Tucker & Candace for life!

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15042605]Shapiro caught red handed. lmao

[url]https://youtube.com/shorts/_1ukEOKg7ms?si=KsP_UBNBoDlDA_qz[/url]

Tucker & Candace for life![/QUOTE]

Your boy Doom already posted in the other thread and provided a video in which Candace is questioning Erika Kirk's involvement and her story.

[url]https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1988635155506897026?s=20[/url]

Candace is very clearly insinuating that Erika isn't on the level.

[QUOTE=Baller234;15042608]Your boy Doom already posted in the other thread and provided a video in which Candace is questioning Erika Kirk's involvement and her story.

[url]https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1988635155506897026?s=20[/url]

Candace is very clearly insinuating that Erika isn't on the level.[/QUOTE]

She never flat out said it. Even the edited clip you shared shows no evidence. Shapiro aka the Zionist flat out lied.

And this is coming from someone who doesn't trust Erika and 100% believe the Kirk murder was some sort of conspiracy since the government still haven't given us straight answers.

[QUOTE=Baller234;15042608]Your boy Doom already posted in the other thread and provided a video in which Candace is questioning Erika Kirk's involvement and her story.

[url]https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1988635155506897026?s=20[/url]

Candace is very clearly insinuating that Erika isn't on the level.[/QUOTE]


Yea.... but she's doing it very indirectly.

She's not claiming Erika was behind the murder, she just said Mikey's story doesn't add up.... and I 100% agree.


This guy took less than half a second to walk away on the phone the moment Charlie got shot. If his behavior wasn't suspect, as well as his father's... Idk what is.

Then you start peeling away the layers on these people and find out who their connected to...


TPUSA is corrupted. 100% fact at this point... and if they put Erika in charge... safe to say that we know who Charlie's handler was.


I hate saying it... but we have some really evil people hiding behind a Christian Mask.

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15042613]
I hate saying it... but we have some really evil people hiding behind a Christian Mask.[/QUOTE]


Can you say the same about Jewish folks Baller?

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15042610]She never flat out said it. Even the edited clip you shared shows no evidence. Shapiro aka the Zionist flat out lied.

And this is coming from someone who doesn't trust Erika and 100% believe the Kirk murder was some sort of conspiracy since the government still haven't given us straight answers.[/QUOTE]

You have every right to believe what you want about Erika, so if that's the case why do you take issue with that Shapiro is saying? Candace hasn't outright said it in those terms but clearly it's what she's implying. If you get to the bottom of what Candace is insinuating, then yes she's absolutely calling Erika's story and her involvement into question. And YOU agree.

So if Shapiro is accurately describing what you and Candace actually believe, why are you denying it? He's 100% right. He might end up being wrong about Erika, that jury is still out, but he's not wrong when all he's doing is repeating exactly what you guys believe.

He's not lying AT ALL. Megyn is wrong. This is what you guys believe and Candace is your spokesperson.