Printable View
Both Kobe and LeBron had very inconsistant series throughout! Yet, both of their final lines are getting vasly overrated by their respective fan's (when comparing it to Jordan level) to the point where it makes you wan't to scratch your head. Jordan on the big stage never disappeared in stretch's of games like these two have.
Do I care? :confusedshrug:
Did Kobe have a great individual series against the Magic? Nope. Why is he even being brought up? My post was towards posters who claim it was all-time type of series when Lebron's performance on the road lost it for the Cavs.
In game 4 for example, West stepped up and knocked down some big shots, all Lebron had to do was not turn the ball over but he blew it. In game 3 despite getting about 8 more FTs than he actually deserved (by my count, Dwights phantom foul on the three pointer being the most obvious), he shot poorly from the field. In game 6, he was non existent from the second quarter on (only 2-13 in last three quarters before the dunk in the closing seconds!). On top of this, he used 50+ possessions in some of these games and it appeared he froze some of the teammates out of the game.
How can a player who had an "all-time series" not even show up for half of the games in a series?!
[QUOTE=bruceblitz]Became the youngest player (23 years, 308 days) and [B]fastest (395 games)[/B] to reach the following totals: [B]10,000 points, 2,500 rebounds[/B], 2,500 assists, 700 steals and [B]300 blocks[/B].[/QUOTE]
I highly doubt that.
[QUOTE=Skip Bayless]Both Kobe and LeBron had very inconsistant series throughout! Yet, both of their final lines are getting vasly overrated by their respective fan's (when comparing it to Jordan level) to the point where it makes you wan't to scratch your head. Jordan on the big stage never disappeared in stretch's of games like these two have.[/QUOTE]
Finally something you typed that I agree with.
[QUOTE=Fatal9]Do I care? :confusedshrug:
Did Kobe have a great individual series against the Magic? Nope. Why is he even being brought up? My post was towards posters who claim it was all-time type of series when Lebron's performance on the road lost it for the Cavs.
In game 4 for example, West stepped up and knocked down some big shots, all Lebron had to do was not turn the ball over but he blew it. In game 3 despite getting about 8 more FTs than he actually deserved (by my count, Dwights phantom foul on the three pointer being the most obvious), he shot poorly from the field. In game 6, he was non existent from the second quarter on (only 2-13 in last three quarters before the dunk in the closing seconds!). On top of this, he used 50+ possessions in some of these games and it appeared he froze some of the teammates out of the game.
How can a player who had an "all-time series" not even show up for half of the games in a series?![/QUOTE]
Exactly. Why does he bring up Kobe's numbers? His agenda not working properly?
Is that really Skip Bayless? Lol
[QUOTE=WADE MONEY]I highly doubt that.[/QUOTE]
Comprehension is a learned ability, he's the fastest and youngest to that combination of totals.
[QUOTE=catch24]Is that really Skip Bayless? Lol[/QUOTE]
That's Skip B1tchless aka Fatal9's Sugar daddy.
[QUOTE=Fatal9]I can't stand LeBron James.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=bruceblitz][B][U]Fatal9, the Kobe apostle leaves this out:[/U][/B]
Game 1 NBA Finals:
Kobe 4th quarter? 1-5fg (doesn't really matter/blowout)
Game 2 NBA Finals:
Kobe 4th quarter? 3 turnovers, 2-5fg
Game 3 NBA Finals:
Kobe misses 13 of his last 17 shots
Game 4 NBA Finals:
Kobe misses 20 shots and only makes 11 in game 4, but his team still wins? Talk about a supporting cast, I mean seriously.
Uh, that's brutal.
Kobe:
Kobe game 1 vs Magic [B]16-34[/B]
Kobe game 2 vs Magic [B]10-22[/B]
Kobe game 3 vs Magic [B]11-25[/B]
Kobe game 4 vs Magic [B]11-31[/B]
Kobe game 5 vs Magic [B]10-23[/B]
He also leaves this out:
Kobe vs LeBron? No comparison...Just look at how the two performed against the exact same team and exact same defenders:
LeBron vs Orlando 2009 playoffs...38.5ppg 48.7%fg 8.3reb 8ast 1.16blk 1.16stl
Kobe vs Orlando 2009 playoffs..... 32.4ppg 42.9%fg 5.6reb 7.4ast 1.4blk 1.4stl
Again, those are the facts, you can try to spin it all you want.[/QUOTE]
:confusedshrug: :confusedshrug: :wtf: :confusedshrug: :confusedshrug:
[QUOTE=bruceblitz]Finally something you typed that I agree with.[/QUOTE]
Well, ofcource a witness like yourself wouldn't agree with my Factual statment's concerning LeBron James. As expected.
(You come off as very protective of LeBron, meaning you respond in a hurtful way when someone make's a not so witness like comment about Prince James, so I assume you are a big fan, also factoring in our last encounter).
[QUOTE=WADE MONEY]I highly doubt that.[/QUOTE]
Shaq did it in less games. David Robinson got his 10000th point in 396 games so I guess he isn't included (lol). Wilt would have too if they counted blocks. Kareem too. Probably a lot more but don't feel like checking.
[QUOTE=Skip Bayless]Well, ofcource a witness like yourself wouldn't agree with my Factual statment's concerning LeBron James. As expected.
(You come off as very protective of LeBron, meaning you respond in a hurtful way when someone make's a not so witness like comment about Prince James, so I assume you are a big fan, also factoring in our last encounter).[/QUOTE]
I appreciate rare talents, if you deny LeBron's abilities on the basketball court, you are blind.
[url]http://www.youtube.com/user/thelebronjamesblitz[/url]
[QUOTE=Fatal9]Shaq did it in less games. David Robinson got his 10000th point in 396 games so I guess he isn't included (lol). Wilt would have too if they counted blocks. Kareem too. Probably a lot more but don't feel like checking.[/QUOTE]
[B][U]Became the youngest player (23 years, 308 days) and fastest (395 games) to reach the following totals: 10,000 points + 2,500 rebounds + 2,500 assists + 700 steals + 300 blocks.[/U]
Fatal9 is full of sh!t again.
[COLOR="Navy"]David Robinson has 2441 assists in his entire career, so David Robinson NEVER reached that mark.
Shaq didn't crack the 2500 assist mark until the 2004-2005 season, Shaq just cracked the 700 steals mark last year.
Once again, Fatal9 proves his ability to post nothing but false material[/COLOR].[/B]
LeBron's road averages against Orlando were 37/9/7/42% + an excellent TS% due to his rim attacking. Not to mention a very good PPS of 1.41. That's a much better stretch than Kobe's entire Finals. With Kobe's cast he would've swept Orlando with those numbers. :oldlol: @ 39/8/8/49% not being an ALL-TIME series.
[QUOTE=Indian guy]LeBron's road averages against Orlando were 37/9/7/42% + an excellent TS% due to his rim attacking. That's a much better stretch than Kobe's entire Finals. With Kobe's cast he would've swept Orlando with those numbers. :oldlol: @ 39/8/8/49% not being an ALL-TIME series.[/QUOTE]
:applause: :applause: :applause:
[QUOTE=bruceblitz]I appreciate rare talents, if you deny LeBron's abilities on the basketball court, you are blind.
[url]http://www.youtube.com/user/thelebronjamesblitz[/url][/QUOTE]
Well, the deal here is that, I do appreciate LeBron's game. But the media hype and the quick boost he's getting to Jordan's legacy is what get's to me. It's like he's getting handed the Crown before he proves his way to the master chair. Being called "King" James in your rookie season isn't respectable at all. Does he have respect for past player's? Yes. Is he a good guy off the court? (on camera)Yes. But has he really done anything on the court to be compared to Jordan? No. Does he strink on the Big stage? Yes. He's no King, and it pain's me to know that the witness's are very blind to this.
And a witness with a LeBron page doesn't impress me, sorry.
I've never seen people read that much into a shirt. It is not that serious people.
I don't care about stats. It's all about winning championships and so far Kobe has 4 and LeBron has 0.
I'm not even a big Kobe fan but the fact is Kobe just won his 4th championship while LeBron hasn't won anything yet.
Don't even compare LeBron (or Kobe for that matter) to Jordan. When LeBron (or Kobe) win 6 titles or more and win them doing it in a 3 peat both times then you can say they might be close to Michael Jordan.
[QUOTE=Skip Bayless]Well, the deal here is that, I do appreciate LeBron's game. But the media hype and the quick boost he's getting to Jordan's legacy is what get's to me. It's like he's getting handed the Crown before he proves his way to the master chair. Being called "King" James in your rookie season isn't respectable at all. Does he have respect for past player's? Yes. Is he a good guy off the court? (on camera)Yes. But has he really done anything on the court to be compared to Jordan? No. Does he strink on the Big stage? Yes. He's no King, and it pain's me to know that the witness's are very blind to this.
And a witness with a LeBron page doesn't impress me, sorry.[/QUOTE]
OK, first of all, let's clear a few things up.
LeBron is on a the type of career pace with his individual production, when concerning scoring and non-scoring contributions, to be compared with the greats. When you reverse the comparison the only 2 players in NBA history that are comparable to LeBron are Jordan and Oscar. That being said he's not as good as either of the two, yet, and might not ever be.
LeBron is the best all-around player we've seen since Jordan.
As far as shrinking on the big stage, I agree to an extent, at his young age he didn't step up in the 2007 Finals, but when you look at the factors around that series, the Spurs didn't respect any of his teammates and they just loaded up on LeBron with double and triple-teams. I'd say he stepped up in the Detroit ECF, and he stepped up big this year in the playoffs. He raised his level of play over his MVP season, which is saying something.
He still has a lot to prove before he gets the type of Jordan comparisons he's been on the receiving end of. People who say LeBron's first 6 years are better than Jordan's first 6 years are flat out wrong.
He proved his nickname "King" right this year. I think King was annointed to him as a nickname because of the "King James" Bible. He was the King of basketball in high school and touted as the next big thing in the NBA, so that all ties in together.
[IMG]http://www.mobipocket.com/eBooks/cover_remote/ID67/king-james-new-TOC.jpg[/IMG]
Oh, and I posted a link to my channel for you to use as a resource, not to impress you.
[QUOTE=ConanRulesNBC]I don't care about stats. It's all about winning championships and so far Kobe has 4 and LeBron has 0.
I'm not even a big Kobe fan but the fact is Kobe just won his 4th championship while LeBron hasn't won anything yet.[/QUOTE]
Are you serious? Are we gonna go over this again?
Percentage of team's points scored in the NBA Finals
Kobe
2000: 14.5% (not even including the game he missed) (W)
2001: 24.4% (W)
2002: 25.2% (W)
In contrast:
Michael Jordan
1991: 30.8% (W)
1992: 34.6% (W)
1993: 38.3% (W)
1996: 29.4% (W)
1997: 36.8% (W)
1998: 38.1% (W)
Kobe's also lost on the big stage as the Lakers main shot taker and leader twice, (yes he tried to take over the 2004 Finals and basically froze Shaq out).... Kobe just won his first ring as a leader in the NBA, and he's 30. If you think LeBron wont match that by the time he's 30, I don't know what to tell you. Most think he will.
[QUOTE=Fatal9]Lebron James also wants you to check out his performance in the three road games in Orlando. Upon "checking" them out, you will discover the following things:
Game 3: lowest FG% for a player scoring more than 40 points in playoff history. 39.2%.
Game 4: 7 turnovers in the last 10-12 minutes of regulation. Most of them on crucial possessions.
Game 6: Made 3 for his last 14 shots as he watched his team get stomped (one of them a garbage time dunk). Had 1 point in the fourth at that point (despite playing the whole quarter!) and 0 points in the second quarter (when the Magic made their run).
:oldlol: at groupies who call this an "all-time" series. [B]Idiot stat geeks[/B].[/QUOTE]
:roll: @ last sentence.
[QUOTE=bruceblitz]Are you serious? Are we gonna go over this again?
Percentage of team's points scored in the NBA Finals
Kobe
2000: 14.5% (not even including the game he missed) (W)
2001: 24.4% (W)
2002: 25.2% (W)
In contrast:
Michael Jordan
1991: 30.8% (W)
1992: 34.6% (W)
1993: 38.3% (W)
1996: 29.4% (W)
1997: 36.8% (W)
1998: 38.1% (W)
Kobe's also lost on the big stage as the Lakers main shot taker and leader twice, (yes he tried to take over the 2004 Finals and basically froze Shaq out).... Kobe just won his first ring as a leader in the NBA, and he's 30. If you think LeBron wont match that by the time he's 30, I don't know what to tell you. Most think he will.[/QUOTE]
Did you even read what I said?
I don't even care about this Kobe vs. LeBron or LeBron vs. Jordan or Kobe vs. Jordan BS that people ALWAYS talk about on here. Jordan > both of them.
But I said I DON'T CARE about shooting percentages. I don't care if LeBron averaged 100 PPG, 80 RPG and 50 APG. The fact is he has yet to win while Kobe has 4.
[QUOTE=Indian guy]LeBron's road averages against Orlando were 37/9/7/42% + an excellent TS% due to his rim attacking. Not to mention a very good PPS of 1.41. That's a much better stretch than Kobe's entire Finals. With Kobe's cast he would've swept Orlando with those numbers. :oldlol: @ 39/8/8/49% not being an ALL-TIME series.[/QUOTE]
If Lebron was on the Lakers, beleive me, he would NOT put up those numbers. The Lakers frontline is not going to stand aside to the wings to let Lebron attack the basket, if they do then the team would certainly lose.
Kobe's finals performance is not even his best game, pretty average performance for Kobe at best, but still impressive. In terms of scoring, not as impressive as Lebron's though. Kobe's experience really helped the Lakers win the close games. Despite Lebron's big assist numbers, if you watch the actual games Kobe is much more skilled in setting up plays for teammates, including very notable great plays finished by Ariza, Gasol, and Odom that led to huge runs. He set up a lot of easy baskets for Bynum too but that guy wasn't able to finish. Fisher's two clutch 3-pointers in Game 4 was also possible only because of Kobe, including that clutch foul against Dwight Howard.
[QUOTE=Fatal9]Lebron James also wants you to check out his performance in the three road games in Orlando. Upon "checking" them out, you will discover the following things:
Game 3: lowest FG% for a player scoring more than 40 points in playoff history. 39.2%.
Game 4: 7 turnovers in the last 10-12 minutes of regulation. Most of them on crucial possessions.
Game 6: Made 3 for his last 14 shots as he watched his team get stomped (one of them a garbage time dunk). Had 1 point in the fourth at that point (despite playing the whole quarter!) and 0 points in the second quarter (when the Magic made their run).
:oldlol: at groupies who call this an "all-time" series. [B]Idiot stat geeks.[/B][/QUOTE]
Oh the irony
It's only a shirt, what the hell are people *****ing about? He has some swagger, so what? What, does he have to fold up his tent and demand trades like Kobe does?
It looks like all Kobe nut lickers are upset that Lebron and the Cavs Fans don't give a **** about Kobe's Championship, because everyone knows it's kind of tainted with KG, Yao and Manu all being injured.
Lebron knows he has time. He is only 24 years old. He is going to get his Team ready, then try again. He is not going to complain, ***** and moan like Kobe did during the Off-Season. He is going to prepare.
Kobe Nut Riders need to get over themselves.
[QUOTE=cotdt]If Lebron was on the Lakers, beleive me, he would NOT put up those numbers. The Lakers frontline is not going to stand aside to the wings to let Lebron attack the basket, if they do then the team would certainly lose.
Kobe's finals performance is not even his best game, pretty average performance for Kobe at best, but still impressive. In terms of scoring, not as impressive as Lebron's though. Kobe's experience really helped the Lakers win the close games. Despite Lebron's big assist numbers, if you watch the actual games Kobe is much more skilled in setting up plays for teammates, including very notable great plays finished by Ariza, Gasol, and Odom that led to huge runs. He set up a lot of easy baskets for Bynum too but that guy wasn't able to finish. Fisher's two clutch 3-pointers in Game 4 was also possible only because of Kobe, including that clutch foul against Dwight Howard.[/QUOTE]
:roll: :oldlol: :roll:
Honestly dude, you are the dumbest poster on here.
As if LeBron wouldn't be able to set up everyone on the Lakers for great shots, :oldlol:
You also leave out the fact that Kobe went straight into the tank last year against the Celtics, LeBron at the very least would have been able to free up the Lakers for better looks on the offensive end of the court. The Lakers would have won the championship last year with LeBron and put LeBron on the Lakers this year and they win 68 games. Maybe 70.
[QUOTE=bruceblitz]OK, first of all, let's clear a few things up.
LeBron is on a the type of career pace with his individual production, when concerning scoring and non-scoring contributions, to be compared with the greats. When you reverse the comparison the only 2 players in NBA history that are comparable to LeBron are Jordan and Oscar. That being said he's not as good as either of the two, yet, and might not ever be.
LeBron is the best all-around player we've seen since Jordan.
As far as shrinking on the big stage, I agree to an extent, at his young age he didn't step up in the 2007 Finals, but when you look at the factors around that series, the Spurs didn't respect any of his teammates and they just loaded up on LeBron with double and triple-teams. I'd say he stepped up in the Detroit ECF, and he stepped up big this year in the playoffs. He raised his level of play over his MVP season, which is saying something.
He still has a lot to prove before he gets the type of Jordan comparisons he's been on the receiving end of. People who say LeBron's first 6 years are better than Jordan's first 6 years are flat out wrong.
He proved his nickname "King" right this year. I think King was annointed to him as a nickname because of the "King James" Bible. He was the King of basketball in high school and touted as the next big thing in the NBA, so that all ties in together.
Oh, and I posted a link to the channel for you to use as a resource, not to impress you.[/QUOTE]
Well when we talk about individual production, yes, his number's may stack up to the greats, but his winning, his fight, killer instinct, overal impactful ability to put the troops on his back and lead the squad to an important victory, is still not even near the level of the greats. While also not even factoring in the weaker defenses he has to go against compared what Jordan had to. We can talk about number's and what pace they are on, all day, but they are hollow number's when the final product doesn't quite mount up. Look at Tracy McGrady's playoff stats, number wise, the hollow stats across the board has him matched with the All-Time elite's, but the total true player Legend end result amount's to nothing. You know this.
Aside from that game 5 in the palace, he hasn't done anything against quality comp that wow'd me. Also, we give him the age excuse when he loses to the Spurs in the Finals, but a week before, we were all over his greatness after that Piston's series. When he win's, this espn station and his witness's give's him beyond glory, but when he loses, he get's placed in the witness protection program (no pun attended) and his "supporting cast" get's thrown in the fire and blamed for everything, when the lead soldier did nothing to help, and even played worst at times.
Good luck to you and your page. I didn't want to come off as mean.
[QUOTE=bruceblitz]As if LeBron wouldn't be able to set up everyone on the Lakers for great shots, :oldlol:
You also leave out the fact that Kobe went straight into the tank last year against the Celtics, LeBron at the very least would have been able to free up the Lakers for better looks on the offensive end of the court. The Lakers would have won the championship last year with LeBron and put LeBron on the Lakers this year and they win 68 games. Maybe 70.[/QUOTE]
You know that Lebron would just dribble the ball until there are only 10 seconds left on the clock, and drive, but if the other team defends properly then Lebron would kick the ball back out to one of his teammates waiting in the wings to take the shot. Oops, only 2 seconds left on the shot clock, gotta take a low percentage shot. Kobe doesn't do this crap. The Lakers have far better ball movement.
And last year, the Celtics played better against the Lakers than they did against the Cavs, so you can't draw any conclusions. Lakers as a team played bad which made Kobe look bad but he was the only one doing anything.
Bruce:
[IMG]http://i43.tinypic.com/fw4m6d.gif[/IMG]
stop hating on lebron's $wag.
10 f*cking pages?!?!
[QUOTE=lefthook00]It's not a big deal. Have you guys ever heard the saying, "Check my tats" or ,"Check out my tats"? It's just a play off that and they put a $ in front.[/QUOTE]
That's all it is!!!! It's OK guys, relax!!!! I would rock that shirt if i had it but I would want the colors switched to black shirt & green/white letters.
[QUOTE=lefthook00]10 f*cking pages?!?!
That's all it is!!!! It's OK guys, relax!!!! I would rock that shirt if i had it but I would want the colors switched to black shirt & green/white letters.[/QUOTE]
/END THREAD
[QUOTE=bruceblitz]Steve Kerr better version of Mo Williams? Steve Kerr averaged 8 points per gamer during that timespan. You obviously didn't watch those Bulls teams. [B][I]Have you ever heard of Glen Rice or Reggie Miller?[/I][/B]
Secondly, Rodman was a huge liability on offense, he couldn't create his own shot, but yes, he could rebound and play defense and no he wasn't in his prime.
If you think you would place LeBron/Kobe on that 3 peat team, and they would have won 3 championships, you are high... this is the [B]%'s of the team's points[/B] they would have needed to score in the Finals alone:
Michael Jordan
1991: 30.8% (W)
1992: 34.6% (W)
1993: 38.3% (W)
1996: 29.4% (W)
1997: 36.8% (W)
1998: 38.1% (W)
So while you give all of that credit to the team, Jordan scored over 35% of his team's points in the 6 title runs. Which is a lot to ask of any player.[/QUOTE]
You do not read whole statements right? You only look at one piece of a whole sentence and just comment on that one little piece. I said "I would say he(Kerr) was a better version of Mo Williams today [B]from 3pt line[/B]." Kerr is a better 3pt shooter than Mo Williams. I did not say Kerr is better overall scorer or better rebounder or better passer or better defender, etc. All I said was that Kerr was a better [B]3pt shooter[/B]. I personally believe that Kerr was the 2nd best [B]3-pt shooter[/B] in the 90's after Reggie Miller. You can make the argument that he was the 3rd best 3pt shooter after Miller and Rice in 90s. Unfortunately, it doesn't matter whether Kerr is the 2nd best 3-pt shooter or the 3rd best 3-pt shooter; he is still a better 3-pt shooter than what both Kobe/LeBron have today (once again, if you haven't figured it out yet, I am NOT saying Kerr is better player than Mo Williams).
Secondly, when was Rodman's prime if he was past his prime in 96? I really want to know. Also, Rodman is not the only player that cannot create his own shot. Just look at Ben Wallace from Cavs and Odom/Bynum/etc from Lakers. Even Shaq was a liability at times on offense due to Hack-a-Shaq. Just because Rodman was a liability doesn't mean his defense/rebounding mean anything less. Teams have won championships or come close even with players that are a liability on offense (last team to win was Pistons with big Ben in his prime, NO came pretty close last year of reaching finals with Chandler). LeBron/Kobe would not mind having somebody like Rodman on their team that can solidify their rebounding and defense.
Finally, I don't know where you got the percentages from for Jordan's total points in each finals vs rest of the Bulls, but I honestly believe LeBron/Kobe are capable of %'s close to that. Some of those Bulls games were blowouts so even if LeBron/Kobe had scored slightly lower %'s than Jordan, they probably would have still won those games. I am sure you can find the percentages that Kobe scored this year in finals and also find the percentages that LeBron has been scoring in each of the series' the last couple seasons. Plus, if you really think about it, those other Bulls players were capable of scoring more points if they got more shots. They would be more than capable of sharing the burden a little bit more.
Why do some people on here act like stats and percentages are the only thing that matters. Guess what... LeBron had amazing stats in the Magic series and was still eliminated. Stats aren't everything.
unhealthy
Most wins in a NBA season
72 96' Bulls NBA champions
69 97' Bulls NBA champions
69 72' Lakers NBA champions
68 67' Sixers NBA champions
[B]68 73' Celtics lost in the ECF[/B]
67 92' Bulls NBA champions
67 86' Celtics NBA champions
67 00' Lakers NBA champions
[B]67 07' Mavericks lost in the first round[/B]
66 71' Bucks NBA champions
66 08' Celtics NBA champions
[B]66 09' Cavs lost in the ECF[/B]
65 09' Lakers NBA champions
65 87' Lakers NBA champions
65 83' Sixers NBA champions
honestly why would a person imitate skip bayless or anyone for that matter? just be yourself.
[QUOTE=inclinerator]honestly why would a person imitate skip bayless or anyone for that matter? just be yourself.[/QUOTE]No social lives. The same reason Corky McBiff existed in other words.
[QUOTE=Roundball_Rock]Most wins in a NBA season
72 96' Bulls NBA champions
69 97' Bulls NBA champions
69 72' Lakers NBA champions
68 67' Sixers NBA champions
[B]68 73' Celtics lost in the ECF[/B]
67 92' Bulls NBA champions
67 86' Celtics NBA champions
67 00' Lakers NBA champions
[B]67 07' Mavericks lost in the first round[/B]
66 71' Bucks NBA champions
66 08' Celtics NBA champions
[B]66 09' Cavs lost in the ECF[/B]
65 09' Lakers NBA champions
65 87' Lakers NBA champions
65 83' Sixers NBA champions[/QUOTE]
:oldlol:
Only stat that needs to be checked.
[QUOTE=Roundball_Rock]Most wins in a NBA season
72 96' Bulls NBA champions
69 97' Bulls NBA champions
69 72' Lakers NBA champions
68 67' Sixers NBA champions
[B]68 73' Celtics lost in the ECF[/B]
67 92' Bulls NBA champions
67 86' Celtics NBA champions
67 00' Lakers NBA champions
[B]67 07' Mavericks lost in the first round[/B]
66 71' Bucks NBA champions
66 08' Celtics NBA champions
[B]66 09' Cavs lost in the ECF[/B]
65 09' Lakers NBA champions
65 87' Lakers NBA champions
65 83' Sixers NBA champions[/QUOTE]
:applause: great stat