[QUOTE=theman93;14431772]Should I be free to murder my 1 year old?[/QUOTE]
I rather have you kill it before it turns 1 years old.
Printable View
[QUOTE=theman93;14431772]Should I be free to murder my 1 year old?[/QUOTE]
I rather have you kill it before it turns 1 years old.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14431775]I rather have you kill it before it turns 1 years old.[/QUOTE]
That wasn't the question.
Should I be free to kill my 1 year old if I felt like it?
[QUOTE=theman93;14431776]That wasn't the question.
Should I be free to kill my 1 year old if I felt like it?[/QUOTE]
The Bible says eat your children when god starves you.
If you can abuse, mutilate, and brainwash your kids then yeah you should be able to kill them.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14431779]The Bible says eat your children when god starves you.
If can you abuse, mutilate, and brainwash your kids then yeah you should be able to kill them.[/QUOTE]
What about someone else's kid? Should I be able to murder them?
A state is putting a bounty out for women who don't comply to it's religious beliefs.
Of course Evangelical Christians support this.
[QUOTE=theman93;14431780]What about someone else's kid? Should I be able to murder them?[/QUOTE]
Yeah and good luck. Those peeps you attacking should be protecting themselves. They have the right to kill you.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14431783]Yeah and good luck. Those peeps you attacking should be protecting themselves. They have the right to kill you.[/QUOTE]
Interesting. So the position of your worldview is that any adult should have the freedom to murder any child they so choose. I thought you were against mutilation?
[QUOTE=theman93;14431780]What about someone else's kid? Should I be able to murder them?[/QUOTE]
Psalm 137:9
[i]Blessed shall he be who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rock![/i]
[QUOTE=theman93;14431785]Interesting. So the position of your worldview is that any adult should have the freedom to murder any child they so choose. I thought you were against mutilation?[/QUOTE]
I’m against your mainstream libtard “I’m doing it for the health benefits” view of mutilation.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14431787]I’m against your mainstream libtard “I’m doing it for the health benefits” view of mutilation.[/QUOTE]
But your worldview puts you in a position of mutilation being ok within any view or context. So who cares?
[QUOTE=theman93;14431790]But your worldview puts you in a position of mutilation being ok within any view or context. So who cares?[/QUOTE]
I only care when fools are hypocrites and try to lobby the state for their own self righteous virtue signaling reasons. You are not a saint and you are not above using big daddy government to get what you want. And you all listen and believe the same mainstream experts. The same mofo telling you to circumcise is the same fool telling you to abort or vaccinate. It’s all the same agenda and you’re too stupid to see that.
[QUOTE=theman93;14431757]Nope. Mutilation means you are destroying a part of the body. Circumcision doesn't destroy the *****, sorry to break it to you.[/QUOTE]
You are destroying the foreskin, which is clearly part of the body. It is something pretty much every mammal has. It contains many nerve endings, and provides protection.
It is an elective mutilation, and should be left to the adult to decide.
Seriously circumcision, vaccination, and abortion are like the unholy trinity when it comes mainstream medical science.
It's not about controlling women's bodies when you call it religion.
[QUOTE=Chick Stern;14431793]You are destroying the foreskin, which is clearly part of the body. It is something pretty much every mammal has. It contains many nerve endings, and provides protection.
It is an elective mutilation, and should be left to the adult to decide.[/QUOTE]
So mutilating the child during an abortion which leads to it’s death is ok, but circumcision is a big no-no?
[QUOTE=theman93;14431808]So mutilating the child during an abortion which leads to it’s death is ok, but circumcision is a big no-no?[/QUOTE]
If you had the choice to live with a dick or without a dick which would you choose? And without a dick would you really wanna live?
Hot take.
I think both parties should have to sign off on the abortion. Can’t be done without both man and woman agreeing. And the man has to administer it.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14431811]If you had the choice to live with a dick or without a dick which would you choose? And without a dick would you really wanna live?[/QUOTE]
Why are those the only 2 options?
[QUOTE=theman93;14431818]Why are those the only 2 options?[/QUOTE]
They aren’t. We’ve all asked ourselves whether we’d even wanna live being blind, deaf, handicapped, third world poor etc.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14431819]They aren’t. We’ve all asked ourselves whether we’d even wanna live being blind, deaf, handicapped, third world poor etc.[/QUOTE]
Irrelevant question then.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14431763]And y’all don’t know what murder is either.[/QUOTE]
When a doctor kills an unborn child. That is murder.
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14431771]I’m implying I’m for freedom. And I always thought Texas was a free state. I’m disappointed they are just as tyrannical as California if not more.[/QUOTE]
Nice deflection.
[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;14431883]When a doctor kills an unborn child. That is murder.[/QUOTE]
What's your opinion if that child went to live on and ended up being a transgender, hmm?
[QUOTE=Axe;14431886]What's your opinion if that child went to live on and ended up being a transgender, hmm?[/QUOTE]
Hmmm.
[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;14431889]Hmmm.[/QUOTE]
Shookt!
i support a womans right to choose... whether or not she gets vaccinated
[QUOTE=Norcaliblunt;14431817]Hot take.
I think both parties should have to sign off on the abortion. Can’t be done without both man and woman agreeing. And the man has to administer it.[/QUOTE]
Man’s choice ends when it leaves his body.
To quote:
“Why now? Why this sperm?”
Chick Stern: “Abortion which mutilates the child and kills it is totally fine. But circumcision which has clear health benefits that outweighs the risks is wrong.”
:roll::roll:
[QUOTE=theman93;14431942]Chick Stern: “Abortion which mutilates the child and kills it is totally fine. But circumcision which has clear health benefits that outweighs the risks is wrong.”
:roll::roll:[/QUOTE]
As usual for a religious delusional, you interpret based on your magic based wishes, instead of sticking to facts.
The “health benefits” are minuscule in difference compared to leaving it for the adult to decide for himself.
You claim to be an advocate for penile health, when the reality is you are a slave to a barbaric practice made by unwashed, desert-dwelling hermits eons ago.
I don’t believe I have made any statements favoring abortion. I have stated that it is not your decision to make. I have stated the same towards circumcision.
[QUOTE=Chick Stern;14431974]As usual for a religious delusional, you interpret based on your magic based wishes, instead of sticking to facts.
The “health benefits” are minuscule in difference compared to leaving it for the adult to decide for himself.[/QUOTE]
This is blatantly false as I already demonstrated in my earlier post. You can read for yourself again here [url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390792/[/url] and here [url]https://www.everydayhealth.com/news/health-benefits-of-circumcision/[/url]. The AAP itself clearly states the health benefits outweigh the risks.
[QUOTE=Chick Stern;14431974]You claim to be an advocate for penile health, when the reality is you are a slave to a barbaric practice made by unwashed, desert-dwelling hermits eons ago.
I don’t believe I have made any statements favoring abortion. I have stated that it is not your decision to make. I have stated the same towards circumcision.[/QUOTE]
Not exactly and your logic is flawed.
You believe the individual should ultimately be the one to decide if he wants to be circumcised or not. However you don't believe the individual should be the one to decide whether he or she is murdered in the womb through an abortion or not.
Being murdered or not is a more important decision to make than being circumcised or not. Not in your worldview though.
Turning in your neighbor for $10,000, I did Nazi that coming.
The abortionists ITT are misguided souls, I don't think they are for abortion out of evilness but rather because they are weak males and have let women convince them that they have the right to murder baby humans.
Sad!
[QUOTE=TheMan;14432111]The abortionists ITT are misguided souls, I don't think they are for abortion out of evilness but rather because they are weak males and have let women convince them that they have the right to murder baby humans.
Sad![/QUOTE]
Abortion is in the Bible. Cope.
If you rat out your neighbor and collect that $10,000, you should also have to adopt that child since you inserted yourself into its life.
Libtards screaming that they'll consider moving to Texas now.
Texans:
[IMG]https://fivethirtyeight.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/dec-23-2015-1620.gif?w=575[/IMG]
Pro life dudes are guys who don’t have a lot of random sex. They are guys who will bang every once in awhile if ever and then want to control chicks with a pregnancy. Just like you have chicks who want to control dudes by getting pregnant. Pro life men aren’t players or alphas. Straight simps.
Every single unwanted pregnancy's was caused by men.
Alpha male animals in the wild kill their kids.
To all the anti-choice males on this board. Wanna end abortions forever?
Don't ejaculate into a v@gina.
If life begins at six weeks, so does child support.