Printable View
[QUOTE=jacobgoindum]as you can see the pace
'62 warriors = 5939 total rebounds
'08 magic = 3445 total rebounds[/QUOTE]
5105 to 3345.
Once again, ADD them up!
Add up EVERY team in EVERY season during the 60's...they are all WRONG. And, I could tell you why, but since you are an "expert" on this subject, I will let you explain it to me.
[QUOTE=jlauber]5105 to 3345.
Once again, ADD them up!
Add up EVERY team in EVERY season during the 60's...they are all WRONG. And, I could tell you why, but since you are an "expert" on this subject, I will let you explain it to me.[/QUOTE]
:oldlol: you been getting your sleep old man?
[QUOTE=jacobgoindum]:oldlol: you been getting your sleep old man?[/QUOTE]
All right, young lad, I will do it for you...
61-62 Warriors rebounding totals, per player, in every minute they played...
Chamberlain 2052
Arizin 527
Meschery 729
Attles 355
Gola 587
Rodgers 348
Conlin 155
Yarese 71
Luckenbill 110
Ruklick 87
Radovich 51
McNeil 33
5105
NOT 5939
If Kobe played when Wilt did... his averages would be astronomical.
loling hard at the rebounding averages for Wilt...
'62 Wilt vs '92 Rodman
Rebounds
'62 Warriors
Team = 5105
Wilt = 2052
% = 40.2
'92 Pistons
Team = 3631
Dennis = 1530
% = 42.1
MPG
Wilt = 48.5
Dennis = 40.3
1.9 higher rebounding % with 8.2 less minutes per game
[QUOTE=jacobgoindum]'62 Wilt vs '92 Rodman
Rebounds
'62 Warriors
Team = 5105
Wilt = 2052
% = 40.2
'92 Pistons
Team = 3631
Dennis = 1530
% = 42.1
MPG
Wilt = 48.5
Dennis = 40.3
1.9 higher rebounding % with 8.2 less minutes per game[/QUOTE]
Care to compare Rodman and Wilt in the post-season? Or how much greater Wilt outperformed his peers in the post-season, as compared to Rodman?
BTW, how come Rodman only averaged 31.7 mpg in his career, while Chamberlain was at 45.2 mpg for his. I guess Rodman just didn't have the stamina to play full bore for over 40 mpg.
Kobe...very easily IMO....Kobe is a better allaround player and a greater champion.
No hear even watched Wilt play:lol
[QUOTE=jlauber]Care to compare Rodman and Wilt in the post-season? Or how much greater Wilt outperformed his peers in the post-season, as compared to Rodman?
BTW, how come Rodman only averaged 31.7 mpg in his career, while Chamberlain was at 45.2 mpg for his. I guess Rodman just didn't have the stamina to play full bore for over 40 mpg.[/QUOTE]
lol just imagine rodman in the 60s :lol
too easy
[QUOTE=TheFrozenOne]Kobe...very easily IMO....Kobe is a better allaround player and a greater champion.
No hear even watched Wilt play:lol[/QUOTE]
Actually those here that ACTUALLY did watch Wilt play, would easily take Chamberlain over Kobe. Why is that?
wilt's got the edge in playoff rebounding pretty good
[QUOTE=jacobgoindum]lol just imagine rodman in the 60s :lol
too easy[/QUOTE]
With Rodman's lack of offensive skills, he probably would have played about 10 mpg back in the 60's. Back then players were generally expected to SCORE and rebound.
[QUOTE=jlauber]With Rodman's lack of offensive skills, he probably would have played about 10 mpg back in the 60's. Back then players were generally expected to SCORE and rebound.[/QUOTE]
oh you mean shoot 30-40% AS BIGMEN
that 7'3" big man you posted, guess what he shot in his career?
34.7%
[QUOTE=jlauber]Actually those here that ACTUALLY did watch Wilt play, would easily take Chamberlain over Kobe. Why is that?[/QUOTE]
Because they have Alzheimer's?
1. M. Jordan
2. M. Johnson
3. K. Abdul-Jabbar
4. B. Russell
5. L. Bird
6. S. O'Neal
7. K. Bryant
8. T. Duncan
9. H. Olajuwon
10. W. Chamberlain
:D