theres a guy making money as a Pau Gasol impersonator, maybe the Lakers should tell him to shave and stop being tall
Printable View
theres a guy making money as a Pau Gasol impersonator, maybe the Lakers should tell him to shave and stop being tall
[QUOTE=FireDavidKahn]Even Andrew Bogut is angry over this:oldlol:
Sterling needs to just go away.[/QUOTE]
Buck Darrell sounds like a porn star. I wouldn't object to that moniker.
[QUOTE=Clippersfan86]If Clippers don't want to get Lebron'd.... they better wise up once the franchise player and core guys like DJ speak up.[/QUOTE]
No they don't....they just gave De'Andre $40-50mil wise up to what? Darrell is still part of the franchise as he has free tickets. Will he stop attending games because he's jilted over having some of his lines cut back from the script?
[QUOTE=qrich]Telling you, Laker Darrell.
Someone photoshop him in a Lakers uni[/QUOTE]
LOL I wanna see this
[QUOTE=TheBluest]I already said the timing was poor/unprofessional but stop acting as if the request was unreasonable... which you are as are many others including the players
It's not like you as a fan would have said "good timing mgmt for handling this in the off-season"(although once again agreed... best time to do so)
We have no idea either what has been asked of him privately until now.[/QUOTE]
So should the NBA and every organization tell Jeff to close this site down as he is making money off of their brand and a lot of idiots on here are making stupid comments as well?
I don't see a difference between the two personally, and I'm sure the owners of a lot of major NBA sites, like this one, are making more off of it then Darrell was without being in a contract with the association.
[QUOTE=flipogb]theres a guy making money as a Pau Gasol impersonator, maybe the Lakers should tell him to shave and stop being tall[/QUOTE]
No Pau Gasol needs to find out how to handle the royalties situation not the Lakers, if he deems it necessary
offers from the Mavs and from the Bucks. more teams want Darrel than Allen Iverson
CP3 tweeting about it now. WOW.... Clippers organization fu**ed up big. I'm truly worried that the players will now be thinking "Same old classless Sterling" and be waiting for the first chance to bolt... FML.
Of course when team is finally going somewhere they decide to try to pinch pennies and end up offending the core of the team.
[quote=TheBluest]I already said the timing was poor/unprofessional but stop acting as if the request was unreasonable... which you are as are many others including the players
It's not like you as a fan would have said "good timing mgmt for handling this in the off-season"(although once again agreed... best time to do so)
We have no idea either what has been asked of him privately until now.[/quote]
You dont get it. It might be a smart financial decision on paper for the clippers, but its a TERRIBLE PR decision. Its completely out of touch with the majority of their fanbase and players. Stupid stuff. You cant tell Clipper Darrell to keep doing his stuff, free seats etc but you cant be Clipper Darrell now. Truely stupid PR stuff, obvious is obvious, no way to defend it.
[QUOTE=TheBluest]No Pau Gasol needs to find out how to handle the royalties situation not the Lakers, if he deems it necessary[/QUOTE]
I believe hes met Pau and he was cool with it. dude is gonna be done soon after the trade deadline tho
[QUOTE=G-train]You dont get it. It might be a smart financial decision on paper for the clippers, but its a TERRIBLE PR decision. Its completely out of touch with the majority of their fanbase and players. Stupid stuff. You cant tell Clipper Darrell to keep doing his stuff, free seats etc but you cant be Clipper Darrell now. Truely stupid PR stuff, obvious is obvious, no way to defend it.[/QUOTE]
Bingo. But with all the bandwagon hoppers and fairweather fans, I doubt it'd make a difference. I'd bet most of them bandwagonners don't even know who Darrell is.
[QUOTE=flipogb]offers from the Mavs and from the Bucks. more teams want Darrel than Allen Iverson[/QUOTE]
:oldlol:
[B]A team rep told Darrell that the team didn't want him speaking on their behalf to the media. The story also stated that the team offered him free additional season tickets if he dropped the "Clipper Darrell" moniker. [/B]
It's not that the idea is wrong... it's the timing of it.. and not communicating this to the players/team first that's typical Clippers BS.
unless he was leaking out inside info on trades, I dont see why speaking to the media would be an issue
So they were fine with him when the Clippers were losing? Why would anyone want to play for a racist owner who doesn't give a sh!t if his staff gets sexually assaulted?